Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Noren

Publications and source records attributed to J Noren.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Effects of compensation method on physician behaviors.

OBJECTIVE: To examine physician and leader perceptions of the relationship between physician compensation and the productivity of physicians practicing in medical groups. STUDY DESIGN: Key informant interviews identified subjects' perceptions of factors influencing physician productivity and the behavioral effects of individual financial incentives. Interview transcripts were analyzed by a team of physicians, economists, and other researchers. STUDY POPULATION: Physicians, medical leaders, and group practice administrators (n = 114) representing 46 medical group practices in California, Oregon, Washington, and Wisconsin were interviewed. RESULTS: Five major themes emerged: (1) Most physicians reported that financial incentives did not substantially affect their own behavior, except for productivity. However, they suggested that specific compensation models do lead to certain seemingly undesirable physician behaviors. (2) By contrast, medical group leaders reported that financial incentives do affect a variety of physician behaviors. (3) Four productivity drivers emerged: financial incentives, demand-side factors, systems and infrastructure, and other individual or group attributes. (4) Physician compensation systems are evolving toward a blend of production-based and production-neutral incentives, plus new metrics aligned with the demands of managed care. (5) Culture, size, and specialty mix are significant determinants of group physician compensation systems. CONCLUSIONS: Compensation method is perceived to be a significant influence on physician productivity, particularly among group practice leaders. The changing context of medical practice represents another powerful "macro" lever on physician behavior.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1998

Primary care physician compensation method in medical groups: does it influence the use and cost of health services for enrollees in managed care organizations?

CONTEXT: Growth of at-risk managed care contracts between health plans and medical groups has been well documented, but less is known about the nature of financial incentives within those medical groups or their effects on health care utilization. OBJECTIVE: To test whether utilization and cost of health services per enrollee were influenced independently by the compensation method of the enrollee's primary care physician. DESIGN: Survey of medical groups contracting with selected managed care health plans, linked to 1994 plan enrollment and utilization data for adult enrollees. SETTING: Medical groups, major managed care health plans, and their patients/enrollees in the state of Washington. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Sixty medical groups in Washington, 865 primary care physicians (internal medicine, pediatrics, family practice, or general practice) from those groups and affiliated with 1 or more of 4 managed care health plans, and 200 931 adult plan enrollees. INTERVENTION: The effect of method of primary care physician's compensation on the utilization and cost of health services was analyzed by weighted least squares and random effects regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total visits, hospital days, and per member per year estimated costs. RESULTS: Compensation method was not significantly (P>.30) related to utilization and cost in any multivariate analyses. Patient age (P<.001), female gender (P<.001), and plan benefit level (P<.001) were significantly positively related to visits, hospital days, and per member per year costs. The primary care physician's age was significantly negatively related (P<.001) to all 3 dependent measures. CONCLUSIONS: Compensation method was not significantly related to use and cost of health services per person. Enrollee, physician, and health plan benefit factors were the prime determinants of utilization and cost of health services.

Capitation Fee↗
PubMed1998

Effect of compensation method on the behavior of primary care physicians in managed care organizations: evidence from interviews with physicians and medical leaders in Washington State.

The perceived relationship between primary care physician compensation and utilization of medical services in medical groups affiliated with one or more among six managed care organizations in the state of Washington was examined. Representatives from 67 medical group practices completed a survey designed to determine the organizational arrangements and norms that influence primary care practice and to provide information on how groups translate the payments they receive from health plans into individual physician compensation. Semistructured interviews with 72 individual key informants from 31 of the 67 groups were conducted to ascertain how compensation method affects physician practice. A team of raters read the transcripts and identified key themes that emerged from the interviews. The themes generated from the key informant interviews fell into three broad categories. The first was self-selection and satisfaction. Compensation method was a key factor for physicians in deciding where to practice. Physicians' satisfaction with compensation method was high in part because they chose compensation methods that fit with their practice styles and lifestyles. Second, compensation drives production. Physician production, particularly the number of patients seen, was believed to be strongly influenced by compensation method, whereas utilization of ancillary services, patient outcomes, and satisfaction are seen as much less likely to be influenced. The third theme involved future changes in compensation methods. Medical leaders, administrators, and primary care physicians in several groups indicated that they expected changes in the current compensation methods in the near future in the direction of incentive-based methods. The responses revealed in interviews with physicians and administrative leaders underscored the critical role compensation arrangements play in driving physician satisfaction and behavior.

