Biomedical subjects

J T van Oirschot

Publications and source records attributed to J T van Oirschot.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Vaccination of pigs two weeks before infection significantly reduces transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus.

The objective of this study was to investigate whether and at what time interval could vaccination reduce transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) among pigs. Reduction of virus transmission by vaccination was determined experimentally. Transmission of FMDV was studied in three groups of ten pigs: one non-vaccinated group and two groups that were vaccinated 7 days (-7 dpi) and 14 days before inoculation (-14 dpi), respectively. Five randomly selected pigs from each group were inoculated with FMDV type O Taiwan, while the other five pigs left in the groups were exposed to the inoculated pigs by direct contact. Clinical signs were recorded, virus isolation and RT-PCR were carried out on oropharyngeal fluid (OPF), and the neutralizing antibody titres and the antibody response against non-structural (NS) proteins of FMDV were determined. No virus transmission was observed in the -14 dpi group, whereas virus transmission was observed in all contact pigs affecting both the non-vaccinated and the -7 dpi group. The reproduction ratio R in the -14 dpi vaccinated group was significantly lower than that of the non-vaccinated group. This study confirms the potential of vaccination as an important tool to reduce transmission of FMDV.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Vaccinology of classical swine fever: from lab to field.

There are two types of classical swine fever vaccines available: the classical live and the recently developed E2 subunit vaccines. The live Chinese strain vaccine is the most widely used. After a single vaccination, it confers solid immunity within a few days that appears to persist lifelong. The E2 subunit vaccine induces immunity from approximately 10-14 days after a single vaccination. The immunity may persist for more than a year, but is then not complete. The Chinese strain vaccine may establish a strong herd immunity 1-2 weeks earlier than the E2 vaccine. The ability of the Chinese vaccine strain to prevent congenital infection has not been reported, but the E2 subunit vaccine does not induce complete protection against congenital infection. Immunological mechanisms that underlie the protective immunity are still to be elucidated. Both types of vaccine are considered to be safe. A great advantage of the E2 subunit vaccine is that it allows differentiation of infected pigs from vaccinated pigs and is referred to as a DIVA vaccine. However, the companion diagnostic E(rns) ELISA to actually make that differentiation should be improved. Many approaches to develop novel vaccines have been described, but none of these is likely to result in a new DIVA vaccine reaching the market in the next 5-10 years. Countries where classical swine fever is endemic can best control the infection by systematic vaccination campaigns, accompanied by the normal diagnostic procedures and control measures. Oral vaccination of wild boar may contribute to lowering the incidence of classical swine fever, and consequently diminishing the threat of virus introduction into domestic pigs. Free countries should not vaccinate and should be highly alert to rapidly diagnose any new outbreak. Once a new introduction of classical swine fever virus in dense pig areas has been confirmed, an emergency vaccination programme should be immediately instituted, for maximum benefit. The question is whether the time is ripe to seriously consider global eradication of classical swine fever virus.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Emergency vaccination against classical swine fever.

At present, emergency vaccination against classical swine fever is not practised in Western countries. However, stamping out and pre-emptive culling policies are increasingly meeting greater resistance. Consequently, emergency vaccination is a re-emerging subject of debate. There are highly efficacious classical live vaccines that induce early immunity, but their use precludes the serological discrimination of infected and vaccinated pigs. Therefore, E2 subunit DIVA vaccines have been developed that allow this discrimination. However, their efficacy is lower than that of the live vaccines and the companion diagnostic differential test, the E(rns) ELISA, has its limitations. Modern biotechnological methods enabled researchers to develop a variety of candidate vaccines that have been shown to induce immunity in pigs. However, it is not expected that one of them will enter the marketplace in less than five to 10 years. The current vaccines should therefore be used, if emergency vaccination programmes to eradicate classical swine fever are to be implemented in the near future. Two possible scenarios for emergency vaccinations are discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

[Biotechnology for the benefit of vaccination against viral diseases: a review].

