Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Pirenne

Publications and source records attributed to J Pirenne.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Hepatitis G virus infection in acute fulminant hepatitis: prevalence of HGV infection and sequence analysis of a specific viral strain.

Hepatitis G virus (HGV) is a recently discovered RNA virus, which belongs to the Flaviviridae family. Although HGV infection is usually not associated with elevated serum transaminases, some recent studies have reported that HGV infection is found in a significant number of patients with fulminant hepatitis and may play a role in its etiopathogenesis. In this study the prevalence of HGV infection was determined in 500 healthy blood donors and in 24 patients admitted to hospital because of acute liver failure caused by fulminant hepatitis. The presence of HGV RNA was tested in sera, obtained at admission and before any transfusion was given, by a sensitive seminested reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay specific for detection of the non-structural (NS)5 region. Nine of the 500 blood donors (1.8%) and two of the 24 patients (8.3%) were found to be HGV RNA positive. One patient was co-infected with HCV and was known to be an intravenous (i.v.) drug user. After intensive supporting treatment, this patient recovered completely. The second patient had no serological markers of known viral hepatitis infection, including hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV). This patient was successfully transplanted. From both patients, from HGV RNA-positive healthy blood donors and from other patients coinfected with HCV, a part of the HGV NS3 region (nucleotides 4191-4345, EMBL entry U45966) was cloned and sequenced. Sequence comparison revealed that the NS3 region of HGV in patients with fulminant hepatitis contained three nucleotide substitutions as part of the six substitutions described in previous work. These nucleotide substitutions were not found in the tested blood donors or in patients with HCV co-infection. Our findings therefore support the concept of the association of fulminant hepatitis with infection of a specific HGV strain.

Adolescent↗

[Intestinal transplantation: a clinical reality in 1998].

Each year, thousands of peoples die, suffering from an anatomical or functional loss of their intestine; these patients would benefit from bowel transplantation; the difficulties of bowel transplantation are as follows: 1. the physiological characteristics of the small bowel, and the fact that denervation, lymphatics interruption and ischemia, independently from rejection, may disturb its function; 2. secondly, the organ is septic; thus, its transplantation causes major infectious problems; 3. at last, the immunological characteristics of the intestinal allograft. Bowel transplantation causes a two-way immunological conflict, not only a standard rejection response, but also a graft-versus-host disease, similar to that observed after bone marrow transplantation; this reaction is caused by the lymphoid tissue conveyed within the bowel graft. The introduction of a new immunosuppressive molecule, FK 506, in combination with profound antibiotic prophylactic regimens, decontamination protocols and vigorous anti-viral protection (against cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr), have significantly improved the results. Bowel transplantation has recently reached clinical application. The one-year survival rate of intestinal grafts reaches now 70%. Still, there is no doubt that, due to its microbiological and immunological characteristics, the small bowel will remain the most challenging abdominal organ to transplant.

Drug Monitoring↗

Recipient preconditioning and donor-specific bone marrow infusion in a pig model of total bowel transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In an outbred pig model of total bowel transplantation, we previously showed that simultaneous donor-specific bone marrow infusion (DSBMI), rather than promoting engraftment, sensitizes recipients and causes rejection; it also aggravates the risk of generalized graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and infection, and tends to reduce recipient and graft survival. Small and large animal models of bone marrow-induced transplant tolerance suggest that some form of recipient preconditioning (RPC) may facilitate engraftment of co-transplanted bone marrow cells and fully expose their tolerogenic potential. METHODS: In a preclinical model, we prospectively studied the effect of RPC on simultaneous DSBMI and total (i.e., small and large) bowel transplantation. RPC consisted of whole body irradiation with 400 R (day 0); some recipients additionally received horse anti-pig antithymocyte globulin (days -2, -1, and 0). We studied six groups of outbred pigs, all of which underwent at least a total bowel transplant: group 1, nonimmunosuppressed control pigs (n=5); group 2, nonimmunosuppressed DSBMI pigs (n=13); group 3, tacrolimus pigs (n=7); group 4, DSBMI+tacrolimus pigs (n=15); group 5, RPC+nonimmunosuppressed DSBMI pigs (n=11); and group 6, RPC+DSBMI+tacrolimus pigs (n=14). RESULTS: RPC did not prolong overall survival at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after transplant. Survival rates were 100%, 100%, 86%, and 71% in group 3; 71%, 43%, 29%, and 29% in group 6; 55%, 9%, 0%, and 0% in group 5; and 60%, 0%, 0%, and 0% in Group 1. Moreover, RPC (groups 5 and 6) increased the incidence of death from rejection, GVHD, and infection when compared with group 3. Survival was significantly higher for RPC+DSBMI+tacrolimus pigs (group 6), compared with RPC+nonimmunosuppressed DSBMI pigs (group 5). Survival greater than 28 days was noted only in pigs that received tacrolimus after transplant: 71% in group 3 versus 29% in group 6. With both RPC and DSBMI (groups 5 and 6), rejection, GVHD, and infection were not mutually exclusive events. In groups 5 and 6, at autopsy, the incidence of rejection and GVHD was 17%; rejection and infection, 17%; and GVHD and infection, 45%. A combination of all three immunologic events was noted in 14%. CONCLUSIONS: RPC, combined with DSBMI, and with or without posttransplant immunosuppression, does not prolong survival after total bowel transplantation. Rather, it increases the incidence of death from rejection, GVHD, infection, or a combination of these three immunologic events. According to this preclinical study, RPC and unmodified DSBMI do not improve patient and graft outcome after total bowel transplantation and need to be refined before being applied clinically.

