Definitions, methodology and therapeutic strategies in portal hypertension. A Consensus Development Workshop, Baveno, Lake Maggiore, Italy, April 5 and 6, 1990.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J P Pascal.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Molsidomine, a long acting vasodilator with antianginal properties, has been shown to decrease porto-hepatic pressure gradient in patients with cirrhosis. The present study aimed at assessing the effects of molsidomine, propranolol and of the association of these two drugs on portal vein blood flow as measured using Doppler and B-mode sonography. In 10 patients without liver disease (group 1), portal flow time average mean velocity (TAV) and portal vein blood flow (PVBF) were measured under basal conditions, 1 hour then 2 hours after ingestion of 4 mg of molsidomine. The same measurements were performed in 15 patients with cirrhosis (group 2) under basal conditions, 1 then 2 hours after double-blind administration of either molsidomine (10 patients) or placebo (5 patients). Fifteen further patients with cirrhosis (group 3) were studied after the double blind administration of 80 mg of propranolol and two hours later of 4 mg of molsidomine (10 patients) or placebo (5 patients); TAV and PVBF were measured under basal conditions, two hours after propranolol ingestion or placebo, then one and two hours after molsidomine or placebo ingestion. TAV and PVBF remained unchanged in patients treated with placebo. Molsidomine reduced TAV by 23.8 +/- 19.5% in group 1 (P < 0.01) and by 25.6 +/- 21.4% in group 2 (P < 0.01). In group 3, a 10% decrease was observed after propranolol (NS). When molsidomine was added, TAV was further decreased (-17.6 +/- 13.3% vs baseline, P < 0.01). PVBF remained unchanged in the three groups of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
BACKGROUND: The value of beta-adrenergic-antagonist drug therapy for the prevention of initial episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices is uncertain, both positive and negative study results having been reported. METHODS: In this study, we analyzed data on individual patients from four randomized, controlled trials to assess the efficacy of this treatment. Of the 589 patients studied, 286 received a beta-adrenergic-antagonist drug (propranolol in 203 and nadolol in 83) and 303 received placebo. RESULTS: After two years, the mean (+/- SE) percentage of patients who had had no upper gastrointestinal bleeding was 78 +/- 3 percent in the beta-adrenergic-antagonist treatment group and 65 +/- 3 percent in the control group (P = 0.002). The percentage of patients without fatal bleeding was 90 +/- 2 percent in the treatment group and 82 +/- 3 percent in the control group (P = 0.01). The percentage of patients surviving after two years was 71 +/- 3 percent in the treatment group and 68 +/- 3 percent in the control group (P = 0.34). After age and severity of cirrhosis were taken into account, the survival rate was better in the treatment group (P = 0.09). The percentage of surviving patients who had had no bleeding after two years was 62 +/- 3 percent in the treatment group and 53 +/- 3 percent in the control group (P = 0.04). Both propranolol and nadolol prevented a first episode of bleeding. Severe cirrhosis and especially the presence of ascites were associated with bleeding (P less than 0.001) and death (P less than 0.001) in both groups. The efficacy of beta-adrenergic-antagonist therapy in the prevention of bleeding (P less than 0.001) and of fatal bleeding (P = 0.004) and in the prevention of bleeding or death (P = 0.005) was the same after adjustment for cause and severity of cirrhosis, ascites, and size of varices. CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol and nadolol are effective in preventing first bleeding and reducing the mortality rate associated with gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis, regardless of severity.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Molsidomine, a long-acting vasodilator mainly used as an antianginal agent, was reported to decrease the portohepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. This study investigated the effects of linsidomine, the active metabolite of molsidomine, on systemic and splanchnic hemodynamics in rats with CCl4-induced cirrhosis using the microsphere technique. Compared with placebo-treated rats, linsidomine-treated animals were found to have a significant decrease in portal venous pressure (-18%, p less than 0.01) and in mean arterial pressure (-16%, p less than 0.01), smaller peripheral resistances (p less than 0.01), greater portal venous inflow (p less than 0.05), smaller splanchnic arteriolar resistances (p less than 0.01) and smaller protocol-lateral resistances (p less than 0.05). Cardiac output, hepatic arterial blood flow, portal blood flow and estimated hepatic blood flow were not significantly different between the two groups of animals. Linsidomine-treated rats exhibited a trend toward greater collateral blood flow compared with controls, but this difference was not significant. We conclude that linsidomine decreases portal venous pressure by reducing portocollateral resistances without affecting liver blood flow. These effects should be beneficial for patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.
