Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J O Rosenberg

Publications and source records attributed to J O Rosenberg.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Colonoscopy in mice.

INTRODUCTION: Current investigational models of murine colitis and colon cancer necessitate sacrifice of animals in order to obtain colonic tissue. The purpose of this study was to develop a safe method of murine colonoscopy that would allow serial evaluation and mucosal biopsies of the same animal. METHODS: Nine mice (two C3H, two C57/BL6, and five IL-10 deficient) were studied a total of four times each over 4 weeks. Three mice [APC (Min +/-)] were examined three times each. Mice were gavaged with 1 cc of a polyethylene glycol solution on the day prior to colonoscopy. Solid chow was withheld and the mice were maintained on Pedialyte. Mice were anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine. A flexible pediatric cystoscope (2.1-mm diameter) with a single biopsy channel was introduced per anum, and the colon was gently insufflated with air to a mean pressure of less than 5 mmHg. Saline irrigation was used when necessary. A single biopsy was obtained from the rectosigmoid colon during each examination. RESULTS: A total of 46 examinations were carried out. One mouse died after being anesthesized for the fourth examination, and two mice [one IL-10 knockout and one APC (Min+/-)] died one day after the 3rd examination. No other complications were noted. The average length of insertion was 3 cm. Transillumination allowed for localization of the endoscope tip. Biopsies, although quite small, were sufficient for pathologic evaluation and diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Murine colonoscopy is a safe and feasible technique. It permits consecutive visual and histopathological examinations, and it allows the investigator to monitor the response of the murine colon to experimental interventions.

Animals↗

Mouse laparoscopy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To develop a technique for performing laparoscopy in the mouse. DESIGN: Controlled animal study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1). SETTING: University research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight CD-1 pregnant mice. INTERVENTION: Eight mice underwent anesthesia only and 20 had anesthesia plus laparoscopy at 5.5 and at 10.5 days' gestation (implantation occurs on day 4.5 and delivery on days 19-20). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four mice in the laparoscopy group died early in the series, three due to hemorrhage and one due to anesthetic overdose. Among survivors, there were no differences between operated and control groups in number of pups delivered at term (8.7 +/- 5.1 and 8.9 +/- 3.8, respectively), frequency of pregnancy failure (18.8% and 12.5%), and presence of intraabdominal adhesions on autopsy after delivery (12. 5% and 12.5%). Intraabdominal contents could be manipulated to visualize both uterine horns in their entirety. The number of gestations could be counted accurately as early as 1 day after implantation. CONCLUSION: Given the fact that laparoscopy is not accompanied by the immunosuppression characteristic of laparotomy, this technique could prove useful for investigations requiring intraabdominal manipulations in mice when preservation of immune function is critical. The technique can be performed safely and repeatedly after an initial learning period. (J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 6(2):173-177, 1999)

Animals↗