Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J W Finney

Publications and source records attributed to J W Finney.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Long-term treatment careers and outcomes of previously untreated alcoholics.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this project was to describe treatment selection and outcomes over an 8-year follow-up period for 466 individuals who had drinking problems and had not yet received formal treatment at baseline. METHOD: By the 8-year follow-up, individuals had self-selected into one of four groups: no-treatment (n = 78); completed treatment (help was received only in Years 1-3 of follow-up; n = 230); additional treatment (help was received in Years 1-3, with more help in Years 4-8; n = 134); and delayed treatment (no help was received until Years 4-8 of follow-up; n = 24). RESULTS: Compared with individuals who remained untreated, the completed treatment group had more severe drinking problems and depression at baseline, but better drinking outcomes at both the 3- and 8-year follow-ups. At 3 years, the additional treatment group perceived their drinking problem as being more serious than did the untreated group and was more likely to have drinking-related problems; by 8 years, individuals who had obtained additional treatment were more likely to be abstinent, but still perceived their drinking problems as being more serious. Compared to individuals who completed treatment in Years 1-3, additional treatment group members had more severe drinking and functioning problems at 3 and 8 years. More involvement with formal outpatient treatment or AA was associated with more improvement on drinking indices. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with alcohol use disorders who elect to enter formal treatment or AA relatively soon after acknowledging their drinking problems experience better drinking-related outcomes than do those who receive no help or who delay receiving help. Accordingly, referral processes should ensure that problem drinkers enter self-help or formal treatment quickly.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Effectiveness of treatment for substance abuse and dependence for dual diagnosis patients: a model of treatment factors associated with one-year outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines a model of treatment for substance abuse and dependence for patients with substance use disorders and concomitant psychiatric disorders. The model focuses on five interrelated sets of variables (social background, intake functioning. dual diagnosis treatment orientation, patients' change on proximal outcomes, and aftercare participation) that are hypothesized to affect dual diagnosis patients' 1-year posttreatment outcomes. METHOD: A total of 981 male dual diagnosis patients completed assessment at intake, discharge and 1-year follow-up. The relative importance of each set of variables as predictors of outcome was estimated by constructing block variables and conducting path analyses. RESULTS: Dual diagnosis patients had a higher abstinence rate at follow-up (39%) than at intake (2%); they also improved on freedom from psychiatric symptoms (from 60% to 68%) and employment (from 20% to 29%). At follow-up, patients in programs with a stronger dual diagnosis treatment orientation showed a higher rate of freedom from psychiatric symptoms (71%) than did patients in weaker dual diagnosis treatment oriented programs (65%); they also were more likely to be employed (34% vs 25%). More change on proximal outcomes and more aftercare participation were also associated with better 1-year outcomes. Patients with less severe psychiatric disorders improved more and responded better to dual diagnosis oriented treatments than did patients with more severe psychiatric disorders. CONCLUSION: Treatment programs for substance use disorders that adhere to principles of dual diagnosis treatment obtain better outcomes for dual diagnosis patients, especially for patients with less severe psychiatric disorders.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: I. Treatment orientation, amount of care, and 1-year outcomes.

This article first explains the conceptual framework and plan of a naturalistic, multisite evaluation of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) substance abuse treatment programs. It then examines the effectiveness of an index episode of inpatient treatment and the effectiveness of continuing outpatient care and participation in self-help groups. The study was conducted among 3018 patients from 15 VA programs that emphasized 12-Step, cognitive-behavioral (CB), or eclectic treatment. Casemix-adjusted 1-year outcomes showed that patients in 12-Step programs were the most likely to be abstinent, free of substance abuse problems, and employed at the 1-year follow-up. Patients who obtained more regular and more intensive outpatient mental health care, and those who participated more in 12-Step self-help groups, were more likely to be abstinent and free of substance use problems at the 1-year follow-up. These findings support the effectiveness of 12-Step treatment and show that patients with substance use disorders who become more involved in outpatient care and self-help groups tend to experience better short-term substance use outcomes. Subsequent papers in this section focus on the proximal outcomes of treatment, patients with psychiatric as well as substance use disorders, patient-treatment matching effects, and the link between program treatment orientation and patients' involvement in and the influence of 12-Step self-help groups.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment III. Examining mechanisms underlying patient-treatment matching hypotheses for 12-step and cognitive-behavioral treatments for substance abuse.