This review deals briefly with some key developments in veterinary viral vaccinology, lists the types of vaccines that are used for vaccinations commonly performed in food animals as well as in companion animals, and indicates that the practising veterinarian can select the best vaccine by comparing the results of efficacy studies. Diva (Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals; also termed marker) vaccines and companion diagnostic tests have been developed that can be used for progam aimed to control or eradicate virus infections. Vaccine-induced herd immunity, which can be measured relatively easily when diva vaccines are used, is a crucial issue in such programmes. Current vaccine research follows many routes towards novel vaccines, which can he divided into non-replicating ('killed') and replicating ('live') vaccines. Promising trends are the development of DNA vaccination, vector vaccines, and attenuation of DNA and RNA viruses by DNA technology. The lack of (in vitro) correlates of vaccine protection markedly hampers progress in vaccine research. Various characteristics of an 'ideal' vaccine are listed, such as multivalency and the induction of lifelong immunity after one non-invasive administration in animals with maternal immunity. Future research should he aimed at developing vaccines that approach the ideal as closely as possible and which are directed against diseases not yet controlled by vaccination and against newly emerging diseases.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

[Vaccination of calves with contaminated batches of bovine herpes virus 1 vaccines did not result in infection with bovine virus diarrhea virus].

The aim of the experiment was to study whether bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV1) marker vaccine batches known to be contaminated with bovine virus diarrhoea virus (BVDV) type 1 could cause BVD in cattle. For this purpose, four groups of cattle were used. The first group (n = 4 calves, the positive control group), was vaccinated with vaccine from a batch contaminated with BVDV type 2. The second group (n = 4 calves, the negative control group), was vaccinated with vaccine from a batch that was not contaminated with BVDV. The third group (n = 39 calves), was vaccinated with a vaccine from one of four batches contaminated with BVDV type 1 (seronegative experimental group). The fourth group (n = 6 seropositive heifers), was vaccinated with a vaccine from one of three batches known to be contaminated with BVDV type 1. All cattle were vaccinated with an overdose of the BHV1 marker vaccine. At the start of the experiment, all calves except those from group 4 were seronegative for BVDV and BHV1. The calves from group 4 had antibodies against BVDV, were BVDV-free and seronegative to BHV1. After vaccination, the positive control calves became severely ill, had fever for several days, and BVDV was isolated from nasal swabs and white blood cells. In addition, these calves produced antibodies to BVDV and BHV1. No difference in clinical scores of the other groups was seen, nor were BVDV or BVDV-specific antibody responses detected in these calves; however, they did produce antibodies against BHV1. The remainder of each vaccine vial used was examined for the presence of infectious BVDV in cell culture. From none of the vials was BVDV isolated after three subsequent passages. This indicates that BVDV was either absent from the vials or was present in too low an amount to be isolated. Thus vaccination of calves with vaccines from BHV1 marker vaccine batches contaminated with BVDV type 1 did not result in BVDV infections.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Efficacy of a live glycoprotein E-negative bovine herpesvirus 1 vaccine in cattle in the field.

To assess the efficacy of a live glycoprotein E-negative bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV1) vaccine to reduce transmission of BHV1 in cattle, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled field trial including 84 herds was conducted in the Netherlands. The incidence of BHV1 infections during 17 months was monitored by detecting antibodies against BHV1 glycoprotein E. In the placebo-treated group 214 seroconversions in 3985 paired sera, and in the vaccinated group 67 seroconversions in 3601 paired sera were detected. Based on these data, the transmission ratio R(0) was estimated for each treatment, using the maximum likelihood approach and the martingale approach. In placebo-treated herds R(0) was 2.5 (CI 1.4-3.1) using maximum likelihood and 2.8 (S.E. 0.4) using the martingale approach. In the vaccinated group these estimations were 1.2 (CI 0.5-1.5) and 1.5 (S.E. 0.4) respectively. The vaccinated and placebo-treated group differed significantly in transmission of BHV1. These results suggest that the use of this live gE-negative BHV1 vaccine will reduce the incidence and transmission of BHV1 infections in the field.

Abortion, Veterinary↗

PubMed2001

Use of PCR and immunofluorescence to detect bovine herpesvirus 1 recombinants.

Homologous recombination occurs frequently between strains of the same alphaherpesvirus species. Studies of this phenomenon require techniques that can differentiate parental strains from putative recombinant progeny viruses. Usually, progeny viruses generated by co-infection of two distinguishable parental strains are first cloned by selection of a single plaque and then characterised by PCR. An assay designed to investigate recombination between two bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1) strains lacking either the glycoprotein gC or gE ORF is described. A PCR assay was developed in which a single step co-amplifies both BHV-1 glycoprotein-encoding sequences. Because the usual procedure for virus isolation, viral plaque picking, can lead to polyclonal virus preparations, a PCR protocol alone does not differentiate between samples containing recombinant viruses (gC+/gE+) and those containing a mixture of both single deleted parental strains (gC-/gE+ and gC+/gE-), and false positives resulting from recombination could occur. To reduce this possibility, double-label immunofluorescence staining of isolated plaques was developed, which coupled with PCR, allows straightforward discrimination between parental strains and progeny recombinant viruses. This assay will be useful for further studies of recombination, especially those evaluating the potential emergence of recombinants between BHV-1 marker vaccine and wildtype strains.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Present and future of veterinary viral vaccinology: a review.

