Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Senges

Publications and source records attributed to J Senges.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Incidence, determinants, and clinical course of reinfarction in-hospital after index acute myocardial infarction (results from the pooled data of the maximal individual therapy in acute myocardial infarction [MITRA], and the myocardial infarction registry [MIR]).

There are few data about the incidence, determinants, and clinical course of in-hospital repeat acute myocardial infarction (RE-AMI) after an index AMI. From June 1994 to June 1998, 22,613 patients with AMI as an index event were registered by the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) and Myocardial Infarction Registries (MIR). Of these, 1,071 (4.7%) had a RE-AMI. For the index event, 9,143 patients (40.5%) were treated with thrombolysis, 1,707 (7.5%) with primary angioplasty, and 443 (2.0%) with a combination of both. Multivariate analysis showed that previous AMI (odds ratio [OR] 1.59; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.35 to 1.86), age >70 years (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.36 to 1.81), diagnostic first electrocardiogram (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.59), and female gender (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.32) were independently associated with a higher incidence of RE-AMI. The incidence of RE-AMI was higher when patients received thrombolysis (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.61), and it was lower when they underwent primary angioplasty (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.53 to 1.03) or received beta blockers (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97). Patients with RE-AMI had higher hospital mortality compared with those without RE-AMI (OR 4.35; 95% CI 3.83 to 4.95). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed an independent association of RE-AMI with in-hospital death (OR 6.60; 95% CI 5.61 to 7.70), repeat revascularization (OR 2.91; 95% CI 2.42 to 3.50), low workload capacity on the bicycle ergometry test (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.71 to 2.76), and ejection fraction <40% (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.38 to 2.14) at discharge. Thus, RE-AMI occurs in 4.7% of patients after an AMI. Previous AMI, age >70 years, diagnostic first electrocardiogram, and female gender are independent determinants for RE-AMI. Thrombolysis is associated with a higher and beta blockers with a lower incidence of RE-AMI. Once a RE-AMI occurs, it is a strong predictor of in-hospital mortality and morbidity.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

[Gene polymorphisms of hemostasis and coronary risk].

Hemostatic disorders are substantially involved in the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndromes. In addition to biochemical markers, gene polymorphisms of hemostasis have been intensively studied in terms of their association with coronary risk. These include polymorphisms of the genes of platelet glycoproteins, fibrinogen, prothrombin, factors V, VIII and XIII, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and tissue-type plasminogen activator. An association of a certain gene polymorphism with an increased coronary risk has usually been demonstrated in retrospective case-control studies. However, numerous clinical studies have not yet been able to identify any of these polymorphisms as unequivocal risk factors of coronary heart disease or acute coronary syndromes. These inconsistencies are mainly due to the complexity of the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease and the minor contribution of a single polymorphism to total coronary risk. This review reports on essential requirements of future studies as a prerequisite to improve our understanding of the genetic basis of coronary heart disease.

Blood Coagulation Factors↗
PubMed2001

[Quality assurance in acute myocardial infarct].

The Ludwigshafen myocardial infarction project has demonstrated, that an intense public media campaign can reduce prehospital delays in acute myocardial infarction. With an additional intrahospital improvement, this can lead to a better and more frequent use of recanalization (thrombolysis or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA]). Several large multicentric registries (60 minutes myocardial infarction project, MIR, MITRA) with a total of about 40,000 patients at over 300 hospitals in Germany showed, that intrahospital improvement of infarction therapy can also be achieved in other hospitals. Voluntary participation in an infarction registry leads to quality control and improvement. Two factors are especially important: (1) documentation of every infarction patient, and (2) documentation of the reasons why therapy was given or withheld in every single patient. The improvement in early therapy is associated with a 20% reduction of hospital mortality (MITRA-1). The media campaign in Ludwigshafen to reduce pre-hospital patient delay, however, could not yet be carried out in other areas effectively and intensely enough.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcome of stroke after acute myocardial infarction in clinical practice. MIR and MITRA Study Groups. Myocardial Infarction Registry. Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction .

In this analysis of ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 21,330 consecutively included patients with AMI, we found an incidence of stroke after AMI of 1.2% and a very poor prognosis. Previous stroke, atrial fibrillation, and older age were the strongest predictors of stroke after AMI; thrombolysis was a borderline risk factor and early therapy with aspirin was associated with a reduction in stroke after AMI.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Effect of preinfarction angina pectoris on outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty (results from the Myocardial Infarction Registry.

