Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J P Lindenmayer

Publications and source records attributed to J P Lindenmayer.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Transcultural differences in suicide attempters: analysis on a high-risk population of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

The aim of the study was to investigate transcultural differences between schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients who did or did not attempt suicide. DSM-IV schizophrenia (N=609) or schizoaffective disorder (N=371) patients who participated in the multicentre International Suicide Prevention Trial (InterSePT) were studied. Patients were sub-divided into 5 groups according to the different geographical regions of recruitment: North America (NA), Europe (EUR), East Europe (EEUR), South Africa (SAf), and South America (SA). The main lifetime clinical variables were compared, within each group, between attempters and non-attempters. The presence of comorbid substance abuse disorder and smoking was associated with suicide attempts in all the geographical groups considered (NA: chi(1)(2)=7.575, p<0.01 and chi(1)(2)=69.549, p<0.0001; EUR: chi(1)(2)=55.068, p<0.0001, and chi(1)(2)=48.431, p<0.0001; EEUR: chi(1)(2)=164.628, p<0.000, and chi(1)(2)=5.127, p<0.01; SA: chi(1)(2)=30.204, p<0.0001 and chi(1)(2)=11.710, p=0.001) except for SAf. For the other clinical variables various differences were found across the different groups. Variables related to suicide behavior were similar across the five groups investigated, with differences only in the age at the first suicide attempt (earlier in the NA sample) and the number of lifetime suicide attempts (higher in the NA sample). Results from this study show that, while some suicide-related clinical characteristics in schizophrenia patients are consistent worldwide suggesting the influence of stable biological traits, other variables may vary across different geographical areas suggesting environmental influences.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Pharmacological treatment strategies for schizophrenia.

The pharmacological choices for the treatment of schizophrenia have been greatly expanded with the availability of the atypical compounds clozapine (Clozaril, Novartis), risperidone (Risperdal, Janssen-Cilag), olanzapine (Zyprexa, Eli Lilly & Co.), quetiapine (Seroquel, AstraZeneca), ziprasidone (Geodon, Pfizer Inc.) and aripiprazole (Abilify, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd). In this article, the effects of the newer antipsychotics and their side effects are reviewed. Key issues in acute and maintenance treatment, often lifelong, will be reviewed. Side-effect management to ensure adherence to an optimal treatment regimen will be discussed. Coexisting syndromes must be treated in concordance with the patient's clinical presentation. For treatment-resistant patients, atypical compounds are generally more effective than their typical counterparts but medication augmentation strategies are frequently recommended. Finally, the results of recent meta-analyses comparing the effects of atypical versus typical compounds will be critically reviewed and remaining gaps in the current pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia will be explored.

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMed2003

The InterSePT scale for suicidal thinking reliability and validity.

BACKGROUND: The InterSePT Scale for Suicidal Thinking (ISST) is a 12-item instrument for the assessment of current suicidal ideation in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders. We report the psychometric characteristics of this new scale based on two studies. METHOD: In Study 1, 22 inpatients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders, who had recently attempted suicide or engaged in suicidal ideation, were rated by three trained independent raters to examine interrater reliability. In Study 2, a total of 980 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder with a history of suicidal ideation in the past 36 months were enrolled in a 2-year industry-sponsored suicide prevention study. At baseline, these patients were administered the ISST and the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Severity of Suicidality (CGI-SS) by the Principal Investigator (PI) and by a blinded rater (BR), who also administered the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), the Calgary Depression Scale (CDS), and the Scale of Functioning (SOF). Indices of internal reliability, construct and discriminant validity were examined. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total ISST score for the 22 subjects in Study 1 was 0.90 and mean weighted item kappa coefficients ranged from 0.66 to 0.92. In Study 2, internal reliability (Cronbach alpha) was high, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 for the individual items, and the overall Cronbach alpha coefficient for all items was 0.88. The ISST (PI) total score was highly correlated with the CGI-SS by the blind rater (r = 0.61, p < 0.0001). ISST total scores significantly differentiated the different levels of CGI-SS (F = 519.2; p < 0.0001). Results of construct and discriminant validity analyses are also presented. CONCLUSION: The ISST is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of current suicidal thinking in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder by both clinicians and researchers.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Clozapine treatment for suicidality in schizophrenia: International Suicide Prevention Trial (InterSePT).