This review deals briefly with some key developments in veterinary vaccinology, lists the types of vaccines that are used for vaccinations commonly performed in food animals as well as in companion animals, and indicates that the practising veterinarian can select the best vaccine by comparing the results of efficacy studies. Diva (Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals; also termed marker) vaccines and companion diagnostic tests have been developed that can be used for progammes aimed to control or eradicate virus infections. Vaccine-induced herd immunity, which can be measured relatively easily when diva vaccines are used, is a crucial issue in such programmes. Current vaccine research follows many routes towards novel vaccines, which can be divided into non-replicating ('killed') and replicating ('live') vaccines. Promising trends are the development of DNA vaccination, vector vaccines, and attenuation of DNA and RNA viruses by DNA technology. The lack of (in vitro) correlates of vaccine protection markedly hampers progress in vaccine research. Various characteristics of an 'ideal' vaccine are listed, such as multivalency and the induction of lifelong immunity after one non-invasive administration in animals with maternal immunity. Future research should be aimed at developing vaccines that approach the ideal as closely as possible and which are directed against diseases not yet controlled by vaccination and against newly emerging diseases.

Animal Diseases↗

PubMed2000

Presence of bovine herpesvirus 1 gB-seropositive but gE-seronegative Dutch cattle with no apparent virus exposure.

Two hundred and thirty-seven of 2052 cattle which had not been vaccinated against bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1) were seropositive in a glycoprotein B (gB)-blocking ELISA, but seronegative in a glycoprotein E (gE)-blocking ELISA. In order to detect whether they were latently infected with BHV-1, 10 of them were treated with corticosteroids in an attempt to reactivate putatively latent virus. After successive treatments with dexamethasone and prednisolone, no virus excretion was detected and they showed no increase in antibody titres. In contrast, one gE-seropositive animal re-excreted BHV-1 and had a four-fold increase in antibody titre after the corticosteroid treatments. After slaughter, no BHV-1 DNA could be detected with a sensitive PCR in samples of the trigeminal, cervical and sacral ganglia and spinal cords of the gE-seronegative cattle.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Airborne transmission of bovine herpesvirus 1 infections in calves under field conditions.

A small scale transmission experiment was performed with bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV1) in a cattle population under field conditions. 10 calves were housed under strict hygienic conditions, with a distance of 4m between each calf. Five calves were experimentally infected with BHV1, two calves with strain Harberink and three with strain Lam, respectively. Experimentally infected calves were placed at 4 m distance from five susceptible sentinel calves. Airborne transmission to sentinel calves was detected using virus isolation and BHV1 specific polymerase chain reactions in samples of nasal fluids, and BHV1 specific antibodies in serum samples. Strain Harberink was hardly transmitted to sentinel calves, whereas strain Lam was transmitted to all sentinels. Estimating the rate of transmission per day, the total number of calves infected by one (strain Lam) infected calf was 1.18. Comparing this estimated transmission ratio between cattle at a distance of 4 m to the estimated transmission ratio R of BHV1 in susceptible commingled cattle reported before, the effect of the factor distance on the transmission ratio could be calculated. Extrapolating these results, a distance of 4.4 m between cattle populations would be necessary to reduce transmission for this strain to R<1.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Social isolation may influence responsiveness to infection with bovine herpesvirus 1 in veal calves.

An experiment was performed to develop a model to study the impact of stress on responsiveness to infection with bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV1) in veal calves. Social isolation after previous group-housing was used as a putatively stressful treatment. Group-housed specific pathogen-free veal calves (n=8) were experimentally infected with BHV1 at the age of 12 weeks. Half of the calves were socially isolated at the time of infection. Clinical, virological and serological responses to BHV1, and adreno-cortical reactivity to exogenous ACTH were examined. In comparison with group-housed calves, calves socially isolated at the time of infection showed a diminished clinical and fever response, and delayed viral excretion after primary infection with BHV1. Four weeks after social isolation, basal cortisol levels before, and the integrated cortisol response after administration of a low dose of ACTH, were significantly depressed in socially isolated calves. The results suggest that social isolation in veal calves influences the response to an experimental BHV1 infection. A possible mechanism is discussed.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗

PubMed2000

A gE-negative BHV1 vaccine virus strain cannot perpetuate in cattle populations.

