Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Vandromme

Publications and source records attributed to J Vandromme.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients.

BACKGROUND: Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic attempts to provide technological solutions to the inherent limitations of traditional laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to report the first experience of two teams concerning telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and malignant pathologies. METHODS: This study included 14 patients at the University Hospital Saint Pierre of Brussels (Belgium) and 16 patients at the Cancer Center of Nancy (France) from September 1999 to July 2003. RESULTS: The indications for surgery were uterine malignant diseases in 12 cases (stade I) (41%), and benign pathologies of the uterus in 18 cases (59%). Five postoperative complications (17%) occurred, none related to the robotic system. CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery can be safely performed in gynecologic and gynecologic-oncologic surgery with no increase in complication rates. A significant advance is represented by the surgeon's ergonomic improvement.

Adult↗

Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases.

Theoretically, in laparoscopic surgery, a computer interface in command of a mechanical system (robot) allows the surgeon: (1) to recover a number a number of lost degrees of freedom, thanks to intraabdominal articulations; (2) to obtain better visual control of instrument manipulation, thanks to three-dimensional vision; (3) to modulate the amplitude of surgical motions by downscaling and stabilization; (4) to work at a distance from the patient. These advances improve the quality of surgical tasks in a perfect ergonomic position. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing a robot in laparoscopic surgery. The first robot-assisted procedure in humans was performed in March 1997 by our team. One hundred forty-six patients underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Between March 1997 and February 2001 a nonconsecutive series was performed of 39 antireflux procedures, 48 cholecystectomies, 28 tubal reanastomoses, 10 gastroplasties for obesity, 3 inguinal hernias, 3 intrarectal procedures, 2 hysterectomies, 2 cardiac procedures, 2 prostactectomies, 2 arteriovenous fistulas, 1 lumbar sympathectomy, 1 appendectomy, 1 laryngeal exploration, 1 varicocele ligation, 1 endometriosis cure, 1 neosalpingostomy, 1 deferent canal. The robot (Da Vinci system, Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, CA), consists of a console and a cart with three articulated robot arms. The surgeon sits in front of the console, manipulating joysticklike handles while observing the operative field through binoculars that provide a three-dimensional picture. This computer is capable of modulating these data by eliminating physiologic tremor and by downscaling the amplitude of motions by a factor 5 or 3 to one. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of several laparoscopic robotic procedures. There is no morbidity related to the system. Operating time and the hospital stay were within acceptable limits. The system seems most beneficial in intra-abdominal microsurgery or for manipulations in a very small space. Optimized ergonomics and increased mobility of the instrument tips are beneficial in many steps of abdominal surgical procedures.

Feasibility Studies↗

Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and reproducibility of laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis using a remote-controlled robot. DESIGN: Descriptive case study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): Eight patients with previous laparoscopic tubal sterilization who requested tubal reanastomosis. INTERVENTION(S): Systematization of the operative steps for laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis using a remote-controlled robot. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome measures were feasibility and reproducibility; secondary measures were tubal patency, operative time, complications, and ergonomic qualities. RESULT(S): The 16 tubes were successfully reanastomosed and patency was confirmed. The mean time that the robotic system was in use was 140 minutes, and mean surgical time was 52 minutes per tube. CONCLUSION(S): Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis after tubal sterilization can be performed using a remote-controlled robotic system. The robot, which has three-dimensional vision, allows the surgeon to perform ultraprecise manipulations with intraabdominal articulated instruments while providing the necessary degrees of freedom. Systematization of the operative steps allowed performance of the operation at a speed that compares favorably with the time needed for open microsurgical techniques. Larger series are needed to assess postoperative pregnancy rates.

Adult↗

Prescription attitudes among gynecologists towards two particular risk factors of osteoporosis: the patient's age and her bone mineral density.

