Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J S Markowitz

Publications and source records attributed to J S Markowitz.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation using combination lamivudine and hepatitis B immune globulin.

Patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related liver disease are prone to recurrence. The mainstay of prophylaxis has been passive immunotherapy with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG). Antiviral therapy with lamivudine has proven effective in lowering hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and improving histology in patients with hepatitis B infection; its role in prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation is under investigation. Viral breakthrough and resistance, however, are a significant problem with monotherapy with either HBIG or lamivudine. The efficacy of combination lamivudine/HBIG prophylaxis has not been reported. Fourteen patients underwent transplantation for decompensated liver disease owing to hepatitis B. Lamivudine (150 mg p.o./d) was begun before transplantation in 10 patients, including 4 who were HBV DNA-positive. In addition, 1 patient was HBV DNA-positive when transplanted. HBIG was given perioperatively and continued thereafter; treatment with lamivudine was maintained or initiated at the time of transplantation and continued indefinitely. The median follow-up was 387 days. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival was 93% (1 patient died of unrelated causes). At a median interval of 28 days following lamivudine treatment, all 5 HBV DNA-positive patients cleared HBV DNA from the serum; 1 went on to clear hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), before transplantation, at day 148 of lamivudine treatment. By the highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR), at a median of 346 days (range, 130-525 days) following transplantation, all 13 surviving patients had no detectable serum HBV DNA. Lamivudine suppresses HBV replication in patients awaiting liver transplantation. At a median follow-up of 1.1 years, combination prophylaxis with lamivudine and HBIG prevented hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Venlafaxine-tramadol similarities.

Venlafaxine and tramadol are relatively new compounds indicated for the treatment of depression and pain, respectively. These agents share a number of molecular and pharmacological features that may allow for broader and overlapping therapeutic indications for both drugs. Additionally, certain patient populations with coexisting depression and pain syndromes could potentially be treated with a single agent.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed1998

Priapism following trazodone overdose with cocaine use.

Priapism is a urologic disorder and medical emergency with a variety of known etiologies including the use of psychotropic medications. The antidepressant trazodone is the agent most frequently implicated in the precipitation of priapism. Additionally, a number of drugs of abuse including marijuana, ethanol, and cocaine have been known to cause the disorder. It is unknown if drugs may act in an additive or a synergistic manner to cause priapism. We report a case of priapism which occurred following trazodone overdose in an individual actively using cocaine. This case suggests that combined trazodone and cocaine use may pose an additional risk of priapism. Since trazodone is commonly employed as a hypnotic and often chosen for polysubstance abusers due to its low abuse potential, clinicians should be aware of the possible additive risk of priapism in this patient population.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Sumatriptan for post-ECT headache.

A 27-year-old woman receiving electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for the treatment of depression developed post-ECT headaches refractory to treatment with acetaminophen and various nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. The patient was then treated successfully with oral sumatriptan. This case suggests that sumatriptan may be a useful treatment of post-ECT headaches that are unresponsive to conventional analgesics.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

In situ splitting of the cadaveric liver for transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of cadaveric donor livers is the rate-limiting step in clinical liver transplantation. Split liver transplantation provides a means to expand the cadaveric donor pool. However, this concept has not reached its full potential because of inferior patient and graft survival and high complication rates when traditional ex vivo split techniques are used. Therefore we sought to evaluate the safety, applicability, and effectiveness of a new technique for split liver transplantation. METHODS: This study consists of 15 in situ split liver procurements, which resulted in 28 liver transplants. In situ splitting of selected livers from hemodynamically stable cadaveric donors was performed at the donor hospital without any additional work-up or equipment being needed. In situ liver splitting is accomplished in a manner identical to the living-donor procurement. This technique for liver splitting results in a left lateral segment graft (segments 2 and 3) and a right trisegmental graft (segments 1 and 4-8). This procedure required the use of the donor hospital operating room for an additional 1.5-2.5 hr and did not interfere with the procurement of 30 kidneys, 12 hearts, 7 lungs, and 9 pancreata from these same donors. RESULTS: The 6-month and 1-year actuarial patient survival rates were 92% and 92%, respectively, while the 6-month and 1-year actuarial graft survival rates were 86% and 86%, respectively. The 6-month and 1-year actuarial patient survival rate of patients who received a left lateral segment graft was 100% and 100%, respectively, while those who received a right trisegmental graft had 6-month and 1-year rates of 86% and 86%, respectively. The actuarial death-censored graft survival rates at 6 months and 1 year were 80% and 80%, respectively, for the left lateral segment grafts, and 93% and 93%, respectively, for the right trisegmental grafts. Alograft and patient survival was independent of United Network for Organ Sharing status at the time of liver transplantation. No patient developed a biliary stricture, required re-exploration for intra-abdominal hemorrhage, or suffered from portal vein, hepatic vein, or hepatic artery thrombosis CONCLUSIONS: In situ split liver transplantation can be accomplished without complications and provides results that are superior to those obtained previously with ex vivo methods. It abolishes ex vivo benching and prolonged ischemia times and provides two optimal grafts with hemostasis accomplished. This technique decreases pediatric waiting time and allows adult recipients to receive right-sided grafts safely. In situ splitting is the method of choice for expanding the cadaveric liver donor pool.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1997

