Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

J P Geyman

Publications and source records attributed to J P Geyman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Orthopedic problems in family practice: incidence, distribution, and curricular implications.

The spectrum of orthopedic problems encountered by family physicians in everyday practice has received little study in the past. This paper presents and analyzes the incidence and distribution of orthopedic problems in general/family practice based on four sources of secondary data. These sources include the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a Family Practice Service in a large military teaching hospital, a state wide study in Virginia, and two community-based family practice settings in Washington State. Orthopedic problems constitute about ten percent of all office visits in family practice. Over one half of these involve chronic, nontraumatic musculoskeletal problems. Major differences are noted in the distribution of sprains, strains, and fractures in adults and children. Fractures of the hand, foot, forearm, lower leg, and clavicle comprise between 50 and 80 percent of fractures seen in the settings under study. This kind of information should be helpful in better defining goals and methods for graduate training of family practice residents in orthopedics.

Family Practice

Graduate education in family practice: a ten-year review.

Assessment of the progress of graduate education in family practice after ten years shows that the original goals established for residency training in this specialty are being effectively met. There are now more than 360 approved family practice residencies in the United States with over 6,000 residents in training. Student interest in these programs has remained at a high level, and attrition has been low. Graduates of these programs have favored partnership and group family practice, and are well distributed in rural, suburban, and metropolitan areas. Heavy emphasis has been placed upon quality control mechanisms for both internal and external review of family practice residency programs. This paper outlines some concerns regarding the present status of family practice residencies, and suggests some directions for future development of these programs.

Curriculum

Family practice in the United States of America: the first 10 years.

Family medicine was officially recognized as an independent discipline and as the twentieth specialty in the USA in 1969, when the American Board of Family Practice was established.The main achievements of the first 10 years has been the establishment of departments of family practice in two thirds of the medical schools and the growth of graduate training has advanced rapidly from a total of 290 residents in 1970 to over 6,000 in 1978. Developments in group practice, team work, and medical records have been considerable and research is expanding.In 1976, the 50-year trend of falling numbers of family physicians in the USA was reversed for the first time and excellent progress is also being made in countering the geographical maldistribution of physicians.The challenges for the future of family practice are different from those in the past and are discussed.

Education, Medical

Evaluation of audiovisual teaching material in family practice: a report of review activities, 1977--1978.

Audiovisual teaching materials have found increasing use in medical education in recent years, and a large number of excellent materials have been produced. The plethora of existing audiovisual teaching programs has made it difficult for educators and potential users to be aware of what is available and to select programs relevant to specific learning needs. The Audiovisual Review Committee has functioned over the last five years as a subcommittee of the Education Committee of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine. This paper describes the experience of this group over the last two years and presents a complete listing of audiovisual teaching materials which have been reviewed and appraised during that period.

Audiovisual Aids

A family practice residency network. Affiliated programs in the Pacific Northwest.

The Department of Family Medicine at the University of Washington School of Medicine has developed a regional network of affiliated family practice residency programs in the Pacific Northwest. Collaborative efforts among the seven participating programs are directed to common needs such as curriculum development, sharing of educational resources, program evaluation, problem-solving of operational programs, and coordination of resident rotations. This family practice residency network is a logical and necessary extension of the program that has been developed in Washington, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho for teaching medical students. Regional undergraduate and graduate teaching programs in family practice represent an important role for the university relating to its surrounding region through the collaborative efforts of the medical school and participating hospitals and physicians in the community.

Curriculum

Family practice in evolution: progress, problems and projections.

Family practice has developed in direct response to the public need for primary care with the elements of comprehensiveness, continuity and accessibility. This specialty represents a re-emphasis of the generalist role in medicine, with particular concern for the family as the unit of care. Since the American Board of Family Practice was formed nine years ago, the first phase of development has been completed. Teaching programs in family medicine have been effectively established at undergraduate and graduate levels throughout the country in both university and community settings. Refinement of teaching programs and initiation of a strong ongoing research effort are now required. The continued successful evolution of family practice as a foundation of primary care in the United States is essential to extend the highest possible quality of care to the entire population at a cost that can be afforded in a society with limited resources for health care.

Curriculum

The ampicillin rash as a diagnostic and management problem: case reports and literature review.

Ampicillin is the most commonly prescribed antibiotic in the United States, and causes skin reactions in five to ten percent of patient populations. These reactions are considerably more frequent in patients with a viral illness, infectious mononucleosis, and lymphocytic leukemia. Skin reactions to ampicillin are usually of two types: a maculopapular rash in about two thirds of cases, and urticaria in about one third of cases. There is strong evidence that the maculopapular rash is a benign, nonallergic phenomenon. Patients with the maculopapular ampicillin rash are often incorrectly labeled as allergic to ampicillin/penicillin. Ampicillin can be continued and administered again in the future in these patients, and this kind of skin reaction resolves spontaneously in a few days without sequelae. Skin tests are neither required nor recommended to document the nonallergic basis of the maculopapular ampicillin rash.

Ampicillin