Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J P Crown

Publications and source records attributed to J P Crown.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The platinum agents: a role in breast cancer treatment?

Metastatic breast cancer is a partially chemotherapy-sensitive neoplasm. Most chemotherapy groups have activity in this disease, and the most active single drugs are the taxanes, especially docetaxel (Taxotere; Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Parsippany, NJ), and the anthracyclines. The alkylating agents, antimetabolites, and vinca alkaloids are also widely used. The platinum coordination complexes, which are widely used in oncology, are also active in metastatic breast cancer, but the availability of other drugs that are less toxic and easier to administer has resulted in their having a strictly limited use in this setting. Cisplatin appears to be somewhat more active than carboplatin, but direct comparative studies are lacking. The identification of the prominent activity of the taxanes has led to the investigation of wholly novel non-anthracycline-containing combination regimens, and platinum/taxane doublets appear to be particularly active. More recently, reports that trastuzumab (Herceptin, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA), a novel monoclonal antibody directed against the protein product of the HER2/(neu) oncogene, has a powerful synergistic interaction with docetaxel and with platinum agents have prompted evaluation of the triplet docetaxel/platinum/trastuzumab in the therapy of metastatic breast cancer.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Odynorgasmia.

Painful ejaculation ("odynorgasmia") is not well recognized. When it occurs it may indicate the precise site of pathology.

Ejaculation↗

Expanding options in breast cancer.

In metastatic breast cancer, docetaxel is the only drug to have shown superior activity to doxorubicin [objective response rates (ORRs) 48 versus 33%] by direct comparison in a randomized trial. Importantly, this greater activity was accompanied by a lower risk of cardiotoxicity. Docetaxel has also proved superior to various combination regimens in patients who had previously failed anthracyclines. In the comparison versus mitomycin C plus vinblastine, survival was significantly prolonged in the docetaxel arm. The combination of paclitaxel with doxorubicin has achieved remarkably high rates of response. However, the combination is cardiotoxic (with the highest response rates reporting an incidence of clinical congestive heart failure in the region of 18%). In comparison, the combination of docetaxel with doxorubicin, while also highly active (ORR > 70%), is relatively non-cardiotoxic (with only one case of clinical congestive heart failure in 96 patients treated). Given that docetaxel appears to be the most active single agent in metastatic breast cancer, there is a compelling case for the drug to be evaluated in the adjuvant setting and such studies are ongoing.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

Sequential dose-dense doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide for resectable high-risk breast cancer: feasibility and efficacy.

PURPOSE: Dose-dense chemotherapy is predicted to be a superior treatment plan. Therefore, we studied dose-dense doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (A-->T-->C) as adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Patients with resected breast cancer involving four or more ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes were treated with nine cycles of chemotherapy, using 14-day intertreatment intervals. Doses were as follows: doxorubicin 90 mg/m2 x 3, then paclitaxel 250 mg/m2/24 hours x 3, and then cyclophosphamide 3.0 g/m2 x 3; all doses were given with subcutaneous injections of 5 microg/kg granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on days 3 through 10. Amenorrheic patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen 20 mg/day for 5 years. Patients treated with breast conservation, those with 10 or more positive nodes, and those with tumors larger than 5 cm received radiotherapy. RESULTS: Between March 1993 and June 1994, we enrolled 42 patients. The median age was 46 years (range, 29 to 63 years), the median number of positive lymph nodes was eight (range, four to 25), and the median tumor size was 3.0 cm (range, 0 to 11.0 cm). The median intertreatment interval was 14 days (range, 13 to 36 days), and the median delivered dose-intensity exceeded 92% of the planned dose-intensity for all three drugs. Hospital admission was required for 29 patients (69%), and 28 patients (67%) required blood product transfusion. No treatment-related deaths or cardiac toxicities occurred. Doxorubicin was dose-reduced in four patients (10%) and paclitaxel was reduced in eight (20%). At a median follow-up from surgery of 48 months (range, 3 to 57 months), nine patients (19%) had relapsed, the actuarial disease-free survival rate was 78% (95% confidence interval, 66% to 92%), and four patients (10%) had died of metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: Dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (A-->T-->C) is feasible and promising. Several ongoing phase III trials are evaluating this approach.