Three identical transmission experiments were successively performed to quantitatively evaluate the possible transmission of a gE-negative bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV1) vaccine strain among cattle. After intranasal inoculation, the vaccine virus was excreted in high titers in nasal fluids. However, the vaccine virus was transmitted to only one sentinel in one experiment, and not to any of the 10 sentinel cattle in the other two experiments. Based on these observations, it can be concluded that the expected number of cases per vaccine-inoculated animal, i.e. the transmission ratio R(0) of the vaccine strain, is significantly below 1. The R(0) was estimated to be 0.14. After intramuscular inoculation, shedding of vaccine virus was not detected. Therefore, we concluded that it is highly unlikely that this live gE-negative BHV1 vaccine strain will perpetuate in the cattle population.

Administration, Intranasal↗

PubMed2000

A gE-negative bovine herpesvirus 1 vaccine strain is not re-excreted nor transmitted in an experimental cattle population after corticosteroid treatments.

To study possible reactivation and to quantify subsequent transmission of a live gE-negative bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV1) vaccine strain in cattle populations, four experiments were performed. Two groups of cattle were each tested twice for the possibility of reactivation. Inoculation with a gE-negative BHV1 vaccine was done either intramuscularly or intranasally and treatment with corticosteroids in an attempt to reactivate vaccine virus, was done after 6 or 11 weeks, and again after 6 months. To quantify transmission of vaccine virus following possible reactivation, each cattle was housed together with one susceptible contact-cattle. Contact-infections were monitored using virus shedding and antibody responses. After corticosteroid treatments, re-excretion of virus was never detected in cattle that had been inoculated with the gE-negative BHV1 vaccine strain. Contact cattle did not shed gE-negative BHV1, nor mounted any antibody response against BHV1. In contrast, positive control cattle, inoculated intranasally with wild-type BHV1, re-excreted virus in high titers in nasal fluids and transmitted the virus to contact cattle. Based on these results, the transmission ratio R(0) of the vaccine strain was zero. We concluded that it is highly unlikely that the live gE-negative BHV1 vaccine strain will be re-excreted after possible reactivation, and consequently, it is even less likely that reactivated vaccine virus will spread in the cattle population.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Epitopes on glycoprotein E and on the glycoprotein E/glycoprotein I complex of bovine herpesvirus 1 are expressed by all of 222 isolates and 11 vaccine strains.

Glycoprotein E (gE) of bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV1) forms a complex with glycoprotein I (gI) and plays an important role in cell-to-cell spread mechanisms of the virus, but is not essential for propagation of the virus. To study the antigenic variability of BHV1 glycoprotein E, a set of six well characterised monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) was established using BHV1 gE and gI deletion mutants, eukaryotically expressed gE and gI and pepscan analysis. Two of these MAbs reacted with a linear gE epitope (MAbs 3 and 52), two reacted with a more conformation dependent gE epitope (MAbs 61 and 81) and two reacted with epitopes formed by a complex formed between gE and glycoprotein I (MAbs 67 and 75). With these six MAbs the gE expression of 222 BHV1 isolates and 11 BHV1 modified-live vaccine strains was studied in vitro, using an immunoperoxidase monolayer assay. All 222 BHV1 isolates and 11 vaccine strains were found to react with MAbs 61, 81 and 75. Three of the 222 isolates failed to react with MAb 67 and two of the vaccines reacted very weakly with MAbs 3 and 52. Analysis of the gE genes of these five aberrant isolates and the gE glycoproteins they expressed, did not show obvious size differences compared to wild-type BHV1. We conclude that the tested gE epitopes are highly conserved, including the epitopes formed by the gI/gE complex.

3T3 Cells↗

PubMed2000

Systemic and mucosal isotype-specific antibody responses in pigs to experimental influenza virus infection.

