Biomedical subjects

J Verweij

Publications and source records attributed to J Verweij.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

The bioavailability of oral GI147211 (GG211), a new topoisomerase I inhibitor.

Topoisomerase I inhibitors are new compounds of interest for cancer chemotherapy. We performed a study with GI147211, a new semisynthetic camptothecin analogue, to determine the absolute bioavailability of the drug given orally. Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of a solid tumour refractory to standard forms of therapy were eligible for the study. GI147211 was given orally on day 1 and as a 30-min infusion daily on days 2-5. The treatment course was repeated every 3 weeks. In subsequent patient cohorts, the dose of the oral formulation was escalated from 1.5 mg m(-2) to 6.0 mg m(-2); the dose for i.v. administration was fixed at 1.2 mg m(-2). Plasma pharmacokinetics was performed on day 1 and 2 of the first course and on day 1 of the second course using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay. Nineteen patients were entered into the study; one patient was not evaluable because the treatment course was stopped prematurely. Eighteen patients received a total of 47 treatment courses. The absolute bioavailability of GI147211 averaged 1.3 +/- 5.2%. Drug appeared quickly in plasma with a median Tmax at 0.5 h. Fasting or fed state had no significant influence on the bioavailability of GI147211. The terminal half-life after administration of oral GI147211 was 6.85 +/- 3.13 h, similar to the half-life after intravenous administration. The major toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Nadirs for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred on day 8 and day 15 respectively. Other toxicities predominantly consisted of mild and infrequent nausea and vomiting, and fatigue. The oral administration of the drug is well tolerated. Oral administration of topoisomerase I inhibitor GI147211 results in a low bioavailability with relatively wide interpatient variation. The intravenous route of administration is advised for further development of this promising topoisomerase I inhibitor.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1997

Topoisomerase I inhibitors: the relevance of prolonged exposure for present clinical development.

Topoisomerase I inhibitors constitute a new class of anti-cancer agents. Recently, topotecan and irinotecan were registered for clinical use in ovarian cancer and colorectal cancer respectively. Cytotoxicity of topoisomerase I inhibitors is S-phase specific, and in vitro and in vivo studies have suggested that, for efficacy, prolonged exposure might be more important than short-term exposure to high concentration. Clinical development of those topoisomerase I inhibitors that have reached this stage is also focused on schedules aiming to achieve prolonged exposure. In this review, we summarize all published preclinical studies on this topic for topoisomerase I inhibitors in clinical development, namely 20-S-camptothecin, 9-nitro-camptothecin, 9-amino-camptothecin, topotecan, irinotecan and GI147211. In addition, preliminary data on clinical studies concerning this topic are also reviewed. The data suggest that prolonged exposure may indeed be relevant for anti-tumour activity. However, the optimal schedule is yet to be determined. Finally, clinical data are yet too immature to draw definitive conclusions.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy: the influence of 5HT3 antagonists.

In 1983, Coates conducted a survey that ranked the side-effects perceived by patients receiving chemotherapy in the order of their severity. Vomiting and nausea were found to be the two most distressing side-effects. They have an impact on quality of life and compliance with treatment. The development of 5HT3 antagonists has been a major step forward in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Presently, these antiemetics are routinely used as concomitant therapy in emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of 5HT3 antagonists on patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy. Coates' survey was replicated in patients who received 5HT3 antagonists for acute nausea and vomiting resulting from emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients received the survey to identify those physical and non-physical side-effects that they attributed to chemotherapy and were asked to rank the five most distressing side-effects. Of the 197 patients who consented to take part in the study, 181 were evaluable. Nausea, hair loss and vomiting were described as the three most distressing side-effects of chemotherapy. Eighty per cent of all the patients actually experienced nausea and 57% experienced vomiting. Hair loss appeared to be more distressing to women (P < 0.001) but, in other aspects, gender, age and marital status did not influence the ranking of the three most distressing side-effects. Constipation was ranked as 6th and was not identified as a distressing side-effect in 1983. Nausea and vomiting remain to be the first and third most distressing side-effects of chemotherapy, even though the incidence and severity of acute nausea and vomiting are now significantly reduced.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Peripheral neuropathy induced by combination chemotherapy of docetaxel and cisplatin.