Oesophageal varices are found in two-thirds of cirrhotic patients, and they bleed by rupture in only 50% of the cases. Each bleeding episode carries a mortality risk of about 30%. Recurrences occur in 70% of survivors. Patients with cirrhosis may be considered as being at risk of haemorrhage when large varices, notably with "red signs", are discovered at endoscopy. In two-thirds of the cases, the hemorrhage from ruptured oesophageal varices has stopped by the time emergency endoscopy is performed, but its severity mainly depends on its early recurrence. Haemostatic treatments are justified only in the presence of an active haemorrhage. The best method seems to be endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy carried out in a specialized centre by a centre by a trained endoscopist. The other methods should be used only when sclerotherapy has failed. The prevention of recurrences (secondary prophylaxis) mainly rests on the eradication of varices by endoscopic sclerosis. The addition of propranolol to treatment is probably useful. The seriousness of haemorrhages due to rupture of oesophageal varices justifies primary prophylaxis in patients with large varices found at endoscopy. At present, nonselective beta-blockers constitute the best method of primary prophylaxis. In about 1 out of 5 cases, haemorrhages in cirrhotic patients are due to a different lesion, such as ruptured gastric varices or gastric disease due to portal hypertension. The treatment of haemorrhages causes by these lesions has not been clearly defined, but surgical haemostasis is sometimes indicated in case of ruptures gastric varices.
Organic nitrates were reported to reduce portohepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhosis. However, these drugs lower arterial pressure and are well known to induce tolerance. The aim of the present study was to assess the hemodynamic effects of molsidomine, an antianginal agent, which does not induce tolerance and has little effect on arterial pressure in patients with normal liver, in 13 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Wedged hepatic vein pressure (-11%, p less than 0.01), portohepatic venous pressure gradient (-15%, p less than 0.005), hepatic blood flow (-17.4%, p less than 0.005), mean arterial pressure (-13.5%, p less than 0.01) and cardiac output (-17%, p less than 0.001) were significantly reduced by molsidomine. Free hepatic vein pressure, intrinsic hepatic clearance indocyanine green, heart rate and systemic vascular resistances were not significantly modified. There was no correlation between the decrease in portohepatic venous pressure gradient and the reduction in mean arterial pressure on one hand and the decrease in cardiac output on the other hand. We therefore conclude that in patients with cirrhosis, molsidomine has effects similar to nitrates on systemic and splanchnic hemodynamics.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Because several studies have suggested that beta blockers are effective in the prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding in cirrhosis, screening for oesophageal varices might be appropriate. We prospectively studied 84 cirrhotic patients without obvious evidence of large oesophageal varices and previous bleeding during a mean follow up of 16 months. At entry to the study 41 patients had no oesophageal varices and in 43 these were grade 1. The subsequent percentages of patients without large oesophageal varices were 74% at one year and 52% at two years. Univariate analysis showed that a longer duration of cirrhosis (p less than 0.05) and grade 1 oesophageal varices at entry (p less than 0.001) were predictive factors for the occurrence of large oesophageal varices, whereas, multivariate analysis showed that the initial size of the oesophageal varices (p less than 0.001), a high initial Child-Pugh score, and a smaller improvement in Child-Pugh score during the study were independent risk factors. Among patients with grades 0 and 1 oesophageal varices at the start of the study the proportions with large oesophageal varices at two years were 31% and 70% respectively. We have calculated that, accepting a maximum risk of first bleeding of 10% without prophylactic treatment, a patient without oesophageal varices should be screened endoscopically every other year, while a patient with grade 1 disease should benefit from one annual upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