Preinfarction angina is associated with better clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who receive intravenous thrombolysis. This has not been proved in patients with AMI treated with primary angioplasty. We analyzed the data of the prospective multicenter Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR). Of 14,440 patients with AMI, 774 with a prehospital delay of < or =12 hours were treated with primary angioplasty. Five hundred thirty-two patients (68.7%) had preinfarction angina. Patients with preinfarction angina were slightly older than patients without (63 vs 62 years, p = 0.042), prehospital delay was 1 hour longer (180 vs 120 minutes, p = 0.001), and arterial hypertension was more prevalent (47.6% vs 32.2%, odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.39 to 2.62). There was no significant difference in hospital mortality (5.6% vs 3.3%, OR 1.75, 95% CI 0.79 to 3.87), reinfarction, stroke, or the combined end point of death, reinfarction, or stroke between the 2 groups. Logistic regression analysis showed no association of preinfarction angina with the occurrence of either death (OR 2.21, 95% CI 0.91 to 6.08) or the combined end points (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.31). There was also no significant difference in mortality (6% vs 5.1%, OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.56 to 2.52), reinfarction, stroke, postinfarction angina, or the combined end points between patients with preinfarction angina within 48 hours compared with patients with preinfarction angina between 49 hours and 4 weeks before the AMI. Thus, the MIR data showed no protective effects of preinfarction angina in patients with AMI treated with primary angioplasty.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed2001

[2 year follow-up of 321 patients with an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator: comparison of patients with and without atrial fibrillation].

UNLABELLED: Atrial fibrillation is the most common cause of inappropriate therapy deliveries by implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICD). However, the importance of atrial fibrillation for the induction of ventricular arrhythmias and for the prognosis is controversial. We studied 321 ICD patients (pts) over the median follow-up of 25 months. In 92 pts, atrial fibrillation was found to be the underlying rhythm (in 49 pts chronic, in 43 pts paroxysmal), in 229 pts sinus rhythm. Pts with atrial fibrillation were older (67 +/- 9 vs. 63 +/- 9 years, p = 0.001) and were considered to suffer more often from a valvular (14 vs. 4%, p = 0.004) or a dilative cardiomyopathy (29 vs. 19%, p = 0.04). Both groups were similar regarding other baseline characteristics like gender, left ventricular ejection fraction, hypertension, diabetes and in the ICD system (single chamber, dual chamber) used. Pts with atrial fibrillation experienced more appropriate (ventricular fibrillation: 0.33 vs. 0.2/month, p = 0.0049, ventricular tachycardias: 0.05 vs 0/month, p = 0.0033) as well as inappropriate (34 vs. 8%, p < 0.001) therapy deliveries by the ICD. Pts with atrial fibrillation were found to suffer twice as much from a progression of their heart failure (43% vs. 22%, p < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, atrial fibrillation was significantly associated with progressive pump-failure mortality (relative risk (RR) 3.12, confidence interval (CI) 1.30 to 7.48, p = 0.01). There was no difference in the incidence of ICD therapies and mortality rates between the pts with chronic and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSION: The presence of atrial fibrillation in ICD patients is associated with a progression of heart failure and therefore is an unfavorable factor for pump-failure death. Also, atrial fibrillation is a marker for greater possibility to experience more appropriate as well as inappropriate therapy deliveries by the ICD.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

[Current prescription practice of CSE inhibitors at clinic discharge after acute myocardial infarct].

We investigated the use of statins in clinical practice in patients with acute myocardial infarction in Germany in 17,732 consecutively included patients of the registries MIR-1 and MITRA-1. A clinical follow-up has been performed in the MITRA-1 study after a mean period of 18 months. In total 30% of all patients with acute myocardial infarction received statins at discharge. From 1994 to 1998 the use of statins increased from 6% to 44%; however in 1998 still less than half of the patients with acute myocardial infarction received statins at discharge. In a logistic regression model, concomittant diseases as renal failure (OR 0.7), heart failure (OR 0.7) and diabetes mellitus (OR 0.9) were associated with a lower use of statins. Age > 70 years (OR 0.5) was also associated with a lower use of statins at hospital discharge. Patients with statins at discharge had a lower long-term mortality of 5.8% versus 12.9% in patients without statins. After adjustment to age and comorbidity, use of statins at discharge was associated with a borderline significant reduction of long-term mortality (multivariate OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.0). In a subgroup analysis of therapeutic benefit, measured by the "number needed to treat" (NNT), the number of patients to treat with statins to save one life, patients with cardiovascular risk factors, as heart failure (NNT 7.5), diabetes mellitus (NNT 7.8) and age > 70 years (NNT 13.8) had a larger therapeutic benefit as patients without these risk factors (NNT 345). However, these high-risk patients received less often statins than patients without risk factors (use of statins 11.8% versus 19.8%).

