Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J R Dubno

Publications and source records attributed to J R Dubno.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Estimating parameters for psychometric functions using the four-point sampling method.

Although a psychometric function describing a subject's responses to some physical stimuli is of considerable value, characterizing such functions is time consuming and, hence, is not carried out routinely in psychophysical experiments. A principal reason for the lack of efficiency in characterizing a psychometric function is the use of sampling methods that either converge on a single point on the psychometric function, such as the PEST method, or which distribute observations uniformly over a wide range, such as the constant stimuli method. As an alternative, a multimodal four-point sampling method has been proposed [C. F. Lam, J. H. Mills, and J. R. Dubno, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 3689-3693 (1996)]. A psychometric function is then fitted to the four points (each with several trials) to estimate the threshold and slope parameters of the psychometric function. Adaptive methods, such as the up-down methods [H. Levitt, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 467-477 (1971)], can be used to provide good initial estimates of the threshold and spread parameters of a psychometric function described by a logistic function. In ongoing studies of age-related changes in auditory masking and discrimination, this new four-point sampling method has been applied to determine psychometric functions for absolute thresholds as a function of duration, thresholds in simultaneous and forward masking, frequency discrimination, and intensity discrimination in both young and aged human subjects. Results indicate that a reduction in data collection time of about 50% with no increase in variance can be achieved. This increase in efficiency applies to simple detection tasks by normal hearing subjects as well as to complex discrimination tasks by older subjects with hearing loss.

Adult↗

Placement of observations for the efficient estimation of a psychometric function.

Psychometric functions for different psychophysical tasks describe the relationship between physical stimuli and subjects' responses. Although a psychometric function is of considerable value, characterizing the function is time consuming and, hence, is not carried out routinely in psychophysical experiments. A principal reason for the lack of efficiency in characterizing the psychometric function is the use of unimodal (e.g., Gaussian and uniform) sampling methods. As an alternative, a multimodal four-point sampling method is proposed. A psychometric function is then fitted to the four data points (each with several trials) to estimate the threshold and slope parameters of the psychometric function. Results from three examples demonstrate that a 60% savings in data-collection time can be achieved.

Auditory Perception↗

Masking by ipsilateral and contralateral maskers.

Contralateral masking occurs when the threshold of a signal in one ear is elevated by the presence of a masker in the other, contralateral ear. The classic data and theory on contralateral masking were provided by Zwislocki [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52, 644-659 (1972)] who observed a 3- to 18-dB threshold shift (masking) for a gated pure-tone signal in one ear when a gated pure-tone masker was presented via insert earphones to the other ear. Zwislocki referred to this phenomenon as "central masking." Here, using two psychophysical methods (Yes-No; two-interval forced-choice), Zwislocki's original results, obtained with other psychophysical methods, were successfully replicated. Similar results using several psychophysical methods suggest that contralateral masking is indicative of a sensory phenomenon rather than observer bias and other response proclivities. In a second experiment, psychophysical tuning curves were obtained using either an ipsilateral masker or a contralateral masker. Tuning curves obtained with a contralateral masker had steeper slopes on both the low- and high-frequency sides than tuning curves obtained with an ipsilateral masker. Thus, although substantially smaller in effect than ipsilateral masking, contralateral masking is more sharply tuned. The sharp tuning of contralateral masking reflects a greater compression of the input/output functions for contralateral masking than for ipsilateral masking. The closest correspondence between the tuning curves reported here for contralateral masking and those predicted by Zwislocki's theory and data (on central masking) occurred for tuning curves where the ratio of driven activity to spontaneous activity was about six. A remaining issue is the role, if any, of the efferent auditory system, especially the olivocochlear bundle, in threshold shifts measured using the Zwislocki (central masking) paradigm.

Adult↗

Masking of auditory brainstem responses in young and aged gerbils.

Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) were recorded in the presence of low-pass (1 kHz cutoff) or high-pass (8 kHz cutoff) filtered noise in young (4-8 month) and aged (36 month) gerbils. For low-pass maskers, aged gerbils had higher masked thresholds at 2 and 4 kHz than young subjects. This was true for all aged subjects, including those with quiet thresholds similar to those of young controls. For high-pass masking, the majority of aged subjects had higher masked thresholds at 2 and 4 kHz than young controls; however, aged subjects with relatively normal quiet thresholds had masked thresholds similar to those of young subjects. A modified power-law (MPL) model was used to predict masked thresholds for aged subjects. Thresholds measured in the presence of low-pass noise were higher than predicted in many of the aged subjects, particularly those with near-normal quiet thresholds. In contrast, thresholds measured in the presence of the high-pass masker were similar to the predicted thresholds. These results suggest that: (a) excess masking occurred in aged subjects for low-pass, but not high-pass, maskers; (b) the excess masking occurred independently of quiet thresholds; and (c) excess upward spread of masking was related to the spectrum of the masker and not the 2 and 4 kHz regions of the auditory periphery.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Confidence limits for maximum word-recognition scores.

Clinical judgments are often made regarding whether maximum word-recognition scores (PBmax) are appropriate in relation to degree of sensorineural hearing loss. In order to determine if word recognition is significantly poorer than expected, it is necessary to consider the lower boundary of PBmax associated with a particular degree of hearing loss for speech materials commonly used to measure word recognition. The purpose of this experiment was to define a confidence limit for PBmax from Northwestern University Test #6 (NU-6) word-recognition scores obtained from a large group of young and aged subjects with confirmed cochlear hearing loss. Word-recognition scores at several speech levels were obtained from 407 ears with a wide range of pure-tone averages. Because the characteristics of the distribution of maximum scores are not known, a procedure was developed using computer simulations to approximate the distribution of word-recognition scores corresponding to PBmax and determine the 95% confidence limit (CL). Results of the simulation were confirmed by comparing means and standard deviations of PBmax derived from experimental and simulation data. Percentages of young and aged subjects with scores outside the 95% CL are equal to their proportions in the entire subject sample. If PBmax determined from a score-level psychometric function is poorer than the 95% CL, PBmax may be considered "disproportionately" poor in relation to the degree of hearing loss. One score measured at a single arbitrary suprathreshold level that is poorer than the 95% CL suggests that the score may underestimate PBmax and that word recognition should be measured at additional levels to obtain a more reasonable estimate of the listener's maximum word-recognition score.

Adult↗

Masked thresholds and consonant recognition in low-pass maskers for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.

Thresholds and consonant recognition were measured in six low-pass maskers as a function of masker bandwidth for hearing-impaired subjects and for normal-hearing subjects listening in spectrally shaped broadband noise (SSBB). SSBB was adjusted such that thresholds in that masker for a normal-hearing listener were equal to a hearing-impaired listener's absolute thresholds. Thresholds measured in low-pass maskers were higher for hearing-impaired than for normal-hearing subjects for signal frequencies both within and outside masker passbands, although threshold differences were larger for signal frequencies outside masker passbands. Slopes of functions relating consonant recognition to speech level were not significantly different between groups, due to the presence of SSBB for the normal-hearing listeners. However, 25% of observed scores for hearing-impaired listeners, compared to only 5% of observed scores for normal-hearing listeners, were significantly poorer than predicted by the articulation index (AI), when AIs were computed using subjects' absolute thresholds. Better correspondence between observed and predicted scores in low-pass maskers was achieved when AIs were derived empirically from thresholds measured in each low-pass masker. Hence poorer-than-predicted consonant recognition scores in low-pass maskers were accounted for by higher-than-normal thresholds in those maskers.

Auditory Threshold↗

Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with equivalent masked thresholds.

