Radiation dose escalation in non-small cell carcinoma of the lung.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to James D Cox.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The purpose of this preliminary study was to determine the incidence of second malignancies after combined-modality therapy for adults with Hodgkin disease and relate it to the details of initial treatment. We retrospectively studied 286 patients ranging in age from 16 to 88 years with stage I or II Hodgkin disease who were treated between 1980 and 1995 with chemotherapy followed 3 to 4 weeks later by radiotherapy. Patients received a median of three cycles of induction chemotherapy. Mitoxantrone, vincristine, vinblastine, and prednisone was used in 161 cases, mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP) in 67 cases, Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine in 19 cases, lomustine, vinblastine, procarbazine, and prednisone/doxorubicin, bleomycin, dacarbazine, and lomustine in 18 cases, and other chemotherapeutic regimens in the remaining 21 cases. The median radiotherapy dose was 40 Gy given in 20 daily 2-Gy fractions. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 7.4 years. There were 2,230 person-years of observation. Significantly increased relative risks (RR) were observed for acute myeloid leukemia (RR, 69.3; 95% CI, 14.3-202.6) and melanoma (RR, 7.3; 95% CI, 1.5-21.3). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year actuarial risks of acute myeloid leukemia were 0.8%, 1.3%, and 1.3%, respectively. Patients treated with MOPP had the highest 15-year actuarial risk of leukemia (1.6%). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year actuarial risks of solid tumors were 1.9%, 9.3%, and 16.8%, respectively. Consolidative radiotherapy to both sides of the diaphragm resulted in a trend toward an increased risk of solid tumors relative to radiotherapy to only one side of the diaphragm (p = 0.08). In an effort to reduce the risk of second malignancies, we have stopped using the alkylating agents nitrogen mustard and procarbazine and elective paraaortic and splenic radiotherapy after chemotherapy.
UNLABELLED: This study assessed the radiation dosimetry of 99mTc-labeled ethylene dicysteine (EC) C225 (EC-C225), a promising radioligand for functional tumor imaging. METHODS: Whole-body scanning was performed on 6 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma up to 24 h after administration of 99mTc-EC-C225. Alternate patients who had been randomized to receive C225 in a phase III trial received 99mTc-EC-C225 before their 20-mg test dose or after their 400 mg/m2 loading dose of unlabeled C225 (patients 1/3/5 and 2/4/6, respectively). Radiation dosimetry was assessed using the MIRD method. RESULTS: The critical organ was the kidney, with an average radiation-absorbed dose for all 6 patients of 0.0274 mGy/MBq. The average total-body absorbed dose was 0.0022 mGy/MBq (0.243 cGy/1,110 MBq). CONCLUSION: The new radiopharmaceutical 99mTc-EC-C225 appears to have reasonable dosimetric properties for a diagnostic nuclear medicine agent. Correlation of the imaging results with clinical findings is the next step.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To clarify the relationship between the percentage of lung receiving low radiation doses with concurrent chemotherapy and the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: From 117 patients who underwent preoperative chemoradiation for esophageal cancer at our institution between 1998 and 2002, we selected 61 patients for whom complete pulmonary dose-volume histogram (DVH) data were available and analyzed the incidence of pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in this group. All patients received concurrent chemoradiation therapy, and 39 patients also received induction chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiation. The median age was 62 years, and the median radiotherapy dose was 45 Gy. The percentage of lung volume receiving at least 10 Gy (V10), 15 Gy (V15), and 20 Gy (V20) were recorded from each pulmonary DVH. RESULTS: Eleven (18%) of the 61 patients had pulmonary complications, 2 of whom died after progression of pneumonia. Pulmonary complications were noted more often (35% vs. 8%, p = 0.014) when the pulmonary V10 was > or =40% vs. <40% and when the V15 was > or /=30% vs. < 30% (33% vs. 10%, p = 0.036). An apparent increase in pulmonary complication rate when V20 was > or =20% vs. <20% (32% vs. 10%, p = 0.079) was not significant. None of the other factors analyzed (surgical procedure, tumor location, use of induction chemotherapy, use of concurrent taxane-based chemoradiation, or smoking history) was associated with the occurrence of pulmonary complications. The median hospital stay was 17 days for patients who had pulmonary complications vs. 12 days for patients who did not (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The use of multimodality therapy may require minimization of lung volume irradiation to levels lower than previously expected. Radiotherapy techniques that decrease the volume of lung receiving low radiation doses may significantly reduce the risk of this potentially life-threatening complication.
