Rapid injection reduces pain on injection with propofol.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J R Brimacombe.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The incentives and approaches for modelling chemical fate at a continental scale are discussed and reviewed. It is suggested that a multi-media model consisting of some 20-30 regions, each of which contains typically seven environmental compartments represents a reasonable compromise between the issues of the need for detailed resolution, avoidance of excessive data demands and inherent complexity and transparency. Strategies adopted in compiling the Berkley-Trent (BETR) model for North America are discussed and used to illustrate the issues of selecting appropriate number and nature of segments, treatment of air and water flows and the acquisition of environmental data. It is suggested that GIS software can play a valuable role in gathering and processing such data and in the display and interpretation of the results of the model assessment. The BETR model will be a useful tool for describing the nature of persistence and long-range transport of chemicals of concern in the North American environment.
We have tested the hypothesis that intubation success rates, haemodynamic changes, airway complications and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity differ between blind and lightwand-guided intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway. One hundred and twenty paralysed anasthetised adult patients (ASA I-II, no known or predicted difficult airways) were assigned in a random manner to one of two equal-sized groups. In the blind group, patients were intubated blindly through the intubating laryngeal mask airway. In the lightwand group, patients were intubated through the intubating laryngeal mask airway assisted by transillumination of the neck with a lightwand. A standard sequence of adjusting manoeuvres was followed if resistance occurred during intubation or if transillumination was incorrect. The number of adjusting manoeuvres, time to intubation, intubation success rates, haemodynamic changes (pre-induction, pre-intubation, postintubation), oesophageal intubation, mucosal trauma (blood detected), hypoxia (oxygen saturation < 95%) and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity (double-blinded) were documented. Overall intubation success was similar (blind, 93%; lightwand, 100%), but time to successful intubation was significantly shorter (67 vs. 46 s, p = 0. 027) and the number of adjusting manoeuvres was significantly fewer (p = 0.024) in the lightwand group. There were no significant differences in blood pressure or heart rate between the groups at any time. Oesophageal intubation occurred more frequently in the blind group (18 vs. 0%, p = 0.002). The incidence and severity of mucosal injury, sore throat and hoarseness were similar between the groups. We conclude that lightwand-guided intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask is superior to the blind technique.
We tested the hypothesis that haemodynamic changes to intubation and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity are similar for blind intubating laryngeal mask (ILM)-guided compared with laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation in adults with normal airways. We also compared intubation success rates and airway complications. One-hundred and fifty paralysed, anaesthetized adult patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly assigned to one of three equal-sized groups: 1. blind intubation via the ILM using a straight, silicone tube; 2. intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope using a straight silicone tube and 3. intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope using a polyvinyl chloride tube (controls). A standard sequence of adjusting manoeuvres was followed if intubation was difficult. The number of adjusting manoeuvres and intubation attempts, time to intubation, intubation success rate (first attempt and within 3 min), haemodynamic changes (pre-induction, post-induction, post-intubation), oesophageal intubation, mucosal trauma (blood detected), hypoxia (SpO2 < 95%) and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity (double-blinded) were documented. Time to successful intubation was longer (57 vs 35 s), and more intubation attempts were required in the ILM group (P < 0.0001). The intubation success rate was 100% (all first attempt) for the laryngoscope groups and 94% (56% first attempt) for the ILM group. There were no significant differences in heart rate or blood pressure among groups. Oesophageal intubation (26 v 0%) and mucosal trauma (19 v 2%) were more common in the ILM group. Hypoxia and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were similar among groups. Blind intubation through the ILM offers no advantages over the Macintosh laryngoscope for adult patients requiring intubation for elective surgery with normal airways, but it is a feasible alternative.
We conducted three studies to test the hypothesis that elevation of the intubating laryngeal mask (ILM) handle increases efficacy of seal, changes fibreoptic position, prevents aspiration of regurgitated fluid and improves intubation. In study 1, the ILM was inserted into 20 paralysed, anaesthetized patients and 20 cadavers. Oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position were measured at an intracuff pressure of 0, 60 and 120 cm H2O with 0, 20 and 40 N of elevation force. In study 2, the oesophageal pressure at which regurgitation and aspiration occurred was measured in 20 cadavers with the ILM at the above intracuff pressures and elevation forces and 10 cadavers without the ILM (controls). In study 3, ease of blind intubation (first attempt only) was determined in 20 paralysed, anaesthetized patients at 0 and 40 N elevation force. In study 1, there was a significant increase in oropharyngeal leak pressure with increasing elevation force at an intracuff pressure of 0 and 60 cm H2O. There were no changes in fibreoptic position. Oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position were similar between patients and cadavers. In study 2, oesophageal pressure for regurgitation and aspiration was usually greater for the ILM than controls (all: P < 0.05. Aspiration and regurgitation usually occurred at the same oesophageal pressure. In study 3, blind intubation was more successful at 0 N than 40 N (15/20 v 8/20, P = 0.03). We conclude that elevation of the ILM handle has little clinical utility other than as a temporary measure to improve the efficacy of the seal.