Thresholds in notched-noise maskers (NN) and narrow-band maskers (NB) were measured for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subject pairs who were listening in a background of spectrally shaped broadband noise (SSBB). Consonant recognition was also measured in SSBB. SSBB was adjusted so that thresholds in that noise for each normal-hearing/hearing-impaired subject pair were equal. Threshold and signal-level differences between subject pairs were minimized with the addition of threshold-elevating SSBB, and the presence of a noise background for both groups provided a comparable listening environment for all subjects. At signal frequencies outside masker passbands, thresholds in NN and NB for hearing-impaired subjects were higher than for normal-hearing subjects, although threshold differences were much smaller than observed between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects without SSBB. No consistent differences in consonant recognition measured in SSBB were observed between groups. The pattern of results is comparable to that observed in a previous experiment [Dubno and Schaefer, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2110-2121 (1992)] in which thresholds in NN and NB, and consonant recognition, for hearing-impaired listeners were compared to results obtained for normal-hearing subjects, but only normal-hearing subjects listened in SSBB. Using a modified power-law model of masking additivity, thresholds in combined-masker conditions were estimated. Masking effects for spectrally overlapping maskers were similar for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners and suggest that residual differences between subject groups are not due to the presence of an additional background noise.

Audiometry, Pure-Tone↗

Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.

Tonal thresholds and consonant recognition were measured in low-pass maskers as a function of masker bandwidth and spectrum level. Thresholds and consonant-recognition scores were obtained for normal-hearing subjects, and for pairs of normal-hearing subjects (who listened in threshold-equating background noise) and hearing-impaired subjects. Consonant-recognition scores were compared to scores predicted by a modified articulation index. Mean thresholds measured in low-pass maskers were higher for hearing-impaired than for normal-hearing subjects for signal frequencies above the masker. Slopes of functions relating thresholds for signals above the masker to masker spectrum level were not significantly different between hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects listening in spectrally shaped broadband noise (SSBB), but were shallower than slopes of masking functions for normal-hearing subjects listening without SSBB. Slopes of masking functions for signals within the masker were equivalent for all subjects. Slopes of functions relating consonant recognition to masker spectrum level were similar within subject pairs, whereas, in some cases, slopes of functions relating consonant recognition to speech level were shallower for hearing-impaired subjects than for their normal-hearing counterparts. Although greater improvement in consonant recognition with speech level was predicted for hearing-impaired than for normal-hearing subjects, on average, less improvement with speech level was observed. Shallower slopes of functions relating score to speech level observed for some hearing-impaired listeners may result from more shallow growth of speech sensation levels in spectral regions above the low-pass masker.

Aged↗

Minimal upward spread of masking: correlations with speech and auditory brainstem response masked thresholds.

Much less than predicted upward spread of masking, termed undermasking, was previously noted in three elderly listeners, who are the focus of this report. Three aspects of undermasking were studied: Reliability, facilitation of speech recognition in noise, and correlation with physiological measurements. The masker was a 90-dB-SPL 1-kHz low-pass-filtered noise. Reliability of undermasking was assessed from serial measurements made over an approximately 2-year interval. Masked speech thresholds were measured with an adaptive procedure for two types of stimuli: spondaic words and the California Consonant Test. Subjects with undermasking had substantially lower masked speech thresholds than either audiometrically matched elderly subjects or young, normal-hearing subjects. It appears that undermasking is a stable characteristic that provides the listener with exceptionally good communication abilities in noise. Finally, a strong positive correlation was observed between the masked auditory brainstem response (wave V) threshold and the masked behavioral threshold, suggesting that the mechanism producing undermasking is in the auditory periphery.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.

Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition were determined for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners using techniques that facilitate comparisons of performance among listeners whose absolute thresholds vary in magnitude and configuration. First, for each of six subjects with cochlear hearing loss, masked thresholds in notched noise and narrow-band-noise maskers were obtained and compared to results for three normal-hearing listeners whose thresholds were precisely matched to the impaired listeners' by masking with spectrally shaped broadband noise. Second, for hearing-impaired listeners and their masked normal-hearing controls, measurements of consonant recognition were obtained at several speech-presentation levels selected on the basis of articulation-index predictions to assure equal speech-spectrum audibility across listeners. The results suggest that frequency selectivity is poorer for hearing-impaired listeners than for masked normal-hearing listeners, even when thresholds among subjects are equated, but the deviation from normal frequency selectivity is smaller than estimated from comparisons with normal-hearing listeners in quiet. Critical ratios for hearing-impaired listeners are equivalent to normal. Although frequency selectivity is reduced, there is no consistent difference in consonant recognition between hearing-impaired subjects and masked normal-hearing subjects, when performance is assessed under conditions that assure equal speech-spectrum audibility across subjects.

