Biomedical subjects

J Stettin

Publications and source records attributed to J Stettin.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

[Telematics and quality. Implementation of a telematic platform in Hamburg].

Since the end of the year 2000 a group of interested people has been working on the subject of quality improvement in breast cancer. Within this framework the project "improvement of breast cancer treatment by telemedicine" was started. Based on a workflow analysis and interviews with patients as well as health professionals, it turned out that there are gaps and flaws in the communication process. These problems occurred between health professionals involved in the treatment of patients and between health professionals and patients as well. As a result a telemedicine network has been developed which is based on MPLS technology. Within this network a central communication unit facilitates optimization of the workflow for the treatment of breast cancer. It will also be possible to set up groups for integrated care. Currently the system is being evaluated in specific breast centres in Hamburg. As the net is based on a positive business plan, it can be foreseen that a broad implementation will follow.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2001

Electronic documentation in endoscopy: present status and future perspectives from a company standpoint.

At the beginning of the development of endoscopic information systems all companies were technology-oriented. Today, we see a change from technology to content orientation, the same development which is seen in internet technology. In future systems, it will not be the software that makes a difference but the contents. Contents means not only patient data but also algorithms for feature extraction within large databases with reference images, for example [20]. The automatic recognition of features, such as a complication rate that is too high or a correlation of a certain disease with an endoscopic finding, will be part of a content-based approach. It means that content will also be the knowledge base which has to be developed for future systems. The system of the future will be much more intelligent and less software technology-oriented.

Computer Communication Networks↗

PubMed2000

Minimal standard terminology for digestive endoscopy: results of prospective testing and validation in the GASTER project.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Standardization of the endoscopic report is a key issue for future research in the field of digestive endoscopy. The Minimal Standard Terminology (MST) has been proposed by the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) as a structured language for production of computerized endoscopic reports. The aim of this study was to validate version 1.0 of this terminology prospectively, by collecting cases in a multicenter, multilingual trial. METHODS: Endoscopic cases (esophagogastroduodenoscopy [EGD], colonoscopy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP]) were prospectively collected in nine university hospitals in Europe, using the same software. Reports were produced in the local language, but the software allowed comparison of reports between languages, and global analysis of the database. Outcome measures were the adequacy of terms proposed in the MST to describe "reasons for performing an endoscopy", "findings", and "endoscopic diagnoses", frequency of use and content of free-text fields, and types of lesions described. RESULTS: A total of 6,232 reports were analyzed, including 3,447 gastroscopies, 1,743 colonoscopies, and 1,042 ERCPs. Overall, terms originally contained in the MST were adequate to describe fully 91.0% of all examinations where "reasons for endoscopy" were described, 99.5 % of examinations where "findings" were described, 95.8% of all examinations containing descriptions of "endoscopic diagnosis", 98.9% of examinations containing descriptions of "additional diagnostic procedures", and 94.8 % of examinations containing descriptions of "additional therapeutic procedures". Free-text fields were only used in the other cases (less than 5% of cases in average). CONCLUSIONS: The MST appeared adequate to cover a large part of routine endoscopy reports, and could thus be used as a tool for standardization of endoscopic reports in clinical practice. The latter could be significantly improved by the use of a structured and standardized terminology for the production of endoscopic reports.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed1994

[Structured documentation in gastroscopy: a method for improved quality assurance?].

To further improve quality assurance of gastrointestinal endoscopy, a computer assisted documentation system for gastroscopic data was assessed. In this context, for the structured written recording system, parameters "expenditure of time" and "acceptance by doctors" was evaluated. Contrary to free, unstructured data recording, the structured system employing predefined terms was able to promote doctors' acceptance of endoscopic terminology standards.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1990

[Video-endoscopy and sonography--future developments].

Video Endoscopy and Video Sonography are new developments in the field of endoscopy. They will start a structural change of the common endoscopy unit. This article shall give an overview about new development ways and their consequences for the next years in the field of Video Endoscopy.

Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal↗