Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J W Ely

Publications and source records attributed to J W Ely.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Differences in practice patterns between obstetricians and family physicians: use of serum screening.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the use of the Iowa Expanded Serum Screening program (maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and unconjugated estriol) by obstetricians and family physicians. STUDY DESIGN: A registry was used to identify all obstetricians (160) and family physicians (404) who practice obstetrics in Iowa. A questionnaire exploring attitudes and practice patterns related to serum screening was mailed to these physicians. RESULTS: The response rate was 80.3% overall. There were significant differences in the offering of serum screening (p < 0.001) for following three responses: obstetricians were more likely to offer screening through the Iowa Expanded Serum Screening Program than were family physicians (89.3% vs 57.2%) and less likely to offer screening outside the state program (9.9% vs 39.0%), whereas family physicians were more likely to not offer screening (0.8% vs 3.8%). When the responses of the physicians who offer screening were analyzed, several differences emerged: (1) obstetricians were more likely than family physicians to offer screening to all obstetric patients (99.2% vs 92.1%, p < 0.05), whereas family physicians were more likely to offer testing to patients with perceived risks for neural tube defects or chromosomal abnormalities and to those patients who requested it, (2) obstetricians were more likely to recommend screening than family physicians (39.0% vs 25.7%, p < 0.05), who more often discouraged testing, although the latter did not reach statistical significance, (3) family physicians more than obstetricians felt that screening was not necessary if the patient would not terminate the pregnancy for neural tube defects (41.6% vs 19.1%, p < 0.001) or chromosomal abnormalities (39.7% vs 21.4%, p < 0.01), and (4) obstetricians used nurses to counsel patients to a much greater extent than family physicians did (44.6% vs 14.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a significant difference in practice patterns between obstetricians and family physicians in their reported use and presentation of maternal serum screening. Guidelines based on outcome studies should be developed and followed by obstetricians and family physicians.

Chorionic Gonadotropin↗
PubMed1996

Benign fever following vaginal delivery.

BACKGROUND: In patients with fever following vaginal delivery, physicians must differentiate benign self-resolving fevers from fevers with more serious causes, especially endometritis. To help differentiate these clinical entities, we explored the characteristics and risk factors for benign "single-day" postpartum fever. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2137 vaginal deliveries. Patients were randomly selected from the 25,687 vaginal deliveries that took place between 1979 and 1992 at The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. The data were analyzed using odds ratios and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Benign fevers occurred in 3.3% of patients, while endometritis was diagnosed in 1.6%. After controlling for confounding variables, two clinical factors were independently associated with single-day fever: primiparity (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 5.7) and use of a uterine pressure catheter (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.5 to 3.7). These factors were not associated with endometritis. The first postpartum temperature elevation ( > or = 38.0 degrees C) occurred earlier in patients with single-day fever than in patients with endometritis (4.0 +/- 4.6 hours postpartum vs 30.2 +/- 27.0 hours postpartum, P < .001). The maximum temperature elevation was lower, on average, in patients with single-day fever than in patients with endometritis (38.2 degrees +/- 0.2 degrees C vs 38.9 degrees +/- 0.6 degrees C, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Single-day fever was more likely to occur in primiparous women and in women who were monitored with a uterine pressure catheter. Most women with benign single-day fevers had early low-grade fevers, whereas women with endometritis had higher fevers that occurred later in the postpartum period.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Diagnosing left lower lobe pneumonia: usefulness of the 'spine sign' on lateral chest radiographs.

BACKGROUND: Left lower lobe pneumonia may be obscured by the heart on the postero-anterior (PA) chest radiograph. In such cases, the lateral projection may be helpful, especially if it exhibits the "spine sign", which is an interruption in the progressive increase in lucency of the vertebral bodies from superior to inferior. We investigated whether the spine sign would help family physicians diagnose left lower lobe pneumonia on chest radiographs. METHODS: We selected the chest radiographs of all patients with left lower lobe pneumonia who were seen between 1983 and 1995 at a family practice training program (N = 78) and an equal number of chest radiographs of patients without pneumonia. Six family physicians read these radiographs under two viewing conditions: PA only vs PA and lateral. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve methodology to compare the two viewing conditions. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in performance between the two viewing conditions. The lateral view was helpful in some patients but misleading in others. Among patients with pneumonia, the lateral view was helpful when the spine sign was present, but it was misleading when the spine sign was absent. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of family physicians, the lateral chest radiograph did not improve overall diagnostic accuracy in patients with left lower lobe pneumonia. Among pneumonia patients with the spine sign, however, the lateral view was often helpful.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Understanding logistic regression analysis through example.

Logistic regression is a valuable statistical tool that is often used in primary care research. When researchers explore the association between a possible risk factor and a disease, they attempt to control the effects of extraneous factors (confounders) that can obscure the true association. Using logistic regression, researchers can simultaneously control for the effects of multiple confounders. When investigators use logistic regression, they make subjective decisions about which factors to include in the analysis and in the final predictive model. Critical readers must understand basic concepts of logistic regression and potential problems with its use before they can accurately interpret study results. This article uses a familiar example to explain the principles of logistic regression to make it understandable to nonstatisticians.