PURPOSE: This study determines the effect on toxicity of adding neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in RTOG 94-06. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between August 1994 and February 2000, 583 eligible prostate cancer patients enrolled on the first 3 dose levels of RTOG 94-06, a Phase I/II dose escalation 3D-CRT trial. Two hundred and seven men initiated hormonal therapy (HT) between 2 to 3 months before 3D-CRT, and completed all HT no longer than 3 months after radiotherapy. Thirty-three patients receiving longer-duration HT were excluded. The 547 patients were treated at dose level I (68.4 Gy), level II (73.8 Gy), or level III (79.2 Gy). All dose prescriptions were to the minimum isodose surface encompassing the planning target volume (dose levels I and II) or the clinical target volume (dose level III). Men were stratified into three risk groups according to their relative risk of seminal vesicle invasion: <15% (Group 1) vs. >15% (Group 2), or to T stage (T1, 2 vs. T3 tumors [Group 3]). In Group 2 patients, there was a clinical target volume reduction to treat only the prostate after delivery of 55.8 Gy to a planning target volume including the seminal vesicles. All HT consisted of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist with or without a nonsteroidal anti-androgen. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, NHT significantly increased the likelihood of Grade 2 acute genitourinary (GU) complications (22% to 32%, p = 0.009). Hormonal therapy did not have a significant univariate effect on any other acute or late toxicity. On multivariate analysis, the percent of the bladder (< or =30% vs. >30%) receiving > or = the reference dose (68.4 Gy, 73.8 Gy, or 79.2 Gy) (p = 0.0009, relative risk = 2.07, confidence interval: 1.88-2.28) was a significant predictor of acute GU effects. Although NHT was not significant in itself, in the multivariate analysis its interaction with baseline urinary status was an important factor (p = 0.011, relative risk = 4.31, confidence interval: 1.68-5.29). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant HT did not show an independent effect on the risk of side effects after 3D-CRT in patients treated on RTOG 94-06. However, this combined modality therapy significantly increased the risk of acute GU effects compared to 3D-CRT alone in men with poor baseline urinary function.
PURPOSE: To analyze the long-term outcomes and pattern of failures for Stage III follicular lymphomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of all patients with Stage III follicular lymphoma presented to our institution between 1978 and 1993 was performed. One hundred ten patients were eligible and form the basis of this analysis. Fifty-seven patients were male. The median age was 57 years (range: 21-82 years). The treatments were as follows: chemotherapy alone (CTX), 39 patients; combined modality with chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CMT), 69; radiation therapy alone, 2. Radiation therapy fields were as follows: regional, 13 patients; extended, 6; subtotal, 44; and central lymphatic, 8. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 8, and 98 patients received doxorubicin-containing regimens. Enough information was available to calculate the International Prognostic Index for 107 patients. The following prognostic factors were examined for predictive value in overall survival (OS) and freedom from progression (FFP) by univariate and multivariate analyses: International Prognostic Index, gender, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (normal vs. elevated), B symptoms, performance status, beta-2 microglobulin, presence or absence of a bulky disease, age (</= vs. >60 years), number of sites of involvement, treatment (CTX vs. CMT), and pathology. To minimize patient selection biases given the nature of the retrospective analysis, the patterns of relapse were analyzed only for the patients who achieved a complete response. RESULTS: The median follow-up for the alive patients was 9.5 years (range: 1.1-19.5 years). Complete response was achieved in 80 patients: 24 of 39 patients in the CTX group (62%), 54 of 69 patients in the CMT group (78%), and 2 of 2 patients in the radiation therapy alone group. The actuarial 5- and 10-year OS rates were 65% and 42%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year FFP was 42% and 26%, respectively. Significant prognostic factors by multivariate analyses were age and LDH for OS and LDH for FFP. For complete responders, 5-year freedom from recurrence in the original sites of involvement (with or without recurrence in the new sites) was 43% for CTX and 60% for CMT patients (p = 0.03, Wilcoxon). Five-year freedom from isolated recurrence in the original sites of involvement was 60% for CTX and 69% for CMT patients (p = 0.17). The 5-year overall FFP was 43% for CTX patients and 56% for CMT patients (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Combined modality treatment seems to give an advantage in terms of disease control in the primary sites compared to chemotherapy alone, though the advantages in OS and FFP were not statistically significant in our patient population. By multivariate analyses, LDH was a significant prognostic indicator for OS and FFP, whereas age was for OS.
