Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Torres

Publications and source records attributed to J Torres.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Comparison of the InPouch TV culture system and Diamond's modified medium for detection of Trichomonas vaginalis.

This study compared the use of Diamond's modified medium to InPouch for the culture of Trichomonas vaginalis from pooled vaginal secretions. The sensitivity for InPouch was 82.4% (61/74) versus 87.8% (65/74) for Diamond's modified medium. There were no significant differences in the sensitivity and negative predictive value of InPouch compared to Diamond's modified medium.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Surgical treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax with video-assisted thoracic surgery.

We report the results of our experience using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to treat primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) from January 1992 until December 1994 in a multicentered co-operative study. A total of 132 patients (110 males and 22 females, aged 13-38 yrs, mean age 26 yrs) were treated by VATS to deal with the PSP that they presented with. A standard VATS technique was used. Apical bullae were always removed, and mechanical pleural abrasion was performed, leaving a pleural drainage tube. In two cases (1.5%), a switch to thoracotomy was necessary. In eight cases (6%), air leakage persisted for 5 days after surgery, which resolved with pleural drainage. There were eight postoperative relapses (6%), which were treated with pleural drainage (n = 4), VATS (n = 3) or axillar thoracotomy (n = 1). The average postoperative stay was 5.6 days (range 2-15 days). We conclude that video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is a viable alternative for the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. There is, however, a high relapse rate, and in a number of cases air leakage persists in the postoperative period.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Pharmacokinetic study of ebrotidine administered in multiple doses to healthy volunteers for 4 days.

The safety of ebrotidine (N-[(E)-[[2-[[[2-[(diaminomethylene)amino]-4- thiazolyl]methyl]thio]ethyl]amino] methylene]-4-bromo-benzenesulfonamide, CAS 100981-43-9, FI-3542), a new H2-receptor antagonist with gastroprotective activity, was assessed and its main pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in order to establish the dose linearity after the repeated administration of three different dose levels. The study was carried out in a group of 8 healthy volunteers of either sex, aged between 20 to 29 years. Oral doses of ebrotidine were administered in a randomized, single-blind design. Volunteers remained in the Unit for two days at each of the three study phases with washout intervals of 2 weeks and received seven doses of ebrotidine (150, 300 and 500 mg b.i.d). Pharmacological evaluation included vital signs, laboratory tests, adverse events and blood and urine samplings for pharmacokinetic analysis. Ebrotidine was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV detection. The results showed a good tolerability of ebrotidine after the administration of seven doses for 4 days, with no changes in the vital signs or laboratory parameters. No clinically significant dose-related adverse events were reported during the study. The absorption of ebrotidine was relatively rapid (tmax approximately 2 h) and linear within the dose range from 150 to 500 mg. Drug biotransformation was linear with doses tested, and no metabolic saturation occurred. The terminal elimination half-life of ebrotidine was between 7 and 11 h or even longer. There was no accumulation of ebrotidine and the steady state was reached, regardless of the dose administered, within the first 24-48 h.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Continuous intragastric pH monitoring in the evaluation of ebrotidine, cimetidine and placebo on gastric acidity in healthy volunteers.

This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and tolerance of ebrotidine (N-[(E)-[[2-[[[2-[(diaminomethylene)amino]-4-thiazolyl) methyl]thio]ethyl]amino]methylene]-4-bromo-benzenesulfonamide, CAS 100981-43.9, FI-3542), a new H2-receptor antagonist, on reducing gastric acidity after a single 800 mg dose, compared with cimetidine 800 mg once daily and placebo by means of a continuous intragastric pH monitoring. A total of 30 healthy volunteers were allocated to receive in a double blind, parallel design the study medication. Clinical observations, physical examinations and visual analogue scales (VAS) were performed during the study to assess the tolerability of the three treatments. Ebrotidine and cimetidine caused a greater and longer-lasting gastric acid inhibition than placebo. With ebrotidine, significantly (p < 0.05) higher median pH values (and interquartile range, IQR) were reached in the post-administration (2.61, IQR 2.02-3.93), postprandial (3.38, IQR 2.82-3.91) and nocturnal (2.83, IQR 1.69-3.77) periods than with placebo: 1.82 (IQR, 1.66-2.09), 2.81 (IQR, 2.02-3.28), and 1.89 (IQR, 1.44-2.13), respectively. Cimetidine showed significant differences compared to placebo in the post-administration (2.36, IQR 1.89-3.46) and nocturnal (2.46, IQR 1.88-4.33) periods. No statistical differences were observed between the active treatments. Ebrotidine caused a significantly higher percentage of time above pH 2.0 in the post-administration and nocturnal periods compared to placebo (p < 0.05), and above pH 3.0 in the post-administration, postprandial and nocturnal periods. No serious adverse effects, or disturbances in the VAS or in the vital signs were reported, and all medications were well tolerated. It is concluded that a single dose of ebrotidine 800 mg is as effective as cimetidine 800 mg in reducing total and nocturnal intragastric acidity. The study also confirms the excellent safety profile of the new drug.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ebrotidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. A multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study.