Coffee↗
PubMed1996

Practice patterns during the third stage of labor: the effect of physician age and specialty.

BACKGROUND: Elective manual removal of the placenta and routine uterine exploration following vaginal delivery are controversial procedures. Although advocated in the past, little is known about current attitudes and practices related to these procedures. METHODS: Using a mailed questionnaire, we surveyed all 178 Iowa obstetrician-gynecologists and a random sample of 163 Iowa family physicians to determine their practice patterns related to selected aspects of the third stage of labor. The data were analyzed using odds ratios and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The analysis was based on answers from 302 physicians. Physicians in the oldest age quartile were three times more likely than physicians in the youngest age quartile to routinely explore the uterus after a vaginal delivery (P < .01). After controlling for specialty, younger physicians were more likely to believe that manual removal of the placenta is a risk factor for endometritis (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.7 for each 10-year increase in age, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6 to 1.0). Controlling for age, family physicians were more likely than obstetrician-gynecologists to routinely order prophylactic antibiotics after manually removing the placenta (adjusted OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.7). CONCLUSIONS: Both physician age and specialty were associated with selected practice patterns involving the third stage of labor. Older physicians were less likely to believe that manually removing a placenta increases the risk of postpartum endometritis, and they were more likely to routinely explore the uterus after a vaginal delivery.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

The association between manual removal of the placenta and postpartum endometritis following vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether manual removal of the placenta after vaginal delivery is a risk factor for postpartum endometritis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of vaginal deliveries compared 1052 patients who had manual removal of the placenta with 1085 patients whose placentas delivered spontaneously. Subjects were selected randomly from the 25,687 vaginal deliveries at the University of Iowa Hospitals during 1979-1992. The presence of endometritis was determined using information in medical records. The data were analyzed using odds ratios (OR) and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: After controlling for confounding variables, manual removal of the placenta was associated with postpartum endometritis (adjusted OR 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-4.9). Other risk factors for endometritis included maternal age less than 17 years (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.5-7.2), postpartum anemia (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.9-4.5), and membranes ruptured longer than 24 hours (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.3). CONCLUSION: Manual removal of the placenta is a risk factor for postpartum endometritis after vaginal delivery.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Perceived causes of family physicians' errors.

BACKGROUND: Competent physicians occasionally make critical errors in patient care that can lead to long-lasting remorse and guilt. The perceived causes of self-admitted physician errors have not been previously explored. METHODS: Fifty-three family physicians were interviewed in depth and asked to describe their most memorable errors and the perceived causes. The authors analyzed transcripts of the audiotaped interviews to determine the frequencies of the different causes. Errors were classified according to four general categories. RESULTS: Family physicians collectively reported a mean of 8 different causes for each case in which an error was made (range, 1 to 16). In 47% of the cases, the patient died following the error, whereas in 26% of the cases, there was no adverse outcome. Only 4 of the 53 errors led to malpractice suits, and none were addressed by peer review organizations. Seven (10%) of the 70 physicians who were invited to participate could not recall having made any errors. Family physicians attributed their most memorable errors to 34 different causes, which fit into the following categories: physician stressors (eg, bing hurried or distracted), process-of-care factors (eg, premature closure of the diagnostic process), patient-related factors (eg, misleading normal findings), and physician characteristics (eg, lack of knowledge). CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians attribute their memorable errors to a wide variety of causes, but most commonly to hurry, distraction, lack of knowledge, premature closure of the diagnostic process, and inadequately aggressive patient management. Physicians who understand common causes of errors may be better prepared to prevent them.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

The physician's decision to use tube feedings: the role of the family, the living will, and the Cruzan decision.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative importance of factors influencing physicians to use tube feedings in patients lacking decision-making capacity. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred thirty-nine members of the Missouri Academy of Family Physicians. MEASUREMENTS: Using a mailed questionnaire, physicians were asked for a decision about feeding tube placement in an 89-year-old man who was unable to swallow or communicate after a stroke. Changing the conditions of the scenario, we then evaluated the influence of patient age, duration of disability, a living will, the Cruzan decision, and family preferences on the physician's decision. RESULTS: After reading the initial case history, 47% of physicians opposed tube feedings. Physicians who were told that the patient signed a living will specifically excluding tube feedings were more likely to oppose tube feedings than those who were told that he signed only a standard living will (53% vs 42%; P = 0.02). Forty-two percent of physicians who initially suggested a feeding tube changed their recommendation if the family opposed it. Sixty-six percent of physicians who initially opposed a feeding tube changed their recommendation if the family "pushed" for it. Thirty-three percent of physicians who initially opposed tube feedings under the living will scenario would favor tube feedings if the patient had not signed a living will. Twenty-two percent of physicians who initially opposed tube feedings would change to favor them if the issue had arisen before the Cruzan decision. CONCLUSIONS: Among this group of physicians, there was no consensus on whether tube feedings should be initiated. However, it was found that the family's opinion was the most influential factor affecting the physician's recommendation about tube feedings. Most physicians endorsed family preferences for tube feedings even when this intervention was specifically opposed in the patient's living will.

Brain Diseases↗
PubMed1992

The information needs of family physicians: case-specific clinical questions.

BACKGROUND: Physicians must be able to rapidly obtain information that answers specific patient-related clinical questions. This study describes the information-seeking process in the office practices of family physicians. METHODS: We observed and recorded the information-seeking and information-obtaining behavior of 30 family physicians in their offices. RESULTS: Based on 172 hours of observation and 602 patient visits, family physicians sought answers to an average of only one clinical question for every 15 patients seen. Urban physicians sought answers to more questions than rural physicians (one question for every 9 patients, as compared with one question for every 24 patients; P less than .05). The frequency of seeking information was not related to the physician's age. Busier physicians (those seeing more patients per hour) tended to ask fewer questions (correlation coefficient (r) = -.34, P = .06). Drug-prescribing questions were the most common type; second most common were orthopedic questions. Colleagues and the Physicians' Desk Reference were the most often used resources. Eight percent of the questions were not answered. CONCLUSIONS: Among family physicians, patient-related questions are infrequently asked and highly specific. Most questions are rapidly answered using colleagues and books, not journals or computers.

Adult↗
PubMed1976

An audit of obstetric care in a university family medicine department and an obstetrics-gynecology department.

The care of obstetric patients in a university family medicine department was compared with that in the obstetrics-gynecology department of the same university. The obstetric service patients tended to be at higher risk due to a higher black population (24.2 percent vs 6.3 percent), greater prepregnancy weight (mean 154.0 lbs vs 113.9 lbs), and a greater number of patients referred from the community because of prenatal complications. However, the family medicine patients had a higher incidence of premature rupture of membranes (26 percent vs 11 percent), and were therefore at risk for several complications. Family medicine nulliparas had first stages of labor which lasted an average of 12.2 hours as opposed to obstetric service nulliparas whose first stages averaged only 9.2 hours. There were more family medicine than obstetric service patients who received no anesthesia (18.0 percent vs 10.2 percent). Elective low forceps were used more often by obstetric service physicians than by family physicians (28.2 percent vs 15.3 percent). Mothers on the family medicine service had more puerperal complications than those on the obstetric service (16.0 percent vs 5.6 percent). No serious discrepancies in quality of care could be found between the two services.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical diagnosis and the order of information.

BACKGROUND: Information order can influence judgment. However, it remains unclear whether the order of clinical data affects physicians' interpretations of these data when they are engaged in familiar diagnostic tasks. METHODS: Of 400 randomly selected family physicians who were given a questionnaire involving a brief written scenario about a young woman with acute dysuria, 315 (79%) returned usable responses. The physicians had been randomized into two groups, and both groups had received the same clinical information but in different orders. After learning the patient's chief complaint, physicians received either the patient's history and physical examination results followed by the laboratory data (the H&P-first group) or the laboratory data followed by the history and physical examination results (the H&P-last group). The results of the history and physical examination were supportive of the diagnosis of UTI, while the laboratory data were not. All physicians judged the probability of a urinary tract infection (UTI) after each piece of information. RESULTS: The two groups had similar mean estimates of the probability of a UTI after learning the chief complaint (67.4% vs 67.8%, p = 0.85). At the end of the scenario, the H&P-first group judged UTI to be less likely than did the H&P-last group (50.9% vs 59.1%, p = 0.03) despite having identical information. Comparison of the mean likelihood ratios attributed to the clinical information showed that the H&P-first group gave less weight to the history and physical than did the H&P-last group (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The order in which clinical information was presented influenced physicians' estimates of the probability of disease. The clinical history and physical examination were given more weight by physicians who received this information last.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Community attitudes and knowledge about advance care directives.

BACKGROUND: Patients and their physicians are increasingly being encouraged to discuss end-of-life decisions. The purpose of this study was to enhance understanding of the public's attitudes and knowledge about medical decision making and advance care directives. METHODS: Eight focus groups of community members discussed their understanding of and attitudes about advance care directives. Transcripts of these discussions were analyzed using coding categories created from the transcripts. RESULTS: Eighty-three people attended the focus groups. Most discussions of advance care directives involved family members in the setting of family or personal illness. Elderly persons commonly confused wills with living wills. Most who had given advance directives did so either to make others follow their wishes or to ease family burdens. Among the great variety of reasons for not using advance directives was a perceived lack of personal relevance, as well as conceptual, moral, and practical difficulties. Participants were divided about whether it was appropriate for physicians to initiate discussions about life-sustaining care with their patients. We discerned three themes affecting individuals' opinions about personal decision making about advance directives: (1) trust in family and the medical system, (2) need for control, and (3) knowledge about advance directives. CONCLUSIONS: Although living wills are advocated by many authorities, and many of our participants endorsed their use, our participants also cited numerous cautions and impediments to their use. As the role of advance care directives changes, physicians will need to be aware of their patients' perceptions, as well as the legalities of these documents.

Adult↗