Animals↗

Combined liver-total bowel transplantation has no immunologic advantage over total bowel transplantation alone. A prospective study in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Rejection remains a major obstacle to successful bowel transplantation in humans. It has been suggested that a simultaneous liver transplant would shield the bowel graft from immunologic attack, but the liver shortage would be aggravated. In a preclinical model, we studied the influence of simultaneous liver grafting by comparing the incidence of early bowel rejection after combined liver-total (small- and large-) bowel transplants vs total bowel transplants alone. METHODS: We assessed the incidence of early post-transplant rejection, graft-vs-host disease, and infection after combined liver-total bowel transplants (group 1, n = 10) and total bowel transplants alone (group 2, n = 9) in outbred Yorkshire Landrace pigs. Liver and bowel grafts were transplanted orthotopically with portal vein drainage after recipient hepatectomy (group 1) and total enterectomy (groups 1 and 2). Posttransplant immunosuppression was performed with intravenous tacrolimus (whole blood levels, 15 to 30 ng/mL) and prednisolone. In groups 1 and 2, bowel biopsy specimens from the ileostomy were obtained daily. In group 1, liver biopsy specimens were obtained weekly. Rejection was graded according to a 4-point scoring system (none, mild, moderate, and severe). RESULTS: Overall graft survival at days 7, 14, and 21 was 89%, 44%, and 11%, respectively, in group 1 vs 100%, 100%, and 86%, respectively, in group 2 (P < .001). Death rates owing to (irreversible) rejection at days 7, 14, and 21 were 0% in groups 1 and 2 (P = .48). Grading of bowel rejection episodes, based on the results of daily biopsy specimens, was not significantly different between the groups whether on individual days or overall. In group 1, the incidence of liver rejection episodes was as high as 66% (day 14 and at autopsy). At autopsy, generalized graft-vs-host disease (skin, native intestine, and native liver) was noted in 55% of group 1 and 43% of group 2 pigs (P = .55). Graft-vs-host disease was noted concurrently with rejection episodes of the liver or bowel grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous liver grafting did not further reduce the incidence of early bowel rejection or graft-vs-host disease when compared with total bowel transplants alone. Based on the results of this preclinical study, simultaneous liver grafting is not indicated for patients with short-bowel syndrome and normal liver function.

