Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J P Sculier

Publications and source records attributed to J P Sculier.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Prognostic role of thyroid transcription factor-1 in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

UNLABELLED: Stage III NSCLC represents a heterogeneous group and the ISS remains unsatisfactory in term of prognosis prediction. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of TTF-1 as prognostic factor in stage III NSCLC in addition to other known clinical factors. All stage III NSCLC patients treated in our hospital were retrieved and searched for biopsy specimens. TTF-1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry (Novocastra SPT24). Between 01/1987 and 07/2003, 108 assessable stage III NSCLC patients were included in the study. Their principal characteristics were: median age 64 years (range 37-83), male/female 81/27, squamous/non squamous 52/56, IIIA/IIIB 44/64, median Karnofsky PS 80 (range 20-100). Forty-four patients were positive for TTF-1 (squamous 25.0% versus non-squamous 55.4%). In multivariate analysis, only three factors were statistically significantly associated with better survival: good PS, surgery and creatinine level. CONCLUSION: In stage III NSCLC patients, good PS, resectability and low creatinine level but not TTF-1 are prognostic factors for survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Survival improvement in resectable non-small cell lung cancer with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy: results of a meta-analysis of the literature.

The recent publication of many randomised trials about (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has prompted our group to update a prior meta-analysis of the literature. Randomised studies published in French and English between 1965 and June 2004 were included in this analysis. A qualitative assessment of each trial was first performed using the European lung cancer working party (ELCWP) and the Chalmers' scales. In absence of statistically significant quality difference between positive and negative trials, a quantitative aggregation (meta-analysis) of the individual results was performed. Two trials for which data were available on ASCO virtual meeting website were also included in the meta-analysis. Twenty-five studies eligible for this analysis assessed chemotherapy as induction (n = 6) or adjuvant to surgery (n = 19). No quality difference was detected between positive and negative trials according to the two scores, whatever all trials were combined or only adjuvant chemotherapy studies were considered. The overall meta-analysis showed that the hazard ratio (HR) of the combined results was 0.66 (95% CI 0.48-0.93) in favour of the addition of induction chemotherapy to a standard surgical procedure and 0.84 (95% CI 0.78-0.89) in favour of adjuvant chemotherapy. The effect was significant for adjuvant chemotherapy in stages I and II with a HR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.94). It was not statistically significant in stage III although the trend was in favour of chemotherapy whatever adjuvant (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.69-1.04) or (neo)adjuvant (HR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.41-1.04) chemotherapy was tested. In conclusion, our meta-analysis shows the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in stages I and II resected NSCLC. More data are needed to confirm such a role for induction chemotherapy. Further trials should separate stage III disease from earlier stages.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2005

A phase II study evaluating the cisplatin and epirubicin combination in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Few chemotherapeutic agents have demonstrated their efficacy in malignant mesothelioma. The cisplatin plus doxorubicin combination has one of the highest response rates. Epirubicin is an anthracyclin, analogous to doxorubicin, with a different toxicologic pattern. As there are no data on the activity of the combination cisplatin plus epirubicin in malignant mesothelioma, the European Lung Cancer Working Party (ELCWP) designed a phase II study with response rate as primary objective. Sixty-nine eligible patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma were centrally registered. The majority of the patients were male (n=59), had a Karnofsky performance status of 80 or more (n=62) and presented with an epithelial histologic subtype (n=43). Median age was 62 years. In nine patients, metastases were documented at the initial work-up, mainly in bone, lung and skin. Three hundred and twenty-four cycles of chemotherapy were administered. The main toxicities were nausea and vomiting, neutropenia and alopecia. Among 63 assessable patients, response rate was 19.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-29%). Median survival was 13.3 months. In multivariate analysis, poor prognostic factors for survival were neutrophil count and CALGB groups 4-6. In conclusion, cisplatin plus epirubicin appears as an effective regimen in malignant mesothelioma, with a favourable toxicity profile. However, it does not demonstrate superior activity to other active regimens in this disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Prognostic role of epidermal growth factor receptor in stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer.

New biological factors have not been extensively studied in stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the present retrospective study was to determine the role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) as a prognostic factor in stage III NSCLC, in addition to the stage and other known clinical factors. Clinical characteristics were retrieved from the patients' charts. Membrane immunostaining for EGF-R was evaluated by three independent observers. The Cox multivariate model, including all variables with a p-value of <0.2 in univariate analysis, was used to assess the impact of clinical and biological factors on patients survival. Between January 1987 and July 2002, 99 assessable stage III NSCLC patients were included in the study. A total of 23 patients were positive for EGF-R (squamous 39.6% versus nonsquamous 7.8%). In multivariate analysis, only three factors were statistically significantly associated with survival: performance status, surgery and creatinine. In conclusion, good performance status, surgical resection and creatinine were found to be independent favourable prognostic factors for survival in a retrospective analysis of stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer, while epidermal growth factor receptor was not even in the univariate analysis.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Mitomycin, ifosfamide, cisplatin for non-small cell lung cancer: an implementation study.