Ebrotidine (N-[(E)-[[2-[[[2-[(diaminomethylene)amino]-4 -thiazoly]methyl]thio]ethyl]amino]methylene]-4-bromo-benzenesulfon amide, CAS 100981-43-9, FI-3542) is a new H2-receptor antagonist characterized by its high receptor affinity and gastroprotective effect. This Phase II study has been undertaken to establish the efficacy and safety of ebrotidine, administered in four dosages as a single evening dose versus placebo in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. A total of 110 duodenal ulcer patients were studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical trial. The patients were assigned to 5 groups: placebo, 200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg and 800 mg of ebrotidine once daily. Controls were performed at baseline and every two weeks at four follow-up visits unless ulcer healed before. Endoscopic examination was the main parameter for the assessment of treatment efficacy and ulcer healing rate. Vital signs and blood/ urine analysis were used to establish safety. The three groups treated with higher dosages (400 to 800 mg of ebrotidine daily) showed an endoscopic ulcer healing rate of 90-95%, significantly higher than 55% achieved with placebo (p < 0.05), whilst the differences between these three dosages of ebrotidine were not statistically significant. Healing rate in the group treated with 200 mg of ebrotidine daily was not significantly different from that in the placebo group. The development of symptoms, number of episodes of ulcer-related pain, total ulcerated surface area or subjective ratings by the patients and investigators also differed significantly between ebrotidine (400, 600 and 800 mg daily) and placebo, and again, no marked differences were found between these three doses of ebrotidine. As far as tolerance is concerned, no clinically or statistically significant changes were observed in vital signs and analytical parameters. The incidence of side effects was less than that presented by the placebo group, possibly due to a greater consumption of antacids in this group. Results showed that a daily dose of 400 mg ebrotidine is effective and safe in the treatment of duodenal ulcers.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed1997

Ebrotidine versus ranitidine in the healing and prevention of relapse of duodenal ulcer. A multicentre, double-blind, parallel, randomized, controlled study.

Two hundred and fifty patients were included in a double-blind, parallel, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Duodenal ulcer treatment lasted up to 8 weeks. Forty-nine patients were followed up for prevention of ulcer relapse for up to one year. All patients received either ranitidine (300 mg/day in the healing phase and 150 mg/day in the follow-up phase) or ebrotidine (N-[(E)-[[2-[[[2-[(diaminomethylene)amino]-4 -thiazolyl]methyl]thio]ethyl]amino]methylene]-4-bromo-benzenesulfonamide , CAS 100981-43-9, FI-3542) (400 mg/day in both phases) as a single dose at bedtime. Both groups were matched in all demographic parameters, except for a significantly higher percentage of smokers in the ranitidine group. The percentage of total healing was almost the same with both products. Healing occurred in a higher percentage with ebrotidine at weeks 4 (75% versus 66.7%) and 6 (87% versus 79.7%). A higher effect of ebrotidine on the incidence of duodenitis was identified during the whole study, but only reached statistical significance at week 6. The relapse rate during the follow-up phase showed no differences between the two study treatments, relapse percentage figures being 25% for ebrotidine and 24% for ranitidine. There were no differences in the number of unscheduled visits between the two groups, although 57% of patients in the ranitidine group had to make a second follow-up visit, as compared with 33% in the ebrotidine group. Both drugs caused hardly any side effects, affecting only one patient from each group: one patient with ebrotidine suffered from diarrhoea and one patient with ranitidine developed a skin rash on the limbs. Administration of ebrotidine in a single dose (400 mg/d) was at least as effective and safe as ranitidine both for healing and relapse prevention in patients with duodenal ulcer.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Ebrotidine versus ranitidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer. A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.