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder attempt suicide, and approximately 10% die of suicide. Study results suggest that clozapine therapy significantly reduces suicidal behavior in these patients. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, international, 2-year study comparing the risk for suicidal behavior in patients treated with clozapine vs olanzapine was conducted in 980 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, 26.8% of whom were refractory to previous treatment, who were considered at high risk for suicide because of previous suicide attempts or current suicidal ideation. To equalize clinical contact across treatments, all patients were seen weekly for 6 months and then biweekly for 18 months. Subsequent to randomization, unmasked clinicians at each site could make any interventions necessary to prevent the occurrence of suicide attempts. Suicidal behavior was assessed at each visit. Primary end points included suicide attempts (including those that led to death), hospitalizations to prevent suicide, and a rating of "much worsening of suicidality" from baseline. Masked raters, including an independent suicide monitoring board, determined when end point criteria were achieved. RESULTS: Suicidal behavior was significantly less in patients treated with clozapine vs olanzapine (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.97; P =.03). Fewer clozapine-treated patients attempted suicide (34 vs 55; P =.03), required hospitalizations (82 vs 107; P =.05) or rescue interventions (118 vs 155; P =.01) to prevent suicide, or required concomitant treatment with antidepressants (221 vs 258; P =.01) or anxiolytics or soporifics (301 vs 331; P =.03). Overall, few of these high-risk patients died of suicide during the study (5 clozapine vs 3 olanzapine-treated patients; P =.73). CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine therapy demonstrated superiority to olanzapine therapy in preventing suicide attempts in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder at high risk for suicide. Use of clozapine in this population should lead to a significant reduction in suicidal behavior.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Adjunctive high-dose glycine in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Glycine is an agonist at brain N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and crosses the blood-brain barrier following high-dose oral administration. In a previous study, significant improvements in negative and cognitive symptoms were observed in a group of 21 schizophrenic patients receiving high-dose glycine in addition to antipsychotic treatment. This study evaluated the degree to which symptom improvements might be related to alterations in antipsychotic drug levels in an additional group of 12 subjects. Glycine treatment was associated with an 8-fold increase in serum glycine levels, similar to that observed previously. A significant 34% reduction in negative symptoms was observed during glycine treatment. Serum antipsychotic levels were not significantly altered. Significant clinical effects were observed despite the fact that the majority of subjects were receiving atypical antipsychotics (clozapine or olanzapine). As in earlier studies, improvement persisted following glycine discontinuation.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Olanzapine for schizophrenia refractory to typical and atypical antipsychotics: an open-label, prospective trial.

The role of olanzapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia is still unresolved. This article presents an open-label, prospective, 14-week trial with olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder selected for unambiguous resistance to either clozapine or risperidone and to typical antipsychotics. Forty-three inpatients (mean age, 41.6 years; mean duration of illness, 21.7 years) were enrolled and treated after cross-titration from their previous antipsychotic treatment with olanzapine 10 to 40 mg daily without any concomitant antipsychotic medication. Patients were evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impressions Scale, and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale. The change with olanzapine treatment was associated with a PANSS total score improvement of 3.7 (SD = 15.6; not significant). There was a significant improvement for the PANSS cognitive and depression/anxiety factors, whereas the PANSS excitement factor worsened. The improvement rate was superior in patients receiving olanzapine doses higher than 20 mg. A total of 16.7% of patients reached response criteria set forth by a previous study. There was a significant decrease in extrapyramidal side effects (t = 2.04; p < 0.05) and statistically significant, yet modest, weight gain. These results indicate that olanzapine is only modestly effective in these severely treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia. However, a trial with olanzapine can be recommended in these patients before moving to augmentation strategies, given the lack of proven alternatives and the observation that 16.7% of patients reached the response criteria.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Effects of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol on hostility among patients with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the specific antiaggressive effects of clozapine with those of olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol. METHODS: A total of 157 inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and a history of suboptimal treatment response were randomly assigned to receive clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, or haloperidol in a double-blind 14-week trial. The trial was divided into two periods: eight weeks during which the dosage was escalated and then fixed, and six weeks during which variable dosages were used. The hostility item of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was the principal outcome measure. Covariates included the items that reflect positive symptoms of schizophrenia (delusions, suspiciousness or feelings of persecution, grandiosity, unusual thought content, conceptual disorganization, and hallucinations) and the sedation item of the Nurses Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation (NOSIE). RESULTS: Patients differed in their treatment response as measured by the hostility item of the PANSS. The scores of patients taking clozapine indicated significantly greater improvement than those of patients taking haloperidol or risperidone. The effect on hostility appeared to be independent of the antipsychotic effect of clozapine on other PANSS items that reflect delusional thinking, a formal thought disorder, or hallucinations and independent of sedation as measured by the NOSIE. Neither risperidone nor olanzapine showed superiority to haloperidol. CONCLUSION: Clozapine has a relative advantage over other antipsychotics as a specific antihostility agent.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Hyperglycemia associated with the use of atypical antipsychotics.

