Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J du Cailar

Publications and source records attributed to J du Cailar.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Comparison of hydrophobic heat and moisture exchangers with heated humidifier during prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Inspired gases must be warmed and humidified during mechanical ventilation. In a prospective randomized study we compared the performance of a heated humidifier (HH) (Draegger Aquaport) and a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) (Pall Filter BB 2215). A total of 116 patients requiring mechanical ventilation (Servo 900 C Siemens) were enrolled into the study and were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Patients in group I were ventilated with a traditional breathing circuit with HH and patients in group II using a simplified circuit with HME. Pre-existing and hospital acquired atelectasis and pneumonia, occurrence of endotracheal tube (ET) occlusion and ventilatory parameters (respiratory rate, tidal volume) were studied. No statistical difference was found between groups for each parameter except the greater frequency of ET occlusions in the II group (0/61 vs 9/55) (p = 0.0008). Pall Filter (PF), a hydrophobic filter, humidifies the dry gases from the condensed water which is put down on the HME surfaces during cooling of saturated expired gases. This purely physical property is linked to the magnitude of the thermic gradient between the expired gases and the ambiant temperature. Performance impairment of PF in our study might be due to high ambiant temperature in the intensive care unit (usually around 28 degrees C) which reduces thermic gradient and water exchanges. We conclude that efficiency of PF may be weak in some conditions of ambiant temperature.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

[Sedation with propofol and fentanyl in patients under intensive care].

This study investigated the efficacy of a constant rate infusion of propofol and fentanyl in thirty patients requiring artificial ventilation for more than 24 h. A loading dose, which differed according to the patient's age, was administered over a 30 min period: 2.5 mg.kg-1 for patients less than 50 (G1) (n = 9), 2 mg.kg-1 for patients between 50 and 60 years old (G2) (n = 9), and 1.5 mg.kg-1 for patients over 60 (G3) (n = 12). This was followed by an infusion of 3 mg.kg-1.h-1 in G1 and G2, and 2 mg.kg-1.h-1 in G3. A 1 microgram.kg-1.h-1 infusion of fentanyl was also given. The degree of sedation was assessed with the Ramsay scale before starting, after induction, and every four hours thereafter. When this proved to be insufficient, the dose of propofol was increased by 0.5 mg.kg-1.h-1 as well as that of fentanyl by 0.5 microgram.kg-1.h-1. Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, blood propofol, creatinine, transaminase and lipid levels, and urine output were measured before, during, and after the infusion. The blood propofol level increased during the infusion, being correlated to the doses given (r = 0.64, p less than 0.001). Sedation lasted 91.7 +/- 57.7 h. After stopping the infusion of propofol, mean recovery times were 7.5 +/- 5.9 min (G1), 11.4 +/- 11.4 min, and 14.4 +/- 13.5 min (G3) (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1992

[Nicardipine vs trinitrin for controlled hypotension in maxillo-facial surgery].

In this study we examined perioperative blood losses during maxillo-facial surgery comparing 2 techniques for controlled hypotension using nitroglycerin (NTG) and nicardipine (NICAR). 37 ASA I and II patients electively scheduled for rhinoseptoplasties under general anaesthesia were randomly divided into 2 groups. General anaesthesia was induced with intravenous thiopental and vecuronium following a neuroleptanalgesia consisting of fentanyl (0.053 +/- 0.004 microgram.kg-1.min-1) IV and droperidol (1.98 +/- 0.35 microgram.kg-1.min-1) IV given in bolus doses. The patients were intubated and ventilated (N2O in O2) to maintain normocarbia. Controlled hypotension to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 50 and 55 mmHg was induced using an IV infusion of NTG 6 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 in group I and NICAR 10 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 over 10 minutes followed by an infusion at 4 mg.kg-1.min-1 for group II. Measurements of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), MAP using an automated blood-pressure cuff and end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) were recorded prior to induction (PREIND), intraoperatively (PEROP) at 15, 30, 40 and 120 minutes post-induction, and at 15, 30 and 60 minutes postoperatively (POSTOP). Blood loss, graded as minimal or frank, was assessed by the surgeon during the operative period, post-extubation and 3 days postoperatively at dressing removal. The surgeon was unaware of the randomization schedule. Student's test was applied for statistical analysis of measured variables and Fisher's test for qualitative parameters. No statistically significant differences were noted between both groups with respect to demographic data, duration of surgery and total doses of anaesthetic agents (Table I).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Brachial plexus block with bupivacaine: effects of added alpha-adrenergic agonists: comparison between clonidine and epinephrine.