A total of 478 patients with endoscopically confirmed duodenal ulcer entered this randomized, parallel, double-blind trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive ebrotidine (N-[(E)-[[2-[[[2-[(diaminomethylene)amino]- 4-thiazolyl]methyl]thio]ethyl]amino]methylene]-4-bromo-benzenesulfona mid e, CAS 100981-43-9, FI-3542) 400 mg or ranitidine 300 mg tablets (4:1) respectively, administered in single evening doses. Endoscopy, clinical examination and symptom assessment were performed at baseline and at weeks 4 and 8. Safety evaluations including laboratory tests, treatment compliance and antacid consumption checks were conducted at the beginning and/or at the 4 and 8 week visits. Patients whose ulcer showed endoscopic healing at the 4-week control left the study. Both groups were matched in all parameters studied. The healing rates at 4 weeks were 76.4% and 75.3% for ebrotidine and ranitidine respectively, while at 8 weeks the final rates were 95% and 91.8% respectively. Accompanying symptoms disappeared rapidly and the patients returned to normal. Smoking proved to be a highly significant negative risk factor, since healing rates were 83.4% and 71.2% at 4 weeks and 97.4% and 92.3% at 8 weeks in non-smokers and smokers respectively (p = 0.0046). Smokers treated with ranitidine showed significantly lower final healing rates than non-smokers (86% vs 100%; p = 0.0358), while the healing rates among patients treated with ebrotidine were similar regardless of whether they were smokers or not (93.9% and 96.7% N.S.). Ebrotidine (94%) proved to be more effective than ranitidine (86%) in smokers with higher healing rates (p < 0.05). Alcohol intake showed no significant relationship with the healing rates. Both drugs demonstrated an excellent safety. There were no changes in blood parameters, and no significant adverse events were reported.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed1997

Efficacy of ebrotidine and ranitidine in the treatment of benign gastric ulcer.

This is a phase III, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial with two parallel groups of 50 patients to assess the efficacy of ebrotidine (N-[(E)-[[2-[[[2-[(diaminomethylene)amino]-4-thiazolyl]methyl]thio]ethyl ] amino]methylene]-4-bromo-benzenesulfonamide, CAS 100981-43-9, FI-3542) 800 mg and ranitidine 300 mg as a single evening dose in the treatment of benign gastric peptic ulcer. Prior to treatment, an endoscopy was performed to detect ulcer lesions and to discard malignancies. Clinical and endoscopic examinations were performed at 6, 9 and 12 weeks. Healing rates were significant for both treatments at week 6, while at week 12 there was statistical significance for ebrotidine as compared to ranitidine (96% vs 88% in the intention-to-treat analysis and 98% vs 87.5% in the per protocol analysis). Decrease in ulcer diameter was significant for both treatments at week 6, and for ebrotidine versus ranitidine at weeks 9 and 12. The overall improvement of symptoms was higher with ebrotidine, which was already significant at week 6. Safety was considered to be excellent, since no significant adverse events were reported for the patients included in the study.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Studies on the protective effect of ebrotidine on experimental ulcers induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in healthy volunteers.

Ebrotidine (N-[(E)-[[2-[[[2-[(diaminomethylene)amino]- 4-thiazolyl]methyl]thio]ethyl]amino]methylene]-4-bromo-benzenesulfonamid e, CAS 100981-43-9, FI-3542) is a new H2-receptor antagonist providing a new therapy for the prevention and healing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-induced gastroduodenal lesions. Carbonic anhydrase is a zinc enzyme, and its isozyme (carbonic anhydrase II) in parietal cells plays a central role in HCl secretion. The effects of ebrotidine on carbonic anhydrase in human subjects are reported. Eighteen healthy volunteers were distributed in 3 equal subgroups and treated for 10 days as follows: ebrotidine 800 mg/d p.o. (Group A); indometacin 4 mg/kg/d p.o. in 3 divided doses (Group B); ebrotidine 800 mg/d p.o. plus indometacin 4 mg/kg/d p.o. (Group C). Assessment of the enzymatic activity of carbonic anhydrase was based on the colorimetric method of changing pH with the stopped-flow technique. In group A, ebrotidine reduced total gastric mucosal carbonic anhydrase activity by 62%; in group B, indometacin increased carbonic anhydrase activity in gastric mucosa by 138%; in group C, the combined treatment with ebrotidine plus indometacin decreased gastric mucosal carbonic anhydrase activity by 38%. The present study shows that, unlike ranitidine, ebrotidine, a competitive H2-receptor antagonist, is also a non-competitive inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase I and II. By antagonizing the activating effects of indometacin on gastric mucosal carbonic anhydrase, ebrotidine prevents mucosal lesions caused by anti-inflammatory drugs.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Comparative study of the safety and efficacy of ebrotidine versus ranitidine and placebo in the prevention of piroxicam-induced gastroduodenal lesions.