OBJECTIVE: The present report assesses, among Belgian gynecologists, the effect of age and bone mineral density on osteoporosis prescription strategy in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Charts of postmenopausal women were summarized. We constructed cases by modifying some parameters. Ten years of age were added or subtracted to the real age of the patient. The bone mineral density (BMD) result was also modified (three levels: normal BMD, osteopenia, osteoporosis). A total of 612 cases were constructed. Twelve cases were sent out of these 612 files to every Belgian gynecologist (n = 1010). For each chart the gynecologists were asked whether they would treat the patient with HRT. They were also asked whether they would prescribe other therapies than HRT and if so, which ones. RESULTS: The chance to have an osteoporosis prevention or treatment prescribed increased when BMD decreased (respectively 57.4% for normal BMD, 73.1% for osteopenia cases and 89.4% for osteoporosis cases; P < 0.001). HRT was the most frequently prescribed medication (67% of the cases), but its prescription rate does not reflect only osteoporosis prevention. Nevertheless, for similar cases with osteopenia, the HRT prescription rate increased by a factor 1.25 and for similar cases with osteoporosis, HRT prescription rate increased by a factor 1.39. Calcium was the 2nd most frequent prescribed regimen. It was prescribed in 17% of the cases. A 3.4-fold increase for osteopenia cases and 7.6-fold increase for osteoporosis cases was observed, compared to women with normal BMD. When calcium was prescribed, it was in association with HRT in 64% of the osteopenia cases and in 76% of osteoporosis cases. Other drugs were less often prescribed. For the "younger age group", that is, with a mean age of 55 years, a prescription rate of 82.9% for any osteoporosis regimen was reached, whereas in the age group that was 10 years older a 20% lower prescription rate was reached (62.6%, P < 0.001). This was mostly due to a decrease in HRT prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription of medication known to reduce osteoporosis occurred more often in cases with low BMD. In the older patients with osteoporosis, gynecologists prescribed HRT less frequently. This was not compensated by a higher prescription rate of other medication.

Adult↗

Educating patients about the benefits and drawbacks of hormone replacement therapy.

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) influences many aspects of health: climacteric symptoms, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, breast and endometrial cancer, thrombosis and emboli, and Alzheimer's disease. A decision to use HRT may depend on a woman's individual views of the menopausal transition, the postmenopause and its consequences. It is therefore useful that the health provider inquiries about and discusses these issues in a cultural and family context. Health providers and patients should be thoroughly informed about the symptoms associated with hormonal deprivation, the associated risks of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease, and the potential of HRT to prevent these afflictions. Recent studies suggest that HRT might be particularly beneficial in women who have an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (because of left ventricular hypertrophy, diabetes mellitus, hypertension or hypercholesterolaemia, or because they smoke) or osteoporosis. In women who are undecided about HRT, a low bone mineral density measurement might help convince them to start using, or to continue using, HRT. There is also a need to discuss with the patient the effect of HRT on cancer risk. In most instances, women can be reassured about the risk of endometrial cancer. The risk of breast cancer should be carefully considered and discussed with each patient before beginning HRT. In most cases, HRT should not be withheld because of fears about breast cancer, because the protective effects of HRT against cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis outweigh the possible increased risk of breast cancer. When HRT is prescribed, individual regiments should be discussed with the patient, who must be warned of the possible adverse effects. In older women, HRT can be started at half the normal dosage and tolerability assessed before increasing the dosage further.

Age Factors↗

[Pharmacoeconomics of menopause treatments: epidemiological data and hormonal and non-hormonal prescription attitude of Belgian gynecologists].

In an economic analysis one has not only to consider costs induced by hormonal substitution therapy (HRT) but also its impact health. Different therapy costs will be considered and related to potential benefits on health. HRT decreases the incidence of symptoms of the menopause, the risk of osteoporosis and perhaps the incidence of coronary hearth disease and the risk of Alzheimer disease but probably increases the incidence of breast cancer. For a majority of women, the favorable impact seems to dominate, increasing their life expectancy.

Aged↗

Factors influencing the prescription of hormone replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of age, bone mineral density, risk of cardiovascular disease, and of breast cancer on the prevalence of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prescriptions. METHODS: Seventeen charts of postmenopausal women were summarized. For each chart, we constructed 36 different cases by modifying the age (two levels), the bone mineral density (three levels), the cardiovascular risk (three levels), and the breast cancer risk (two levels). Twelve cases of these 612 files were sent to each Belgian gynecologist (n = 1010). RESULTS: Overall, HRT was prescribed in 67% of the cases. It was prescribed in 54.6% of women who had a normal bone mass, 67.9% of women with a low bone mass, and 79.0% of those with osteoporosis (P < .001). The prescription rate was higher in younger women (mean +/- standard deviation 55 +/- 4 years) than in their peers who were 10 years older (79.3% versus 55.2%; p < .001). No significant variation was observed in relation to the cardiovascular risk profile or to breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis is associated with an increased rate and older age with a decreased rate of HRT prescription, whereas no difference is observed in association with cardiovascular or breast cancer risk.