Docetaxel, a new semisynthetic taxoid that has demonstrated promising activity as an antineoplastic agent, was administered in combination with cisplatin to 63 patients in a dose-escalating study. As both drugs were known to be potentially neurotoxic, peripheral neurotoxicity was prospectively assessed in detail. Neuropathy was evaluated by clinical sum-score for signs and symptoms and by measurement of the vibration perception threshold (VPT). The severity of neuropathy was graded according to the National Cancer Institute's 'Common Toxicity Criteria'. The docetaxel-cisplatin combination chemotherapy induced a predominantly sensory neuropathy in 29 (53%) out of 55 evaluable patients. At cumulative doses of both cisplatin and docetaxel above 200 mg m(-2), 26 (74%) out of 35 patients developed a neuropathy which was mild in 15, moderate in ten and severe in one patient. Significant correlations were present between both the cumulative dose of docetaxel and cisplatin and the post-treatment sum-score of neuropathy (P < 0.01) as well as the post-treatment VPT (P < 0.01). The neurotoxic effects of this combination were more severe than either cisplatin or docetaxel as single agent at similar doses.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Phase I and pharmacologic study of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin and to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the side effects with an emphasis on sequence-dependent side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were not pretreated with taxanes or cisplatin derivatives and who had received no more than one prior combination chemotherapy regimen or two single-agent regimens were entered. Treatment consisted of docetaxel given as a 1-hour infusion followed by cisplatin as a 3-hour infusion (schedule A), or cisplatin followed by docetaxel (schedule B). Docetaxel doses ranged from 55 to 100 mg/m2 and cisplatin doses from 50 to 100 mg/m2. RESULTS: Leukocytopenia and granulocytopenia were common (overall, 90%; grade 3 or 4, 87%), short-lasting, and docetaxel dose-dependent. Infections and neutropenic fever occurred in 10% and 4.5% of courses, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild to moderate and included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, mucositis, neurotoxicity, fluid retention, and skin and nail toxicity. There were no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between schedules A and B. Tumor responses included one complete response (CR) and nine partial responses (PRs). CONCLUSION: The dose levels docetaxel 100 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and docetaxel 85 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 appeared to be manageable. At these dose levels, the median relative dose-intensity was high and 81% and 88% of all cycles, respectively, could be given at full dose. Schedule A is advocated for further treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral topotecan administered twice daily for 21 days to adult patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Topotecan is a specific inhibitor of topoisomerase I. Recently bioavailability of an oral formulation of approximately 30% with limited variability was reported. We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral formulation of topotecan to characterize the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor effects in patients with refractory malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with oral topotecan given twice daily for 21 days, with cycles repeated every 28 days. In subsequent cohorts, the dose was escalated from 0.15 to 0.6 mg/m2 twice daily. Pharmacokinetics were performed on day 1 and 8 of the first course using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients entered the study; one patient was not assessable for toxicity and response as therapy was prematurely interrupted on request of the patient who had not experienced toxicity. Thirty patients received a total of 59 courses. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at a dose of 0.6 mg/m2 twice daily and consisted of diarrhea, which started subacutely at a median onset on day 15 (range, 12 to 20) and resolved after a median of 8 days (range, 7 to 16). Other toxicities were mild, including leukocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting. The MTD was 0.5 mg/m2 twice daily. No responses were observed. Pharmacokinetics showed a substantial variation of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve at time point "t" [AUC(t)] of topotecan and ring-opened product hydroxyacid. A significant correlation was observed between the percentage of decrease in WBC count versus the AUC(t) of topotecan (r = .75), which was modeled by a sigmoidal maximal effect concentration (Emax) function. CONCLUSION: The DLT in this phase I study for chronic oral topotecan for 21 days was diarrhea. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 0.5 mg/m2 twice daily.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1997

Topotecan, a new active drug in the second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study in patients with refractory and sensitive disease. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group and New Drug Development Office, and the Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: To assess activity and toxicity of topotecan in previously treated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable SCLC, progressive after one first-line regimen, were eligible for the study. Two groups of patients were selected: (1) patients who failed first-line treatment < or = 3 months from chemotherapy discontinuation (refractory group); and (2) patients who responded to first-line treatment and progressed greater than 3 months after chemotherapy discontinuation (sensitive group). Topotecan was administered as a 30-minute daily infusion at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred one patients were entered onto the study and 403 courses were administered. Ninety-two patients (47 refractory and 45 sensitive) were eligible and assessable for response. Among refractory patients, there were two partial responses (PRs) and one complete response (CR), for an overall response rate of 6.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3% to 17.6%), whereas in the sensitive group, there were 11 PRs and six CRs, for an overall response rate of 37.8% (95% CI, 23.8% to 53.5%). Overall median duration of response was 7.6 months. Median survival was 5.4 months; median survival of refractory patients was 4.7 months, whereas that of sensitive patients was 6.9 months (P = .002). Median survival of responding patients was 12.5 months. Toxicity was mainly hematologic. Leukopenia, although short-lived, was universal, with grade III and IV neutropenia occurring in 28% and 46.8% of cycles, respectively. Nonhematological toxicity was mild. Fatigue/malaise was reported in 39.3% of cycles and transient elevation of liver enzymes in 17%. CONCLUSION: Topotecan has significant activity in SCLC, particularly in patients sensitive to prior chemotherapy, with predictable and manageable toxicity. The incorporation of topotecan in combination chemotherapy regimens for future treatment of SCLC is warranted.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

Review of phase I clinical studies with topotecan.