Adult↗

Dose escalation of paclitaxel with high-dose carboplatin using peripheral blood progenitor cell support in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

A phase I study of escalating doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) given in combination with high-dose carboplatin was conducted to identify the antitumor efficacy and maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel in patients who had received sequential cycles of paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide as prior treatment for ovarian carcinoma. Eighteen patients with advanced ovarian cancer were treated in this study. Induction therapy consisted of two cycles of cyclophosphamide 3.0 g/m2 plus high-dose paclitaxel 300 mg/m2 plus filgrastim and leukapheresis to harvest peripheral blood progenitor cells, followed by four courses of rapidly cycled high-dose carboplatin with planned dose escalation of paclitaxel (150, 200, 250, and 300 mg/m2) rescued with peripheral blood progenitor cells. The study was amended after accrual of 11 patients, and the remaining seven patients received a single cycle of induction therapy with paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide, followed by four courses of rapidly cycled high-dose carboplatin with planned dose escalation of paclitaxel through levels 200 and 250 mg/m2. All 18 patients have completed therapy. Of the 15 who are evaluable for response, the pathologic complete response was 33% (five of 15 patients). The administration of escalating doses of paclitaxel in combination with high-dose carboplatin following sequential cycles of paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide induction resulted in significant nonhematopoietic toxicity. Induction with a single cycle of paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide resulted in excellent progenitor cell mobilization, and significantly ameliorated the toxicity of this approach. The response rates thus far obtained are promising and warrant further evaluation.

Adult↗

The development of docetaxel (Taxotere) in non-small cell lung cancer--docetaxel in new combinations and new schedules: an overview of ongoing and future developments.

Non-small cell lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in the western world. Non-small cell lung cancer is modestly sensitive to chemotherapy with a small survival benefit in locally advanced and metastatic disease. Newer agents such as docetaxel are yielding encouraging response rates both as single agents and in combination. A phase I/II study is in progress in our institution to determine the maximum tolerated dose and noncomparative efficacy of the combination of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France), ifosfamide, and cisplatin, with mesna and lenograstim support, in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. To date, nine patients have received 37 cycles of treatment at increasing dose levels (no intrapatient dose escalation). Treatment was administered to patients on an inpatient basis every 3 weeks, with lenograstim on days 3 to 10. Dose-limiting toxicity has not occurred at levels I to III (dose level III: docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cisplatin 75 mg/m2, and ifosfamide 3 g/m2). These preliminary results suggest that the combination of docetaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin, with lenograstim support, is well tolerated in the doses evaluated. Preliminary efficacy results show a response rate of 67% (six of nine patients). The study continues to determine the maximum tolerated dose of this regimen in preparation for a phase II evaluation.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

Phase II and pharmacologic study of docetaxel as initial chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Because docetaxel (Taxotere, RP 56976; Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) appeared to be active against breast cancer in phase I trials, we performed this phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with measurable disease were enrolled. Only prior hormone therapy was allowed, as was adjuvant chemotherapy completed > or = 12 months earlier. Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was administered over 1 hour every 21 days. Diphenhydramine hydrochloride and/or corticosteroid premedication was added after hypersensitivity-like reactions (HSRs) were seen in two of the first six patients. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed during cycle 1 for correlation with toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were assessable. Nineteen (51%) required dose reductions, usually for neutropenic fever. The median nadir WBC count was 1.4 x 10(3)/microL. HSRs were noted in 20 patients (54%). At a median cumulative dose of 297 mg/m2 (range, 99.6 to 424.5 mg/m2), 30 patients (81%) developed fluid retention, for which 11 (30%) subsequently stopped treatment. The first-cycle plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) did not correlate with toxicity, although an ineligible patient with hepatic metastases (pretreatment bilirubin level 1.8 mg/dL) had an elevated AUC and died of toxicity. Responses were seen at all sites. On an intent-to-treat basis, there were two (5%) complete responses (CRs) and 18 (49%) partial responses (PRs). The overall response proportion (CRs plus PRs) was 54% (95% confidence interval, 37% to 71%). The median time to response was 12 weeks (range, 3 to 15) and the median duration was 26 weeks (range, 10 to 58+). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is active for metastatic breast cancer. Neutropenia and fluid retention are dose-limiting. The AUC did not predict toxicity, but caution is warranted when treating patients with liver dysfunction. An understanding of the pathophysiology of the fluid retention may facilitate prevention. Frequent HSR may warrant prophylactic premedication.

Adult↗

High-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor autografting.

