Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J N Cohn

Publications and source records attributed to J N Cohn.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Influence of prerandomization (baseline) variables on mortality and on the reduction of mortality by enalapril. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Vasodilator Therapy of Heart Failure (V-HeFT II). V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group.

BACKGROUND: The effects of hydralazine plus isosorbide dinitrate were compared with those of enalapril in 804 men receiving digoxin and diuretic therapy for chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) in the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trial (V-HeFT II). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 20 mg of enalapril or 300 mg of hydralazine plus 160 mg of isosorbide dinitrate daily. At 2 years, treatment with enalapril resulted in a significant (28%) reduction in mortality relative to the active control treatment. Baseline variables were examined to determine their impact on risk of mortality and on relative response to treatment. Mortality rates were significantly higher in patients with severe ventricular arrhythmias; in patients with low baseline ejection fractions, low peak oxygen consumption, and low systolic blood pressures; in patients with high cardiothoracic ratios, high scores indicating greater impairment on a quality-of-life questionnaire, and high plasma norepinephrine or renin levels; and in patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes III and IV. Coronary artery disease, duration of CHF, and patient age were not predictive of mortality. Enalapril reduced mortality significantly compared with hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate in patient subgroups with high plasma renin or norepinephrine levels and in patients with low cardiothoracic ratios. Furthermore, enalapril conferred significantly greater protection from mortality than hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate in patients in NYHA classes I and II and in patients without arrhythmias or with < or = 10 premature ventricular contractions per hour. CONCLUSIONS: Of the prerandomization characteristics that were predictive of mortality in patients with CHF, only neurohormone measurements, cardiothoracic ratios, arrhythmia severity, and NYHA class identified subgroups of patients who benefited most from treatment with enalapril; a treatment interaction across strata was detected only for plasma norepinephrine and NYHA class. In no patient subgroup was the mortality with enalapril treatment significantly higher than the mortality with hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate treatment.

Drug Therapy, Combination↗
PubMed1993

Plasma norepinephrine, plasma renin activity, and congestive heart failure. Relations to survival and the effects of therapy in V-HeFT II. The V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group.

BACKGROUND: Congestive heart failure is a clinical syndrome characterized by neuroendocrine activation. Measurements of plasma norepinephrine and plasma renin activity were performed in the Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trial II (V-HeFT II) to characterize the effect of therapy on neuroendocrine activation and to examine the responses to therapy among patients with different degrees of activation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The baseline median plasma norepinephrine value (n = 743) was 490 pg/mL and the baseline median plasma renin activity (n = 737) was 6.9 ng.mL-1 x hr-1. Baseline plasma renin activity and plasma norepinephrine correlated poorly with each other (r = 0.12), implying that these two neuroendocrine systems are being activated by separate processes. By univariate analysis, the logarithms of the plasma norepinephrine (p < 0.0001) and the plasma renin activity (p = 0.01) were significantly related to all-cause mortality. In a multivariate analysis that included other significant univariate prognostic variables (i.e., baseline ejection fraction, peak oxygen consumption during exercise, and cardiothoracic ratio), log plasma norepinephrine but not plasma renin activity remained a significant (p = 0.02) predictor of mortality. Baseline plasma norepinephrine correlated poorly with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (r = -0.18), peak oxygen consumption (r = -0.15), and cardiothoracic ratio (r = 0.11). Neither the plasma norepinephrine (r = 0.09) nor the plasma renin activity (r = 0.18) was closely associated with a quality of life assessment at baseline. The baseline plasma norepinephrine level in patients randomized to enalapril (mean, 593 +/- 388 [SD] pg/mL; n = 372) and to hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate (mean, 544 +/- 297 pg/mL; n = 371) were similar. Thirteen weeks after randomization, plasma norepinephrine did not change (-5 +/- 393 pg/mL) in 312 patients randomized to enalapril but increased significantly by 74 +/- 311 pg/mL (p < 0.0001) in 300 patients assigned to hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate. The plasma norepinephrine increased significantly more in patients assigned to hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate than those on enalapril at both 13 weeks (p = 0.01) and at 1 year (p = 0.04) (90 +/- 302 pg/mL [n = 240] versus 14 +/- 376 pg/mL [n = 265]). Based on previous reports and examination of survival among several plasma norepinephrine strata, the baseline plasma norepinephrine data were grouped into three relatively homogeneous strata for further analysis. The cumulative mortality was significantly different between the three strata (p < 0.0001). The patients with plasma norepinephrine > 900 pg/mL had a higher mortality than those with corresponding values from 601 to 900 pg/mL or < 600 pg/mL. The survival benefit of enalapril compared with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate was most evident in those patients with a plasma norepinephrine value > 900 pg/mL. Although the plasma renin activity was not strongly associated with survival, patients in the upper quartile (> 16 ng.mL-1 x hr-1) had the worst prognosis. Among this group, the patients on enalapril demonstrated significantly better survival than those on hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that plasma norepinephrine is an independent predictor of prognosis in patients with congestive heart failure. Hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate treatment, unlike enalapril treatment, was associated with increased plasma norepinephrine concentration during the first year of follow-up. The enalapril group had a significantly lower mortality, and this survival benefit of enalapril as compared with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate was most evident among patients with the most marked neuroendocrine activation. Neuroendocrine activation is an important prognostic factor for patients with congestive heart failure and is an important determinant of the differential response to vasodilators.