BACKGROUND: The MIP regimen (mitomycin, ifosfamide, cisplatin) demonstrated its effectiveness as first-line chemotherapy in phase II and III trials in NSCLC. We aimed to determine whether these results could be confirmed in a hospital population. METHODS: Between 1987 and 2004, 204 patients with NSCLC received MIP in our institution. Patients treated in and off trials received the same combination of cisplatin (50 mg/m2), ifosfamide (3 g/m2) and mitomycin C (6 mg/m2) every three weeks and were staged and followed in a similar way. RESULTS: Response rates for patients treated in or outside trials were 36.8% and 40.7%, respectively. After multiple logistic regressions, the only statistically significant factor predicting objective response was stage. The median survival time was 54.6 and 43.7 weeks respectively for patients treated in and outside trials. In multivariate analysis, four factors were statistically significantly associated with better survival: good performance status (p = 0.003), normal LDH value (p < 0.001), early stage (p = 0.01) and active smoking (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Participation in a clinical trial was not associated with a significant difference in efficacy. This implementation study thus confirms the activity of the MIP regimen when used in the routine management of patients with NSCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Continuous venovenous haemofiltration in cancer patients with renal failure: a single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in cancer patients with acute renal failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of all patients with acute renal failure requiring dialysis and treated with CVVHDF in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) from a cancer hospital. RESULTS: From January 1997 until December 2002, 32 cancer patients were treated with CVVHDF for acute renal failure. Their characteristics were: male/female 23/9, median age 61 years, haematological/solid tumours 16/16, and median APACHE II and IGS II scores 31/67. The number of organ failures was 1/2/3/4 in respectively 10/6/13/2 patients. Complete, partial or absence of resolution of acute renal failure was noted in 13, 8 and 11 patients. Sixteen patients (50%) died in the ICU and 15 (47%) were discharged alive from the hospital. In univariate analysis, variables statistically significantly adversely associated with hospital mortality were renal failure of renal origin, bone marrow transplant, increasing number of organ failures, reduced lymphocyte count, elevated bilirubin and lower creatinine levels, increased thromboplastin time, younger age, increased APACHE II and IGS II, ARDS and mechanical ventilation. In multivariate analysis, two models were used including either APACHE II or IGS II. The number of organ failures was found as the only significant prognostic factor in both models ( p=0.01). Elevated phosphate level was a poor prognostic factor for hospital mortality ( p=0.04) in the model including APACHE II. CONCLUSIONS: In the experience of a single centre, CVVHDF is effective in the treatment of acute renal failure in cancer patients. The increasing number of organ failures was the single independent poor predictive factor for hospital mortality. Cancer characteristics and general gravity scores were not predictive factors.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Is a specific oncological scoring system better at predicting the prognosis of cancer patients admitted for an acute medical complication in an intensive care unit than general gravity scores?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a specific oncologic scoring system-the ICU Cancer Mortality model (ICM)-in predicting hospital mortality in comparison to two general severity scores-the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 247 patients admitted for a medical acute complication over an 18-month period in an oncological medical intensive care unit were prospectively registered. Their data, including type of complication, vital status at discharge and cancer characteristics as well as other variables necessary to calculate the three scoring systems were retrospectively assessed. RESULTS: Observed in-hospital mortality was 34%. The predicted in-hospital mortality rate for APACHE II was 32%; SAPS II, 24%; and ICM, 28%. The goodness of fit was inadequate except for the ICM score. Comparison of the area under the ROC curves revealed a better fit for ICM (area 0.79). The maximum correct classification rate was 72% for APACHE II, 74% for SAPS II and 77% for ICM. APACHE II and SAPS II were better at predicting outcome for survivors to hospital discharge, although ICM was better for non-survivors. Two variables were independently predicting the risk of death during hospitalisation: ICM (OR=2.31) and SAPS II (OR=1.05). CONCLUSIONS: Gravity scores were the single independent predictors for hospital mortality, and ICM was equivalent to APACHE II and SAPS II.