Age Factors↗

Effect of bone density evaluation on hormone replacement therapy prescription.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates whether Bone Mineral Density (BMD) results influence HRT prescription. METHODS: Successive charts of 29 postmenopausal women were summarised. For each chart, 3 'simulated cases' were created by modifying the BMD result (based on the Z-score) in order to have 4 groups with the same clinical story but a wide range of BMD values (Group I = Z-score > 0, Group II = Z-score between 0 and -1, Group III = Z-score between -1 and -2 and Group IV = Z-score < -2). The obtained cases were presented to 10 gynaecologists who were asked whether HRT should be prescribed. The gynaecologists were not aware of the above-mentioned manipulation. RESULTS: The overall treatment rate was 74.2%, ranging from 65% for women with the highest BMD (Group I), 73% for Group II, 79% for Group III and 80% for Group IV, i.e. women with the lowest BMD (Friedman analysis of variance; chi-square 17.2; P < 0.001). In approximately a third of the patients (11/29), there was agreement for initiation of therapy, regardless of the BMD. Most of these women presented other indications and no contra-indications for therapy. The prescription frequency of the 10 gynaecologists varied between 63% and 87%; Cochran Q Statistic 39.2; P < 0.0001). For some physicians, a trend to increase prescription was observed in relation to the BMD result, but a statistical difference could only be reached for one physician (P < 0.05). Furthermore, for some physicians no modification whatsoever could be observed. CONCLUSIONS: BMD appears to be a determinant factor for HRT prescription in only a limited proportion of the patients and a small number of the physicians. From an epidemiological point of view, BMD measurements may be useful in order to help deciding women to start HRT, especially those who are reluctant or to those who present relative contra-indications, provided that their physicians are aware of the usefulness of these investigations.

Adult↗

Precision and accuracy of in vivo bone mineral measurement in rats using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision and accuracy of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for measuring bone mineral content at different sites of the skeleton in rats. In vitro the reproducibility error was very small (< 1%), but in vivo the intra-observer variability ranged from 0.9% to 6.0%. Several factors have been shown to affect in vivo reproducibility: the reproducibility was better when the results were expressed as bone mineral density (BMD) rather than bone mineral content (BMC), intra-observer variability was better than the inter-observer variability, and a higher error was observed for the tibia compared with that for vertebrae and femur. The accuracy of measurement at the femur and tibia was assessed by comparing the values with ash weight and with biochemically determined calcium content. The correlation coefficients (R) between the in vitro BMC and the dry weight or the calcium content were higher than 0.99 for both the femur and the tibia. SEE ranged between 0.0 g (ash weight) and 2.0 mg (Ca content). Using in vitro BMC, ash weight could be estimated with an accuracy error close to 0 and calcium content with an error ranging between 0.82% and 6.80%. The R values obtained between the in vivo and in vitro BMC were 0.98 and 0.97 respectively for femur and tibia, with SEE of 0.04 and 0.02 g respectively. In conclusion, the in vivo precision of the technique was found to be too low. To be of practical use it is important in the design of experimentation to try to reduce the measurement error.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Osteoporosis prevention and treatment with sex hormone replacement therapy.

Oestrogen deficiency is by far the major factor contributing to the high rate of osteoporotic fractures in women. The anti-osteoporotic effect of estrogen may be explained by its property to regulate cytokine secretion and thus balance bone remodeling. In oestrogen deficiency, increased resorption and remodeling will occur leading to osteoporosis. It has been extensively shown that oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) prevents postmenopausal bone loss and reduces fracture risk by half, provided that an appropriate dose is used. In order to optimize osteoporosis prevention, ERT should be started a early as possible in menopause and be maintained as long as possible. ERT may also be effective in elderly osteoporotic patients in preventing bone loss and, reducing fracture risk. The acceptance of ERT, however, at an older age has not been thoroughly evaluated. A reduction of cardiovascular disease and of climateric symptoms are among other benefits of ERT. So far, only few postmenopausal women are treated with ERT. ERT without progestins has been repeatedly found associated with an increased risk of developing endometrial cancer, but the cyclic addition of progestins protects from endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Combined oestrogen-progestin therapy is as efficient as estrogen therapy alone, but not more so. Since progestins may oppose some of the beneficial effects of estrogens, the lowest dose with the least metabolic impact should be prescribed. Women who have had a hysterectomy, should probably be treated by estrogen replacement therapy only. Meta-analyses concerning breast cancer associated with ERT found a very moderately increased risk (RR = 1.06). Therefore ERT prescription should be discussed openly with women considering all risks and benefits. In women who have suffered from breast cancer, a bone sparing effect of tamoxifen has been shown.