Topotecan (Hycamtin; SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA), a camptothecin analog, is a novel and specific inhibitor of the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase I. In preclinical studies, topotecan demonstrated significant in vitro activity in a variety of solid tumor explants derived from colorectal, breast, ovarian, renal cell, non-small cell lung cancer, and gastrointestinal sources. Notable activity was also demonstrated in vivo in a wide range of animal tumor models. A large number of phase I studies with topotecan have been conducted since 1992 in both adults and children with a broad range of refractory malignancies and as many as 14 different dosing schedules. Complete, partial, or minor responses were demonstrated in patients with recurrent or refractory neuroblastoma, non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer, esophageal cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma. The antitumor activity of topotecan in these phase I evaluations was associated more often with frequent or continuous dosing schedules compared with less frequent or short exposure schedules. Maximum tolerated doses were predominantly dependent on the dosing schedule used. Myelosuppression was the major dose-limiting toxicity across all schedules, and nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild. Data from phase I studies have provided valuable information about antitumor responses, maximum tolerated doses, and dose-limiting toxicities associated with different dosing schedules. Based on this information, there was substantial enthusiasm for further evaluating topotecan in a wide range of cancer patients in phase II studies.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Mitomycins.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Optimal sampling strategies for bayesian estimation of docetaxel (Taxotere) clearance.

Docetaxel activity has been documented in many solid tumors, including metastatic breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. However, as clinical studies in other tumor types are now being conducted, the validation of an optimal sampling strategy would allow the performance of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics studies with minimum inconvenience for the patient. Six optimal sampling strategies with one to six sampling times were computed, based on the D-optimality theory, using population pharmacokinetic parameters estimated from a large pharmacokinetic database of 547 patients treated in previous Phase II studies. Validation of these sampling strategies was performed on a set of 35 patients, from two Phase I studies, who received docetaxel as a 1-h infusion at doses ranging from 50 to 100 mg/m2. Validation consisted of comparing clearance assessed by maximum likelihood estimation obtained using complete plasma concentration-time data (considered as the reference) and clearance determined by Bayesian estimation with an optimal design. For all of the optimal sampling strategies tested, clearance was found to be well estimated when at least two samples were taken. Bayesian estimation with two measured levels (at the end of infusion and at 6 h after the start of infusion) can be selected, because it allows adequate estimation of clearance with a nonsignificant bias of +1.37% and a precision of 12.3%.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

PubMed1996

Adverse effect on bone marrow protection of prechemotherapy granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support.

BACKGROUND: Increased proliferation of endogenous bone marrow progenitor cells in response to the administration of hematopoietic growth factors, followed by reduced cell cycling or entrance of the cells into a quiescent state upon withdrawal of the growth factors, may have clinically relevant effects on the tolerance of the hematopoietic system to subsequent myelotoxic treatments. PURPOSE: We investigated the ability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to protect progenitor cells in the bone marrow of cancer patients from the toxic effects of subsequent treatments with chemotherapeutic agents. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with histologically documented, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin once every 3 weeks at a dose of 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide at a dose of 1000 mg/m2, with G-CSF administered either before and after chemotherapy (18 patients) or after chemotherapy only (18 patients). For prechemotherapy administration of G-CSF, recombinant human methionyl (r-met Hu) G-CSF was administered subcutaneously to patients twice per day for 5 days at a dose of 5 micrograms/kg, with the last dose given 48 hours before the start of chemotherapy. For postchemotherapy administration of G-CSF, r-met Hu G-CSF was administered subcutaneously to patients once per day for 7 days at a dose of 5 micrograms/kg, with the first dose given 24 hours after chemotherapy. RESULTS: The incidence or the duration of grade 4 neutropenia was not reduced in all patients by the use of prechemotherapy G-CSF; the incidence over all cycles of chemotherapy was 74% for patients treated with prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy G-CSF and 66% for patients treated with postchemotherapy G-CSF only (two-sided P, adjusted for dose = .21) and the median duration in both treatment arms was 3 days (two-sided P = .19). Unexpectedly, the incidence of grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was much greater in patients who received prechemotherapy G-CSF compared with those who did not (54% versus 6%, respectively, over all chemotherapy cycles; two-sided P, adjusted for dose < .001). No difference in the decrease in hemoglobin level (adjusted for red blood cell transfusions) between patients in the two treatment arms was observed. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: No beneficial effects were associated with the administration of G-CSF to cancer patients prior to chemotherapy. The observation of more severe thrombocytopenia in patients treated with prechemotherapy G-CSF led us to conclude that the proliferation of progenitor cells was still increased 48 hours after the last dose of G-CSF and that the administration of chemotherapy at or within this time period actually worsens the toxic effects on bone marrow. This result has important ramifications for the design of clinical cancer treatment protocols, especially those that involve shortened intervals between cycles of chemotherapeutic agent administration.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic fluorescence assay for the quantitation of topotecan (SKF 104864-A) and its lactone ring-opened product (hydroxy acid) in human plasma and urine.