This study assessed the efficacy of ebrotidine (N-[(E)-[[2-[[[2-[(diaminomethylene)amino]-4-thiazolyl] methyl]thio]ethyl]amino]methylene]-4-bromo-benzenesulfonamide, CAS 100981-43-9, FI-3542) versus ranitidine and placebo in preventing gastroduodenal lesions induced by piroxicam. Thirty patients with rheumatic disease, who were divided into 5 groups, received an oral treatment of piroxicam 20 mg once daily for 6 days plus ebrotidine 400 mg/day (Group I); ebrotidine 800 mg/day (Group II); ranitidine 150 mg/day (Group III); ranitidine 300 mg/day (Group IV); or placebo (Group V). Patients were endoscopically examined before and after treatment. Lanza's score was also determined, and laboratory tests were performed. The results of this study showed that the most powerful protective effect against mucosal gastric lesions induced by piroxicam was achieved with 800 mg/day of ebrotidine. Ranitidine at doses of 150 mg/day did not protect gastric mucosa, and the 300 mg/day dose exerted a poor gastroprotective effect.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Efficacy of ebrotidine and ranitidine combined with amoxicillin and metronidazole in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer.

This double-blind, randomized, phase III clinical trial was carried out in two parallel groups to assess the efficacy of ebrotidine (N-[(E)-[[2-[[[2-[(diaminomethylene) amino]-4-thiazolyl]methyl]thio]ethyl]amino] methylene]-4-bromo-benzenesulfonamide, CAS 100981-43-9, FI-3542) 400 mg and ranitidine 300 mg given in single evening dose, combined with amoxicillin 750 mg and metronidazole 500 mg three times daily for 14 days, in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer. Thirty patients were included, divided into two groups of 15, to whom one of the study therapies was administered based on a randomization code. Clinical and endoscopic controls were performed 4, 6 and 8 weeks after the onset of the treatment. No differences were seen between the two treatment groups with regard to demographic parameters and clinical histories. They were both perfectly homogeneous. There were no differences between the eradication of both therapies in both the antrum and gastric body samples (over 80% eradication), allowing the results to be classified as satisfactory. Moreover, perfect control was achieved through the study of clinical symptoms, which even disappeared in some cases. There were no differences in the healing rate of the duodenal ulcer after four weeks, 86.7% being achieved for both groups.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Studies on the cytoprotective and antisecretory activity of ebrotidine. A review.

Gastric mucosa is exposed to various aggressive factors such as stress, ulcerogenic drugs including acetyl-salicylic acid(ASA)-like agents, ethanol, bacteria, particularly Helicobacter pylori (Hp), and various endogenous irritants such as acid-pepsin secretion and bile salts. The maintenance of the mucosal barrier depends upon the activation of the pre-epithelial (mucus-alkali secretion), epithelial (surface-active phospholipids and rapid mucosal restitution) and post-epithelial (mucosal microcirculation, sensory nerves and mast cells) components of mucosal defense. Ebrotidine (N-[(E)-[[2-[[[2-[(diaminomethylene)amino]- 4-thiazolyl]methyl]thio]ethyl]amino]methylene]-4-bromo-benzenesulfonamid e, CAS 100981-43-9, FI-3542) is the first of a new generation of H2-receptor antagonists with both antisecretory and cytoprotective activities. Its inhibitory action is similar to that of ranitidine and approximately tenfold greater than cimetidine, and is accompanied by a small and transient increase in plasma gastrin levels. In contrast to ranitidine and other H2-receptor antagonists, ebrotidine exerts a unique cytoprotection against injury by various ulcerogens such as ethanol, ammonia, lipopolysaccharides (LPS), stress and ASA or acidified taurocholate. The mechanism of this protection by ebrotidine is not clear, but it has been shown to stimulate mucus secretion, to increase the quality of adherent mucus gel and to increase gastric mucosal blood flow (GBF), possibly due to enhanced mucosal formation of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and nitric oxide (NO). The cytoprotective effects of ebrotidine were observed in rats and confirmed also in humans with gastric lesions induced by ethanol or ASA. Ebrotidine also exerts anti-Helicobacter pylori (Hp) effects by interfering with surface receptors of epithelial cells and inhibiting urease, protease and lipase activity, and by counteracting the noxious effects of Hp-related substances such as ammonia and lipopoly-saccharides (LPS).