APACHE↗
PubMed2004

Survival is better predicted with a new classification of stage III unresectable non-small cell lung carcinoma treated by chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

UNLABELLED: The 1997 International staging system (ISS) classification separated stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) into stages IIIA and IIIB. In a previous study including unresectable NSCLC initially treated with chemotherapy, we analysed survival according to tumour (T) and node (N) stages and derived a classification into stages IIIbeta (T3-4N3) and IIIalpha (other TN stage III) that had a better discrimination on survival distribution. The aim of this study was to validate these results in a further set of patients. Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC included in a phase III trial assessing the role of increased dose chemotherapy (SuperMIP: mitomycin 6 mg/m2, ifosfamide 4.5 g/m2, cisplatin 60 mg/m2, carboplatin 200 mg/m2) in comparison to standard chemotherapy MIP (mitomycin 6 mg/m2, ifosfamide 3 g/m2, cisplatin 50 mg/m2), before thoracic irradiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) were the subject of this study. Survival distributions were assessed by the method of Kaplan-Meier. Survival comparisons were made by the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses using Cox regression models, included all potential prognostic factors for survival with a P-value <0.2 in univariate analysis. According to the 1997 International staging system classification, 328 eligible patients were included in the study. There was no imbalance between the two arms. Five parameters were significantly associated (P < or = 0.05) with survival in univariate analysis: European lung cancer working party (ELCWP) staging (IIIalpha[n = 294 pts] versus IIIbeta [n = 46]), Karnofsky index, weight loss, platelet count and haemoglobin level. These variables as well as the 1997 ISS staging, white blood cell (WBC) count, LDH and sodium levels were included in a multivariate analysis. Two models were constructed, including either the ELCWP or the 1997 ISS. In model 1 (ISS included), Karnofsky index (HR 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.00; P = 0.05) and haemoglobin (HR 1.49; 95% CI 1.11-1.99; P = 0.007) were found significant. In model 2, including ELCWP staging, two variables were associated with survival: ELCWP staging (HR 1.68; 95% CI 1.20-2.35; P = 0.002) and haemoglobin (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.15-2.07; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In initially unresectable stage III NSCLC treated by chemotherapy and radiotherapy, we validated the results of our previous study. The classification into stages IIIbeta (T3-4N3M0) and IIIalpha (other TN stage III) better discriminates the patients in term of survival than the 1997 ISS classification.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

[Good and bad uses of the Impact Factor, a bibliometric tool].

The Impact Factor (IF) is a bibliometric tool that has become very popular among the academic people. It has been developed by the publishers of scientific reviews to determine the impact of their journal among the scientific and medical community. It is based on the following principle: more often are cited the articles of a journal, more often is that journal read and thus sold. Various secondary applications have been performed with the IF, including the evaluation of the academic curriculum of a scientist or of a research group. That approach is however not validated, a recent methodological study having demonstrated a lack of good correlation between the IF of a given review and the quality scores of its published articles.

Bibliometrics↗
PubMed2003

Leucopenia is an independent predictor in cancer patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation: a prognostic factor analysis in a series of 168 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine prognostic factors predicting success of invasive mechanical ventilation in medical cancer patients admitted to ICU for a complication, in terms of extubation and ICU and hospital discharges. DESIGN: Retrospective study SETTING: Medical ICU of an European cancer hospital. SUBJECTS: A total of 168 consecutive cancer patients who were admitted to ICU for an acute medical complication requiring immediate mechanical ventilation or who later needed mechanical ventilation. MEASUREMENTS: Variables related to the demographic, cancer, scores and complication characteristics. Extubation rates, ICU and hospital mortalities and duration of survival were measured. RESULTS: Respectively, 26%, 22% and 17% of the patients were extubated, discharged from the ICU and discharged from hospital. For weaning from mechanical ventilation, a higher APACHE II score and leucopenia were poor prognostic factors in univariate analysis, but leucopenia remained the only significant one in multivariate analysis. For ICU mortality, no significant prognostic feature was identified. For hospital mortality, leucopenia was the only significant factor in univariate as well as in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Leucopenia appeared to be the only independent poor prognostic factor for both extubation and hospital discharge. None of the variables related to the cancer disease process was shown to be a predictor of success.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Critical factors for patient management.

The main critical factors for lung cancer patient management, apart from TNM staging, include expertise required to offer optimal management and conditions related to the patient, including performance status and weight loss and the presence of lung, cardiac or other comorbidities. Performance status and weight loss must be assessed for all patients. The minimal pulmonary functional evaluation should include spirometry. The minimal cardiac evaluation should consist of a clinical history and evaluation for cardiac risk factors and disease and at least preoperatively, and ECG. Age per se is not a contraindication for curative treatment.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

Consensus: the follow-up of the treated patient.