OBJECTIVE: When ventilating an unintubated patient in cardiac or respiratory arrest, smaller tidal volumes of 500 ml instead of 800-1200 ml may be beneficial to decrease peak airway pressure, and to minimise stomach inflation. The purpose was to determine the effects of small (approximately 500 ml) versus large (approximately 1000 ml) tidal volumes given with paediatric versus adult self-inflatable bags and approximately 50% oxygen on respiratory parameters in patients during simulated basic life support ventilation. METHODS: While undergoing induction of anaesthesia, patients were randomised to three minutes of ventilation with either an adult (n = 40) or paediatric (n = 40) self-inflatable bag. RESULTS: When compared with an adult self-inflatable bag, the paediatric bag resulted in significantly lower mean (+/- standard deviation) exhaled tidal volume (365 +/- 55 versus 779 +/- 122 ml; P < 0.0001), peak airway pressure (20 +/- 2 versus 25 +/- 5 cm H2O; P < 0.0001), but comparable oxygen saturation (97 +/- 1% versus 98 +/- 1%; NS (nonsignificant)). Stomach inflation occurred in five of 40 patients ventilated with an adult self-inflatable bag, but in no patients who were ventilated with a paediatric self-inflatable bag (P = 0.054). CONCLUSION: Administering smaller tidal volumes with a paediatric instead of an adult self-inflatable bag in unintubated adult patients with respiratory arrest maintains good oxygenation and carbon dioxide elimination while decreasing peak airway pressure, which makes stomach inflation less likely.
Digital palpation of the pilot balloon provides information about the intracuff pressure of the laryngeal mask airway. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate this technique for the reusable and disposable laryngeal mask airway. Ten anaesthetists and 10 recovery-unit nurses estimated intracuff pressures from low/high initial pressures before/after training. In the pretraining phase, the mean (95% CI) pressure was 99 (94-105) cmH2O, but this was significantly lower for the reusable laryngeal mask airway (91 vs. 103 cmH2O) and if the initial pressure was low (81 vs. 112 cmH2O). In the post-training phase, there was a significant overall improvement to 75 (66-85) cmH2O, but target pressures remained more accurate if the initial pressure was low. Subjects in the training group could estimate 95% of pressures for both devices to within +/-10 cmH2O of the target if the initial pressure was low. We conclude that anaesthetists and recovery-unit nurses are capable of accurate estimation of intracuff pressures using the digital palpation technique following a brief period of training.
We have compared four tests for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) to test the hypothesis that airway sealing pressure and inter-observer reliability differ between tests. We studied 80 paralysed, anaesthetized adult patients. Four different airway sealing pressure tests were performed in random order on each patient by two observers blinded to each other's measurements: test 1 involved detection of an audible noise; test 2 was detection of end-tidal carbon dioxide in the oral cavity; test 3 was observation of the aneroid manometer dial as the pressure increased to note the airway pressure at which the dial reached stability; and test 4 was detection of an audible noise by neck auscultation. Mean airway sealing pressure ranged from 19.5 to 21.3 cm H2O and intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.95-0.99. Inter-observer reliability of all tests was classed as excellent. The manometric stability test had a higher mean airway sealing pressure (P < 0.0001) and better inter-observer reliability (P < 0.0001) compared with the three other tests. We conclude that for clinical purposes all four tests are excellent, but that the manometric stability test may be more appropriate for researchers comparing airway sealing pressures.