Animals↗

Donor-specific unmodified bone marrow transfusion does not facilitate intestinal engraftment after bowel transplantation in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND: The immunosuppression required to prevent rejection of intestinal transplants causes a high rate of infection and lymphoma. It is crucial that immunomodulatory strategies be developed to facilitate intestinal engraftment. METHODS: We prospectively examined the effect of unpurified donor-specific bone marrow transfusions (DSBMTs) on rejection, infection, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and survival after intestinal transplantations in 44 Yorkshire Landrace pigs. Four groups that differed according to presence or abscence of treatment with FK506 and DSBMT were analyzed. RESULTS: In nonimmunosuppressed pigs, DSBMTs had no effect on survival (8 days versus 9 days in controls; p = 0.9). In FK506 pigs, DSBMTs tended to reduce survival (21 days versus 37 days in FK506 controls; p = 0.1); no difference was seen between two bone marrow dosages 5 x 10(7) or 5 x 10(8) bone marrow cells/kg. No difference in the incidence of death caused by rejection was seen between DSBMTs and controls, but there was a marked tendency toward more deaths caused by rejection in DSBMTs + FK506 versus FK506-only pigs (p = 0.09). Daily stomal assessment showed a higher rate of moderate and severe interstitial rejection in DSBMT + FK506 versus FK506-only pigs; DSBMT was also associated with increased vascular rejection. Finally, groupwise comparison showed an order of susceptibility to lethal GVHD and infection as follows: DSBMT + FK506 > FK506 > DSBMT > controls. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than promoting engraftment, DSBMT can sensitize recipients and cause rejection after intestinal transplantation. It aggravates the risks of generalized GVHD and infection and tends to reduce graft and recipient survival. Before being applied clinically, DSBMT needs to be refined to increase its tolerogenic potential without causing GVHD.

Animals↗

Colon perforation after renal transplantation: a single-institution review.

Colon perforation (CP) is an uncommon but dramatic complication after renal transplantation. Of 1530 consecutive kidney transplants performed at our center, 8 recipients had an CP (incidence of 0.5%), either early (n = 5, 2-14 days) or late (n = 3, 8-48 months) post transplant. Clinical symptoms were generally vague. Biological findings were inconstant. Risk factors for CP included a cadaver graft (versus a living donor), high body weight, history of diverticulitis, and Kayexalate use. Crucial to outcome were: 1) immediate diagnosis and 2) aggressive surgical care consisting of resectional therapy, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and reduced immunosuppression. Applying these principles, mortality in our patients (25%) was lower than in previously reported series (33-64%). All grafts were functioning at the time of diagnosis; graft function was preserved in recipients who recovered from CP. Patients with a documented history of diverticulitis should undergo prophylactic colonic resection. Constipation and colonic dilatation should be treated aggressively in the early post-operative period.

Adolescent↗

Combined transplantation of small and large bowel. FK506 versus cyclosporine A in a porcine model.

Clinically, FK506 is superior to CsA after solitary small bowel transplantation (SBTx). Development of diarrhea after SBTx has been the rationale for adding the colon to small bowel grafts. However, the additional lymphoid and bacterial content transferred with total small plus large bowel transplants (TBTx) might aggravate the alloimmune response-rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-and increase the risk of infection. We studied the incidence of rejection, GVHD, and infection after TBTx and the impact of CsA versus FK506. We performed orthotopic TBTx with portal drainage after total enterectomy in outbred Yorkshire Landrace pigs, divided into 3 groups: control pigs (n=6) received no immunosuppression; CsA pigs (n= 14) received CsA (5 mg/kg), antilymphocyte globulin (10 mg/kg for 10 days), prednisone (2 mg/kg), and AZA (2.5 mgtkg); and FK506 pigs (n=9) received FK506 (0.2 mg/kg) and prednisone (2 mg/kg). Trough CsA whole blood levels were >400 ng/ml for the first 7 days and >200 ng/ml thereafter. FK506 levels were > 15 ng/ml. We excluded from further analysis 5 early deaths (<3 days) due to anesthesiologic (n=2) or technical reasons (n=3). Median survival of control pigs was 9.5 days (range, 4-13). Cyclosporine did not extend survival: median, 9 days (range, 5-31) (P=0.6). FK506 prolonged survival: median, 37 days (range, 21-49) (P<0.001 vs. control and CsA pigs). Of FK506 pigs, 60% gained weight (+75 g/day), whereas 100% of controls and 75% of CsA pigs lost weight (-550 g/day and -300 g/day, respectively). All control pigs died of rejection within 2 weeks versus none of the FK506 pigs. However, 36% of CsA pigs died of rejection. Groupwise comparison showed less rejection in FK506 versus control pigs (P<0.001) and in FK506 versus CsA pigs (P<0.03), but no difference between CsA and control pigs. None of the control pigs died of GVHD versus 18% of CsA pigs (by day 31) and 37% of FK506 pigs (by day 49). Groupwise comparison showed increased GVHD in FK506 versus control pigs (P<0.001) and a tendency toward increased GVHD in FK506 versus CsA pigs (P=0.08). None of the control pigs died of infection alone versus 22% of CsA pigs (by day 31) and 67% of FK506 pigs (by day 49). Groupwise comparison showed increased infection in FK506 versus control pigs (P<0.001). We detected significant endotoxemia early and late postoperatively. But we saw no specific correlation between endotoxemia, rejection, GVHD, or infection. Based on this study, we have drawn several conclusions: (1) In untreated pigs, TBTx provokes a severe rejection response, but no lethal GVHD. (2) Cyclosporine and particularly FK506 pigs have a high incidence of infection and lethal GVHD, a complication that we had not seen after solitary SBTx. (3) FK506 is superior to CsA in controlling rejection and in prolonging graft and recipient survival; FK506, however, does not reduce GVHD, but rather tends to augment it. (4) TBTx causes endotoxemia. As with solitary SBTx, FK506 is superior to CsA after TBTx. However, longterm survival is difficult to achieve on FK506 recipients because of the development of GVHD and infection.