The available literature suggests that patients with schizophrenia are at risk for diabetes mellitus and taking antipsychotic medication further increases the chance of developing non-insulin-dependent hyperglycemia. Case reports, chart reviews, and some results from clinical drug trials implicate a relationship between glucose levels and treatment with clozapine or olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia, although a few cases of hyperglycemia have also been reported in patients taking risperidone and quetiapine. These studies indicate that hyperglycemia is not dose dependent, is reversible on cessation of treatment with clozapine or olanzapine, and reappears on reintroduction of these therapies. The postulated underlying mechanisms involved in this process in patients with schizophrenia include (1) a decreased sensitivity to insulin that is independent of atypical medication, (2) an increased insulin resistance related to atypical medications, (3) the effects of atypical medications on serotonin receptors, and (4) overuse of insulin due to weight gain. These mechanisms are discussed in detail, and recommendations for the administration of atypical antipsychotics are offered. Overweight, ethnicity, family or personal history of diabetes mellitus or hypertension, and weight gain during the course of treatment have all been identified as risk factors in the development of hyperglycemia in patients with schizophrenia. However, it is difficult to statistically assess the true incidence of diabetes within each type of antipsychotic medication group with the exclusive dependence on available case studies and without proper epidemiologic research.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Treatment refractory schizophrenia.

Treatment resistance constitutes a significant dilemma in schizophrenia since it affects a substantial number of patients, their families and the health care professionals involved in their care. Nonresponsiveness needs to be approached as a multidimensional syndrome by specifying which symptoms in the spectrum of positive symptoms, negative symptoms, excitement/hostility, cognitive symptoms, and anxiety/depression are failing to respond to treatment. This review presents some of the clinical, demographic and biological correlates of nonresponse, in addition to compliance issues, psychosocial factors or side effects and as-yet-untreated comorbidities as a source for nonresponse. The effects of the atypicals clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone and quetiapine as compared to typicals are reviewed using available double-blind studies in this treatment refractory group of schizophrenia patients. The limited number of reports on the comparison of atypical compounds amongst each other are critically presented. Given that a subset of patients still do not respond to these agents, clinicians are using various augmentation strategies. We review studies with augmentation strategies which remain difficult to interpret given the open label and uncontrolled nature of most of these studies.

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMed2000

High-dose treatment with haloperidol: the effect of dose reduction.

High doses of antipsychotic medications are sometimes prescribed in clinical practice, although the efficacy and safety of such treatment have not been established. The purpose of this study was to determine whether high-dose, long-term antipsychotic treatment prescribed on the basis of clinical judgment can be justified. Patients who were receiving high doses of haloperidol were screened, and those patients whose plasma levels were at least 15 ng/mL were randomly assigned to an experimental group (N = 11) or to a control group (N = 12). The experimental group underwent a dose reduction to achieve the target plasma level of 10 ng/mL. The reduction was gradual over a period of 12 weeks. The control group treatment was maintained at the original level. Both groups were then followed up for another 16 weeks, during which the plasma levels of haloperidol were kept constant. The study used double-blind procedures. Both groups showed an average slight symptom reduction. There was no significant difference in the severity of symptoms between the two groups at any time point. The dose reduction had no apparent adverse effects. Thus, the results of this study did not provide justification for high-dose, long-term antipsychotic treatment. However, these results must be interpreted with caution because the sample studied here was small and biased.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Use of sodium valproate in violent and aggressive behaviors: a critical review.