This study examined several hypotheses for matching patients to 12-Step and cognitive-behavioral (CB) treatments in a multisite evaluation of VA inpatient substance abuse programs. A total of 804 male patients in five 12-Step programs, and 1069 male patients in five CB programs completed an intake, discharge, and 1-year follow-up questionnaire. The findings did not support the notion that certain patient characteristics would differentially predict better outcomes after 12-Step and CB treatment This conclusion held when the purest 12-Step and CB programs were used, and when patients who received the full dose of treatment (i.e., treatment completers) were examined separately. Process analyses of the hypothesized mechanisms underlying the patient-treatment matching effects did not yield the expected links among patient characteristics, proximal outcomes, and 1-year outcomes. Our conclusion is that there is no advantage to matching men with substance abuse problems to 12-Step or CB treatments based on the patient attributes measured here.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1999

A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment IV. The effect of comorbid psychiatric diagnoses on amount of treatment, continuing care, and 1-year outcomes.

Recent surveys of the substance abuse patient population have shown a striking increase in the proportion of patients with a comorbid psychiatric disorder. In this study, patients with substance abuse and psychotic, anxiety/depressive, or personality disorders were compared with patients with only substance use disorders on treatment experiences and outcomes. Regardless of dual diagnosis status, patients generally improved on both substance use and social functioning outcomes after substance abuse treatment. At the 1-year follow-up, dually diagnosed patients, and patients with only substance use disorders, had comparable substance use outcomes. However, patients with major psychiatric disorders, specifically psychotic and anxiety/depressive disorders, fared worse on psychological symptoms and employment outcomes than did patients with personality disorders and only substance use disorders. Although there were some group differences on the amount of index treatment received and continuing care, the overall pattern of relationships between treatment variables and outcomes was comparable for the patient groups. In addition, there was no diagnostic group by treatment orientation matching effects, which indicated that the dual diagnosis patient groups improved as much in 12-Step as in cognitive-behavioral substance abuse programs.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: V. Substance abuse treatment can enhance the effectiveness of self-help groups.

Affiliation with Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and other 12-Step self-help groups is becoming more common at the same time as professional substance abuse treatment services are becoming less available and of shorter duration. As a result of these two trends, patients' outcomes may be increasingly influenced by the degree to which professional treatment programs help patients take maximum advantage of self-help groups. The present study of 3018 treated veterans examined how the theoretical orientation of a substance abuse treatment program affects (1) the proportion of its patients that participate in self-help groups, and, (2) the degree of benefit patients derive from participation in self-help groups. Patients treated in 12-Step and eclectic treatment programs had higher rates of subsequent participation in 12-Step self-help groups than did patients treated in cognitive behavioral programs. Furthermore, the theoretical orientation of treatment moderated the outcome of self-help group participation: As the degree of programs' emphasis on 12-Step approaches increased, the positive relationships of 12-Step group participation to better substance use and psychological outcomes became stronger. Hence, it appears that 12-Step oriented treatment programs enhance the effectiveness of 12-Step self-help groups. Findings are discussed in terms of implications for clinical practice and for future evaluations of the combined effects of treatment and self-help groups.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Evaluating substance abuse treatment process models: I. Changes on proximal outcome variables during 12-step and cognitive-behavioral treatment.

OBJECTIVE: This article provides data on the early linkages in the treatment process chains that are thought to underlie two prevalent approaches to substance abuse treatment-traditional 12-step treatment and cognitive-behavioral treatment. The focus is on the during-treatment changes on "proximal outcomes" that, according to the treatment theory underlying each modality, patients are supposed to undergo or achieve in order to experience a positive "ultimate outcome." METHOD: In all, 3,228 men receiving treatment in 15 Department of Veterans Affairs substance abuse treatment programs were assessed at treatment entry and at or near discharge from inpatient programs that had desired lengths of stay of 21-28 days. RESULTS: Between intake and discharge, patients in 12-step programs improved more than did C-B patients on proximal outcome variables assumed to be specific to 12-step treatment (e.g., attending 12-step meetings, taking steps), whereas patients in cognitive-behavioral programs made no greater change (and in a few cases, less change) than did 12-step patients on proximal outcome variables assumed to underlie cognitive-behavioral treatment (e.g., self-efficacy, coping skills). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the proximal outcomes thought to be specific to cognitive-behavioral treatment are actually general proximal outcomes of both 12-step and cognitive-behavioral treatment.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1998

Influence of outpatient treatment and 12-step group involvement on one-year substance abuse treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether substance abuse patients self-selecting into one of three aftercare groups (outpatient treatment only, 12-step groups only, and outpatient treatment and 12-step groups) and patients who did not participate in aftercare differed on 1-year substance use and psychosocial outcomes. METHOD: A total of 3,018 male patients filled out a questionnaire at intake and 1 year following discharge from treatment. Patients were classified into aftercare groups at follow-up using information from VA databases and self-reports. RESULTS: Patients who participated in both outpatient treatment and 12-step groups fared the best on 1-year outcomes. Patients who did not obtain aftercare had the poorest outcomes. In terms of the amount of intervention received, patients who had more outpatient mental health treatment, who more frequently attended 12-step groups or were more involved in 12-step activities had better 1-year outcomes. In addition, patients who kept regular outpatient appointments over a longer time period fared better than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Encouraging substance abuse patients to regularly attend both outpatient aftercare and self-help groups may improve long-term outcomes.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Twelve-step and cognitive--behavioral treatment for substance abuse: a comparison of treatment effectiveness.