Animals↗

Bacterial translocation in a large-animal model of small-bowel transplantation. Portal vs systemic venous drainage and the effect of tacrolimus immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVE: To study whether bacterial translocation is more prevalent after small-bowel transplantation with systemic venous drainage (SVD) vs portal venous drainage (PVD) and whether it is influenced by immunosuppression. DESIGN: We performed 15 small-bowel transplantations in pigs. Group 1 (n = 5) had SVD and no immunosuppression; group 2 (n = 6), PVD and no immunosuppression; and group 3 (n = 4), PVD and immunosuppression with tacrolimus and methylprednisolone sodium succinate. Portal and systemic blood, portal and mesenteric lymph nodes, and liver were cultured in donors and recipients on postoperative day 0 (POD 0) and in recipients on postoperative day 3 (POD 3). Jejunal and ileal contents were also sampled at these times. SUBJECTS: Outbred male Yorkshire-Landrace pigs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Blood and tissue bacterial cultures, (2) blood endotoxin levels, and (3) histopathologic examination. RESULTS: Cultures were positive for bacteria in 32% (16/50) of samples on POD 0 and 88% (22/25) on POD 3 in group 1, in 18% (11/60) of samples on POD 0 and 97% (29/30) on POD 3 in group 2, and in 8% (3/40) of samples on POD 0 and 95% (19/20) on POD 3 in group 3. Systemic blood cultures were positive for bacteria on POD 3 in 60% (3/5) of pigs in group 1, 83% (5/6) in group 2, and 100% (4/4) in group 3. Significantly more bacteria were present in the ileum than in the jejunum on POD 0 in group 2; this difference approached significance in groups 1 and 3. Bacterial numbers were identical in the ileum and jejunum by POD 3 in all groups. Circulating endotoxin levels were significantly elevated on POD 3 vs POD 0 only in group 1. Endotoxin levels were not significantly different between the SVD group (group 1) and either PVD group (groups 2 and 3). CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial translocation is prevalent after small-bowel transplantation in pigs whether PVD or SVD is used. Immunosuppression with tacrolimus does not prevent bacterial translocation but may reduce systemic endotoxemia.

Animals↗

Colon vs small bowel rejection after total bowel transplantation in a pig model.

With the advent of FK 506, small bowel transplantation has become clinically feasible. Both clinically and experimentally, jejunal and ileal biopsies are used for early diagnosis of rejection. More recently, the colon, in addition to the small bowel, has been transplanted to decrease the high incidence of diarrhea after small bowel transplantation. A Bishop-Koop ileostomy allows biopsies on a regular basis, but the diagnosis of rejection remains a problem after takedown of the ileostomy. Rejection of the ileum is more frequent and more severe than rejection of the jejunum or the colon. Colon biopsy after ileostomy takedown would not rule out rejection of the ileum.

Animals↗

Combined liver and kidney transplantation.

Patients with end-stage renal and hepatic failure may be treated with combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKTx). We reviewed the indications and outcomes of 16 CLKTx performed at the University of Minnesota between 1980 and 1994. The majority of the recipients (87.5%) were young patients affected by congenital hepatic anomalies and concomitant end-stage renal failure. Fourteen were treated with cyclosporin-based immunosuppression and had an excellent outcome: with an average of 6 years of follow-up, patient survival was 85.7%, liver graft survival 85.7%, and kidney graft survival 72%. The incidence of rejection episodes was similar to the rate of rejection in our solitary kidney and liver transplants. In conclusion, our experience supports the value of CLKTx in treating patients with simultaneous failure of both organs or with congenital enzymatic hepatic deficits leading to renal failure.

Adolescent↗