Biomedical subjects

J T Moller

Publications and source records attributed to J T Moller.

27 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1993

Randomized evaluation of pulse oximetry in 20,802 patients: II. Perioperative events and postoperative complications.

BACKGROUND: The authors describe the effect of pulse oximetry monitoring on the frequency of unanticipated perioperative events, changes in patient care, and the rate of postoperative complications in a prospective randomized study. METHODS: The study included 20,802 surgical patients in Denmark randomly assigned to be monitored or not with pulse oximetry in the operating room (OR) and postanesthesia care unit (PACU). RESULTS: During anesthesia and in the PACU, significantly more patients in the oximetry group had at least one respiratory event than did the control patients. This was the result of a 19-fold increase in the incidence of diagnosed hypoxemia in the oximetry group than in the control group in both the OR and PACU (P < 0.00001). In the OR, cardiovascular events were observed in a similar number of patients in both groups, except myocardial ischemia (as defined by angina or ST-segment depression), which was detected in 12 patients in the oximetry group and in 26 patients in the control group (P < 0.03). Several changes in PACU care were observed in association with the use of pulse oximetry. These included higher flow rate of supplemental oxygen (P < 0.00001), increased use of supplemental oxygen at discharge (P < 0.00001), and increased use of naloxone (P < 0.02). The rate of changes in patient care as a consequence of the oximetry monitoring increased as the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status worsened (P < 0.00001). One or more postoperative complications occurred in 10% of the patients in the oximetry group and in 9.4% in the control group (difference not significant). The two groups did not differ significantly in cardiovascular, respiratory, neurologic, or infectious complications. The duration of hospital stay was a median of 5 days in both groups (difference not significant). An equal number of inhospital deaths were registered in the two groups. Questionnaires, completed by the anesthesiologists at the five participating departments, revealed that 18% of the anesthesiologists had experienced a situation in which a pulse oximeter helped to avoid a serious event or complication and that 80% of the anesthesiologists felt more secure when they used a pulse oximeter. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that pulse oximetry can improve the anesthesiologist's ability to detect hypoxemia and related events in the OR and PACU and that the use of the oximeter was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of myocardial ischemia. Although monitoring with pulse oximetry prompted a number of changes in patient care, a reduction in the overall rate of postoperative complications was not observed.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Hypoxaemia is reduced by pulse oximetry monitoring in the operating theatre and in the recovery room.

To determine the impact of pulse oximeter monitoring on the incidence, severity and duration of hypoxaemia in the operating theatre (OT) and in the recovery room (RR), we investigated 200 patients in a randomized study. The extent of hypoxaemia in the OT was compared with that in the RR. Adult inpatients were allocated randomly to two groups: group I, pulse oximeter data and alarms "available"; group II, these data "unavailable" to the anaesthesia team and RR staff. Hypoxaemia was graded into four values of oxyhaemoglobin saturation (SpO2). The incidence of hypoxaemia was reduced significantly in group I in both OT and RR. In the OT, five patients in group II suffered SpO2 less than 76% compared with none in group I (P less than 0.02). In group II in the RR, seven patients suffered SpO2 less than 81%; three of these had SpO2 less than 76%. No patients in group I exhibited such small values of saturation. The smallest recorded SpO2 in the OT and the RR was significantly greater in group I. The cumulative duration of hypoxaemia was significantly less in group I in the RR, but not in the OT. The incidence and severity of hypoxaemia in the OT and in the RR were comparable, whereas the cumulative duration of hypoxaemia was significantly greater in the RR than in the OT. The occurrence of hypoxaemia in an individual patient in the OT significantly increased this patient's risk of suffering hypoxaemia in the RR. We conclude that the extent of hypoxaemia, especially in the RR, may be reduced significantly by pulse oximeter monitoring, but even with the information provided, some patients still develop hypoxaemia.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Hypoxaemia during anaesthesia--an observer study.

We have investigated 296 inpatients in a single-blind observer study to determine the incidence, degree and duration of hypoxaemia during anaesthesia. The clinical recognition of hypoxaemia, period of time until recognition and risk factors were studied. Oxygen saturation (Spo2) was monitored continuously with a pulse oximeter (Ohmeda, model 3700). One or more episodes of mild hypoxaemia (Spo2 86-90%) were recorded in 53% of patients. Severe hypoxaemia with Spo2 values less than 81% were recorded in 20% of patients. The mild hypoxaemic episodes lasted up to 34.6 min (mean 2.3 min) and 70% were not detected by the anaesthetist. In the remaining 30% of episodes, the anaesthetist diagnosed the complication with a mean time delay of 70 s. After intervention a mean time delay of 57 s was recorded until Spo2 exceeded 90%. Utilizing a stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis, we found that risk factors associated with a greater incidence of hypoxaemia were patient age (P less than 0.005) and anaesthetic technique (P less than 0.00001). We conclude that hypoxaemic episodes in our operating rooms are common during anaesthesia and suggest preoxygenation in all patients in addition to administration of supplementary oxygen during arousal from anaesthesia and during transfer to the recovery room.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1990

Hypoxemia in the postanesthesia care unit: an observer study.

To determine the incidence and duration of hypoxemia in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), 200 patients were investigated in a single-blind observer study. The number of unrecognized hypoxemic episodes, as well as risk factors and possible association between hypoxemia and postoperative morbidity, were studied. Oxygenation was monitored continuously with a pulse oximeter. One or more hypoxemic episodes (SpO2 less than or equal to 90%) were noted in 55% of the patients. SpO2 values less than or equal to 80% were noted in 13% of the patients. Supplementary oxygen was given during 55% of the 447 hypoxemic episodes registered. The hypoxemic episodes were unrecognized by the staff in 95% of the cases. With stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses, risk factors associated with a higher incidence of hypoxemia were: duration of anesthesia (P less than 0.0001), age (P less than 0.002) and a history of smoking (P less than 0.01). Patients who had undergone regional anesthesia had a lower risk of hypoxemia (P less than 0.0002). The occurrence of hypoxemia in the PACU could not be correlated to postoperative morbidity. We conclude that hypoxemic episodes in our PACU are common and that the routine use of supplemental oxygen combined with normal clinical surveillance did not prevent hypoxemic episodes.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1976