Mobilized PBPs are an acceptable alternative to ABMT for hematopoietic rescue following high-dose therapy (table 10-3). Platelet recovery appears to be faster following PBPs than ABMT. In most series, leukocyte recovery is also accelerated, but this may be particularly due to the use of colony-stimulating factor. Morbidity and mortality also appear to be reduced. The optimal mobilization methodology is not defined, but larger numbers of PBPs are mobilized by chemotherapy plus colony-stimulating factors compared to CSFs alone, at the cost of enhanced toxicity. The use of PBPs has also facilitated the study of very-high-intensity regimens in which multiple courses of high-dose chemotherapy are given at very short intervals. Following completion of feasibility studies, prospective random assignment trials will be necessary to determine the benefit, if any, of this approach.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Paclitaxel as second and subsequent therapy for metastatic breast cancer: activity independent of prior anthracycline response.

PURPOSE: Two phase II clinical trials were performed to determine efficacy and tolerability of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, Wallingford, CT) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor ([G-CSF] Neupogen; Amgen, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA) as second or subsequent therapy for metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paclitaxel plus G-CSF was administered as a second stage IV regimen to 25 patients with metastatic breast cancer at a dose of 250 mg/m2 intravenously over 24 hours. Fifty-two patients received paclitoxel plus G-CSF at 200 mg/m2 as a third or subsequent regimen (no restriction on number of prior regimens or on prior high-dose chemotherapy). All patients had received prior anthracycline treatment, and ultimately had progressive bidimensionally measurable disease. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 76 patients (32.8%) had a major objective response (95% confidence interval [CI], 14% to 37%). The median duration of response was 7 months (range, 1 to 20+). Responses were as likely in patients with disease demonstrated to be unresponsive to anthracycline, ie, de novo resistance (11 of 37, or 30%) as in those with disease that once exhibited anthracycline sensitivity, ie, acquired resistance, (10 of 31, or 32%). G-CSF administration was associated with febrile neutropenic episodes in 36 of 402 cycles (9%) in 16 of 76 patients (21%). CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel's clinically significant activity against metastatic breast cancer extends to patients with many prior chemotherapy regimens. The lack of impact of prior doxorubicin therapy on the likelihood of subsequent response to paclitaxel suggests an important role for this agent in the treatment of refractory metastatic breast cancer.

Adult↗

Taxol (paclitaxel) plus recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

We treated 28 patients who had no prior chemotherapy for stage IV breast cancer and 51 patients with extensive prior exposure to other chemotherapeutic agents with a 24-hour infusion of Taxol (paclitaxel) as a single agent. Prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered routinely to ameliorate the anticipated dose-limiting toxicity of neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild to moderate in most cases. Taxol was more active in patients with chemotherapy-naive stage IV disease, but activity was also observed in extensively treated patients as well. There is a strong clinical suggestion of at least partial noncross-resistance with doxorubicin. Taxol is a very promising agent for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer; its optimal application in this disease will be the subject of future trials.

Adult↗

Factors affecting the mobilization of primitive and committed hematopoietic progenitors into the peripheral blood of cancer patients.

Rapid hematopoietic reconstitution following peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autotransplantation is thought to result from reinfusion of committed progenitor cells. This has raised concern that PBPC autografts might be rich in committed hematopoietic progentors responsible for early engraftment, but deficient in more primitive progenitors required for long-term hematopoietic reconstitution. The granulomonocytic colony-forming unit (CFU-GM) assay measures committed progenitors responsive to a single species of colony-stimulating activity such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), whereas the pre-CFU assay identifies more primitive progenitors by measuring interleukin-3 (IL-3) and kit ligand (KL) induced generation of secondary CFU-GM from CD34+, 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide resistant progenitors that require multiple cytokine stimuli. Paired bone marrow (BM) and PBPC samples from 17 breast and ovarian cancer patients participating in four separate clinical trials were compared in these assay systems. In seven of nine patients, PBPC autografts mobilized with cyclophosphamide rebound and G-CSF compared favorably with paired BM autografts in both committed and primitive progenitor capacity. Failure to mobilize substantial primitive progenitor cell numbers occurred in two of nine patients undergoing this mobilization regimen and could not have been predicted by either circulating CFU-GM or CD34+ cell number. Prior myelosuppressive treatment experiences reduced peripheral progenitor yields somewhat, but still allowed for the collection of PBPC autografts which compared favorably with BM autografts in total CFU-GM and Pre-CFU. Mobilization of PBPC with G-CSF or GM-CSF alone in patients who had received prior myelosuppressive therapies produced autografts which were relatively deficient in committed progenitors, but absolutely deficient in primitive progenitors. We conclude that optimization of patient characteristics and mobilization parameters can achieve PBPC autografts rich in both the primitive and committed hematopoietic progenitor cells.