The immunoglobulin isotype-specific responses in serum and at the respiratory mucosa of pigs after a primary infection with influenza virus were studied. To do this, we developed an aerosol challenge model for influenza in specified pathogen-free (SPF) pigs and isotype-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Ten-week-old pigs were inoculated without anesthesia in the nostrils with an aerosol of the field isolate influenza A/swine/Neth/St. Oedenrode/96 (H3N2). The infection caused acute respiratory disease that closely resembled the disease observed in some outbreaks of influenza among finishing pigs, which were not complicated by bacterial infections. Pigs showed clinical signs characterized by fever, dyspnea, and anorexia. At necropsy on postinfection days 1 and 2, an exudative endobronchitis was observed throughout the lung. Viral antigen was present in the epithelial cells of the bronchi and bronchioli and virus was isolated from bronchioalveolar and nasal lavage fluids and from pharyngeal swabs until 5 days after infection. With the isotype-specific ELISAs, viral nucleoprotein specific immunoglobulin (Ig) M, IgG1, and IgA antibody responses were measured in serum and bronchioalveolar and nasal lavage fluids. To determine whether the antibodies were produced and secreted at the respiratory mucosa or were serum-derived, the specific activity (ie, the ratio of antibody titer to Ig concentration) was calculated for each isotype. The IgA and interestingly also a substantial part of the IgG1 antibody response in pigs upon infection with influenza virus was shown to be a mucosal response. Local production of specific IgA in the nasal mucosa, and of specific IgA and IgG1 in the lung was demonstrated. These results indicate that protective efficacy of vaccination can be improved by an immunization procedure that preferentially stimulates a mucosal immune response. The aerosol challenge model in SPF pigs and the isotype-specific ELISAs that we developed can be useful for evaluating various strategies to improve efficacy of porcine influenza vaccines and to study the immune mechanisms underlying the observed protection.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Diva vaccines that reduce virus transmission.

This brief review deals with the effect of diva (Differentiating Infected from VAccinated individuals) vaccines (also termed marker vaccines) on transmission of herpesviruses and pestiviruses in swine and cattle. Pseudorabies and bovine herpesvirus 1 diva vaccines have been demonstrated to reduce transmission of wild-type virus in populations of pigs and cattle in the laboratory as well as in the field. A subunit diva vaccine based on the immunodominant E2 protein of classical swine fever virus that is expressed in the baculovirus system may reduce transmission of wild-type virus among pigs and also transmission from mother to foetuses. A similar diva vaccine against bovine virus diarrhoea infections protected sheep against transplacental transmission of antigenically homologous wild-type virus. Diva vaccines along with their companion diagnostic tests can play a role in control of infections, ultimately leading to eradication of viruses.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Transmission of classical swine fever virus by artificial insemination.

Classical swine fever (CSF) virus was introduced into an artificial insemination centre during the CSF epizootic of 1997-1998 in the Netherlands. The risk of further spread of CSF virus via contaminated semen was recognised, but could not be assessed because scientific data on this issue were not available. An animal experiment was performed to determine whether CSF virus could be transmitted via artificial insemination with contaminated semen. Three boars were inoculated with a CSF virus field isolate and from Day 5 till Day 18 thereafter, ejaculates were collected and prepared for insemination. Ruttish sows were inseminated with the extended semen from Day 5 till Day 18 after inoculation of the boars. All the inoculated boars remained healthy throughout the experiment and developed CSF neutralising antibodies between 14 and 21 days after inoculation. Virus was isolated from several semen samples collected from 5 till 11 days after inoculation. Two out of six sows inseminated with CSF contaminated semen seroconverted after insemination. All the other sows remained seronegative. In the foetuses of both the seropositive sows, CSF virus was detected at approximately 35 days post insemination. These results demonstrate that adult boars infected with CSF virus can excrete virus with semen and can, subsequently, transmit the virus to sows and their foetuses via artificial insemination.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Airborne transmission of BHV1, BRSV, and BVDV among cattle is possible under experimental conditions.

To control the diseases caused by bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV1), bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV), and bovine virus diarrhoea virus (BVDV), it is crucial to know their modes of transmission. The purpose of this study was to determine whether these viruses can be transmitted by air to a substantial extent. Calves were housed in two separate isolation stables in which a unidirectional airflow was maintained through a tube in the wall. In one stable, three of the five calves were experimentally infected with BHV1 and later with BRSV. In the BVDV experiment, two calves persistently infected with BVDV (PI-calves) instead of experimentally infected calves, were used as the source of the virus. In all the calves infections were monitored using virus and antibody detection. Results showed that all the three viruses were transmitted by air. BHV1 spread to sentinel calves in the adjacent stable within three days, and BRSV within nine days, and BVDV spread to sentinel calves probably within one week. Although airborne transmission is possibly not the main route of transmission, these findings will have consequences for disease prevention and regulations in control programmes.

Air Microbiology↗