A sensitive reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic fluorescence method is described for the simultaneous determination of topotecan (I) and the hydrolysed lactone ring-opened product hydroxy acid (II) in plasma and for the determination of I in urine. To 250 microliters of plasma, a 750-microliters volume of cold methanol was added to stabilize the pH-dependent conversion of I into II. In plasma, the lower limit of quantitation (LLQ) for both compounds was 0.10 ng/ml. The between-day variation for I at the LLQ was 7.1% and for II was 5.5%. Prior to injection, urine samples were acidified with orthophosphoric acid and diluted with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). In urine, the calibration curve for I was linear in the range of 10 to 250 ng/ml and the LLQ was 10 ng/ml. The assay was developed to enable pharmacological analysis of I, in on-going phase I and II studies, in patients with solid tumors.

Camptothecin↗

PubMed1996

Docetaxel and paclitaxel inhibit DNA-adduct formation and intracellular accumulation of cisplatin in human leukocytes.

The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanism of the pharmacodynamic interaction between docetaxel/paclitaxel and cisplatin. Cisplatin-induced DNA-adducts and cisplatin accumulation were quantitated in peripheral blood leukocytes (WBC). The WBC were obtained from patients treated with docetaxel or paclitaxel in phase I/II studies and were incubated in vitro with cisplatin. In addition, blank whole-blood samples were obtained from patients and healthy subjects and incubated in intro with cisplatin or docetaxel/paclitaxel and cisplatin. The cisplatin-induced DNA-adduct levels measured in WBC after treatment with docetaxel or paclitaxel were significantly lower than those determined in non-pretreated WBC. Docetaxel and paclitaxel reduced the intracellular accumulation of cisplatin in WBC by 46-47%. If the pharmacodynamic interaction between docetaxel/paclitaxel and cisplatin also occurs in other normal tissues such as bone marrow, it may well contribute to the sequence dependent toxicity that has been observed in clinical studies.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed1996

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topotecan given on a daily-times-five schedule in phase II clinical trials using a limited-sampling procedure.

Topotecan is a novel semisynthetic derivative of the anticancer agent camptothecin and inhibits the intranuclear enzyme topoisomerase I. The lactone structure of topotecan, which is in equilibrium with the inactive ring-opened hydroxy acid, is essential for this activity. We performed a pharmacokinetics study as part of phase II clinical trials in patients with various types of solid tumors, giving topotecan at 1.5 mg/m2 per day by 30-min infusion for 5 consecutive days, with courses being repeated every 3 weeks. Previously validated limited-sampling models, using concentration measurements in samples obtained 2 h after infusion, were used to calculate the area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUCs) for both chemical forms. Samples were obtained from a total of 36 patients over 136 treatment days. The mean AUC of the closed-ring form (AUC(closed)) was 8.74 (range 2.3-16.3 microM min per day, and the mean AUC of the ring-opened form (AUC(open)) was 11.5 (range 3.2-46.0) microM min per day (interpatient variability 34-61%). In each patient the AUC values achieved on the 1st day of administration were similar to and, thus, predictive for those achieved during the following days, with a day-to-day variation of 7.39% being recorded for the AUC(closed) and that of 12.6% for the AUC(open). There was no drug accumulation during the 5 consecutive treatment days of each cycle. However, despite the large interpatient pharmacokinetic variability, the importance of regular drug monitoring on this schedule can be questioned, as the pharmacodynamic variability was relatively small.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Comparison of ethanol plasma-protein precipitation with plasma ultrafiltration and trichloroacetic acid protein precipitation for the measurement of unbound platinum concentrations.