Adolescent↗

Frequency selectivity for hearing-impaired and broadband-noise-masked normal listeners.

When evaluating frequency selectivity, it is difficult to determine if the deviation from normal performance observed for hearing-impaired listeners reflects abnormal cochlear function or normal, level-dependent changes in frequency selectivity. This experiment was designed to investigate the dependence of frequency-selectivity measures on threshold and signal level. Auditory-filter characteristics, critical ratios, forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves, and narrowband-noise masking patterns were obtained from normal-hearing listeners in quite and in the presence of broadband noise at five levels. These findings were then compared to previously obtained frequency-selectivity measurements for subjects with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss whose absolute thresholds are comparable to the normal-hearing listeners' masked thresholds. The results suggest that frequency selectivity deterioriates as threshold increases for all subjects. However, the poor frequency selectivity exhibited by hearing-impaired listeners may not be explained entirely by the effects of threshold and signal level. Nevertheless, because frequency selectivity is poorer in the normal auditory system at higher stimulus levels, the deviation from normal performance observed for hearing-impaired listeners may not be as large as previously suggested.

Adolescent↗

Associations among frequency and temporal resolution and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners.

To examine the association between frequency and temporal resolution and speech recognition, auditory filter parameters, rates of masking decay, and stop-consonant recognition were determined for 9 normal-hearing and 24 hearing-impaired subjects. Speech-presentation levels were selected for each subject based on articulation index (AI) predictions. Results suggest that auditory filter widths and dynamic ranges were strongly correlated with pure-tone threshold, while time constants were not. Stop-consonant recognition scores for most hearing-impaired listeners were not significantly poorer than predicted by the AI model. Furthermore, differences between observed recognition scores and those predicted by the AI were poorly correlated with derived psychophysical parameter values, suggesting that measures of frequency and temporal resolution and speech recognition may appear to be associated primarily because of their dependence on auditory threshold.

Adult↗

Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions.

The purpose of this study is to specify the contribution of certain frequency regions to consonant place perception for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss, and to characterize the differences in stop-consonant place perception among these listeners. Stop-consonant recognition and error patterns were examined at various speech-presentation levels and under conditions of low- and high-pass filtering. Subjects included 18 normal-hearing listeners and a homogeneous group of 10 young, hearing-impaired individuals with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Differential filtering effects on consonant place perception were consistent with the spectral composition of acoustic cues. Differences in consonant recognition and error patterns between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners were observed when the stimulus bandwidth included regions of threshold elevation for the hearing-impaired listeners. Thus place-perception differences among listeners are, for the most part, associated with stimulus bandwidths corresponding to regions of hearing loss.

Adult↗

Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.

Articulation index (AI) theory was used to evaluate stop-consonant recognition of normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. From results reported in a companion article [Dubno et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 347-354 (1989)], a transfer function relating the AI to stop-consonant recognition was established, and a frequency importance function was determined for the nine stop-consonant-vowel syllables used as test stimuli. The calculations included the rms and peak levels of the speech that had been measured in 1/3 octave bands; the internal noise was estimated from the thresholds for each subject. The AI model was then used to predict performance for the hearing-impaired listeners. A majority of the AI predictions for the hearing-impaired subjects fell within +/- 2 standard deviations of the normal-hearing listeners' results. However, as observed in previous data, the AI tended to overestimate performance of the hearing-impaired listeners. The accuracy of the predictions decreased with the magnitude of high-frequency hearing loss. Thus, with the exception of performance for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss, the results suggest that poorer speech recognition among hearing-impaired listeners results from reduced audibility within critical spectral regions of the speech stimuli.

Adult↗

Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners.

