Biomedical subjects

J Warnking

Publications and source records attributed to J Warnking.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Timing of interactions across the visual field in the human cortex.

While it is generally believed that interactions across long distances in the visual field occur only in the higher-order cortical areas, other results suggest that such interactions are processed very early. In the preceding paper, we identified the latencies within a subset of cortical areas in the human visual system. In the present study, we test in which areas and at which latencies the responses to two visual patterns start interacting. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging directly combined with visual-evoked potential source analysis. Interactions appeared first anterolaterally to the retinotopic areas, at 80 ms for two stimuli presented in the left lower visual quadrant and at 100 ms for symmetrical stimulation of both lower quadrants. In the lateral occipital-V5 region (LOV5), two patterns presented simultaneously in one quadrant elicited a response with shorter latency and infra-linear addition of the amplitudes compared with the patterns presented separately. For bilateral stimulation, the timing of the LOV5 response coincided with the response to contralateral stimulation alone. Other visual areas showed interactions appearing later than within LOV5: starting at 150 ms in V1, at 120 ms in V3-V3a for the left visual hemifield stimulation and at 160 ms for both visual hemifields stimulation. Our data show that distinct patterns in the visual field interact first in LOV5, suggesting that this region must be the first to pool spatial information across the whole visual field.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Sequence of pattern onset responses in the human visual areas: an fMRI constrained VEP source analysis.

We measured the timing of activity in distinct functional areas of the human visual cortex after onset of a visual pattern. This is not possible with visual evoked potentials (VEPs) or magnetic fields alone, and direct combination of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with electromagnetic data has turned out to be difficult. We tested a relatively new approach, where both position and orientation of the active cortex was given to the VEP source model. Subjects saw the same visual patterns flashed ON and OFF, both when recording VEPs and fMRI responses. We identified the positions and orientations of the activated cortex in four retinotopic areas in each individual, and the corresponding dipoles were seeded to model the individual evoked potential data. Unexplained variance, comprising signals from other areas, was inversely modeled. Despite the partially a priori fixed model and optimized signal-to-noise ratio of VEP data, full separation of retinotopic areas was only seldom possible due to crosstalk between the adjacent sources, but separation was usually possible between areas V1 and V3/V3a. Whereas the latencies generally followed the hierarchical organization of cortical areas (V1-V2-V3), with around 25 ms between the strongest responses, an early activation emerged 10-20 ms after V1, close to the temporo-occipital junction (LO/V5) and with an additional 20-ms latency in the corresponding region of the opposite hemisphere. Our approach shows that it is feasible to directly seed information from fMRI to electromagnetic source models and to identify the components and dynamics of VEPs in different retinotopic areas of a human individual.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

fMRI retinotopic mapping--step by step.

fMRI retinotopic mapping provides detailed information about the correspondence between the visual field and its cortical representation in the individual subject. Besides providing for the possibility of unambiguously localizing functional imaging data with respect to the functional architecture of the visual system, it is a powerful tool for the investigation of retinotopic properties of visual areas in the healthy and impaired brain. fMRI retinotopic mapping differs conceptually from a more traditional volume-based, block-type, or event-related analysis, in terms of both the surface-based analysis of the data and the phase-encoded paradigm. Several methodological works related to fMRI retinotopic mapping have been published. However, a detailed description of all the methods involved, discussing the steps from stimulus design to the processing of phase data on the surface, is still missing. We describe here step by step our methodology for the complete processing chain. Besides reusing methods proposed by other researchers in the field, we introduce original ones: improved stimuli for the mapping of polar angle retinotopy, a method of assigning volume-based functional data to the surface, and a way of weighting phase information optimally to account for the SNR obtained locally. To assess the robustness of these methods we present a study performed on three subjects, demonstrating the reproducibility of the delineation of low order visual areas.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2000

Moving illusory contours activate primary visual cortex: an fMRI study.

Identifying the cortical areas activated by illusory contours provides valuable information on the mechanisms of object perception. We applied functional magnetic resonance imaging to identify the visual areas of the human brain involved in the perception of a moving Kanizsa-type illusory contour. Our results indicate that, in addition to other cortical regions, areas V5 and V1 are activated. Activity in area V1 was particularly prominent.

Adult↗