Aplastic anemia complicating orthotopic liver transplantation.

The clinical characteristics and outcome of posttransplantation aplastic anemia (AA) were determined in 12 of 1,736 patients (0.007%) undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) that were afflicted with AA. None of the affected patients had a history of hematologic disease. Median patient age was 53 years (range, 2-61 years); 10 of the affected patients were men, and 2 were women. The etiologies of AA included non-A, non-B, non-C fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) (3 patients), graft-versus-host disease (4 patients), Parvovirus-induced (1 patient), and idiopathic (4 patients). The median duration between OLT and the onset of AA was 12 days (range, 11-14 days) in the 3 patients undergoing OLT for FHF; in contrast, AA developed in the other 9 patients at 37 days (range, 27-51 days) after OLT. Eleven patients were treated with reduction of their cyclosporine or tacrolimus dosage, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, anti-thymocyte globulin, and Solumedrol. Two of the 3 patients developing AA following OLT for FHF achieved hematologic recovery 21 and 92 days after diagnosis. In contrast, all 9 non-FHF patients developing AA after OLT died, 5 due to infectious complications and 4 following intracranial bleeding. AA is an unusual complication of OLT. In the setting of FHF, it affects young males in the early posttransplantation period, and, when infectious complications can be avoided, remission and stable allograft function can be anticipated. However, in the non-FHF patient, AA occurs in older individuals later in the posttransplantation period and has a uniformly poor outcome.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

The impact of microsurgical hepatic arterial reconstruction on the outcome of liver transplantation for congenital biliary atresia.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) after liver transplantation for biliary atresia (BA) is a serious complication that most often leads to retransplantation (re-OLT). The purpose of the present study was: (1) to identify risk factors associated with HAT and (2) to analyze the impact of recently introduced microsurgical hepatic arterial reconstruction (MHR) on the incidence of HAT, subsequent need for re-OLT, and patient survival. METHODS: A retrospective review of 194 patients transplanted for BA was performed. One hundred and sixty-six patients (group 1) underwent conventional arterial reconstruction and 28 (group 2) had MHR. RESULTS: Actuarial survival for patients with HAT was significantly worse than for patients without HAT at 1, 2, and 5 years (71%, 61%, and 57% versus 85%, 85%, and 85%, P = 0.0007). Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk of HAT correlated best with the type of arterial reconstruction (P = 0.007) followed by pretransplant bilirubin concentration (P = 0.04) and the number of acute rejection episodes (P = 0.03). In group 1, 32 patients developed HAT (19%), and of these, 18 underwent re-OLT for HAT. No patient in group 2 developed HAT (P = 0.006 versus group 1). One-year actuarial patient survival was 81% in group 1 and 100% in group 2 (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In OLT for BA, (1) the predominant risk factor for HAT is the technique of arterial reconstruction, and (2) MHR markedly reduces the incidence of HAT and the need for re-OLT while improving patient survival.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1997

