Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Pendlebury

Publications and source records attributed to J Pendlebury.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Radiological insertion of gastrostomy in patients in whom endoscopy was unsuccessful.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopy is the standard technique of percutaneous gastrostomy placement, but failure of placement may occur due to difficulty with intubation or previous abdominal surgery. A review of personal experience is made. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1997 and May 1998, 90 gastrostomy devices were successfully placed endoscopically in our unit. Endoscopic placement was unsuccessful in 3 patients and not attempted in a further 7 because of oro-pharyngeal obstruction. These 10 patients (6 male, 4 female, aged 51-84 years) had advanced neuro-degenerative disease or malignancy of the head and neck or oesophagus. All patients underwent radiological insertion of a gastrostomy tube by the 'push' method after insufflation of air into the stomach via a naso-gastric tube. RESULTS: Radiological insertion of gastrostomy device was successful in 9 out of 10 patients. Failure occurred in 1 patient due to inability to pass a naso-gastric tube and surgical gastrostomy was required. Pain at the gastrostomy site was the most common problem post-procedure and 4 patients still required analgesia on discharge. One patient developed a wound infection. There were no procedure-related deaths. The 30-day mortality due to all causes was 20%. Only 1 patient remained alive at 6 months. DISCUSSION: Availability of a radiologist trained in the placement of percutaneous gastrostomy allowed 99% of such devices to be placed percutaneously, even in those patients in whom endoscopy was not possible. However advanced underlying disease in this patient group results in a high mortality.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Cross-sectional and prospective studies of nutritional indices after percutaneous gastrostomy.

OBJECTIVE: Formal monitoring of nutritional status may be lacking in many patients after gastrostomy. We aimed to study nutritional assessment and its problems in patients after gastrostomy in a cross-sectional study, assess prospectively the changes in nutritional status of patients at 1 month and 6 months after gastrostomy placement, and determine the prognostic value of nutritional indices assessed at the time of gastrostomy placement. DESIGN: We used cross-sectional and prospective cohorts. The subjects were institutional and community patients receiving percutaneous gastrostomy in a teaching hospital. METHOD: We studied patients living in the community and in long-term care institutions after gastrostomy. In the cross-sectional study, we observed all individuals who received a percutaneous gastrostomy from the Gastrointestinal Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh from January 1994 to December 1996. In the prospective study, we observed consecutive referrals of patients to the Gastrointestinal Unit for percutaneous gastrostomy from March 1997 to June 1998. Nutritional status was assessed using: weight (kg), height or stature estimated from knee-height (m), mid-upper arm circumference and triceps skinfold thickness. Body mass index, arm-muscle circumference and corrected arm-muscle area were calculated. A blood sample was taken to assess micronutrient status. RESULTS: In the cross-sectional study, 215 patients were identified who had received a percutaneous gastrostomy during the 3-year period 1994-1996. The weight and height measurements obtained in patients after gastrostomy were not as successful as upper-arm anthropometry. Of the 55 who were alive, traceable and agreed to take part in the study, 8% were under-nourished by corrected arm-muscle area at a median of 16 months after gastrostomy placement, whilst 57% had biochemical evidence of macro- or micronutrient deficiency. In the prospective study, 54 out of 87 patients referred for percutaneous gastrostomy agreed to participate. Using corrected arm-muscle area, 14% of patients were under-nourished at the time of gastrostomy placement. Changes in nutritional status at 1 month and 6 months post gastrostomy were mixed across the patient groups. Patients with a depleted corrected arm-muscle area 21.6 cm2 (log-rank test 9.05; P = 0.003, relative risk 4.7). All patients in whom corrected arm-muscle area had increased at the 1-month follow-up survived to 6 months post gastrostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of nutritional status may be difficult in gastrostomy-fed patients. Upper-arm anthropometry is more often successful than other assessment methods and gives prognostic information.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of health-related quality of life after percutaneous gastrostomy.

OBJECTIVE: Although gastrostomy feeding tends to have fewer interruptions than naso-gastric feeding and is cosmetically more acceptable; there is little information on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in these patients. This study aimed to measure the health-related quality of life of patients after gastrostomy placement. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and prospective cohorts. SETTING: Institutional and community-dwelling patients receiving nutritional support via a gastrostomy. PARTICIPANTS: For the cross-sectional cohort, all individuals who have received a percutaneous gastrostomy from our unit (January 1994-December 1996) were included; 55 of the 102 patients who were still living agreed to follow-up assessment. For the prospective cohort, all patients referred to our unit for percutaneous gastrostomy (March 1997-June 1998) were eligible to participate; 54 of 88 patients (62%) consented and were recruited. METHODS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: A cross-sectional assessment of patient outcome and health-related quality of life using SF-36, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and a disease-specific questionnaire (PEG-Qu) was carried out in patients in primary health care after receiving a gastrostomy. These assessments, plus the Modified Rankin Scale, were performed on patients studied at the time of gastrostomy placement, and after 1, 6 and 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: HRQoL questionnaires could be answered in less than half the patients. An overall rating of the effect of the gastrostomy on the patients' and carers' HRQoL showed a positive effect in 55% and 80%, respectively. A positive impression of the gastrostomy by the patient did not necessarily reflect an improvement in their nutritional status. Assessment of HRQoL in a cohort of gastrostomy patients showed deficiencies in the physical domain but not mental function (anxiety or depression), energy or health perception. Neither physical function nor level of cognition at time of gastrostomy placement appear to be able to predict patient survival. Nutritional outcome was not related to HRQoL outcome. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients and carers rate gastrostomy positively. Patients who were 75 years or older had a poorer survival compared to younger patients, but gender, physical or cognitive function had no predictive value on survival.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1997

Successful pregnancy in a patient with chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction while on ambulatory percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding.

We report a case of ambulatory endoscopic gastrostomy feeding via a low profile button device using a portable feeding pump. This provided successful nutritional support to a patient with chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction who became pregnant while on gastrostomy feeding. She successfully completed her pregnancy with nutritional support through the gastrostomy. The portable feeding pump gave her excellent quality of life both indoors and outdoors, and she could continue feeding without interrupting her daily housework, shopping and babycare.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Feeding by PEG.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Enteral Nutrition↗