PURPOSE: To report treatment setup data from an emerging technique using near-simultaneous computed tomography (CT) image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of spinal and paraspinal tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A targeting system that integrates a CT-on-rails scanner with a linear accelerator (LINAC) was evaluated in the lead-in portion of a Phase I/II protocol for treating patients with paraspinal metastases. Patients were immobilized in supine position by a moldable body cushion vacuum wrapped with a plastic fixation sheet. Planning CT and immediately repeated CT were performed on the LINAC/CT-on-rails unit to assess respiratory-related vertebral body motion. Coplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using 7-9 beams was used to deliver 30 Gy in five fractions to the target volume, while limiting the spinal cord dose to <10 Gy. Pretreatment CT scans were fused with the planning CT scans to determine the correct target isocenter by accounting for any translational and roll (axial) rotational discrepancies from the planning CT. (Corrections caused by yaw and pitch rotations have not yet been implemented.) The reproducibility of the treatment isocenter as compared with the planned isocenter was measured with digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs), portal film imaging, and immediate post-treatment verification CT scans. Phantom measurements were taken for dose verification for each IMRT plan. RESULTS: Based on a total of 36 CT scans (3 for planning, 3 for respiration study, 15 pretreatment, and 15 post-treatment) from 3 patients, no respiration-associated vertebral body motion was seen. A comparison of the corrected daily anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) digital portal images with the planning AP and LAT DRRs confirmed that the isocenter setup accuracy for the 15 treatments was within 1 mm of the planning isocenter. The results from the immediate post-treatment CT scans reconfirmed the findings from the portal images and verified the absence of spinal movement during the treatment. The ion-chamber measurement for the high-dose region was within 2% of the planning dose for three patient treatment plans. Film dose measurement in an IMRT quality assurance phantom demonstrated good agreement from 90% to 30% isodose lines between the planned and measured results. CONCLUSION: Preliminary experience suggests that the near-simultaneous CT image-guided verification technique can be used as a new platform technology for extracranial applications of stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery to spinal and paraspinal tumors.
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to update our experience with follicular lymphoma treated with central lymphatic irradiation (CLI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 47 patients were treated with CLI between January 1993 and March 2000 in a prospective manner. CLI consisted of mantle, whole abdomen, and pelvic radiation fields with a 1-month break after each field. Each field was treated to 3000-3060 cGy at 150-180 cGy per fraction followed by a boost dose of 900 cGy to the areas with gross disease. The median age was 52 years (range: 29-73 years). There were 29 males. The diagnoses were as follows: follicular small cleaved-cell lymphoma, 23 patients; follicular mixed-cell lymphoma, 19 patients; follicular large-cell lymphoma, 5 patients. Ann Arbor stages were as follows: I, 5 patients; II, 14 patients; and III, 28 patients. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) categories were as follows: 0, 14 patients; 1, 24 patients; and 2, 9 patients. M. D. Anderson Tumor Score was as follows: 0, 14 patients; 1, 18 patients; 2, 9 patients; 3, 4 patients; 4, 1 patient; and unknown, 1 patient. Two patients had abnormal LDH levels, and 11 patients had beta2M levels >2 mg/dL. Gender, pathology, stage, IPI, Anderson Tumor Score, beta2M, and number of disease sites were examined for significance in freedom from progression (FFP) by univariate analyses. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 54 months (range: 8-93 months) for the 45 surviving patients. Every patient achieved a complete response, except for 1 patient whose lymphoma progressed to diffuse large-cell lymphoma during treatment. The 5-year overall survival and FFP were 94% and 53%, respectively. No failure has yet been observed beyond 55 months of follow-up with 13 patients at risk. Patterns of failure were as follows: within the radiation field, 10; outside the fields, 4; and both, 2. Of the seven variables investigated, beta2M >2 mg/dL and IPI >1 were the only significant adverse prognostic factors for FFP (p = 0.023 and 0.046, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CLI is well tolerated and seems to achieve durable FFP in about half of the patients with Stage I-III follicular lymphoma. Most of the experiences with CLI come from the treatment of Stage III disease and are very similar to our previous experience with combined modality treatment. Whether a plateau in FFP can be maintained beyond 5 years remains to be seen.
BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, and outcome of infusional 5 bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (bromodeoxyuridine; BUdR) given with accelerated fractionation whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) after chemotherapy for the treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). METHODS: Twelve patients with untreated and histologically confirmed PCNSL were entered on the study between 1994 and 1996. Chemotherapy was comprised of one course of IDHAP plus high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX). IDHAP is comprised of idarubicin at a dose of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 4 days intravenously by continuous infusion (i.v. CI), dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg i.v. on Days 1-5, cytosine arabinoside at a dose of 2000 mg/ m(2) i.v. on Day 5 after cisplatin, and cisplatin at a dose of 25 mg/m(2)/day x 4 days i.v. CI. HD-MTX was given at a dose of 3.5 g/m(2) i.v. between Day 10 and Day 14 after IDHAP. BUdR was given as an i.v. CI over 48 hours, 2-3 days prior to WBRT and then weekly during WBRT. Dose escalation started at 1.5 g/m(2)/day for Cohort 1 with subsequent increments of 0.3 g/m(2)/day. The WBRT dose was 45 grays (Gy) at a dose of 1.5 Gy twice a day, 5 days per week. Neurocognitive testing was performed before, during, and after treatment. RESULTS: Nine of 12 patients entered on the study received BUdR. One of 3 patients in Cohort 1 developed leukoencephalopathy (LEP), a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), within 2 months of the completion of therapy. Therefore, the next cohort received the same dose level. Because no toxicity was observed in Cohort 2, the third cohort received a BUdR dose of 1.8 g /m(2)/day. Shortly after completing enrollment in Cohort 3, 3 more patients developed LEP, including 2 from Cohort 1 who had received a dose of 1.5 g/m(2)/day. Thus, DLT occurred at a dose of 1.5 g/m(2)/day, the starting level in the current study. As a result, the trial was stopped. Eight of 12 patients achieved a complete response, 3 achieved a partial response, and 1 patient died before response assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperfractionated WBRT with concurrent BUdR after chemotherapy was found to result in modest disease control but has unacceptable neurotoxicity.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term outcome of chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and surgery for patients with locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-eight patients with locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer were entered into a Phase II study between November 1996 and October 1998 at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Patients initially received two cycles of chemotherapy with paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)), 5-fluorouracil (750 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days), and cisplatin (15 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days), followed by chemoradiotherapy, consisting of radiation (45 Gy during 5 weeks) with 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m(2)/d during radiation) and cisplatin (15 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days). Surgical resection was performed 4-6 weeks after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: Most patients had adenocarcinoma (n = 32; 84%). Pretreatment endoscopic ultrasonography revealed T3 tumors in 33 patients (87%) and N1 disease in 25 patients (66%). Thirty-seven patients (97%) completed the planned chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, and 35 patients (92%) underwent surgery, with a 30-day mortality rate of 6% (2 of 35 patients). A pathologic complete response or microscopic residual carcinoma (<10% viable) was found in 25 (71%) of 35 patients and was associated with a disease-free survival rate of 72% at 3 years and 51% at 5 years. On the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis and a median potential follow-up of 58 months, the 3- and 5-year overall survival rate for all 38 patients was 63% and 39%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The long-term results of this study suggest that the strategy of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy and surgery is safe and warrants further evaluation in the treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To quantify the differences in doses to target volumes and critical thoracic structures calculated by traditional homogeneous point-dose prescription and heterogeneity-corrected volume-dose prescription. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2001, 30 patients with inoperable Stage I/II non-small-cell lung cancer underwent radiation treatment planning at our institution. A commercially available convolution/superposition- based algorithm was used. Three treatment plans were calculated for each patient using identical beam geometries: one plan was generated by traditional homogeneous point-dose prescription, a second by the traditional method with heterogeneity correction, and a third by heterogeneity-corrected volume-dose prescription that would cover 95% of the planned target volume (PTV). Target volume coverage, isocenter dose, and dose uniformity in the second and third plans were compared. RESULTS: The PTV, clinical target volume (CTV), and isocenter calculated by the heterogeneity-corrected volume-dose method were equivalent to those calculated by the traditional homogeneous point-dose method with heterogeneity correction. The fraction of the PTV covered by heterogeneity-corrected volume-dose prescription was significantly greater than the fraction covered by traditional homogeneous point-dose prescription with heterogeneity correction (p = 0.05). The dose prescribed using the traditional method would have been delivered to less than 90% of the PTV in 14 of 30 patients. There was no significant difference in the maximum and minimum doses to the PTV, the CTV, or the isocenter calculated by the traditional homogeneous method with heterogeneity correction and the heterogeneity-corrected volume-dose method. There was also no significant difference in the planned volume of lung receiving greater than 20 Gy as calculated by these two methods. CONCLUSION: When compared with traditional homogeneous radiation treatment planning, heterogeneity-corrected methods produce equivalent PTV, CTV, and isocenter doses while providing superior PTV coverage.
PURPOSE: Standard therapy for patients with stage I-II indolent lymphoma has been involved-field radiation therapy (IF-XRT), which achieves 10-year disease-free survival in 40% to 50% of patients, with many of these patients cured. We investigated the potential for combined-modality therapy to increase the disease-free survival for such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 102 eligible patients with stage I-II low grade lymphoma (International Working Formulation criteria) were enrolled from 1984 to 1992. Treatment comprised 10 cycles of risk-adapted chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, bleomycin [COP-Bleo], and with doxorubicin added for some [CHOP-Bleo]) and 30 to 40 Gy IF-XRT. RESULTS: The patients' median age was 56 years (range, 28 to 77), with follicular histology in 83%, bulky disease (>/= 5 cm) in 24%, and stage II in 52%. There were no treatment-related deaths and 99% of patients attained complete remission. With a median follow-up of 10 years, the 10-year time to treatment failure and overall survival were 76% and 82%, respectively. For patients with follicular lymphoma, these figures were 72% and 80%, respectively. The only factor associated with treatment failure, for follicular lymphoma patients, was stage-modified International Prognostic Factors Index score (P =.02). None of 17 patients with diffuse small lymphocytic or mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue histology have relapsed. Elevated serum beta2-microglobulin was associated with shorter survival (P <.0001). The 10-year survival after relapse was 46%. There have been two cases of myelodysplasia and 12 other new malignancies, including four arising within radiation fields. CONCLUSION: With prolonged follow-up, combined-modality therapy with risk-adapted COP-/CHOP-Bleo and IF radiation has attained higher rates of disease control and survival than previously reported with IF-XRT alone. This apparent improvement is being further explored in an ongoing randomized trial.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the rates of low-grade late effects in patients treated for prostate cancer on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9406. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 1994 and September 1999, 424 patients were entered on this dose escalation trial of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate at doses of 68.4 Gy (level I) and 73.8 Gy (level II). We have previously reported Grade 3 or greater late toxicity of patients treated on the first two dose levels of this trial. This analysis examines the distribution of all late toxicities in these patients. All radiation prescriptions were a minimum dose to a planning target volume (PTV). Patients were stratified according to clinical stage and risk of seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) based upon Gleason score and presenting prostate-specific antigen. Group 1 includes patients with T1,2 disease with SVI risk < 15%, and Group 2 includes patients with T1,2 disease with SVI risk > 15%. Group 3 patients had T3 disease. Average months at risk after completion of therapy ranged from 21.4 to 40.1 months for patients treated at dose level I and 10.0 to 34.2 months for patients at dose level II. The frequency of all grades of late effects was compared with a similar group of patients treated in RTOG studies 7506 and 7706 with adjustments made for the interval from completion of therapy. The RTOG toxicity scoring scales for late effects were used for grading. RESULTS: The rate of Grade 3 or greater late toxicity continues to be low compared with RTOG historical controls. No Grade 4 or 5 late sequelae were reported in any of the 393 evaluable patients during the period of observation. The frequency of patients free of any complications was lower in RTOG 9406 than in historical controls. In the 73 Group 1 patients treated on dose level 1, there were 24 patients without sequelae compared with an expected rate of 39.7 (p = 0.013), and in 80 Group 3 patients at dose level II there were 24 patients without sequelae when 56.2 were expected (p < 0.0001). Other groups treated at these dose levels demonstrated a nonsignificant reduction in the rate of patients free of any side effects. These data suggest that the reduction in high-grade morbidity may be related to a shift of complications to lower grades. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity of 3D-CRT in the treatment of prostate cancer is low. It is important to continue to closely examine late effects in patients treated in RTOG 9406. The primary objective of dose escalation without an increase rate of >/= Grade 3 sequelae has been achieved. However, the reduction in Grade 3 complications may have resulted in a higher incidence of Grade 1 or 2 late effects. Because Grade 2 late effects may have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life, it is important to reduce these complications as much as possible. Clinical trials should use quality-of-life measures to determine that trade-offs between severity and rates of toxicity are acceptable to patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of chemoradiation on objective tests of pulmonary function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred lung cancer patients treated in five protocols between 1992 and 2000 with combinations of thoracic radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy were evaluated with pre- and post-RT pulmonary function tests. The pulmonary function tests were analyzed for changes in measures of obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 s per unit of vital capacity [FEV(1)/VC]), restriction (total lung capacity [TLC]), and diffusing capacity (diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide [DLCO]). The use and timing of chemotherapy and RT, as well as patient, tumor, and treatment factors, were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: No treatment or patient factors were significantly associated with changes in FEV(1)/VC. Chemotherapy with RT, compared with RT alone, was associated with a lower post-RT TLC (92% vs. 107%, p = 0.002). Nodal status (N2-N3 vs. N1), tumor location (central vs. peripheral), use of >/=6 treatment fields, and tumor volume >/=100 cm(3) were also associated with a significantly lower post-RT TLC. On univariate analysis, the use of any chemotherapy (p = 0.029) and the use of concurrent vs. sequential chemotherapy (p = 0.028) were predictive of a lower post-RT DLCO. Patient age >/=60 years, nodal status (N2-N3 vs. N0-N1), tumor volume >/=100 cm(3), tumor location (central vs. peripheral), and use of >/=6 treatment fields were also associated with a significantly lower post-RT DLCO. The fractional volume of irradiated normal lung correlated with the decrease in DLCO (p <0.001), with a 1.3% DLCO decline for each 1% of total lung volume that received >20 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of chemotherapy to RT significantly exacerbates the post-RT decrease in TLC and DLCO. The greatest decrease in DLCO occurs in patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation.
