Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Ottaway

Publications and source records attributed to J Ottaway.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Dietetic guidelines on food and nutrition in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease - evidence from systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (second update, January 2006).

AIM: To update dietetic guidelines based on systematic review evidence on dietary advice to prevent further events in people with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) (secondary prevention). METHODS: The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE were comprehensively searched to January 2005 for systematic reviews on aspects of diet and heart health. Reviews were included if they searched systematically for randomized controlled trials relating to diet and secondary prevention of CVD. Each review was critically appraised by at least two members of the UK Heart Health and Thoracic Dietitians Group. The quality and results of each review were discussed and summarized at a group meeting. RESULTS: Evidence-based strategies that reduce cardiovascular events in those with CVD include reduction in saturated fat and substitution with unsaturated fats. Individuals who have suffered a myocardial infarction may also benefit from adopting a Mediterranean type diet and increasing intake of omega 3 fats, but it is not clear whether they are beneficial for all patients with CVD. There is no systematic review evidence to support the use of antioxidant vitamins supplements, low glycaemic index diets, or homocysteine lowering therapies in this group. CONCLUSION: There remains good evidence that reducing saturated fat reduces morbidity in patients with CVD. This advice is consistent for most manifestations of CVD, with the addition of Mediterranean dietary advice and increased omega 3 fats for those who have had a myocardial infarction.

Antioxidants↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of gemcitabine versus the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BAY 12-9566 in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

PURPOSE: To compare the selective matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BAY 12-9566 with the nucleoside analog gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who had not previously received chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive BAY 12-9566 800 mg orally bid continuously or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 for the first 8 weeks, and then days 1, 8, and 15 of each subsequent 28-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progression-free survival, tumor response, quality of life, and clinical benefit. The planned sample size of the study was 350 patients. Two formal interim analyses were planned. RESULTS: The study was closed to accrual after the second interim analysis on the basis of the recommendation of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Data Safety Monitoring Committee. There were 277 patients enrolled onto the study, 138 in the BAY 12-9566 arm and 139 in the gemcitabine arm. The rates of serious toxicity were low in both arms. The median survival for the BAY 12-9566 arm and the gemcitabine arm was 3.74 months and 6.59 months, respectively (P <.001; stratified log-rank test). The median progression-free survival for the BAY 12-9566 and gemcitabine arms was 1.68 and 3.5 months, respectively (P <.001). Quality-of-life analysis also favored gemcitabine. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine is significantly superior to BAY 12-9566 in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

A phase I-II study of rituximab, ifosfamide, mitoxantrone and etoposide (R-IME) for B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma prior to and after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC-ASCT).

This phase I-II study describes the safety of rituximab, ifosfamide, mitoxantrone and etoposide (R-IME) as an induction regimen prior to high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC-ASCT), and rituximab given post-HDC-ASCT for B cell non-Hodgkins's lymphoma. This study also measured the effect on disease burden and stem cell contamination. Patients with relapsed, refractory or poor risk B cell lymphomas were eligible. Patients were treated with two cycles of R-IME; all non-progressing patients under-went a third cycle and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection. Patients underwent HDC-ASCT and those patients in remission after HDC-ASCT were treated with four additional doses of rituximab. Tumor cell contamination was measured at baseline and in the PBSC. Serial immunoglobulin levels were measured. Patients were followed for time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). Thirty-two patients were enrolled. Thirty patients had at least stable disease after two cycles of R-IME. Twenty-nine underwent stem cell collection. The response rate to R-IME induction was 77% (20/26) with 35% (9/26) complete response(CR). Stem cell mobilization was successful in 93% (27/29) of patients. The response rate to R-IME induction and HDC-ASCT was 95% with a confirmed CR of 68%. Median follow-up was 28 months; the median TTFand OS have not been reached. There was a significant decline in stem cell tumor cell contamination and a significant decline in IgG without an increase in infections. Forty-three per cent of patients had transient neutropenia after post-transplant rituximab. R-IME is an effective cytoreductive and mobilization regimen. There appears to be a reduction in the number of lymphoma cells in the stem cell product and the toxicity is manageable.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Randomized study of CODE versus alternating CAV/EP for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: an Intergroup Study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group and the Southwest Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To determine whether an intensive weekly chemotherapy regimen plus thoracic irradiation is superior to standard chemotherapy in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ESCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with ESCLC were considered eligible for the study if they were younger than 68 years, had a performance status of 0 to 2, and were free of brain metastases. Patients were randomized to receive cisplatin, vincristine, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CODE) or alternating cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine/etoposide and cisplatin (CAV/EP). Consolidative thoracic irradiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation were given to patients responding to CODE and according to investigator discretion on the CAV/EP arm. RESULTS: The fidelity of drug delivery on both drug regimens was equal, and more than 70% of all patients received the intended protocol chemotherapy. Although rates of neutropenic fever were similar, nine (8.2%) of 110 patients on the CODE arm died during chemotherapy, whereas one (0.9%) of 109 patients died on the CAV/EP arm. Response rates after chemotherapy were higher (P =.006) with CODE (87%) than with CAV/EP (70%). However, progression-free survival (median of 0.66 years on both arms) and overall survival (median, 0.98 years for CODE and 0. 91 years for CAV/EP) were not statistically different. CONCLUSION: The CODE regimen increased two-fold the received dose-intensity of four of the most active drugs in small-cell lung cancer compared with the standard CAV/EP regimen while maintaining an approximately equal total dose. Despite supportive care (but not routine prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor), there was excessive toxic mortality with the CODE regimen. The response rate with CODE was higher than that of CAV/EP, but progression-free and overall survival were not significantly improved. In view of increased toxicity and similar efficacy, the CODE chemotherapy regimen is not recommended for treatment of ESCLC.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1998

Randomized study of chemotherapy and surgery versus radiotherapy for stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study.