This is the first consensus document on the follow-up of the treated patient with non-small cell lung cancer that has been written by this group. The document has been drawn up by doctors coming from many different cultures and philosophical backgrounds. It acknowledges that there are published guidelines on the follow-up particularly those in trials, and does not wish to contradict these. There is lack of evidence-based medicine to recommend a strong general policy in this area. For those patients who were treated with curative intent the initial follow-up will depend upon the toxicity that is evident from the treatment given. Thereafter the interval between follow-up visits should be every 3 months for the first two years, then every 6 months for up to five years. Rapid and easy access to the multidisciplinary team should be available. Full examination and chest X-ray should be carried out on each visit but other investigations should be determined by clinical need. For those patients treated with palliative intent the interval between follow-up visits once the acute reactions have settled will depend upon the adequacy of the control of the symptom and the availability of separate palliative care teams. At all times the patient should have rapid access to the multidisciplinary team and in general frequent follow-up, that is at intervals of one to two months, may be appropriate during the first six months. Follow-up constitutes an important part of lung cancer management. Efforts should be made to gain clinical material to give us evidence-based guidelines.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed2003

Citation indexes do not reflect methodological quality in lung cancer randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Citation factors are applied to assess scientific work despite the fact that they were developed commercially in order to compare competing journals. The aim of the present study was to determine whether there is a relationship between citation factors and a trial's methodological quality using published randomised trials in lung cancer clinical research. Material and methods All of the randomised trials included in nine systematic reviews performed by the European Lung Cancer Working Party (ELCWP) were assessed using two quality scales (Chalmers and ELCWP). RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-one articles were eligible. The median overall ELCWP and Chalmers quality scores were 61.8% and 49.0%, respectively, with a correlation coefficient (r(s)) of 0.74 (P <0.001). A weak association was observed between citation factors and quality scores with the respective correlation coefficients ranging from 0.18 to 0.40 (ELCWP scale) and from 0.21 to 0.38 (Chalmers scale). American authors published trials significantly more often in journals with high citation factors than European or non-American authors (P <0.0001), despite no better methodological quality. Positive trials, which were significantly more likely to be published in journals with higher citation factors, were of no better quality than negative ones. CONCLUSION: Journals with higher citation factors do not appear to publish clinical trials with higher levels of methodological quality, at least for trials in the field of lung cancer research.

Chi-Square Distribution↗
PubMed2003

Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in pre-invasive and early invasive bronchial lesions.

The 1999 World Health Organization/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer histological classification of preneoplastic bronchial lesions has been shown to be reproducible but little is known about its biological significance. The current study evaluated the correspondence between the morphological changes of the bronchial epithelium and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) expression. Thirteen normal bronchial epithelia, 19 hyperplasia, 16 metaplasia, 10 mild dysplasia, one moderate dysplasia, 10 severe dysplasia (SD), 14 carcinoma in situ (CIS) and 11 microinvasive tumours were assessed. A global EGF-R score obtained by the sum of the positivity score plus the EGF-R staining intensity score was calculated for each lesion. A global EGF-R score of >5 was reached only in one metaplasia, in six SD, in six CIS and in six microinvasive tumours. There was no difference in EGF-R expression between normal, hyperplastic and metaplastic epithelia versus mild dysplasia or between severe dysplasia versus CIS and microinvasive tumours but there was a statistically significant difference between mild versus severe dysplasia. This study demonstrates that epidermal growth factor receptor expression rate changes with the stage of the bronchial lesion, increasing from normal epithelium to carcinoma in situ and microinvasive tumours with a statistically significant difference between mild versus severe dysplasia.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Fragile histidine triad protein expression in nonsmall cell lung cancer and correlation with Ki-67 and with p53.

Fragile histidine triad (FHIT) is a tumour suppressor gene, which is altered in a variety of epithelial tumours, including lung cancer. Biochemical and functional pathways of its tumourigenicity are not yet understood. Its role in tumour proliferation is particularly controversial. The purpose of this study was to correlate the expression of FHIT protein in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tumour proliferation as estimated by Ki-67 antigen and with p53, a suppressor gene. FHIT, Ki-67 and p53 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 119 resected NSCLC. Altogether, 58 tumours were negative (expression <10%) for FHIT. The median expression in tumours was 15% positive cells, in comparison with 100% in normal matched lung tissue. The expression was as strong as in normal tissue in only 19 cases. FHIT expression was significantly lower in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (5%) than in adenocarcinoma (ADC) (64%). The median expression of Ki-67 was 20% and 69% of tumours were positives (expression >10%). Ki-67 expression was significantly higher in SCC (33.3%) than in ADC (10%). The loss of FHIT protein was not correlated with the expression of p53 (median: 7.5%, 58% of positive tumours for a cut-off of 10% of positive cells) or Ki-67. But percentage of labelled cells for p53 and Ki-67 were significantly correlated. The results suggest that for fragile histidine triad, the pathway of tumourigenesis is independent of p53 and of tumoural proliferation, as reported previously in vitro.

Acid Anhydride Hydrolases↗