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Effects of propafenone on anisotropic conduction properties within the three-dimensional structure of the canine ventricular wall.

BACKGROUND: Structural complexities of the intact ventricular wall cause a very complex spread of activation. The effects of regional tissue damage and of antiarrhythmic drugs on directional differences in activation should help to further elucidate intramural conduction patterns. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 10 healthy dogs and in 5 dogs with subacute anterior wall infarction, 6 parallel rows of 6 needle electrodes with 4 bipolar electrode pairs per needle were inserted into the left anterior ventricular wall. Using a computerized multiplexer-mapping system, the spread of activation in epi-, endo- and midmyocardial muscle layers and in the surviving epicardium, respectively, was reconstructed. Marked differences in conduction velocities relative to fiber orientation were evident in the surviving epicardium of infarcted hearts. Directional differences in conduction velocities, although less pronounced, were still preserved throughout the intact ventricular wall. Epicardial transverse conduction in intact hearts was significantly faster than transverse conduction in infarcted hearts (0.87 +/- 0.11 m/s vs 0.68 +/- 0.1 m/s). In normal hearts, propafenone (2 mg/kg) decreased conduction velocities primarily in longitudinal directions (-27 +/- 10%), but also moderately in transverse directions (-13 +/- 7 %) of all muscle layers, with no significant effect on straight (-4 +/- 8 %), but on oblique transmural conduction (-33 +/- 18 %). In infarcted hearts propafenone decreased conduction particularly in longitudinal direction (-23 +/- 14 %) without affecting conduction transverse to the fiber orientation (+3 +/- 6%). CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal intramural shortcircuits reduce directional differences in activation. Transmural infarction results in a loss of alternative intramural pathways, unmasking marked anisotropy in the surviving epicardium. Conduction delay in intramural pathways explains the effects of propafenone on transverse and oblique transmural conduction. Primarily longitudinal conduction delay results in reduced tissue anisotropy.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Clinical profile and management of heart failure: rural community hospital vs. metropolitan heart center.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge on clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with heart failure originates from studies of selected populations in clinical trials or from epidemiological observations. Reports on the large numbers of patients with heart failure treated in community hospitals are sparse. OBJECTIVE: Are there differences in patient characteristics and heart failure management between a metropolitan heart center (HC) and a rural community hospital (RCH)? PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical charts from all patients admitted for heart failure (ICD 428.x, NYHA II-IV, EF<45%) between May 1997 and April 1998 and discharged alive from a rural community hospital. A similar, but prospective registry was available at the HC. Follow-up information was obtained by request at registration authorities. RESULTS: Patient groups comprised 120 in RCH and 146 in HC. Mean age was 75+/-11 and 66+/-11 years, respectively (P<0.001); 48% (RCH) vs. 74% (HC) of patients were male (P<0.001). On admission the proportion of functional class IV was 69% (RCH) vs. 17% (HC) (P<0.001). At discharge, the rate of ACE-inhibitors was 74% (RCH) vs. 98% (HC); 11% (RCH) vs. 43% (HC) of patients received beta-blocker therapy. Ninety-six percent of patients in HC underwent and 22% in RCH had undergone invasive diagnostics. One-year mortality rate of patients discharged alive was 26% in RCH and 19% in HC (P=n.s. after adjustment for age and gender). CONCLUSION: Heart failure management according to current guidelines, using beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors, and invasive cardiac examination was significantly less performed in the rural community hospital than in the metropolitan heart center. Therefore, strategies to improve heart failure management according to guidelines are urgently needed.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

Differences in treatment and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with compared to without departments of cardiology; results from the pooled data of the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA 1+2) Registries and the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR).