Estrogen Replacement Therapy↗

Clinical significance of heterogeneity of vertebral mineral density.

Important variations in Z-score per vertebra, which is a common expression of bone mineral density (BMD), are sometimes observed. The present study evaluates the clinical significance of this heterogeneity. Normal and osteoporotic subjects were defined by using strict criteria. For every scan, the minimal Z-score (the vertebra with the lowest Z-score) and the delta Z (highest Z-score--lowest Z-score) was calculated. Of the investigated subjects, 30% presented a delta Z > or = 1. No significant correlation could be found between delta Z and age, BMD, height and weight. There was no difference in delta Z between scans of good, average or poor quality. Osteoporotic subjects had significantly lowered BMD values, whether evaluated through Z-scores for the L2-L4 site (P < 0.001; t = 3.71) or by minimal Z-score (P < 0.001; t = 3.97). Reproducibility calculated for the L2-L4 site on phantoms as well as on patients was excellent (C.V. < 1%). When reproducibility was calculated on each vertebra in vitro or in vivo, an increase in variability was observed. These data show that marked heterogeneity in BMD per vertebra is not infrequent. In some subjects low BMD may be measured at certain vertebrae but not at the total site. Our data suggest that in those cases the lowest BMD should be considered. In follow-up studies however, the BMD should be calculated on the L2-L4 segment, since a loss of precision is observed when only one vertebra is measured.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Hydrosalpinges in in-vitro fertilization: an unfavourable prognostic feature.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of a hydrosalpinx influences in-vitro fertilization (IVF) prognosis. Comparisons were made between 69 IVF cycles in 37 patients carrying hydrosalpinges (hydrosalpinx group) and 67 IVF cycles in 41 patients without tubes or surgically sterilized (control group). Twenty-two patients carrying hydrosalpinges underwent salpingectomy or salpingoplasty (operated group); they then underwent 42 IVF trials which were compared with the two former groups. In the hydrosalpinx group, pregnancy rates by oocyte retrieval were 10.1% for clinical and ongoing pregnancies. In the control group, the corresponding pregnancy rates were 23.0 and 21.3% respectively. The implantation rate per embryo was 4.2% for clinical and ongoing pregnancies in the hydrosalpinx group and 11.0 and 10.4% respectively in the control group. The operated group had pregnancy rates of 38.1% for clinical pregnancies and 31.0% for ongoing pregnancies, with implantation rates of 17.4 (clinical) and 14.8% (ongoing) respectively. Pregnancy and implantation rates were statistically lower in the hydrosalpinx group as compared with controls and with the operated group. The differences between control and operated groups were not significant. In conclusion, the presence of a hydrosalpinx is thus associated with poor prognosis in IVF treatment. Surgical correction of such lesions appears to restore high success rates.

Adult↗

Compliance to hormone replacement therapy.

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after menopause can effectively reduce climacteric-related symptoms and therefore increase quality of life. A large number of studies have also demonstrated that with a sufficient dosage bone loss can be prevented and fracture frequency reduced. Epidemiological and experimental studies also suggest a decrease in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity among HRT users compared to nonusers. From an epidemiological perspective, in order to obtain optimal prevention of osteoporosis and of cardiovascular diseases, a high proportion of postmenopausal women should be treated using long-term therapy. Surveys generally show that only a small proportion of postmenopausal women use hormone replacement therapy (in Belgium, around 14%) and that the long-term compliance to treatment, which is mandatory in the prevention due to low compliance remains unknown. The reasons why patients patients do not pursue their treatment in the long run remain unclear. Fear of cancer and drug-related side effects, such as unacceptable bleeding, have been among the most frequently mentioned causes. Thus, individual information on patients regarding HRT seems to be crucial issue. A few recent studies have suggested a favorable role of osteoporosis prevention and bone mass measurements to increase compliance, but this is not well established and will depend on the physician's attitude toward HTR and osteoporosis prevention. At present, very little is known about the physician's decision to treat postmenopausal women with HRT. Sometimes, the physician's attitude has been reported was very negative toward HRT-apparently, many physicians think HRT increases cardiovascular risk, even though most data suggest a reduction of cardiovascular risk among HRT users. Very little research has actually been performed on how to improve compliance. Education and behavioral strategies may be of use. Improved communication between patients and physicians, establishing a confidential relationship with patients, and the involvement of nursing counseling are all strategies which may improve compliance. The use of easy-to-take medication that induces no bleeding, supported by calendar devices or reminders, may facilitate chronic use of medication. Future research needs to investigate the physician's and patient's decision-making processes and the reasons for those decisions.

