Biomedical subjects

J-P Franceschi

Publications and source records attributed to J-P Franceschi.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Sensori-motor adaptation to knee osteoarthritis during stepping-down before and after total knee replacement.

BACKGROUND: Stepping-down is preceded by a shift of the center of mass towards the supporting side and forward. The ability to control both balance and lower limb movement was investigated in knee osteoarthritis patients before and after surgery. It was hypothesized that pain rather than knee joint mobility affects the coordination between balance and movement control. METHODS: The experiment was performed with 25 adult individuals. Eleven were osteoarthritic patients with damage restricted to one lower limb (8 right leg and 3 left leg). Subjects were recruited within two weeks before total knee replacement by the same orthopedic surgeon using the same prosthesis and technics of surgery. Osteoarthritic patients were tested before total knee replacement (pre-surgery session) and then, 9 of the 11 patients were tested one year after the surgery when re-educative training was completed (post-surgery session). 14 adult individuals (men: n = 7 and women: n = 7) were tested as the control group. RESULTS: The way in which the center of mass shift forward and toward the supporting side is initiated (timing and amplitude) did not vary within patients before and after surgery. In addition knee joint range of motion of the leading leg remained close to normal before and after surgery. However, the relative timing between both postural and movement phases was modified for the osteoarthritis supporting leg (unusual strategy for stepping-down) before surgery. The "coordinated" control of balance and movement turned to be a "sequential" mode of control; once the body weight transfer has been completed, the movement onset is triggered. This strategy could be aimed at shortening the duration-time supporting on the painful limb. However no such compensatory response was observed. CONCLUSION: The change in the strategy used when supporting on the arthritis and painful limb could result from the action of nociceptors that lead to increased proprioceptor thresholds, thus gating the proprioceptive inputs that may be the critical afferents in controlling the timing of the coordination between balance and movement initiation control.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2005

[Not Available].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2005

[Not Available].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2005

["Isolated" injury of the posterior cruciate ligament. Surgical treatment of isolated posterior cruciate ligament tears: a multicentric retrospective study of 103 patients].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: We present a retrospective multicentric series of carefully selected patients presenting "isolated" laxity of the posterior cruciate ligament. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The series included 103 patients who were reviewed clinically (with a dedicated review chart) and radiographically with measurement of posterior laxity (Telos 15 kg). RESULTS: In these patients with an isolated injury of the PCL (without associated injury of the peripheral ligament) DISCUSSION: The short follow-up of this series (four years) does not enable an assessment of the risk or benefit of PCL ligamentoplasty for arthrosic knees.

English Abstract↗

PubMed2004

[Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison on cadaver specimens using a single or double hamstring technique].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: We worked with cadaver specimens to evaluate control of anterior knee laxity after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) comparing double two-strand anterolateral and posteromedial reconstruction with the classical four-strand technique. We hypothesized that the double reconstruction would provide better control of anterior laxity in both flexion and extension. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixteen cadaver knees were randomly assigned to reconstruction technique. Anterior tibial translation was measured with an arthrometer (Rolimeter) at maximal manual tension at 20 degrees, 60 degrees and 90 degrees flexion on the intact knee, after section of the ACL and after arthroscopic reconstruction using either the classical four-strand hamstring technique or a double two-strand anteromedial and posterolateral technique. An EndoButtonCL was used for the femoral fixation and a interference screw with staples for the tibial fixation. Variation in the length of each construct was measured between 0 degrees and 90 degrees flexion. RESULTS: In the single reconstruction group, the length of the graft varied by 0.5 +/- 0.7 mm between 0 degrees and 90 degrees flexion. In the double reconstruction group, the length varied by 0.5 +/- 0.9 mm for the anteromedial construct and 3.4 +/- 0.5 mm for the posterolateral construct. When studied with an intact ACL, anterior laxity of the 16 knees was 3.2 +/- 1.1, 3.5 +/- 1.5 and 2.6 +/- 1.1 mm at 20 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees respectively. After section of the ACL, laxity increased significantly at all angles: 9.4 +/- 3.3, 6.1 +/- 2.5 and 6.8 +/- 2.9 at 20 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees respectively. After classical four-strand single graft reconstruction, the residual anterior laxity was 3.7 +/- 0.9, 3.1 +/- 1.1, and 2.3 +/- 1.6 mm at 20 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees flexion. Statistical analysis using parametric or non-parametric tests as appropriate showed a significant difference in laxity at 20 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees of flexion between knees with a cut ACL and knees with reconstructed ACL. At 20 degrees flexion, residual laxity was greater after single-construct reconstruction. At 60 degrees and 90 degrees there was no significant difference in anterior translation of the tibia in knees with intact or reconstructed ACL. After reconstruction with the dual-construct technique, laxity was 3.4 +/- 1.3, 2.6 +/- 1.5, and 2.4 +/- 1.2 mm at 20 degrees, 60 degrees and 90 degrees flexion respectively. Laxity was significantly greater with a cut ACL than after reconstruction at 20 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees flexion, but there was no significant difference in anterior translation of the tibia at 20 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees flexion between knees with an intact and a reconstructed ACL. DISCUSSION: These results based on a clinical evaluation measuring anterior translation of the tibia with an arthrometer are in agreement with results in the literature using robots. Compared with the classical technique, reconstruction of the ACL with a dual-construct technique provides a statistically significant improvement in control of anterior tibial translation at 20 degrees of flexion. The advantage of the dual anteromedial and posteriolateral construct technique is thus not found in the control of anterior laxity but rather in control of rotation laxity. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction of the ACL with a two-bundle graft technique provides control of anterior laxity at 20 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees flexion similar to that observed in knees with an intact ACL while the single construct technique re-establishes physiological laxity at 60 degrees and 90 degrees only. This improved control of anterior laxity with the two-bundle reconstruction is a small improvement regarding anterior laxity, the more potential advantage concerning rotational stability.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

[Biomechanical consequences of a knee osteoarthritis on the opposite lower limb].

UNLABELLED: The aim of this work was to study the compensatory strategies built up by patients with unilateral knee arthritis during stair descent. These compensatory strategies might induce increased biomechanical constraints on the unaffected knee. METHOD: A kinetic and kinematic analysis was performed in 11 patients with unilateral knee arthritis and in 14 control subjects using an ELITE system and two force-plates. The peak of vertical ground reaction forces when landing on the reception force-plate, the time to reach the peak and the duration of the different phases of the movement were studied during stair descent. RESULTS: The peak of vertical ground reaction forces was more important when landing on the unaffected limb than when landing on the affected limb. The time to reach this peak was longer in patients than in controls no matter which side was supporting. The duration of the single support phase was longer on the unaffected limb than on the affected limb. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This work has shown that patients with unilateral knee arthritis develop new strategies during stair descent. These new strategies imply increased biomechanical constraints on the unaffected limb and might favor arthritis on the sound side. These results support the idea that rehabilitation protocols of patients with unilateral knee arthritis should also involve the unaffected limb.

Aged↗