Orthotopic liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis. A 12-year single center experience.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze a single center's 12-year experience with 127 orthotopic liver transplantations (OLT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a chronic cholestatic liver disease of unknown origin that occurs most commonly in young men and is associated frequently (70-80%) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients with PSC also are at risk for the development of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and those with IBD for colon carcinoma. Although the course of PSC is variable, it frequently is progressive, leading to cirrhosis and requirement for OLT. METHODS: The medical records of 127 consecutive patients undergoing OLT for PSC from July 1, 1984, to May 30, 1996, were reviewed. Actuarial patient and graft survival was determined at 1,2, and 5 years. The incidence and outcome of patients with CCA, recurrent sclerosing cholangitis, and post-transplant colon carcinoma was determined. Results were analyzed by way of stepwise Cox regression to determine the statistical strength of independent associations between pretransplant covariates and patient survival. The median follow-up period was 3.01 years. Incidental cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) was defined as a tumor < 1 cm in size that was discovered at the time of pathologic sectioning of the explanted liver. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients (72%) had associated IBD. Seventy-nine (62%) had undergone previous biliary tract surgery. One hundred seven patients (84%) received a single graft, whereas 20 patients (16%) required 22 retransplants. Patients received either cyclosporine- (n = 76) or tacrolimus- (n = 51) based immunosuppression. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year actuarial patient survivals were 90%, 86%, and 85%, respectively, whereas graft survival was 82%, 77%, and 72%, respectively. The presence of previous biliary surgery had no effect on patient survival. Ten patients (8%) had ICCA and their survival was not significantly different from patients without ICCA (100%, 83%, and 83% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively). Four patients were known to have CCA at the time of OLT, all recurred within 6 months, and had a significantly worse outcome (p < 0.0001). Recurrent sclerosing cholangitis developed in 11 patients (8.6%). The patient and graft survival in this group was not different from those in whom recurrence did not develop (patient; 100%, 90%, and 90%; graft: 80%, 70%, and 52%). Thirty patients (23%) underwent colectomy after liver transplantation for dysplasia-carcinoma or symptomatic colitis. Of the nine covariates entered into the Cox multivariate regression analysis, only common bile duct frozen section biopsy specimen showing CCA was predictive of a survival disadvantage. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation provides excellent patient and graft survival rates for patients affected with PSC independent of pretransplant biliary tract surgery. Incidental cholangiocarcinoma does not affect patient survival significantly. However, known CCA or common duct frozen section biopsy specimen or both showing CCA are associated with poor recipient survival, and OLT should be proscribed in these cases. Recurrent PSC occurs in approximately 9% of cases but does not affect patient survival. Post-transplant colectomy does not affect patient survival adversely.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1997

Long-term survival after retransplantation of the liver.

OBJECTIVE: The authors determined the long-term outcome of patients undergoing hepatic retransplantation at their institution. Donor, operative, and recipient factors impacting on outcome as well as parameters of patient resource utilization were examined. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Hepatic retransplantation provides the only available option for liver transplant recipients in whom an existing graft has failed. However, such patients are known to exhibit patient and graft survival after retransplantation that is inferior to that expected using the same organs in naiive recipients. The critical shortage of donor organs and resultant prolonged patient waiting periods before transplantation prompted the authors to evaluate the results of a liberal policy of retransplantation and to examine the factors contributing to the inferior outcome observed in retransplanted patients. METHODS: A total of 2053 liver transplants were performed at the UCLA Medical Center during a 13-year period from February 1, 1984, to October 1, 1996. A total of 356 retransplants were performed in 299 patients (retransplant rate = 17%). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with survival. Additionally, a case-control comparison was performed between the last 150 retransplanted patients and 150 primarily transplanted patients who were matched for age and United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) status. Differences between these groups in donor, operative, and recipient variables were studied for their correlation with patient survival. Days of hospital and intensive care unit stay, and hospital charges incurred during the transplant admissions were compared for retransplanted patients and control patients. RESULTS: Survival of retransplanted patients at 1, 5, and 10 years was 62%, 47%, and 45%, respectively. This survival is significantly less than that seen in patients undergoing primary hepatic transplantation at the authors' center during the same period (83%, 74%, and 68%). A number of variables proved to have a significant impact on outcome including recipient age group, interval to retransplantation, total number of grafts, and recipient UNOS status. Recipient primary diagnosis, cause for retransplantation, and whether the patient was retransplanted before or after June 1, 1992, did not reach statistical significance as factors influencing survival. In the case-control comparison, the authors found that of the more than 25 variables studied, only preoperative ventilator status showed both a significant difference between control patients and retransplanted patients and also was a factor predictive of survival in retransplanted patients. Retransplant patients had significantly longer hospital and intensive care unit stays and accumulated total hospitalization charges more than 170% of those by control patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic retransplantation, although life-saving in almost 50% of patients with a failing liver allograft, is costly and uses scarce donor organs inefficiently. The data presented define patient characteristics and preoperative variables that impact patient outcome and should assist in the rational application of retransplantation.

Adolescent↗