Sample preparation for the measurement of non-protein-bound platinum was evaluated by precipitation of plasma proteins with cold ethanol. The method was compared with the routinely used plasma ultrafiltration and with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) protein precipitation. After incubation of human plasma samples with cisplatin or carboplatin, unbound platinum concentrations were determined applying Amicon Diaflo ultrafiltration membranes and Millipore ultrafree-MC filters. For protein precipitation, 1 ml of cold (-20 degrees C) pure ethanol was added to 0.5 ml of human plasma and the supernatant was collected after 2 h, or 0.5 ml of cold 20% TCA was added to 0.5 ml of plasma. Platinum was analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). There was no significant difference between the ethanol and ultrafiltration methods in the unbound platinum concentration. The protein content in the supernatant (1.00 +/- 0.20%) was slightly higher than that in the Amicon (0.58 +/- 0.05%) and Millipore (0.55 +/- 0.04%) ultrafiltrates. On average, the TCA and ethanol method seemed to be equally appropriate. The ethanol precipitation method is concluded to be simple, convenient, and reproducible and has negligible costs.

Blood Proteins↗

PubMed1996

New promising anticancer agents in development: what comes next?

Anticancer drug development has recently shifted in part to development of more innovative anticancer agents. The increasing knowledge of the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in cancer cell growth has enabled the introduction of drug screening that is more mechanism-based. The realization that new targets should be preferentially evaluated as sites for anticancer drug treatment has led to the introduction of drugs such as the taxanes. Following this logic, several new drugs are being developed. Minor groove-binding agents such as carzelesin and oral platins lacking organ toxicity, such as JM216, have recently entered clinical studies. The activity of gemcitabine is a result of its being a cytidine analogue and being competitively incorporated by DNA; the drug has shown interesting activity in non-small-cell lung cancer and, although registration is imminent, issues regarding the optimal dose and administration schedule have yet to be resolved. Tomudex is a thymidylate synthase inhibitor with interesting activity in colorectal cancer. Activity in colorectal cancer is also of interest for irinotecan, the first clinically applied topoisomerase I inhibitor, an enzyme that is another example of a new target for anticancer drugs. Irinotecan has produced consistent response rates of 20-30% in six different studies in colorectal cancer. The other topoisomerase I inhibitor that is in the advanced stage of development is topotecan. This drug has shown activity in second-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer and small-cell lung cancer. Another interesting feature of topotecan is the availability of an oral formulation with consistent bioavailability. Drugs interfering with cellular signal transduction, such as the protein kinase C inhibitors, are in the development spotlight. Finally, the use of old drugs in new ways, such as immunoconjugates of doxorubicin, holds promise for the near future.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed1996

Phase II study of a short course of weekly high-dose cisplatin combined with long-term oral etoposide in metastatic malignant melanoma.

The results of cytostatic therapy in metastatic melanoma are very disappointing. In phase II studies with high-dose cisplatin regimens, a remarkably high response rate was observed. In a phase I study with a short course of weekly cisplatin, combined with oral etoposide, we were able to reach, in most patients, a cisplatin dose intensity of 60 mg/m2/week. We performed a phase II study with this schedule in metastatic malignant melanoma. 15 consecutive patients were entered in the study. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and days 29, 36, 43 combined with oral etoposide 50 mg daily, days 1-15 and days 29-43. Patients with a response or stable disease continued treatment with oral etoposide 50 mg/m2 daily, days 1-21 every 4 weeks. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The majority of the patients received six cycles of cisplatin with the planned cisplatin dose intensity of 60 mg/m2/week. A partial response was observed in 2 patients (13%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2-44%) of, respectively, 22 and 12 weeks; stable disease was observed in 6 patients. Toxicity consisted mainly of alopecia and bone marrow suppression. 4 patients had tinnitus, one patient had neurotoxicity grade 1. The regimen studied has only limited activity in metastatic melanoma in spite of the high-dose intensity of cisplatin reached with this schedule.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1996

EO9 phase II study in advanced breast, gastric, pancreatic and colorectal carcinoma by the EORTC Early Clinical Studies Group.

In a phase II trial, the activity of EO9, a new bioreductive alkylating agent, was assessed. EO9 was used as second-line chemotherapy in breast cancer patients and as first-line chemotherapy for patients with gastric, pancreatic and colorectal cancer. EO9 was given as a 5 min i.v. infusion at a weekly dose of 12 mg/m2. 92 patients were entered; 22 with breast cancer, 26 with colon cancer, 24 with pancreatic cancer and 20 with gastric cancer. In general, the drug was well tolerated with nausea and vomiting occurring in 26.42 and 13.3% of courses, respectively. Reversible proteinuria was the main toxicity occurring in 45% of courses. Antitumour activity was not observed. At this dose and schedule, EO9 is not an active drug in the type of tumour studied.

Adult↗