Adult↗

Beneficial impact of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) alone or in combination with peripheral blood-derived hematopoietic progenitor cells (PBP) as support for patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and assessed the adequacy of these strategies as alternatives to autologous bone marrow rescue. METHODS: The authors studied patients with metastatic breast carcinoma who had a major response to conventional chemotherapy or had achieved a complete remission by surgical resection of all known metastases. They were treated with carboplatin 1500 mg/m2, etoposide 1200 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 5.0 g/m2. Before this high-dose chemotherapy, the patients had been randomly assigned to one of two hematopoietic support strategies: GM-CSF alone (Group 1) or GM-CSF-primed PBP and GM-CSF (Group 2). Autologous bone marrow was harvested from all patients for use only in the event of persistent pancytopenia with marrow aplasia on day 15. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were treated. Randomization was halted after the initial 10 patients because of the significant advantages for patients in Group 2 in comparison with those in Group 1 in regard to (1) the median number of days to absolute neutrophil count 0.5 x 10(9)/l (12 versus 21) and platelet count to 50 x 10(9)/l (13 versus 23), (2) platelet transfusions (3 versus 15.5), and (3) episodes of neutropenic sepsis (0 versus 4, respectively). One patient in Group 1 died from treatment-related complications. All patients in Group 1 required bone marrow reinfusion. No patient in Group 2 required bone marrow reinfusion, and no early mortality was observed in this group. Eight subsequent patients were treated with PBP and GM-CSF (Group 3). This group was more heavily pretreated than Groups 1 or 2 and had a slower hematologic recovery than Group 2. However, none of these patients required bone marrow reinfusion. The four patients in Group 1 that did not have early bone marrow rescue all had neutrophil counts of 0.0 on day 15. For Groups 2 and 3, the neutrophil counts on day 15 ranged from 0.3-2.1 x 10(9)/l (median, 1.9) and from 0.2-2.1 x 10(9)/l (median 0.6), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PBP plus GM-CSF accelerated hematologic recovery after this chemotherapeutic regimen compared with GM-CSF alone; there were reduced morbidity and platelet transfusion requirements. Recovery was sufficiently rapid that PBP were an acceptable alternative to autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients receiving high-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide.

Adult↗

Paclitaxel and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as initial chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: A phase II study of Taxol (paclitaxel; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ) as initial chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was conducted. Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) was used to ameliorate myelosuppression, the anticipated dose-limiting toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with bidimensionally measurable breast cancer who had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were treated. Taxol was administered at 250 mg/m2 as a continuous 24-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 21 days. rhG-CSF was administered at 5 micrograms/kg/d subcutaneously on days 3 through 10. RESULTS: Objective responses were observed in 16 of 26 assessable patients (62%; 95% confidence interval, 41% to 80%). There were three (12%) complete responses (CRs) and 13 (50%) partial responses (PRs). Ten of 16 patients (63%) who had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy responded, which included one CR and four PRs among eight patients who had received prior doxorubicin-containing therapy. Responses were observed in all sites of metastatic disease. The median time to first objective response was 5 weeks (range, 1 to 14). Administration of rhG-CSF was associated with a short duration of neutropenia (median, 2 days with absolute neutrophil count < 500 cells/microL). Eight of 26 patients (31%) who received more than one course received subsequent therapy without dose reduction. One hundred seventy-eight cycles of treatment were administered, with a median of six cycles per patient (range, one to 19). Eight courses (4.5%) were associated with admissions for neutropenic fever. Twenty-two patients (79%) did not require admission for neutropenic fever. Treatment was well tolerated. Adverse effects included generalized alopecia in all patients. Myalgias, arthralgias, and peripheral neuropathy were mild. No hypersensitivity reactions and no cardiac toxicity were observed. CONCLUSION: Taxol is highly active as initial chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Administration of rhG-CSF reduced the incidence, depth, and duration of neutropenia, compared with published prior experience. Further studies of Taxol in breast cancer, including combinations with other active agents, are clearly warranted.

Adult↗