PURPOSE: Patient dose calculations for mantle-field irradiation have traditionally been performed using homogeneous, water phantom data. The advent of computed tomography (CT)-based treatment planning now permits dose calculations to be corrected for actual patient density. Incorporation of full heterogeneity corrections is desirable, because calculations performed in this fashion more closely represent the actual dose delivered to the patient. In preparation for full clinical implementation of heterogeneity corrections in mantle irradiation, an evaluation of possible changes in dosimetry when transitioning from treatment plans generated without heterogeneity corrections to treatment plans that incorporated full heterogeneity corrections is presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of treatment plans with and without heterogeneity corrections for 15 consecutive patients who had undergone full mantle-field irradiation. Comparisons were made of the absolute delivered doses (in cGy per monitor unit) and the absolute volume (in cubic centimeters) enclosed by the isodose surface of the 30.6 Gy prescription line and the surface representing 90% of the prescribed dose. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were generated and studied to evaluate differences in the doses received by the lungs, heart, and spinal cord between corrected and uncorrected plans. Comparisons were made of the volumes of lung receiving at least 20 Gy, the volumes of heart receiving at least 25.2 Gy, and the maximum cord dose. RESULTS: Dosimetric differences between heterogeneity-corrected and heterogeneity-uncorrected calculations were small. The mean total ratio of corrected-to-uncorrected dose per monitor unit was 1.01, with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.02. The mean corrected-to-uncorrected treated volume ratio (30.6 Gy) was 0.97, SD 0.14, and the mean corrected-to-uncorrected volume ratio of the 90% isodose surface was 0.99, SD 0.02. The ratio of the volume of lung receiving at least 20 Gy was 1.03, SD 0.02; the ratio of the volume of heart receiving at least 25.2 Gy was 1.01, SD 0.03; and the maximum spinal cord dose ratio was 1.02, SD 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: In all patient treatment plans evaluated, no significant dosimetric differences were observed between heterogeneity-corrected and heterogeneity-uncorrected treatment plans. However, unpredictable differences in the prescription isodose (30.6 Gy) were observed. The differences in coverage at the 90% isodose volume were negligible. The dose administered to lung in heterogeneity-corrected plans demonstrates a higher dose overall, with the greatest increase occurring at volumes receiving at least 20 Gy. In light of these small dosimetric differences, we believe that heterogeneity corrections can be incorporated into full mantle-field treatment planning.
PURPOSE: We analyzed in-field (IF) control in adults with early-stage Hodgkin's disease who received chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (RT) in terms of the (1) chemotherapeutic regimen used and number of cycles delivered, (2) response to chemotherapy, and (3) initial tumor size. Cardiac toxicity and second malignancies, particularly the incidence of solid tumors in terms of the RT field size treated, were also examined. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1980 to 1995, 286 patients ranging in age from 16 to 88 years (median: 28 years) with Ann Arbor clinical Stage I or II Hodgkin's disease underwent chemotherapy followed 3 to 4 weeks later by RT. There were 516 nodal sites measuring 0.5 to 19.0 cm at the start of chemotherapy, including 134 cases of bulky mediastinal disease. NOVP, MOPP, ABVD, CVPP/ABDIC, and other chemotherapeutic regimens were given to 161, 67, 19, 18, and 21 patients, respectively. Patients received 1-8 (median: 3) cycles of induction chemotherapy. All 533 gross nodal and extranodal sites of disease were included in the RT fields. The median prescribed RT dose for gross disease was 40.0 Gy given in 20 daily 2.0-Gy fractions. There was little variation in the RT dose. Eighty-five patients were treated with involved-field or regional RT (to one side of the diaphragm), and 201 patients were treated with extended-field RT (to both sides of the diaphragm), based on the protocol on which they were enrolled. RESULTS: Follow-up of surviving patients ranged from 1.3 to 19.9 years (median: 7.4 years). Based on a review of simulation films, there were 16 IF, 8 marginal, and 15 out-of-field recurrences. The chemotherapeutic regimen used and the number of cycles of chemotherapy delivered did not significantly affect IF control. IF control also did not significantly depend on the response to induction chemotherapy. In cases where there was a confirmed or unconfirmed complete response as opposed to a partial response or stable disease in response to induction chemotherapy for bulky nodal disease, the 5-year IF control rates were 99% and 92%, respectively (p = 0.0006). The 15-year actuarial risks of coronary artery disease requiring surgical intervention and of solid tumors were 4.1% and 16.8%, respectively. There was a trend toward a greater risk of solid tumors in patients who received extended-field RT rather than involved-field or regional RT (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with nonbulky disease, induction chemotherapy followed by RT to a median dose of 40.0 Gy resulted in excellent IF control, regardless of the chemotherapeutic regimen used, the fact that only 1-2 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered, and the response to chemotherapy. There was a trend toward a higher incidence of solid tumors in patients who received consolidation RT to both sides rather than only one side of the diaphragm. Ongoing Phase III trials will help clarify whether lower RT doses and smaller RT fields after chemotherapy can maintain the IF control seen in our study, but with a lower incidence of late complications in patients with Stage I or II Hodgkin's disease.