Estrogen Replacement Therapy↗

Cardiovascular protection by estrogen: a hemodynamic mechanism?

Cardiovascular risk is higher in men than in women, and also more prevalent in postmenopausal than in premenopausal women, especially if not treated by estrogens. These differences may be due, in part, to a cardioprotective action of sex hormones, mainly estrogens. However, only a limited part of this protection may be attributed to metabolic modifications induced by replacement therapy with estrogen. Therefore, it remains to be determined which other cardioprotective mechanisms influenced by sex steroids might be involved. It has been demonstrated that the menopause is associated with an increase in uterine arterial pulsatility index, reflecting increased peripheral resistance, while the administration of estrogens has an opposite effect at this level. In Doppler studies, estrogen replacement therapy was also associated with an increase in stroke volume and flow acceleration in the aorta. This suggests a positive inotropic effect of estrogens. Using technetium scanning, it was found that women at an early phase of menopause have a stronger myocardial contractility than women of a similar age whose menopause is of longer duration. These effects of estrogens on hemodynamic characteristics might be controlled by vasoregulatory hormones such as endothelin(s) or endothelial-derived relaxing factor (EDRF), now identified as nitric oxide (NO). Indeed, sex-associated differences in endothelin have been observed. Such are some of the mechanisms by which estrogen administration might effect a cardiovascular protection. At the present time, however, conclusive data are not available.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗

Decrease of bone mineral density during estrogen substitution therapy.

A decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients treated with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is sometimes observed in clinical practice. In order to assess the frequency and the characteristics of these cases, we reviewed the data of 102 women treated with HRT for more than 2 years, and who had undergone at least 3 lumbar BMD measurements during that period. For each patient, a linear function was fitted to the BMD data in relation to time. The slope was calculated. There was an overall gain in BMD during treatment, mean (+/- S.E.M.) values of slope 0.007 g/cm2/year (+/- 0.002). Fifty-three patients had a slope higher than 0.005, 28 a slope close to 0 (between 0.005 and -0.005) and 21 a slope lower than -0.005. By dividing the patients in tertiles of slopes (tertile I: slope < 0; tertile II: 0 < slope < 0.011; tertile III: slope > 0.011), significant differences were observed between the three groups of slope for the initial BMD (P < 0.001), hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio (P < 0.01), weight, DHEAS and alkaline phosphatase (P < 0.05). Only 1 of the 15 patients with a low bone mass (lower than mean +/- 1 S.D.) had a negative slope, while 9 of the 16 with a high-bone mass (higher than mean +/- 1 S.D.), had a negative slope. Under HRT, about 21% of postmenopausal women have a slight decrease in BMD as assessed by DPA. Because of the DPA coefficient of variation, however, the exact number of bone losers cannot be determined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Alkaline Phosphatase↗

Bone mineral density measured by dual photon and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a problem of accuracy.

Dual photon absorptiometers (DPA) are currently being replaced by dual energy X-ray absorptiometers (DXA) for measurements of bone mineral density (BMD). In order to evaluate how to use the previously obtained BMD results by DPA (BMDo) in the follow-up of patients, the following study was performed. Ninety-five women who had had BMDo during the last 12 months were selected. L2-L4 BMD was measured twice on the same day using both DPA (BMDp) and by DXA (BMDx). BMDp was highly correlated to BMDx (R = 0.95; P < 0.001) but a wide variation of the ratio BMDp:BMDx was observed which ranged between 0.65 and 1.09 (mean 0.90, S.D. 0.05). There was no significant relationship between the ratio BDMp:BMDx and age or height but there was a significant relationship between this ratio and the weight of the patient (R = 0.31; P < 0.001). The results also indicated that the correlation between DXA and DPA was lower than that observed between the two DPA measurements (R = 0.98; P < 0.001) which, moreover, were not performed on the same day. These observations contrast with the relatively high precision of both instruments and have to be attributed to relative inaccuracy of one or probably both techniques.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