After years of effort, the treatment of an episode of bleeding from a ruptured varix remains unsatisfactory, as does prophylaxis of rebleeding. As a consequence it was logical to try to prevent bleeding before the first hemorrhage has occurred (primary prophylaxis). Shunt surgery proved to be useful in terms of bleeding rate, but side effects and operative risk made this method inapplicable for prophylaxis. Endoscopic sclerotherapy was efficient in terms of bleeding rate, but doubts about its efficacy in improving survival, together with difficulties in performing repeated endoscopies over the long term, have limited its use in primary prophylaxis. Beta-blockers have proved useful for preventing bleeding and, in some studies, for improving survival. Further studies are still necessary to accurately identify the suitable target population, the method of follow-up and the duration of treatment. Although some groups have started using beta-blockers for prophylaxis before bleeding on a routine basis, others consider this treatment only for prospective randomized trials.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Nowadays, gastroesophageal endoscopic features of portal hypertension are the recognized predictive factors for bleeding and consequently allow the selection of patients for prophylactic therapies. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the interobserver agreement, the interassociations between these features, and the relationship between these signs and the degree of hepatic dysfunction. In 100 consecutive cirrhotic patients (84% with alcoholism) without history of digestive bleeding, gastroesophageal endoscopic examination was performed and recorded using a videoendoscope. Four independent observers evaluated the following endoscopic features: the size, extent, color, and red signs of esophageal varices, the mosaic pattern, congestive gastropathy, fundic varices, and associated lesions of the stomach. Agreement was assessed using kappa statistics (kappa) and a quantitative score. The size of esophageal varices was significantly associated with their extent and the presence of red signs, whereas no relation was found either between gastropathy or mosaic pattern and fundic varices, or between esophageal and gastric features. Agreement between observers was good for the size of esophageal varices (kappa = 0.59), the presence of red signs (kappa = 0.60), and of gastric-associated lesions (kappa = 0.68) and gastropathy (kappa = 0.50), while it was poor for the extent (kappa = 0.37) and the color (kappa = 0.28) of esophageal varices as well as for the mosaic pattern (kappa = 0.38). The Child-Pugh score significantly increased along with the presence or the size of esophageal varices as well as with the presence of red signs; no relationship could be shown between this score and the presence of gastric features. We conclude that (1) interobserver agreement was good for the main endoscopic features, especially for the size and the red signs of esophageal varices; (2) esophageal patterns were significantly associated between themselves and related to hepatic dysfunction; and (3) gastric patterns were related neither to esophageal features nor to hepatic dysfunction and were not associated between themselves.
Obstructive intramural hematoma of the esophagus is an unusual complication of endoscopic sclerotherapy. We report three patients with liver cirrhosis who experienced such a complication. In our series, the frequency was 1.6 percent. A few hours after sclerotherapy, all three patients complained of low retrosternal pain, dysphagia and hypersialorrhea. Endoscopy was performed in two patients and showed a typical bluish submucosal mass occupying the esophageal lumen. Outcome was favorable in all patients within one week of conservative treatment. We hypothesized that hematoma could be ascribed to variceal puncture. The extension of the hematoma with dissection of the esophageal wall which had been fragilized by previous sclerotherapy sessions could have been facilitated by impaired coagulation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Iodized oil (lipiodol) injected into the hepatic artery is selectively retained by hepatocarcinomas, as demonstrated by computerized tomography (CT) performed one week after the injection. The value of this technique for the diagnosis of hepatocarcinoma was assessed in a retrospective study of 45 patients. In 39 per cent of the cases intrahepatic tumoral extension was determined by the iodized oil which showed tumoral nodules that had not been detected by conventional methods, such as ultrasonography and CT alone. The lesions revealed by the iodized oil were small nodules around the main tumour. The combined iodized oil-CT technique plays an important role in the choice of treatment, especially when surgical excision is contemplated. It might also contribute to an early diagnosis of hepatocarcinoma in patients at risk, as illustrated by four of our cases where conventional morphological examinations had been negative.