Thirty-one patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive radiotherapy alone or chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinblastine followed by surgery. Response rates to induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy were 50% and 53.3% respectively. Complete surgical resection was possible for 62.5% of patients. Median survival times were 16.2 and 18.7 months for radiotherapy alone and chemotherapy-surgery respectively (P = Ns), with no long-term improvement in survival seen with combined-modality treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

PURPOSE: To determine the relative efficacy of an intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) adjuvant chemotherapy regimen compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive either cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 through 14; methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) days 1 and 8; and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8 or cyclophosphomide 75 mg/m2 orally days 1 through 14; epirubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8; and fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8. Each cycle was administered monthly for 6 months. Patients administered CEF received antibiotic prophylaxis with cotrimoxazole two tablets twice a day for the duration of chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 59 months. One hundred sixty-nine of the 359 CMF patients developed recurrence compared with 132 of the 351 CEF patients. The corresponding 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 53% and 63%, respectively (P = .009). One hundred seven CMF patients died compared with 85 CEF patients. The corresponding 5-year actuarial survival rates were 70% and 77%, respectively (P = .03). The rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia was 1.1% in the CMF group compared with 8.5% in the CEF group. There was one case of congestive heart failure in a patient who received CMF compared with none in the CEF group. Acute leukemia occurred in five patients in the CEF group. CONCLUSION: The results of this trial show the superiority of CEF over CMF in terms of both disease-free and overall survival in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Phase I studies of fluorouracil, doxorubicin and vinorelbine without (FAN) and with (SUPERFAN) folinic acid in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The Breast Cancer Site Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada - Clinical Trials Group (NCIC-CTG) undertook two parallel phase I studies to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose of vinorelbine in combination with doxorubicin and fluorouracil (with or without folinic acid) in metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Cohorts of five patients were to receive: (a) fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 only and escalating doses of vinorelbine (15, 20, 25, 30 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 3 weeks (FAN regimen), or (b) fluorouracil 340 mg/m2 and folinic acid 200 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 on day 1 only and escalating doses of vinorelbine (15, 20, 25, 30 mg/m2) on day 1 and again on day 5 every 4 weeks (SUPERFAN regimen). Eligibility included measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer and having received neither previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease nor anthracycline-containing adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Of 26 and 12 patients enrolled in the FAN and SUPERFAN regimens, 26 and 12 were evaluable for toxicity and 21 and 9 for response, respectively. Median ages were 60.3 years (41-71 years) and 64.2 years (51-73 years). Both regimens required amendment after the first cohort with an original day- 15 vinorelbine dose omitted from the FAN regimen and more prolonged nadir granulocyte counts allowed. Myelosuppression was dose limiting. MTDs in the FAN and SUPERFAN regimens were vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 and 20 mg/m2. Other toxicities included mucositis, septicemia and febrile neutropenia. Peripheral neuropathy and constipation were mild. Of the 21 FAN patients evaluable for response, 3 (14%) had complete responses and 7 (33%) had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 48%; 9 (43%) had stable disease and 2 (9%) had progressive disease as their best response. Of the nine SUPERFAN patients evaluable for response, none had a complete response. There were two (22%) with partial responses, and six (67%) had stable disease and one (11%) had progressive disease as their best response. CONCLUSIONS: The SUPERFAN regimen was too toxic to pursue even at the lowest dose. The recommended phase II starting dose for the FAN regimen was vinorelbine 20 mg/m2. Although these were phase I studies response rates in evaluable patients were less than expected and toxicity did not allow the use of as much vinorelbine in the combinations as had been anticipated. The limited response data from our study would imply that combining vinorelbine with more toxic agents may not enhance response rates and may defeat the advantage of tolerability, especially in elderly patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1976

Myosin light-chain phosphatase.

1. A method for the isolation of a new enzyme, myosin light-chain phosphatase, from rabbit white skeletal muscle by using a Sepharose-phosphorylated myosin light-chain affinity column is described. 2. The enzyme migrated as a single component on electrophoresis in sodium dodecyl sulphate/polyacrylamide gel at pH7.0, with apparent mol.wt. 70000. 3. The enzyme was highly specific for the phosphorylated P-light chain of myosin, had pH optima at 6.5 and 8.0 and was not inhibited by NaF. 4. A Ca2+-sensitive 'ATPase' (adenosine triphosphatase) system consisting of myosin light-chain kinase, myosin light-chain phosphatase and the P-light chain is described. 5. Evidence is presented for a phosphoryl exchange between Pi, phosphorylated P-light chain and myosin light-chain phosphatase. 6. Heavy meromyosin prepared by chymotryptic digestion can be phosphorylated by myosin light-chain kinase. 7. The ATPase activities of myosin and heavy meromyosin, in the presence and absence of F-actin, were not significantly changed (+/- 10%) by phosphorylation of the P-light chain.

Actins↗