Administrative Personnel↗
PubMed1996

Physician compensation models in medical group practice.

This article examines physician compensation models in medical groups and the factors affecting physician compensation and their impact on individual physician behavior and group practice performance. Four categories of physician compensation models are identified: (1) production-based compensation, (2) salary, (3) group-based compensation unrelated to individual physician productivity, and (4) capitation-based compensation. The statistics and the economic incentives of different compensation methods are presented. Finally, the impacts on health resources consumption, charges in medical group procedures for utilization and care management, and quality of care are discussed.

Economic Competition↗
PubMed1982

Definition of terms and concepts applicable to clinical preventive medicine.

This article defines the terms and concepts applied to the teaching of clinical preventive medicine by the Curriculum Development Project--a joint venture of the Center for Educational Development in Health (CEDH) at Boston University and the Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine Foundation (ATPMF).

Curriculum↗
PubMed1982

A curriculum for physicians in management.

To help physicians operate at the interface between medicine and management, the University of Wisconsin began a program in administrative medicine in 1973 with support from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. In this profile of that program, the following topics are emphasized: values in medical care, budgeting, epidemiology and data skills, decision analysis, planning, health economics, health law, and organizational and human behavior.

Curriculum↗
PubMed1981

An administrative medicine program for clinician-executives.

An educational curriculum for clinician-executives has been developed at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. A comprehensive range of subjects is offered on flexible schedules, including weekends, to accommodate practicing health professionals. Courses may be taken for graduate credit leading to a master's degree in preventive medicine/administrative medicine or for continuing medical education credit. Course projects relate to problems or issues relevant to the student's work environment. The core curriculum includes: current health systems; health care management, planning, and evaluation; information sciences; values; and clinical preventive medicine. Degree requirements may be met in one full-time calendar year or over a several-year part-time period. This curriculum has demonstrated the need for and value off programs directed toward strengthening the executive skills and roles of clinicians.

Administrative Personnel↗
PubMed1980

Ambulatory medical care: a comparison of internists and family-general practitioners.

We analyzed data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to compare the style of practice of two primary-care providers, general internists and family-general practitioners. Whereas internists spent 18.4 minutes with the average patient, family-general practitioners spent 13.0 minutes. Whereas internists used laboratory tests in 73 per cent of visits and x-ray tests in 53 per cent, family-general practitioners used these studies in 34 and 19 per cent of visits. Internists provided instructions regarding health problems in 17.8 per cent of visits, and family-general practitioners in 12.4 per cent. The two provider groups did not differ in terms of therapy for emotional problems, both providing it in a relatively low proportion of visits (3 per cent). Whether by choice or necessity, family-general practitioners spent less time examining and instructing patients, and they ordered fewer laboratory and x-ray studies. The implications of these differences for the cost and quality of primary care need further study.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed1979

Farm tractor fatalities: the failure of voluntary safety standards.

There are no governmental standards for operator protection which require compliance by farm tractor manufacturers. To see how the Wisconsin farming population fares under voluntary safety standards, death certificate data were used to determine rates of tractor-associated fatal injuries. The injury deathrate associated with tractors on farms increased from 10.9 per 100,000 male farm residents during 1961-1965 to 13.6/100,000 during 1971-1975 (p less than .05). Deaths associated with overturning tractors were most common; with death rates of 6/100,000 male farm residents for 1961-1975. The rise in tractor-associated death rates shows that voluntary safety standards are not protecting the farm population. Rollover protective structures (ROPS) are designed to protect operators when tractors overturn but under voluntary safety standards these ROPS are sold only as optional accessory devices. Current Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations which require ROPS for employees operating tractors do not protect self-employed farmers and their families. It is recommended that the government require all tractors sold to be equipped with ROPS as is currently the case in England and Sweden.

Accidents, Occupational↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Population health--a new discipline.

A new discipline--population health--has emerged with the potential to profoundly impact the U.S. health care system. Multiple forces stimulating the new population health concept include: (1) the increasing dominance of managed care and critical scrutiny of its development; (2) the continued refinement of clinical effectiveness and outcomes assessment research; (3) increasing public policy emphasis on cost-effectiveness accountability for health care services; and (4) a new focus on the importance of collaboration between the medicine and public health enterprises in this country. The need for sophisticated analysis of population health determinants has never been greater in history. New programs, like the University of Wisconsin-Madison's interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Population Health, address the need for analysis, dissemination, and application of information about the many factors affecting the health of populations.

Community Health Planning↗