AIMS: The specialty of the admitting physician may influence treatment and outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The pooled data of three German acute myocardial infarction registries: the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) 1+2 studies and the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR) were analysed. Patients admitted to hospitals with departments of cardiology were compared to hospitals without such departments. A total of 24 814 acute myocardial infarction patients were included, 9020 (36%) patients at 91 (29.8%) hospitals with departments of cardiology and 15 794 (64%) at 214 (70.2%) hospitals without cardiology departments. There were only minor differences in patient characteristics and prevalence of concomitant diseases between the two types of hospital. The first electrocardiogram was more often diagnostic at hospitals with cardiology departments (71.8% vs 66.5%, P<0.001). Reperfusion therapy and adjunctive medical therapy, such as aspirin, beta-blockers and ACE-inhibitors were used more often at cardiology departments (all P -values <0.001), even after adjustment for confounding parameters. Treatment improved at both types of hospital over time. Admission to a hospital with a department of cardiology was independently associated with a lower hospital mortality (14.2% vs 15.4%, adjusted OR=0.91; 95%CI: 0.83-0.99). Additional logistic regression models showed that the higher use of reperfusion therapy and recommended concomitant medical therapy was responsible for most of the survival benefit at such hospitals. CONCLUSION: Treatment of acute myocardial infarction patients at hospitals with departments of cardiology was independently associated with a higher use of recommended therapy and a lower hospital mortality compared to hospitals without such departments.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Characterization and clinical course of patients not receiving aspirin for acute myocardial infarction: results from the MITRA and MIR studies.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have shown the efficacy of aspirin for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, not all patients receive aspirin for AMI. The aim of this study was to provide information on characteristics and clinical course of patients not treated with aspirin for AMI. METHODS: We analyzed the data of the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR) and the Maximal Individual Therapy of Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) registry. MITRA and MIR were prospective multicenter registries of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in Germany. RESULTS: Of 22,572 patients registered from 1994 to 1998, 1767 (7.8%) did not receive aspirin within the first 48 hours after admission. Multivariate analysis revealed two main factors associated with withholding aspirin for AMI: relative contraindications to aspirin (gastric ulcer [odds ratio (OR) 4.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-5.7], renal insufficiency [OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8]), and critical clinical state at admission (cardiogenic shock [OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.1] and prehospital resuscitation [OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.2]). In addition, these patients were significantly less likely to receive reperfusion therapy and adjunctive medical therapy such as beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. In-hospital mortality after adjustment for baseline characteristics was 27.2% in patients without aspirin compared with 11.1% in patients treated with aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of AMI patients (7.8%) did not receive aspirin. Relative contraindications to aspirin and a critical clinical state at admission were the main factors associated with withholding aspirin for AMI. Even after adjustment for patient characteristics, the mortality of patients without aspirin was almost three times higher.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Impact of prehospital delay on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis, longer times to treatment are associated with increasingly worse clinical outcome. This relation may be different for treatment with primary angioplasty. METHODS: We analyzed the pooled data of the German acute myocardial infarction registries Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) and Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR) to determine the influence of prehospital delays on hospital mortality rates. Primary angioplasty was performed in 1063 patients and thrombolysis in 7552 patients. RESULTS: In patients treated with thrombolysis, in-hospital time to treatment was constantly 30 minutes median. In patients treated with primary angioplasty, in-hospital time to treatment increased from 60 minutes median up to 87 minutes median with increasing prehospital delay. Hospital mortality rates slightly decreased with increasing prehospital delays in patients treated with primary angioplasty (P for trend =.02). However, in patients treated with thrombolysis, mortality rate was nonsignificantly increased (P for trend =.11). Logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference in mortality rates between primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for prehospital delays of <3 hours. However, when prehospital delay was >3 hours, thrombolysis was independently associated with a higher mortality rate compared with primary angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with thrombolysis, primary angioplasty is independently associated with a lower mortality rate in prehospital delays of >3 hours. The reason for this may be a time-dependent loss of efficacy to achieve reperfusion for thrombolysis but not for primary angioplasty.