To examine the association between frequency resolution and speech recognition, auditory filter parameters and stop-consonant recognition were determined for 9 normal-hearing and 24 hearing-impaired subjects. In an earlier investigation, the relationship between stop-consonant recognition and the articulation index (AI) had been established on normal-hearing listeners. Based on AI predictions, speech-presentation levels for each subject in this experiment were selected to obtain a wide range of recognition scores. This strategy provides a method of interpreting speech-recognition performance among listeners who vary in magnitude and configuration of hearing loss by assuming that conditions which yield equal audible spectra will result in equivalent performance. It was reasoned that an association between frequency resolution and consonant recognition may be more appropriately estimated if hearing-impaired listeners' performance was measured under conditions that assured equivalent audibility of the speech stimuli. Derived auditory filter parameters indicated that filter widths and dynamic ranges were strongly associated with threshold. Stop-consonant recognition scores for most hearing-impaired listeners were not significantly poorer than predicted by the AI model. Furthermore, differences between observed recognition scores and those predicted by the AI were not associated with auditory filter characteristics, suggesting that frequency resolution and speech recognition may appear to be associated primarily because both are degraded by threshold elevation.

Adolescent↗

Effects of hearing loss on utilization of short-duration spectral cues in stop consonant recognition.

The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the utilization of short-term spectral cues for recognition of initial plosive consonants (/b,d,g/) by normal-hearing and by hearing-impaired listeners differing in audiometric configuration. Recognition scores were obtained for these consonants paired with three vowels (/a,i,u/) while systematically reducing the duration (300 to 10 ms) of the synthetic consonant-vowel syllables. Results from 10 normal-hearing and 15 hearing-impaired listeners suggest that audiometric configuration interacts in a complex manner with the identification of short-duration stimuli. For consonants paired with the vowels /a/ and /u/, performance deteriorated as the slope of the audiometric configuration increased. The one exception to this result was a subject who had significantly elevated pure-tone thresholds relative to the other hearing-impaired subjects. Despite the changes in the shape of the onset spectral cues imposed by hearing loss, with increasing duration, consonant recognition in the /a/ and /u/ context for most hearing-impaired subjects eventually approached that of the normal-hearing listeners. In contrast, scores for consonants paired with /i/ were poor for a majority of hearing-impaired listeners for stimuli of all durations.

Aged↗

Effects of spectral flattening on vowel identification.

The identification of front vowels was studied in normal-hearing listeners using stimuli whose spectra had been altered to approximate the spectrum of vowels processed by auditory filters similar to those that might accompany sensorineural hearing loss. In the first experiment, front vowels were identified with greater than 95% accuracy when the first formant was specified in a normal manner and the higher frequency formants were represented by a broad, flat spectral plateau ranging from approximately 1600 to 3500 Hz. In the second experiment, the bandwidth of the first formant was systematically widened for stimuli with already flattened higher frequency formants. Normal vowel identification was preserved until the first formant was widened to six times its normal bandwidth. These results may account for the coexistence of abnormal vowel masking patterns (indicating flattened auditory spectra) and normal vowel recognition.

Auditory Perception↗

Log-linear modeling of consonant confusion data.

Log-linear models, in conjunction with the G2 statistic, were developed and applied to several existing sets of consonant confusion data. Significant interactions of consonant error patterns were found with signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), presentation level, vowel context, and low-pass and high-pass filtering. These variables also showed significant interactions with error patterns when categorized on the basis of feature classifications. Patterns of errors were significantly altered by S/N for place of articulation (front, middle, back), voicing, frication, and nasality. Low-pass filtering significantly affected error patterns when categorized by place of articulation, duration, or nasality; whereas, high-pass filtering only affected voicing and frication error patterns. This paper also demonstrates the utility of log-linear modeling techniques in applications to confusion matrix analysis: specific effects can be tested; variant cells in a matrix can be isolated with respect to a particular model of interest; diagonal cells can be eliminated from the analysis; and the matrix can be collapsed across levels of variables, with no violation of independence. Finally, log-linear techniques are suggested for development of parsimonious and predictive models of speech perception.

Humans↗