The effects of clonidine and epinephrine, administered into the brachial plexus sheath, were evaluated in 60 patients who underwent surgery of the upper limb. All patients received 40 to 50 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine, injected into the brachial plexus sheath, using the supraclavicular technique. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups so that 30 patients received 150 micrograms clonidine hydrochloride (Group I), and 30 received 200 micrograms epinephrine (Group II). The quality and the duration of analgesia were assessed as well as the possible side-effects. The block produced with the addition of clonidine was longer (994.2 +/- 34.2 vs 728.3 +/- 35.8 min) and superior to that with epinephrine (P less than 0.001). No major side-effects were recorded. We conclude that the injection of clonidine into the brachial plexus sheath is an attractive alternative to epinephrine to prolong the duration of analgesia following upper limb surgery under conduction anaesthesia.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

[Incidence and etiology of cardiac arrest occurring during the peroperative period and in the recovery room. Apropos of 102,468 anesthesia cases].

This study reviewed retrospectively 186 cardiac arrests (CA) observed in a series of 102,468 anaesthetics, carried out in a University Hospital between 1983 and 1987. Among them 29 were partly or totally related to anaesthesia and 11 had a fatal outcome. On the other hand, 157 CA (144 deaths) were not related to anaesthesia. Mortality rate due to anaesthesia was therefore 1.1 per 10,000. The main causes of anaesthesia related CA were overdosage, with or without hypovolaemia (9 CA, 6 of which occurred under regional anaesthesia); hypoxaemia (6 CA, 5 of which occurred under regional anaesthesia) and multifactorial sudden cardiac arrest (n = 8). The other aetiologies were: myocardial ischaemia (n = 3); anaphylactic shock due to propanidid (n = 1); protamine accident (n = 1); ventricular arrhythmia due to hypokalemia (n = 1). Fourteen CA occurred during induction (2 deaths), 14 during maintenance (8 deaths), and one during recovery. Risk factors for CA included a high ASA class, and the type of anaesthesia: there were 8 CA for 12,981 regional anaesthetics, and 21 for 89,487 general anaesthetics (p = 0.017). Emergency and paediatric anaesthesia were not risk factors. Outcome was independent of ASA class, but was related to aetiology: hypoxaemia (5 out of 6 recovered) and overdose with or without hypovolaemia (7 out of 8 recovered) had favourable outcomes. Furthermore, outcome of CA due to regional anaesthesia was satisfactory (7/8 recovered) (p = 0.08, NS). Such an analysis of the causes of anaesthetic disasters and their rate of occurrence can lead to more effective prevention.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

[Pharmacokinetics and changes in the physical properties of blood and urine after administration of dextran 60000].

A study was carried out to assess the changes induced by an infusion of dextran, molecular weight 60,000 daltons, in blood and urine. Plasma and urine dextran and serum protein concentrations, haematocrit, blood and urine viscosities, and blood oncotic pressure were measured in 10 consecutive male patients. Fifteen min after administration of 20 ml dextran 1000 (Promit), they were each given 500 ml (30 g) dextran 60 (Hemodex) over 30 min for plasma volume expansion. The measurements were carried out at the end of the infusion, and then at regular intervals over a 48 h period. The highest dextran blood concentrations were found at the end of the infusion, decreasing thereafter with a distribution half-life of 1.83 +/- 0.64 h, and an elimination half-life of 25.5 +/- 7.6 h. Haematocrit values decreased by 12%, and serum protein concentrations by 9.5%, after the end of the infusion. These changes remained significant for 9 h; they were probably due to the dilution effect of 500 ml of dextran. Colloid osmotic pressure was not significantly altered (20.7 +/- 4.7 mmHg vs. 23.1 +/- 5.1 mmHg 48 h after the end of the infusion). The colloid osmotic pressure due to dextran 60 compensated for the fall in protein concentration. A decrease in blood viscosity was found at different shear rates, despite dextran 60 being highly viscous. This could also be explained by a dilution effect. The highest degree of urinary excretion occurred 30 min after the end of the infusion, and lasted for 3 h. Forty-five percent of the total dextran dose had been excreted by the 48th hour.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1989

[Does flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist used during the anesthesia recovery period, have an anxiogenic effect?].

The goal of this study was to assess the degree of postoperative anxiety flumazenil might provide in patients when used to reverse the sedation induced by midazolam. Twenty-four patients, aged 18 to 60 yrs, and scheduled for elective orthopaedic surgery of the upper limb, were included in the study Regional anaesthesia (brachial plexus block) was carried out 20 min after the patient had been premedicated with 0.15 mg.kg-1 intramuscular midazolam. When the block was clinically complete, 0.12 mg.kg-1 midazolam was given intravenously. Sedation was maintained throughout surgery using 0.03 mg.kg-1 midazolam every quarter of an hour (mean total dose 0.206 mg.kg-1). At the end of the procedure, the patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups: A+, the patients were given 0.1 mg intravenous flumazenil repeated every min until the patient was fully awake (mean 4.5 +/- 2.6 micrograms.kg-1); and A-, the patients were allowed to recover spontaneously. A wakefulness, and a determination just before premedication (E1, P1, H1 respectively). The degree of recovery was assessed in both groups, and, when the value of the wakefulness test had returned to that of E1 (E2) (E2 = E1), P2 and H2 were carried out. There were no statistically significant differences between P1 and P2, and between H1 and H2, and this for either group of patients. So, the doses of flumazenil used, which awoke all the patients within 3 min, did not create any anxiety. In accordance with most of the recently published studies, flumazenil can be safely used to reverse benzodiazepine induced sedation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

[The course of blood concentrations of propofol administered at a constant rate, combined with fentanyl].