BACKGROUND: Valproate was initially introduced as an antiepileptic agent in 1967, but has been used over the years to treat a variety of psychiatric disorders. Its use in the treatment of patients exhibiting aggressive and violent behaviors has been reported in the literature as far back as 1988. However, these reports are uncontrolled, which is in marked contrast to the actual wide and established use of valproate for the treatment of aggressive behaviors. The aim of this report is to critically review the available data on valproate's use in nonbipolar patients with aggressive and violent behaviors. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE and PsycLIT databases were searched for all reports published from 1987-1998 containing the keywords valproate, the names of all commercial preparations, aggression, and violence. STUDY FINDINGS: Seventeen reports with a total of 164 patients were located. Ten of these were case reports with a total of 31 patients. Three were retrospective chart reviews with 83 patients, and 3 were open-label prospective studies with a total of 34 patients. No double-blind, placebo-controlled study could be found. An overall response rate of 77.1% was calculated when response was defined as a 50% reduction of target behavior. Most frequent diagnoses recorded were dementia, organic brain syndromes, and mental retardation. The antiaggressive response usually occurred in conjunction with other psychotropic medication. The dose and plasma valproate level required for response appeared to be the same as in the treatment of seizure disorders. DISCUSSION: While valproate's general antiaggressive effect is promising, in the absence of controlled data, conclusions are limited at this time. Specific recommendations for study design are given to obtain interpretable data for this indication.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

The pathophysiology of agitation.

Agitation is a nonspecific constellation of relatively unrelated behaviors that can be seen in a number of different clinical conditions, usually presenting a fluctuating course. Multiple underlying pathophysiologic abnormalities are mediated by dysregulations of dopaminergic, serotonergic, noradrenergic, and GABAergic systems. Pathophysiologic mechanisms of agitation that operate in the different clinical disorders where agitation occurs are discussed. These pathophysiologic abnormalities are not associated with distinct clinical features. Although there may be a final common pathway, there is no unifying etiologic pathophysiology. The author suggests that the clinician address the underlying pathophysiology through a treatment intervention that addresses the overarching psychiatric disorder. Generally, agents that reduce dopaminergic or noradrenergic tone or increase serotonergic or GABAergic tone will attenuate agitation, often irrespective of etiology.

Aggression↗
PubMed1998

Effect of a haloperidol challenge on regional brain metabolism in neuroleptic-responsive and nonresponsive schizophrenic patients.

OBJECTIVE: The CNS metabolic response to a neuroleptic challenge in treatment-responsive and nonresponsive schizophrenic patients was measured in order to examine the relation between treatment outcome and the capacity to alter neurochemical function in response to acute receptor blockade. METHOD: Positron emission tomography (PET) and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) were used to measure regional cerebral metabolism in seven schizophrenic patients judged to have been responsive to drug treatment previously and seven nonresponsive schizophrenic patients after a drug-free period of at least 3 weeks (baseline) and again 12 hours after administration of 5.0 mg of haloperidol. RESULTS: The haloperidol challenge caused widespread decreases in absolute metabolism in the nonresponsive patients but not the responsive patients. These group differences reflect the findings on the second (challenge) scans, since metabolic values at baseline were not statistically different in the two groups. The pattern of decreased metabolic activity in the nonresponders after the haloperidol challenge is similar to that previously observed in normal subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The metabolic response to drug challenge separates treatment responders from nonresponders and normal subjects. The results suggest that subtyping of schizophrenia (and other psychiatric disorders) can be achieved by measuring the physiologic response to a pharmacologic challenge in vivo with chemical brain-imaging techniques.

Adult↗