The comparative effectiveness of 12-step and cognitive-behavioral (C-B) models of substance abuse treatment was examined among 3,018 patients from 15 programs at U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Across program types, participants showed significant improvements in functioning from treatment admission to a 1-year follow-up. Although 12-step patients were somewhat more likely to be abstinent at the 1-year follow-up, 12-step, C-B, and combined 12-Step-C-B treatment programs were equally effective in reducing substance use and improving most other areas of functioning. The finding of equal effectiveness was consistent over several treatment subgroups: Patients attending the "purest" 12-step and C-B treatment programs, and patients who had received the "full dose" of treatment. Also, patients with only substance abuse diagnoses, those with concomitant psychiatric diagnoses, and patients who were mandated to treatment showed similar improvement at the 1-year follow-up, regardless of type of treatment received. These data provide important new evidence supporting the effectiveness of 12-step treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Explaining abstinence rates following treatment for alcohol abuse: a quantitative synthesis of patient, research design and treatment effects.

We examined the relationships of treatment, patient and research design characteristics to treatment outcome (i.e. abstinence rates) in a sample of 150 treatment conditions drawn from 100 alcohol treatment outcome studies published between 1980 and 1992. Treatment characteristics were related to abstinence rates: more intensive treatments had higher abstinence rates than less intensive treatments, whereas treatments with an expressed goal other than abstinence had lower abstinence rates than treatments with an abstinence goal. When the public vs. private ownership status of the treatment facility was taken into account, the presence of behavioral elements in the treatment condition also was related to higher abstinence rates. Because of inconsistent reporting in primary studies, we assessed the effects of only one patient pre-treatment characteristic; treatment conditions with a higher proportion of socially stable patients had better outcomes. Research design characteristics were also related to abstinence rates. Treatment conditions with shorter follow-ups and treatments drawn from studies that did not use criteria to exclude more impaired subjects had better outcomes. We discuss possible reasons why our findings regarding the effects of treatment intensity and the use of exclusionary criteria differ from those in previous reviews.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Life domains, alcoholics anonymous, and role incumbency in the 3-year course of problem drinking.

This study examined the course of problem drinking among 439 individuals over 3 years, using a life domains perspective that distinguishes life stressors and social resources in different contexts. More severe chronic financial stressors both predicted and were predicted by more alcohol consumption and drinking-related problems. Among social resources, Alcoholics Anonymous was the most robust predictor of better functioning on multiple outcome criteria. Support from friends and extended family also predicted better outcomes; this effect was stronger for individuals who were low on primary role incumbency (i.e., who were unemployed and/or did not have a spouse/partner).

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1996

Prevention of child-to-mother transmission of cytomegalovirus by changing behaviors: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether a behavioral prevention approach reduces child-to-parent transmission of cytomegalovirus. METHODS: Subjects were seronegative mothers whose child was less than 36 months of age and was shedding cytomegalovirus. Nonpregnant women were randomly assigned to three groups. Mothers in the education group (E) were given instructions about protective behaviors (frequent hand washing, wearing latex gloves) and risky behaviors to avoid (intimate contact with the child). Disposable diapers, liquid soap and latex gloves were provided. During biweekly home visits glove and soap use were monitored for an indirect objective measure of adherence to the protective behaviors. Throughout the study mothers self-reported the frequency they engaged in protective and risky behaviors. In addition to the procedures for Group E the adherence and education group (A) also received social reinforcement for adherence and problem solving for any perceived problems with the behavioral recommendations. The control group (C) received no intervention. A fourth group of pregnant women received an intervention equivalent to that of the education group. RESULTS: Eight of 17 women in Group C and 4 of 11 women in Group E seroconverted. For both E and Group C the average time from enrollment to infection was 4 months (range, 2 to 7 months). Two of 8 women in Group A seroconverted (1 at 3 months and 1 at 8 months). None of 14 pregnant women observed for an average of 8.4 months during pregnancy seroconverted. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that intervention for pregnant women is effective because pregnant women will perceive a higher risk and be more motivated to adhere to recommendations than nonpregnant women.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed1996

The cost-effectiveness of treatment for alcoholism: a second approximation.

