Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

J P Tierney

Publications and source records attributed to J P Tierney.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Diabetic retinopathy. The primary care physician's role in management.

Diabetic retinopathy is a treatable condition currently managed with aggressive therapy. Early recognition of the condition and its causes can protect the patient against blindness and sometimes restore visual acuity. From the first fundascopic examination and visual-acuity evaluation, the primary care physician starts the patient on a program of watchful follow-up, treatment, and referral to an opthalmologist.

Diabetic Retinopathy

Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection.

Traditionally, cancer of the prostate has been staged by digital exam, ultrasound, CT scan, bone scan, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), and prostate specific antigen (PSA) determinations. These methods commonly lead to understaging, resulting in surgical or radiation therapy of questionable benefit. Pathologic staging, even though reliable and accurate, requires laparotomy with its associated morbidity and lengthy hospitalization/recovery period. Following national trends, we have recently introduced the technique of Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection (LPND) at our institution. In July 1990 we performed the first LPND at CAMC (Memorial Division). This report details our experience with the first three patients treated in this manner and suggest that the procedure can be performed safely, effectively, and with a significant reduction in morbidity, thus allowing the surgeon to obtain an adequate specimen for pathologic staging. Possible cost containment, minimal discomfort, and little scarring are other advantages that appeal to both patients and surgeons alike.

Adenocarcinoma

A comparative examination of the residential segregation of persons 65 to 74 and persons 75 and above in 18 United States metropolitan areas for 1970 and 1980.

Indexes of dissimilarity were calculated for 18 standard metropolitan statistical areas in 1970 and 1980. The indexes measured the level of residential segregation of persons 65 and older, 65 to 74 and 75 and older. Results indicated a significantly higher level of segregation for persons 75 and older than persons 65 to 74 in both 1970 and 1980. The difference in the level of residential segregation between persons 65 to 74 and 75 and older significantly increased from 1970 to 1980. When measured as a single age group aged 65 and above, there was no significant change in the level of residential segregation from 1970 to 1980. This result indicates that failure to disaggregate the elderly population into two distinct age groups would have resulted in missing changes in the level and trend of residential segregation among the elderly population.

Aged