Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Jacob Williams

Publications and source records attributed to Jacob Williams.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Cross-ancestry proteome-wide Mendelian randomization prioritizes 12 plasma protein candidates for breast cancer risk.

The plasma proteome provides a molecular bridge between genetic variation and disease risk, yet its contribution to breast cancer susceptibility across ancestries remains unclear. We conducted a proteome-wide Mendelian randomization (MR) study of 2,923 plasma proteins using cis-protein quantitative trait loci from 34,557 European participants in the UK Biobank Pharma Proteomics Project, integrated with genome-wide association studies of 156,901 breast cancer cases and 204,634 controls of European, East Asian, and African ancestries. Cross-ancestry meta-analysis identified 12 candidate proteins associated with breast cancer risk (P < 2.5&#xd7;10-5), including six previously reported and six newly implicated in MR studies. DNPH1 showed cross-ancestry heterogeneity, with a risk-increasing association in European populations and a nominally inverse association in East Asian populations. CASP8, RALB, and USP28 displayed subtype-differentiated associations. Orthogonal validation provided variable support: six demonstrated strong evidence of statistical colocalization; four replicated in an independent European proteomic dataset (deCODE, n = 35,559); two replicated in an independent East Asian proteomic dataset (JCTF, n = 1,384); and four were supported by polygenic-score analyses in the ancestrally diverse All of Us cohort (9,250 cases, 214,857 controls). These findings prioritize a high-confidence subset of plasma proteins, including LRRC25, PARK7, and LRRC37A2, for future mechanistic and translational investigation.

Mendelian randomization

Stratifying Lung Adenocarcinoma Risk with Multi-ancestry Polygenic Risk Scores in East Asian Never-Smokers.

BACKGROUND: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) in never-smokers is a major public health burden, especially among East Asian women. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are promising for risk stratification but are primarily developed in European-ancestry populations. We aimed to develop and validate single- and multi-ancestry PRSs for East Asian never-smokers to improve LUAD risk prediction. METHODS: PRSs were developed using genome-wide association study summary statistics from East Asian (8,002 cases; 20,782 controls) and European (2,058 cases; 5,575 controls) populations. Single-ancestry models included PRS-25, PRS-CT, and LDpred2; multi-ancestry models included LDpred2+PRS-EUR128, PRS-CSx, and CT-SLEB. Performance was evaluated in independent East Asian data from the Female Lung Cancer Consortium (FLCCA) and externally validated in the Nanjing Lung Cancer Cohort (NJLCC). We assessed predictive accuracy via AUC, with 10-year and (age 30-80) absolute risks estimates. RESULTS: The best multi-ancestry PRS, using East Asian and European data via CT-SLEB (clumping and thresholding, super learning, empirical Bayes), outperformed the best East Asian-only PRS (LDpred2; AUC=0.629, 95% CI:0.618,0.641), achieving an AUC of 0.640 (95% CI:0.629,0.653) and odds ratio of 1.71 (95% CI:1.61,1.82) per SD increase. NJLCC Validation confirmed robust performance (AUC =0.649, 95% CI: 0.623, 0.676). The top 20% PRS group had a 3.92-fold higher LUAD risk than the bottom 20%. Further, the top 5% PRS group reached a 6.69% lifetime absolute risk. Notably, this group reached the average population 10-year LUAD risk at age 50 (0.42%) by age 41, nine years earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-ancestry PRS approaches enhance LUAD risk stratification in East Asian never-smokers, with consistent external validation, suggesting future clinical utility.

East Asian never smokers