Angioplasty, Balloon↗
PubMed2001

Rationale and design of the LURIC study--a resource for functional genomics, pharmacogenomics and long-term prognosis of cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Coronary artery disease (CAD), arterial hypertension and Type 2 diabetes mellitus are common polygenetic disorders which have a major impact on public health. Disease prevalence and progression to cardiovascular complications, such as myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or heart failure, are the product of environment and gene interaction. The LUdwigshafen RIsk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study aims to provide a well-defined resource for the study of environmental and genetic risk factors, and their interactions, and the study of functional relationships between gene variation and biochemical phenotype (functional genomics) or response to medication (pharmacogenomics). Long-term follow-up on clinical events will allow us to study the prognostic importance of common genetic variants (polymorphisms) and plasma biomarkers. SETTING: Cardiology unit in tertiary care medical centre in south-west Germany. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of individuals with and without cardiovascular disease at baseline. PATIENTS AND METHODS: LURIC is an ongoing prospective study of currently > 3300 individuals in whom the cardiovascular and metabolic phenotypes CAD, MI, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus have been defined or ruled out using standardised methodologies in all study participants. Inclusion criteria for LURIC were: German ancestry (limitation of genetic heterogeneity) clinical stability (except for acute coronary syndromes [ACSs]) availability of a coronary angiogram (this inclusion criterium was waived for family members provided that they met all other inclusion and exclusion criteria) Exclusion criteria were: any acute illness other than ACSs any chronic disease where non-cardiac disease predominated a history of malignancy within the past five years. Exclusion criteria were pre-specified in order to minimise the impact of concomitant non-cardiovascular disease on intermediate biochemical phenotypes or on clinical prognosis (limitation of clinical heterogeneity). A standardised personal and family history questionnaire and an extensive laboratory work-up (including glucose tolerance testing in non-diabetics and objective assessment of smoking exposure by determination of cotinine plasma levels) was obtained from all individuals after informed consent. A total of 115 ml of fasting venous blood was sampled for the determination of a pre-specified wide range of intermediate biochemical phenotypes in serum, plasma or whole blood, for leukocyte DNA extraction and immortalisation of B-lymphocytes. Biochemical phenotypes measured included markers of endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, oxidative status, coagulation, lipid metabolism and flow cytometric surface receptor expression of lympho-, mono- and thrombocytes. In addition, multiple aliquots of blood samples were stored for future analyses. RESULTS: A total of 3500 LURIC baseline measurements were performed in 3316 individuals between July 1997 and January 2000. The baseline examination was repeated within a median of 35 days in 5% of study participants (n = 166, including a third examination in 18 after a median of 69 days) for pharmacogenomic assessment of lipid-lowering therapy and for quality control purposes. A five-year follow-up on major clinical events (death, any cardiovascular event including MI, stroke and revascularisation, malignancy and any hospitalisation) is ongoing. The clinical phenotypes prevalent at baseline in the cohort of 2309 men (70%) with a mean age of 62 +/- 11 years and 1007 women (30%), mean age 65 +/- 10 years, were angiographically-documented CAD in 2567 (79%), MI in 1368 (41%), dyslipidaemia in 2050 (62%) with hypercholesterolaemia > or = 240 mg/dl (27%), hypertriglyceridaemia > or = 150 mg/dl (44%) and HDL-cholesterol < or = 35 mg/dl (38%) in individuals not treated with lipid-lowering agents, systemic hypertension in 1921 (58%), metabolic syndrome in 1591 (48%), Type 2 diabetes in 1063 (32%) and obesity defined by body mass index > or = 30 kg/m2 in 770 (23%). Control patients in whom CAD had been ruled out angiographically were five years younger than those with CAD (59 +/- 12 and 64 +/- 10 years, respectively; p < 0.001), twice as often females (48% compared to 25% females in the CAD group, p < 0.001) and had significantly less cardiovascular risk factors than individuals with CAD. The prevalence of specific cardiovascular risk subsets in LURIC, such as the elderly (> or = 75 years), was 375 (11%), while 213 (6%) were young adults (< 45 years) and 904 (27%) were postmenopausal women (90% of all females). A low risk status (< or = 1 out of the four traditional risk factors: dyslipidaemia, smoking, hypertension and diabetes mellitus) was identified in 314 (9%) individuals of the entire cohort (5% in CAD and 26% in controls, p < 0.001) and 97 (3%) carried none of the four risk factors (1% in CAD and 9% in controls, p < 0.001). (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2001

Primary angioplasty versus no reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and a pre-hospital delay of > 12-24 hours: results from the pooled data of the maximal individual therapy in acute myocardial infarction (MITRA) registry and the myocardial infarction registry (MIR).