UNLABELLED: We conducted a randomized, controlled, cross-over cadaver study to test the hypothesis that the efficacy of seal for ventilation and airway protection, anatomic position, and airway patency with the flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) are altered by the application of a Boyle Davis (B-D) gag. We also determined the airway sealing pressure (ASP) at which the FLMA prevents aspiration when large volumes of fluid are placed above the cuff. We studied 20 adult cadavers (6-24 h postmortem). Efficacy of seal for ventilation and airway protection, anatomic position, and airway patency were determined with and without a B-D gag (two blade sizes: 8 and 10 cm) for the size 3, 4, and 5 FLMA in random order. Efficacy of seal for ventilation was determined by measuring the ASP at an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O. Efficacy of seal for airway protection was determined by flooding the mouth with 55-135 mL of water, reducing intracuff pressure until aspiration was detected fiberoptically and measuring ASP at this intracuff pressure. Anatomic position and airway patency were determined with a fiberoptic scope at an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O. In addition, in vivo compliance and ASP for the FLMA were measured in 10 cadavers and 10 paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Efficacy of seal for ventilation and airway protection, anatomic position, and airway patency did not change with the application of a gag for any mask size. The mean (range) ASP at which aspiration occurred when large volumes of fluid were placed above the cuff was 11 (7-15) cm H2O. The ASP for ventilation was always higher than the ASP for airway protection (P<0.0001). The FLMA had similar in vivo compliance and ASP in cadavers and anesthetized patients. We conclude that efficacy of seal for ventilation and airway protection, anatomic position and airway patency for the FLMA are unaffected by the application of a B-D gag in adults. ASP should be >15 cm H2O if there is a maximal risk of aspiration from above the cuff. IMPLICATIONS: The flexible laryngeal mask airway forms an effective seal for ventilation and protection of the airway that is unaffected by the application of a mouth gag that provides surgical access to the oropharynx. The efficacy of the seal should be >15 cm H2O if there is a maximal risk of aspiration from above the cuff.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in an ambulatory surgery practice. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal device (survival) study. SETTING: University-based ambulatory surgery center. PATIENTS: 1,831 ASA physical status I, II, and III outpatients undergoing superficial ambulatory surgery procedures. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty LMA devices were entered into service over a 2-year period and the number of uses, as well as the structural integrity, were assessed at the end of this study period. The serial number on each LMA device was used to track the number of times it was autoclaved, as well as the date that the device failed any of the standardized pre-use tests or was lost. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the 2-year survey, 6,430 general anesthetics were administered at the ambulatory surgery center, with 1,831 (28%) using an LMA device for airway management. At the end of the study period, nine devices were still in use, three had been withdrawn for structural analysis by the manufacturer (after > 100 uses), three failed the pre-use test (after 38-82 uses), and five devices were lost (after 21-162 uses). The structural examination revealed that the tubes were 50% weaker; however, the cuffs, pilot balloons, and values were functioning normally. The median (range) number of uses was 92 (21-195). Thus, the 20 LMA devices evaluated tolerated an average of 92 autoclave cycles each over the 2-year observation period. CONCLUSIONS: To optimize the use of the LMA device in the ambulatory setting, it is necessary to increase awareness that it is a nondisposable piece of equipment and to adhere to the manufacturer's instructions for cleaning, sterilization, and insertion.
The purpose of this randomised single blinded study was to determine the optimal size of laryngeal mask airway in the normal adult population, to test the validity of the current selection criteria and to determine if any externally measured anatomical variable correlated with optimal size. In each of 30 apnoeic anaesthetised adults weighting less than 100 kg, size 3, 4 and 5 laryngeal mask airways were inserted in random order by a skilled user and the cuff inflated to a standard pressure (60 cm H2O). Optimal size was based on four criteria in order of priority: number of attempts at placement, oropharyngeal leak pressure, fiberoptic score and percentage of vocal cords seen. The size 5 laryngeal mask airway was optimal in 19/30 and the size 4 in 11/30. In no patient was the size 3 the optimal fit. Oropharyngeal leak pressure was significantly higher for each progressively large size and the fiberoptic view was significantly better for the size 4 and size 5. There was no significant predictive value in any externally measured anatomical variable, but height was the most useful. The best current selection strategy was to choose a size 5 for males and size 4 for females. Potentially useful new strategies may be to use the size 5 in all adults, or a size 5 > or = 165 cm in height and size 4 for < 165 cm. We conclude that predicting the optimal size of laryngeal mask airway for individual adult patients is complex. The best size selection strategies involve use of the size 4 and 5 laryngeal mask airways in adults.
We have compared anaesthetic maintenance and emergence characteristics of propofol and sevoflurane with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) at commonly used doses in 185 ASA I-II patients, in a randomized, prospective study. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5-3.5 mg kg-1 and fentanyl 1-3 micrograms kg-1. Neuromuscular blocking agents were not used. All patients underwent positive pressure ventilation (PPV) with tidal volumes of 6-8 ml kg-1 to maintain normal end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration. Anaesthesia was maintained with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen and infusion of propofol 6 or 8 mg kg-1 h-1, or 1% or 1.5% end-tidal sevoflurane. There were no failed insertion attempts and adequate ventilation was achieved in all patients. During emergence, there was a greater incidence of excitatory phenomena with 1% and 1.5% sevoflurane (95% confidence intervals (CI) 4-19%) compared with propofol (95% CI 0-4%). Sevoflurane 1.0% (95% CI 37-71%) was associated with the greatest overall incidence of respiratory and haemodynamic problems. This was significantly higher compared with propofol 6 mg kg-1 h-1 (95% CI 19-36%). Shorter times to LMA removal were observed with 1% and 1.5% sevoflurane compared with propofol (P < 0.0002). Postoperative problems did not differ between groups. We conclude that propofol 6-8 mg kg-1 h-1 and 1.5% sevoflurane were suitable for maintenance of anaesthesia for musculoskeletal surgery in non-paralysed ASA I-II patients undergoing PPV with the LMA. Emergence was more rapid with sevoflurane, but was associated with more excitatory phenomena.
We studied the size 4 laryngeal mask airway (LMA) to test the hypothesis that oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position improves with increasing cuff volume. After LMA insertion, 50 anaesthetized adult patients had the cuff inflated in 5-ml increments to 40 ml. Oropharyngeal leak pressure was optimal at 15 ml and decreased at higher volumes. The fibreoptic position was optimal at 0-20 ml and deteriorated at higher volumes. Gastric insufflation was detected more frequently when the cuff volume exceeded 20 ml. We conclude that inflation of the size 4 LMA to the maximum recommended volume provides suboptimal conditions and that this value should be reduced from 30 to 20 ml.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
UNLABELLED: We compared the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in 120 anesthetized adult patients. We compared 1) placement success rates, 2) airway interventional requirements, 3) airway stability in different head/neck positions, 4) cardiorespiratory tolerance, and 5) intra- and postoperative adverse events/symptoms. A standardized anesthesia protocol was followed by four anesthesiologists experienced with both devices. Observational data were validated by independent analysis of continuous video recordings. Postoperative interviews were double-blind to the device used. The LMA had a more frequent success rate than COPA (97% vs 55%, P < 0.00001), an overall higher success rate (100% vs 83%; P = 0.001), a shorter time to achieve an effective airway (49 vs 188 s; P < 0.00001), a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure (21 vs 16 cm H2O; P = 0.003), and a fewer number of chin lift airway interventions required (0.1% vs 42%; P < 0.00001). When comparing mean tidal volumes in different head/neck positions to assess airway stability, the quality of airway was unchanged in 98% patients with the LMA and 54% with the COPA (P < 0.00001). The incidences of intraoperative adverse events were similar. On removal, blood was detected more often on the COPA (3% vs 14%; P = 0.04). In the late postoperative period, more patients complained of adverse symptoms with the COPA than with the LMA (26% vs 57%; P = 0.001). Late postoperative symptoms occurred more frequently with the COPA (0.87 vs 0.34; P = 0.003). There was more late postoperative sore throat (14% vs 36%; P = 0.0003) and more jaw/neck pain (12% vs 26%; P = 0.0008) in patients managed with the COPA. This study demonstrates that the LMA offers advantages over the COPA in most technical aspects of airway management and in terms of postoperative morbidity. IMPLICATIONS: In this randomized, prospective study, we compared the laryngeal mask airway and the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in anesthetized patients. The laryngeal mask airway offers advantages in most technical aspects of airway management and in terms of postoperative morbidity.
In assessing the potential role of the LMA outside the operating room, the risks of a less secure airway must be balanced against the benefits of ease of training, success and speed of insertion, no need for direct visualization of laryngeal structures, and lesser need for ancillary equipment. The LMA has a role as an alternative to FMV in CPR when personnel skilled in tracheal intubation are not available. When skilled intubators are present, it has an important role as an alternative airway when intubation has been impossible. These roles extend to the prehospital setting, with an additional specific indication for its use when access to a patient is limited making tracheal intubation impossible. The LMA is incorporated into advanced life support training and as such should be regarded as a device providing temporary airway support, rather than a replacement for a tracheal tube. The LMA, and possibly also the ILM, should be standard equipment carried by prehospital trauma teams and by all those attending victims in the field.