OBJECTIVE: This review builds on the innovative research synthesis of Holder and his colleagues, addresses some of the limitations of the box-score approach to assessing treatment effectiveness that they used and provides a second approximation of the cost-effectiveness of treatment for alcoholism. METHOD: For each of 141 comparative treatment studies, we determined whether or not it found at least one statistically significant positive effect on a drinking-related outcome variable for each of the modalities examined in a paired contrast with one other condition. We next calculated the predicted probability of each study yielding at least one statistically significant treatment effect, based on the number of tests for treatment effects conducted. Following that, for each study of a particular treatment modality, the strength of the "weakest competitor" against which the modality had been compared was determined. For each modality, we used the average predicted probability of the relevant studies finding a significant effect and the average effectiveness of the weakest competitor to predict the modality's effectiveness. RESULTS: We calculated an Adjusted Effectiveness Index (AEIn) for each modality, which was the difference between its predicted and actual effectiveness score. Our AEIn results were consistent with those of Holder et al. in suggesting that some of the same modalities appear to be effective or ineffective. Our results differed from their findings with respect to other modalities, however. Using data presented by Holder and his colleagues on the minimum estimated cost of providing different modalities, we offer a second approximation of the modalities' cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found a smaller range of effectiveness across modalities than did Holder and his colleagues and a nonsignificant relationship between cost and effectiveness. Like Holder et al., we do not believe major treatment provision or funding decisions should be based solely on this type of review.

Alcoholism↗
PubMed1996

Training in early cancer detection and anxiety in adolescent males: a preliminary report.

Because of concerns about increasing anxiety in a population that is at relatively low risk for developing cancer, some investigators have recommended that training in testicular self-examination (TSE) not be provided to adolescent males. However, empirical findings documenting a link between training in cancer detection and increased anxiety in adolescent males are lacking. In this preliminary study, we assessed whether training in TSE was actually associated with elevated state anxiety in two samples of adolescent males (29 ninth graders and 30 college underclassmen). For both groups, anxiety scores were well within normal limits at postassessment, indicating that a purported cost of the procedure may in fact not exist.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

The effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient treatment for alcohol abuse: the need to focus on mediators and moderators of setting effects.

Previous reviews have concluded that there was no evidence for the superiority of inpatient over outpatient treatment of alcohol abuse, although particular types of patients might be more effectively treated in inpatient settings. In this review, we first consider the conceptual rationales that have been offered to support inpatient and outpatient treatment. Following that, the results of the relevant research on setting effects are presented. Five studies had significant setting effects favoring inpatient treatment, two studies found day hospital to be significantly more effective than inpatient treatment, and seven studies yielded no significant differences on drinking-related outcome variables. In all but one instance in which a significant effect emerged, patients in the 'superior' setting received more intensive treatment and patients were not 'preselected' for their willingness to accept random assignment to treatment in either setting. Studies finding significant setting effects also conducted more treatment contrasts (18.6 vs. 4.9), on average, and had a mean statistical power level of 0.71 (median 0.79) to detect a medium-sized effect, whereas studies with no significant findings had an average power level of 0.55 (median 0.57). When inpatient treatment was found to be more effective, outpatients did not receive a respite in the form of inpatient detoxification and the studies were slightly less likely to have social stability inclusion criteria and to use random assignment to treatment settings. We consider the implications of our findings for future research, especially the need to examine the conceptual rationales put forward by proponents of inpatient and outpatient treatment, i.e. mediators and moderators of setting effects.

Alcoholism↗
PubMed1995

Enhancing substance abuse treatment evaluations: examining mediators and moderators of treatment effects.

This article considers ways in which the basic, comparative approach to evaluating treatment for substance abuse is sometimes enhanced. The general strategy has been to make treatment evaluation projects explanatory by embedding them in a theoretical framework. Using either a theory of the treatment process or of patient-treatment matching guide, the typical approaches for enhancing comparative treatment evaluations are to identify either mediators or moderators of treatment effects. In addition to addressing the basic question of "Does the treatment work or not work?" one can also ask in more explanatory evaluations: "How or why does the treatment work or not work?" and/or "For whom do treatments work or not work?" Variations of these questions that can be addressed in treatment process and patient-treatment interaction effect analyses are discussed. Particular attention is given to explaining (identifying mediators of) patient-treatment interaction effects. Some advantages of making treatment evaluations more explanatory are discussed.

Combined Modality Therapy↗