OBJECTIVE: In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), treatment with thrombolysis is superior to no reperfusion therapy only up to 12 hours after the onset of symptoms. There are no data addressing whether this time limit is also justified for treatment with primary angioplasty. DESIGN: The pooled data of two German ST-segment elevation AMI registries, the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) study and the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR), were analyzed. PATIENTS: Out of 22,749 patients, eight hundred and forty-eight with a pre-hospital delay of > 12 hours and < or = 24 hours were treated with either primary angioplasty (94/848; 11.1%) or no reperfusion therapy (754/848; 88.9%). RESULTS: Patients treated with primary angioplasty were 10 years younger (59 years versus 69 years; p = 0.001), more often male [72.3% versus 59.9%; odds ratio (OR) = 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.36-0.92] and less likely to be diabetics (17% versus 27.2%; OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.31-0.97). Hospital mortality was 8.5% in patients treated with primary angioplasty compared to 17.1% in patients with no reperfusion therapy (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.21-0.95; p = 0.033) and the combined endpoint (death, reinfarction or stroke) occurred significantly less often (11.7% versus 20.3%; OR = 0.52; 95% CI =0.27-1; p = 0.045). However, multiple logistic regression showed only a non-significant trend for lower mortality (OR = 0.54; 95% CI =0.20-1.23) and the combined endpoint (OR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.29-1.31) in patients treated with primary angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: These data show the possibility of a benefit of primary angioplasty over conservative treatment in patients with pre-hospital delays of > 12 up to 24 hours, although multiple logistic regression analysis failed to find significant differences between treatments. This might be due to inadequate study power or a selection bias. These findings encourage further investigation of this subject.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2001

What is the relevance of the HOPE study in general practice?

The unique findings from the HOPE (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) study strongly support extending the use of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril as a preventive agent for patients at high risk of cardiovascular events with normal left ventricular function. In addition, ramipril provides significant benefit in diabetic patients. These findings will impact on how ramipril is used in primary care, where ACE inhibitors are currently underprescribed. Patients reflecting the inclusion criteria of the HOPE study should be considered as suitable candidates for long-term ramipril therapy as an addition to their existing drug regimen. Screening should include control of kidney function (by serum creatinine), particularly within the first two weeks of treatment, in addition to regular monitoring of serum potassium. However, the HOPE study shows that ramipril is well tolerated at high doses and over a long treatment period. The effectiveness of therapy should also be regularly reviewed and dose adjustments made where necessary. If concern remains, referral to a specialist--a cardiologist or a diabetologist--may ultimately be necessary.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2000

[Comparison of acute myocardial infarct in the old and new lands of unified Germany, 1996-1998. Data of the Myocardial Infarct Register (MIR)].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Little is known about any differences in the prevention, treatment and treatment results of myocardial infarction between the "old" (western) and "new" (eastern) Lands (OFL vs. NFL) of the now unified Federal Republic of Germany. It was the aim of this study to determine any such differences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Myocardial Infarction Register (MIR) is a multicentre and prospective compilation of consecutive unselected data on patients with acute myocardial infarction sustained between December 1996 and May 1998. All date collected between these dates were included in the study: there were 14,608 patients in 211 hospitals, 5618 patients and 68 hospitals of those in the eastern part (former German Democratic Republic). The median age of the entire collective was 68 years, 35% of patients were female. RESULTS: There was a higher prevalence of risk factors in the NFL than the OFL: 43.3 vs. 39.0% with regard to arterial hypertension (p = 0.002), and 28.9 vs. 22.4% with regard to diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001). The prehospital period was longer in the NFL by an average of 30 min (210 vs. 180 min; p < 0.001. Another difference concerned the lower number of diagnostic ECGs in the NFL (61.8 vs. 68.6%; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences with regard to acute and discharge medication (acetylsalicylic acid, betablockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and cholesterol-synthesis inhibitors). The frequency of primary recanalization treatment (thrombolysis or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) in patients with clear-cut indications for thrombolysis was higher in the OFL (85.1 vs. 74.5%; p < 0.001). Hospital mortality was comparable (15.1 vs. 15.9%; p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Patient characteristics and treatment in the two parts of Germany were comparable in the two parts. Treatment of acute myocardial infarction attained a similarly high standard in both. But in both parts there is room for improving the application of guidelines for treating of myocardial infarction to routine clinical practice. Greater effort should be made to inform the population, especially of the NFL, about the need for primary prevention and reduction in prehospital time.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