Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

J Wennberg

Publications and source records attributed to J Wennberg.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Effect of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on patient quality of life: results from a Medicare survey.

OBJECTIVES: To assess patient responses to radical prostatectomy and its effects. METHODS: A national sample was taken of 1072 Medicare patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (1988 through 1990) by mail, telephone, and personal interviews. The effects of the surgery and its complications on these patients' lives were studied through: (1) patient ratings of the extent to which sexual and urinary dysfunctions were "problems" in their lives; (2) two general measures of quality of life, the Mental Health Index and the General Health Index; (3) patient reports of how they felt about the results of treatment and whether they would choose surgery again. RESULTS: On average, dripping urine, particularly to the point where subjects were wearing pads, had a more significant effect on patients than loss of sexual function; incontinence had significant adverse effects on the measures of quality of life and self-reported results of surgery. Overall, postsurgical patients scored comparatively high on the quality of life measures (similar to a cohort of patients with benigh prostatic hyperplasia who had undergone transurethral resection of the prostate), reported feeling positive about the results (81%), and would choose surgical treatment again (89%). Nonetheless, there was variability in patient response to the effects of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the ability of many Medicare patients to adapt to adverse outcomes, such as loss of sexual function and incontinence. They also provide evidence of the variability of individual patients' responses to surgical results and reinforce the importance of individualized decision making for patients facing a decision about radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Aged

Which rate is right?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Catchment Area, Health

Small area variations in health care delivery.

Health information about total populations is a prerequisite for sound decision-making and planning in the health care field. Experience with a population-based health data system in Vermont reveals that there are wide variations in resource input, utilization of services, and expenditures among neighboring communities. Results show prima facie inequalities in the input of resources that are associated with income transfer from areas of lower expenditure to areas of higher expenditure. Variations in utilization indicate that there is considerable uncertainty about the effectiveness of different levels of aggregate, as well as specific kinds of, health services. Informed choices in the public regulation of the health care sector require knowledge of the relation between medical care systems and the population groups being served, and they should take into account the effect of regulation on equality and effectiveness. When population-based data on small areas are available, decisions to expand hospitals, currently based on institutional pressures, can take into account a community's regional ranking in regard to bed input and utilization rates. Proposals by hospitals for unit price increases and the regulation of the actuarial rate of insurance programs can be evaluated in terms of per capita expenditures and income transfer between geographically defined populations. The PSRO's can evaluate the wide variations in level of services among residents of different communities. Coordinated exercise of the authority vested in these regulatory programs may lead to explicit strategies to deal directly with inequality and uncertainty concerning the effectiveness of health care delivery. Population-based health information systems, because they can provide information on the performance of health care systems and regulatory agencies, are an important step in the development of rational public policy for health.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques