Immunotherapy of metastatic renal cell cancer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J Verweij.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A survey by Coates and co-workers in 1983 revealed that patients ranked nausea and vomiting as the most distressing side effects of chemotherapy. In the last decade the use of high-dose metoclopramide and, especially, the introduction of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, have been major leaps forward in the control of chemotherapy-induced emesis. Nevertheless, since patients still consider nausea and vomiting to be the most distressing side effect of their chemotherapy there is clearly a need for further improvements. Acute emesis, which is the topic of this review, can now be controlled in the majority of patients during their first course of chemotherapy. Future focus should be on better control of emesis during subsequent courses of chemotherapy as well as on better control of delayed emesis.
PURPOSE: Topotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor with preclinical activity against various tumor types. We conducted a large multicenter phase II study with topotecan in ovarian cancer in patients who had failed to respond to one prior cisplatin-based chemotherapeutic regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/d was administered intravenously by 30-minute infusion for 5 days repeated every 3 weeks. As the cisplatin-free interval relates to response in subsequent treatment, patients were stratified in subgroups, ie, cisplatin-refractory, cisplatin-resistant, and cisplatin-sensitive. RESULTS: One-hundred eleven patients entered the study. Nineteen patients were considered to be ineligible; 92 patients were assessable for response. A total of 552 courses were given (median, four per patient; range, one to 17). The major toxicities were leukocytopenia and neutropenia, which were grade 3 to 4 in 54.2% and 69.1% of courses, respectively, but with only 4.3% of these being grade 4 neutropenia plus fever or infectious complications. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given in 20.5% of courses to maintain dose-intensity. Other relatively frequent side effects were alopecia (82%), nausea (36.4%), and vomiting (17.5%). The overall response rate was 16.3%, with one complete response (CR) and 14 partial responses (PRs). In the cisplatin-refractory, cisplatin-resistant, and cisplatin-sensitive strata, the response rates were 5.9%, 17.8%, and 26.7%, respectively. The median duration of time of documented response was 21.7 weeks (range, 4.6 to 41.9). CONCLUSION: Topotecan in a daily-times-five schedule is an effective regimen as second-line treatment in ovarian cancer. Further investigations of topotecan in ovarian cancer, including first-line use and combination with other active agents, are indicated.
PURPOSE: Several investigators have reported that the efficacy of 5HT3 receptor antagonists is maintained over repeated cycles of chemotherapy. These investigators presented conditional probabilities of protection. Because conditional analyses by definition only include patients with protection in previous cycles, the results are flattered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We applied a novel statistical approach to investigate whether the efficacy of the 5HT3 receptor antagonist ICS 205-930 (tropisetron) is maintained over repeated cycles of weekly high-dose cisplatin. Overall protection was determined based on cumulative probabilities with the Kaplan-Meier method. Complete protection was calculated with a three state model for transitional probabilities. Eighty-three patients were studied. RESULTS: Over six consecutive cycles, protection against both acute and delayed emesis decreased significantly. The initial complete and overall protection rates against acute emesis of 71% and 95%, respectively, decreased to 43% and 72% in the sixth cycle of chemotherapy. Similarly, the protection rates of 31% and 68% against delayed emesis decreased to 6% and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that overall and complete long-term protection is more accurately measured by cumulative probabilities than with a method that is based on conditional probabilities. Our statistical approach shows that the efficacy of 5HT3 antagonists is not maintained.
PURPOSE: To perform a phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of ZD1694 (Tomudex, Alderley Park, United Kingdom), a new folate-based thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor, in patients with advanced malignancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 1991 to January 1993, 61 patients with a range of solid tumor received 161 courses of ZD1694 given as a single 15-minute intravenous infusion every 3 weeks, at escalating doses from 0.1 to 3.5 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed with the first two courses of treatment. There were 33 men and 28 women with a median age of 53 years (range, 21 to 73). Fifty-five patients (90%) had previously received chemotherapy. RESULTS: Reversible liver toxicity and dose-related gastrointestinal (GI) and bone marrow toxicity occurred at > or = 1.6 mg/m2. Liver function usually returned to normal with repeated treatment, but GI and bone marrow toxicities generally became more severe. No renal toxicity was observed. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was 3.5 mg/m2, at which, in addition to antiproliferative toxicities, four of six patients (67%) developed severe malaise that consisted of anorexia, nausea, and asthenia, with rapidly decreasing performance status that limited re-treatment. Abnormal liver function was also seen in four patients (67%). At 3.0 mg/m2, grades III and IV diarrhea were seen in six of 23 patients (26%) and grade IV myelosuppression in two others. Liver toxicity was self-limiting and not associated with severe malaise. Two patients had a partial response to treatment. PK analysis showed that plasma elimination was triexponential, with pronounced variability in the mean terminal half-life (t1/2gamma) for a given dose ranging from 8.2 to 105 hours. There was a linear relationship between dose and both the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax), but no clear association between these parameters and response or toxicity. CONCLUSION: The dose of ZD1694 recommended for phase II trials is 3.0 mg/m2.
PURPOSE: Topotecan is a specific inhibitor of topoisomerase I. Preclinical data have indicated that topoisomerase I inhibitors demonstrate more efficacy and have a greater therapeutic index with prolonged continuous exposure. The feasibility of this concept in humans using a 21-day continuous infusion of topotecan has been reported. We conducted a phase II study of this 21-day continuous topotecan administration schedule in patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Topotecan, initially applied at a dose of 0.6 mg/m2/d, was administered as a continuous infusion via an ambulatory pump for 21 days repeated every 4 weeks. The starting dose was reduced to 0.5 mg/m2/d, because in five of the first 11 patients, the second course had to be delayed due to prolonged myelosuppression. Forty-two patients entered the study; one patient was ineligible and was excluded from further analyses. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 10%, with one complete and three partial responses. The median response duration was 7 months (range, 4 to 11). With this schedule, the major toxicity was prolonged cumulative myelosuppression, including a marked inhibition of erythropoiesis. A total transfusion of 250 U of erythrocytes was needed to maintain a hemoglobin level greater than 6.0 mmol/L. Other side effects were mild, and included alopecia (47%), periodic nausea (40%)/vomiting (22%), and fatigue (16%). Pharmacokinetic evaluation showed a mean steady-state plasma concentration (Css) of topotecan of 0.62 ng/mL (range, 0.33 to 1.1), with a significant relationship between the Css of topotecan and common cytotoxicity criteria (CTC) grade of leukocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Topotecan administered as a 21-day continuous infusion exerts minor activity as single-agent therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Docetaxel, a new semisynthetic taxoid used as an antineoplastic agent, induced a predominantly sensory neuropathy in 20 of 41 patients. We assessed neurotoxicity in all patients participating in four phase II trials conducted in our institution. The neuropathy was evaluated by a clinical sum-score for symptoms and signs and by measurement of the Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT). The severity of neuropathy was graded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria. Neuropathic symptoms were mild in most patients. However, at cumulative doses above 600 mg/m2, 3 of 15 patients developed a moderate and 1 of 15 patients a severe neuropathy. There was a significant correlation between the cumulative dose of docetaxel and the post-treatment sum-score (p = 0.002). We found no correlation between post-treatment VPT and clinical sum-score or between post-treatment VPT and the cumulative dose of docetaxel. We conclude that docetaxel produced a mild and predominantly sensory neuropathy in a high proportion of treated patients. This neurotoxicity appeared to be dose dependent and may be severe and disabling at higher dose levels. Determination of the VPT is not a reliable method to monitor docetaxel-induced neuropathy.
A number of novel anticancer agents have emerged during the past few decades, which show high activity in preclinical tumour models and promising activity in early trials in patients with solid tumours. Most of the agents have novel and unique mechanisms of action, and show activity against a variety of malignancies, including tumours which are notoriously resistant to systemic treatment. Recently, our understanding of the molecular basis of cancer has increased considerably. This is reflected in the development of agents that are directed at well defined molecular targets, such as the mitotic tubulin/microtubuli system (taxoids), nuclear enzymes (topoisomerase I inhibitors) and cell signal transduction pathways (protein kinase C inhibitors). In addition, significant advances have been made in our understanding of mechanisms of toxicity, especially of cisplatin. This has resulted in the development of agents modulating cisplatin toxicity, among which amifostine (WR-2721) is one of the most promising. The outlined emerging drug therapies with novel anticancer agents and treatment modalities will, it is hoped, result in increased response rates of advanced tumours, longer disease-free and total survival and better palliative care.
Antitumor activity of topotecan, a new derivative of camptothecin, has been documented in many tumors. The active lactone form of topotecan is in equilibrium with the inactive hydroxyacid form. However, dose-limiting toxicity, neutropenia, is correlated to the area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of not only the lactone form but also total (lactone + hydroxyacid) topotecan. Because the determination of the total topotecan plasma concentration is technically much easier than the lactone, we sought to establish a limited sampling model for the AUC of total topotecan. Thirty-four pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained in 19 patients in a Phase I study of topotecan, which was infused over 30 min for 5 days. Multiple regression models predicting the AUC were developed using 17 profiles and validated using the rest of the data. The best model was: AUCpred (ng x h/ml) = 1.75 x C15m (ng/ml) + 11.2 x C6h (ng/ml) + 7.90 x dose (mg/m2), where AUCpred was the AUC predicted by the model, and C15m and C6h were the measured concentrations of total topotecan at 15 min and 6 h after the end of infusion, respectively. When this model was validated, it was unbiased (percentage of mean predicted error +/- SE, -1.0 +/- 3.3%) and precise (percentage of root mean square error, 11%). Because this model requires only two concentrations of total topotecan to estimate the AUC, it will be useful for further pharmacodynamic evaluation of topotecan in multi-institutional studies.
BACKGROUND: Because of the relative scarcity of natural paclitaxel (Taxol), which has been recently recognized as a highly cytotoxic agent for use in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer, synthetic and semisynthetic substitutes have been actively pursued. Docetaxel (Taxotere), a new semisynthetic taxoid, has been selected for clinical development because it is twice as potent as paclitaxel in promoting assembly of tubulin and in inhibiting microtubule depolymerization. Docetaxel also shows equal or greater cytotoxicity in relevant preclinical models. PURPOSE: Because docetaxel has produced consistent antitumor responses in ovarian cancer patients in phase I trials, we planned and conducted a phase II clinical trial to evaluate the drug's effectiveness and its toxic effects. METHODS: The present trial, which started in May 1992 and ended in December 1992, involved 97 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The target study population had disease relapse or disease progression within 12 months of the last administration of a first-line or second-line platinum-based regimen with at least one bidimensionally measurable target lesion. The patients received docetaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m2 given as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks without premedication for minimizing potential hypersensitivity. Docetaxel-induced side effects were graded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 23.6% in 76 assessable patients versus 20% if all 90 eligible patients were included in the comparison (95% confidence interval [CI] = 11%-29%). Among 34 eligible patients whose tumor progressed on the most recent platinum treatment, the response rate was 23.5% (95% CI = 8%-39%). The median progression-free survival for all eligible patients was 3.9 months, and the median overall survival was 8.4 months. Docetaxel-associated toxicity in 90 assessable patients consisted of short-lived neutropenia in 81 (90%) patients, which was complicated by fever and hospitalization in seven (8%); hypersensitivity reactions were seen in 29 (31%) patients, with significant reactions seen in seven (8%); and neurotoxicity in 43 (48%) patients, with grade 3 or above toxicity seen in only three (3%). The treatment also produced skin reactions in 58 (64%) patients, of whom only four (4%) showed the intensity of grade 3. Eleven (12%) patients experienced pleural effusions, which were the effects of the drug considered to be of greatest concern. Peripheral edema and weight gain due to fluid retention were reported in 40 (44%) and 17 (19%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel appears to be effective in the treatment of platinum-refractory ovarian cancer patients.
In a phase II study, 27 patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with oral etoposide as second-line chemotherapy at a dose of 50 mg/m2/day for 21 days, which courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for response, and twenty-five for toxicity. In two (10%) patients a partial response was observed with a duration of 60 and 122 weeks respectively, and seven patients (33%) showed stable disease. Gastrointestinal toxicity was usually mild, though relatively frequent. Anemia grade II and III was observed in 20% of all courses (< 10% of all measurements), and leukopenia grade III and IV was observed in 22% of all courses (< 10% of all measurements). There was one toxic death. Reviewing the literature we calculated a response rate of intravenous etoposide treatment of 8% in 276 patients with metastatic breast cancer from 7 studies (response rates ranging between 0-14%), while (chronic) oral treatment caused a response rate of 19% in 145 patients from 8 different studies (response rates ranging between 0-35%).
Topotecan is a novel semisynthetic derivative of the anticancer agent camptothecin and inhibits the intranuclear enzyme topoisomerase I. The lactone structure of topotecan, which is in equilibrium with the inactive ring-opened hydroxy acid, is essential for this activity. The open form predominates at physiological pH. We performed a pharmacokinetic study as part of a phase I study in patients with various types of solid tumors, where topotecan was administered in a 30-min infusion daily on 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. The plasma kinetics of topotecan could be described best using an open two-compartment model with t1/2(alpha) and t1/2(beta) of 8.1 (range 0.3 to 40.7) min and 132 (range 49 to 286) min, respectively. The plasma concentration-time profiles of the metabolite, however, could be described using a one-compartment model with t1/2(formation) of 29.0 (range 5.6-99.5) min and t1/2 (elimination of 123.2 (range 32-265) min, respectively. The lactone was the predominate form during the first hour from the start of infusion, but was rapidly converted into its ring-opened structure. The elimination rate of topotecan was independent of the dose. There were linear relationships between the dose (mg m-2 day-1), the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of topotecan and its metabolite, the total AUC, peak plasma lactone concentrations, and the time period that the topotecan concentrations remained above 10 nM. Different models were used to correlate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. The percentage decrease in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was related to these parameters and plots were well fitted by linear and sigmoidal Emax models.
We investigated the potential of cross-over to the serotonin receptor (5HT3) antagonist ondansetron after protection failure with tropisetron. Several cases of complete protection were observed. These limited data suggest that there is an indication for retreatment with a different 5HT3 antagonist after an initial failure to another and also stress the need and relevance for comparative studies between 5HT3 antagonists.
Docetaxel is a new semi-synthetic taxoid, which acts as an antimicrotubule agent and is now clinically available. Clinical studies of docetaxel as a single agent and in combination with other cytotoxic drugs reveals favourable response rates in a number of solid tumor types. Docetaxel appears to have great potential in advanced breast cancer as first or secondline chemotherapy. The dose-limiting toxicity is an early and short-lasting neutropenia. Fluid retention is a cumbersome, sometimes disabling, side-effect. Other side-effects are usually mild and include alopecia, myalgia, mucostitis, neuropathy, hypersensitivity reaction, nail changes and cutaneous reactions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Docetaxel has been evaluated in six tumour types in a total of 189 patients entered into phase II studies. Treatment consisted of a 1 h intravenous infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks. No premedication was administered for possible hypersensitivity reactions. Docetaxel was found to be effective as first-line chemotherapy for head and neck cancer (response rate 44%) gastric cancer (23%) and melanoma (14%) and as second-line chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas (21%; 95% confidence interval: 7.5%-43.7%). The results in colorectal and renal cancer were disappointing, with response rates of less than 10%. The most frequent adverse effects were alopecia (81%), grade III-IV leukocytopenia of short duration (66%) and skin reactions (52%). Hypersensitivity reactions were mild and occurred in 26% of patients. Docetaxel is an important new drug in the treatment of solid tumours.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.