The blood concentration of propofol was studied in 14 ASA 1 informed patients, who were to undergo orthopaedic or plastic surgery lasting at least 90 min. Anaesthesia was induced with a 2 mg.kg-1 bolus of propofol together with 0.86 microgram.kg-1 fentanyl. This was followed by a constant rate infusion of propofol and fentanyl, 5 mg.kg-1.h-1 and 3 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 respectively. The mean duration of propofol infusion was 153 +/- 63 min, with extremes of 90 and 315 min. Propofol concentration was measured using gas phase chromatography on total arterial blood; the lower limit of detection was 0.05 mg.l-1. During the infusion, blood concentrations were found between 2 and 4 mg.l-1. It was 2.25 mg.l-1 at the fifth min; this was 80% of the concentration found at the 120th min. There was in fact no statistically significant difference between the values found at the 90th, 120th and 150th min. On stopping the infusion, the concentrations fell rapidly during the first 5 min, and then more slowly. By the 30th min, it had reached a value 4.5 times less than that at the end of the infusion. However, individual variations were found, which could explain delayed recovery. The calculated pharmacokinetic parameters were: elimination half-life = 41.7 +/- 20 min, clearance = 2.14 +/- 0.55 l.min-1 and equilibrium distribution volume = 43.4 +/- 15.2 l. These results are discussed. It is therefore possible to give propofol continuously at a constant rate without having any accumulative effect.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

[Comparison of propofol and propanidid administered at a constant rate].

So as to compare the anaesthesia obtained using propofol with that obtained using propanidid, 40 ASA I patients, aged between 18 and 50 years, who were to undergo elective orthopaedic or plastic surgery lasting more than 60 min, were randomly divided into two equal groups, one receiving propofol (PF) and the other propanidid (PD). All the patients received 0.5 mg atropine, 100 mg pethidine and 7.5 mg droperidol (10 mg if weight greater than 60 kg) intramuscularly 45 min before induction. Patients in group PF were then given 2 mg.kg-1 propofol over 1 min and 0.9 microgram.kg-1 fentanyl over 3 min, followed by a constant rate infusion of 5 mg.kg-1.h-1 propofol and 3 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 fentanyl. For PD patients, the doses of fentanyl were identical; they were given 10.6 mg.kg-1 propanidid over 3 min for induction, and 37 mg.kg-1.h-1 for maintenance. All the patients were intubated and ventilated mechanically. The usual anaesthetic parameters were monitored at induction, during surgery, and during recovery. Consciousness was lost more quickly with propofol (p less than 0.05), but the corneal reflex returned more rapidly in group PD (p less than 0.02). The time required for a full return to normal consciousness was identical in both groups. The fall, during induction, and the increase, during recovery, of Pasys were greater in group PD (p less than 0.05 and less than 0.001 respectively). Padia and heart rate were lower in group PF after the 30th min (p less than 0.05 and less than 0.01 respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1988

[Cervical peridural selective sensitive anesthesia in surgery and rehabilitation of the hand].

Active patient participation in the operative and postoperative programme is very important for tenolysis, tendon grafts and joint releases. Different anesthesic means can be used to perform selective sensitive analgesia. Cervical epidural anesthesia was used for fifteen cases of hand surgery. The technique is described, the results are analyzed. Indications and use of cervical epidural anesthesia for hand surgery are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

[Comparison of propofol and methohexital for dental and maxillofacial surgery].

A prospective study has been undertaken to compare a new intravenous anaesthetic agent, propofol, to methohexitone in 40 ASA I or II patients aged between 18 and 50 years undergoing maxillo-facial surgery and divided into two groups. Intramuscular premedication was standardized for all patients. In group I, propofol 2 mg X kg-1 was injected over 1 min in a peripheral venous line with fentanyl 0.86 microgram X kg-1, followed by an infusion of propofol 5 mg X kg-1 X h-1 and fentanyl 3 micrograms X kg-1 X h-1. In group II, the fentanyl dosage was the same as in group I, whilst methohexitone 3 mg X kg-1 was given for induction and 4.5 mg X kg-1 X h-1 for maintenance of anaesthesia. The following were recorded during induction, maintenance and recovery; haemodynamic parameters using a non invasive method; respiratory parameters; quality of anaesthesia; side-effects. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test and qualitative analysis using the Schwartz comparison test at 2%. The following results were found: the quality of anaesthesia with propofol was superior to that of methohexitone during the three stages of anaesthesia. The duration of induction was similar in both groups, but the quality of induction (occurrence of more minor side-effects; p less than 0.05) and intubation was in favour of propofol (p less than 0.05). During maintenance, stability of anaesthesia and a lesser incidence of side-effects were again in favour of the propofol group, in which a slower rate was also found (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