Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Worthington

Publications and source records attributed to J Worthington.

112 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

The impact of adolescent development on recovery from traumatic brain injury.

This article analyzes the role an adolescent's development plays in the recovery from traumatic brain injury. Erikson's model of psychosocial development is used to describe the characteristics of the adolescent head-injured patient. The role of family, peers, body image, and sexuality are discussed. Suggestions are offered regarding ways in which the rehabilitation practitioner can conduct comprehensive patient and family counseling and promote optimal developmental recovery after discharge from the rehabilitation facility.

Adolescent↗

Hostility changes following antidepressant treatment: relationship to stress and negative thinking.

It is unclear whether changes in hostility following treatment are primarily related to improvement in depressive symptoms or are also closely associated with reductions in negative thinking or perceived stress. We evaluated 94 outpatients with major depression before and after eight weeks of fluoxetine treatment by administering the Symptom Questionnaire (SQ) Hostility Scale, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Cognitions Questionnaire (CQ) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). We observed significant elevations in scores on these questionnaires in depressed patients as compared to normal controls. Following treatment with fluoxetine, there was a statistically significant reduction in scores on all four questionnaires. We observed that changes in SQ Hostility were significantly positively related to changes in both depression severity and perceived stress, with these relationships remaining significant after adjusting for gender and baseline SQ Hostility. The relationship between SQ Hostility changes and reductions in negative thinking became significant only after adjusting for gender and baseline SQ hostility. Our results suggest that the marked decrease in hostility following antidepressant treatment is related to a reduction in depressive symptoms, stress levels and negative thinking.

Adult↗

Consumption of alcohol, nicotine, and caffeine among depressed outpatients. Relationship with response to treatment.

The authors present findings from the first investigation of the use of alcohol, nicotine, and caffeine in nonsubstance-abusing outpatients with major depressive disorder. The patients (N = 94) were assessed for their intake of alcohol, nicotine, and caffeine, and then treated openly for 8 weeks with 20 mg/day of fluoxetine. The degree of alcohol consumption at baseline was a significant predictor of poorer response to the antidepressant. This relationship remained significant even after adjusting for severity of depression at baseline. Even moderate levels of alcohol consumption appear to negatively affect pharmacologic treatment in depressed outpatients.

Adolescent↗

Ketorolac versus acetaminophen-codeine in the emergency department treatment of acute low back pain.

Acute low back pain is a common problem in the emergency department (ED). Effective management of acute pain enhances early rehabilitation and recovery. Given the importance of inflammatory mediators in pain generation and the adverse effects associated with opioids, it is logical to expect that a non-opioid agent with antiinflammatory and analgesic properties would provide excellent analgesia with fewer adverse effects. This double-blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial, performed in six university and community hospital EDs, compares the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of ketorolac to those of acetaminophen-codeine in ED patients with acute musculoskeletal low back pain. Our hypothesis was that ketorolac would provide superior analgesia with fewer adverse effects. One hundred twenty-three patients with acute low back pain were randomized to receive ketorolac (KET, N = 63) or acetaminophen-codeine (ACOD, N = 60). Most (79%) were males, and the mean age was 34.5 years. After baseline clinical assessment, patients were treated with ketorolac (10 mg every 4 to 6 h as needed, up to four daily doses) or acetaminophen-codeine (600 mg-60 mg, respectively, every 4 to 6 h as needed, up to six daily doses) and followed for one week. Pain intensity was assessed on visual analogue and categorical scales. Functional capacity, overall pain relief, and overall medication rating were assessed on categorical scales. Adverse events were documented. Primary outcomes included: 1) Pain intensity differences, based on visual analogue scores, for the 0 to 6 h treatment phase. 2) Incidence of adverse events. Secondary outcomes included analgesic efficacy, functional capacity, and overall subjective drug evaluation at one week. Both drugs provided substantial pain relief, with maximal effect 2.2 h after oral dosing. There were no significant differences in analgesic efficacy, functional capacity, or overall pain relief between the two groups. Sixteen patients (10 KET vs. 6 ACOD, NS) withdrew prematurely because of drug inefficacy. Patients in the ACOD group reported significantly more adverse drug events and serious adverse drug events. Seven patients--all in the ACOD group--withdrew from the study because of adverse drug events. Based on comparable efficacy and a superior adverse event profile, ketorolac was preferable to acetaminophen with codeine for the treatment of acute low back pain in the ED.

Acetaminophen↗