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Chronic exposure to environmental lead in Chilean infants].

BACKGROUND: In Chile, there are several sources of environmental lead exposure. However, the few studies about lead levels in Chilean infants, do not allow to establish the prevalence of high lead levels in this population. AIM: To measure blood lead levels in nursing infants, living in rural and urban areas, from birth until two years of age. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Newborns from public maternity hospitals in Santiago and a rural area were selected for the study. An umbilical cord blood sample was obtained at birth and venous blood samples thereafter, every 6 months until the age of 24 months. Lead levels were measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Atmospheric lead was measured simultaneously every week in Santiago and the rural area. RESULTS: Three hundred twelve children from Santiago and 113 from the rural area completed the 24 months follow-up. The mean lead exposure for infants living in Santiago and in the rural area was 1.23 +/- 0.66 and 0.19 +/- 0.15 micrograms/m3 respectively (p < 0.001). Mean blood levels were always higher in infants from Santiago, compared to those from the rural area. At 24 months, 4.5% of children from Santiago and 0.7% of children from the rural area had blood lead levels over 10 micrograms/dl. Significant risk factors for high lead levels were recent painting of the house where the infant lives, eating soil, biting banisters and familiar labor exposure to lead. CONCLUSIONS: Infants living in an urban area and exposed to increased atmospheric lead levels have higher blood lead levels than infants living in a rural area.

Air Pollutants↗
PubMed1996

Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF binding proteins-1, -2, and -3 in newborn serum: relationships to fetoplacental growth at term.

Cord sera were obtained from term, Chilean newborns exhibiting various patterns of intrauterine growth and assayed for IGF-1, IGF-2, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-3 by specific radioimmunoassays (RIA). Serum levels of each peptide were correlated with birth weight (BW), ponderal index (PI), and placental weight (PW). Total IGF-1 levels correlated with BW (r = 0.665, P = 0.0001). PI (r = 0.527, P = 0.004), and PW (r = 0.596, P = 0.0017). In contrast, IGF-2 failed to correlate with any growth parameter. Of the three binding proteins, IGFBP-3 exhibited the strongest relationship to each growth parameter. IGFBP-3 correlated significantly with BW (r = 0.71, P < 0.0001), PI (r = 0.782, P < 0.0001), and PW (r = 0.57, P = 0.0029). In addition IGFBP-3 levels positively correlated to IGF-1 levels (r = 0.614, P = 0.0005). By contrast, circulating IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 were inversely related to IGF-1 levels. All five peptides were subjected to multiple regression analysis and related to BW. Significant relationships between the predicted BW and the actual BW were observed in these infants (r = 0.802, P = 0.0006). The BWs of a cohort of unrelated North American infants were also predicted using the Chilean-derived equation and found to be significantly related to their actual BWs (r = 0.453, P = 0.0033). These relationships were strengthened by the inclusion of estimated gestational age (EGA) as an independent variable. These data point to particularly important roles for IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 in regulating fetal growth at term, and suggest that they are regulated in a coordinated manner during the latter stage of gestation. Furthermore, they suggest that IGFBPs play multiple, and potentially opposing, regulatory roles in modulating IGF action. Lastly, an integrated expression of IGF activity derived from one population significantly correlated with newborn BW in a geographically and culturally distinct population.

Body Mass Index↗