Drug Therapy, Combination↗
PubMed1993

Enalapril decreases prevalence of ventricular tachycardia in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. The V-HeFT II VA Cooperative Studies Group.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure have a high prevalence of serious arrhythmias and sudden cardiac-death. METHODS AND RESULTS: Male patients aged 18-75 years with chronic heart failure were randomized to enalapril or hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate. Short-term (4-hour to 8-hour) Holter tape recordings were performed before randomization, at 3 months, at 1 year, and yearly thereafter. Of 804 patients randomized to therapy, 715 had Holters at baseline. Couplets were noted in 56% versus 60% and ventricular tachycardia (VT) (three or more consecutive ventricular premature beats) in 27% versus 29% of patients randomized to enalapril versus hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate, respectively. The presence of VT at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years predicted significantly higher mortality during the subsequent year (p < 0.0001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.037, respectively). In the enalapril group, VT prevalence decreased by 27% at 1 year (p < 0.02). A decrease in prevalence of VT was not seen in the hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate group. New VT was seen in 11% of enalapril patients versus 24% of hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate patients at 1 year (p < 0.002). When compared with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate at 1 and 2 years, there was a 52% and 49% reduction, respectively, in sudden deaths in the enalapril group. Thus, at 1 and 2 years, the decrease in sudden deaths in the enalapril group coincided with the decrease in VT prevalence and the decrease in new VT emergence. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with heart failure, VT and couplets predict increased mortality. When compared with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate, enalapril decreases both the persistence of baseline VT at 3 months and the emergence of new VT at 1 and 2 years. The reduction in VT prevalence parallels a reduction in sudden death. The effect of enalapril on survival over hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate may be related to its ability to reduce prevalence of ventricular arrhythmia.

Death, Sudden, Cardiac↗
PubMed1993

Ejection fraction, peak exercise oxygen consumption, cardiothoracic ratio, ventricular arrhythmias, and plasma norepinephrine as determinants of prognosis in heart failure. The V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group.

BACKGROUND: Recognition of the complex pathophysiology of heart failure and its high mortality has emphasized the need for prognostic markers that can be used in clinical assessment as well as in the design of mortality trials. Data from the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trials (V-HeFT I, 642 patients; V-HeFT II, 804 patients) were therefore examined to determine the influence of prerandomization measurements on subsequent mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients entered into these trials were men with cardiac dysfunction and reduced peak exercise capacity. Measurements included in this analysis were left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) measured by radionuclide angiography, peak bicycle exercise oxygen consumption (VO2), cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) measured on a chest x-ray, ventricular arrhythmias assessed in a core laboratory by short-term Holter monitoring, plasma norepinephrine and plasma renin activity measured in a core laboratory only in V-HeFT II, and a variety of diagnostic and demographic data. The variables related only weakly to each other. EF, VO2, and CTR were powerful independent predictors of all-cause mortality in both studies. Ventricular arrhythmia was a significant independent predictor in V-HeFT II but not in V-HeFT I. Plasma norepinephrine but not plasma renin activity measured in V-HeFT II also had independent prognostic value. Other variables did not exert an independent effect on mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal assessment of the mortality risk in an individual or a group of individuals with heart failure uses measurement of EF, peak VO2, CTR, plasma norepinephrine, and the presence of ventricular arrhythmias.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
PubMed1993

Hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate combination improves exercise tolerance in heart failure. Results from V-HeFT I and V-HeFT II. The V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group.

BACKGROUND: To better define the effects of long-term vasodilator therapy on exercise performance in chronic congestive heart failure, we compared placebo with prazosin and with the combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate (Hyd-Iso) in 642 men over a 5-year period in V-HeFT I. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were randomized (double-blind) to 20 mg of prazosin daily or 300 mg of hydralazine plus 160 mg daily of isosorbide dinitrate or placebo. We compared enalapril (20 mg daily), a converting enzyme inhibitor, with Hyd-Iso in 804 men over another 5-year period in V-HeFT II: Background therapy in both trials consisted of digitalis and diuretics. Serial bicycle ergometric exercise was performed with gas exchange measurements during progressive incremental work rates to a symptom-limited peak end point. Gas exchange anaerobic threshold (ATge) measurement was performed in the second trial. In V-HeFT I, an increase in peak VO2 with Hyd-Iso compared with placebo approached significance at 2 months (p < 0.16) and was significant (p < 0.04) at 1 year. In V-HeFT II, Hyd-Iso significantly increased peak VO2 compared with enalapril (p < 0.01 at 3 months, p < 0.02 at 6 months and 2 years). The changes in ATge measurements were not statistically different between the two treatment groups in V-HeFT II: CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with Hyd-Iso was more effective in increasing peak VO2 than placebo, prazosin, or enalapril in patients with mild-to-moderate congestive heart failure. Long-term data were confounded by mortality and other events, which may have led to an underestimate of the benefits of Hyd-Iso over placebo and an underestimate of the long-term benefits of enalapril on exercise performance. Therefore, short-term improvement in exercise performance is a suitable therapeutic end point, but long-term studies should more appropriately assess mortality.

Anaerobic Threshold↗
PubMed1993

Echocardiographic variables as prognostic indicators and therapeutic monitors in chronic congestive heart failure. Veterans Affairs cooperative studies V-HeFT I and II. V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic indexes of ventricular function have become indispensable in clinical cardiology but have not been tested as prognostic markers or therapeutic monitors in clinical trials. In two Veterans Administration trials on heart failure (Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trials I and II, V-HeFT I and II), echocardiographic variables were analyzed as predictors and monitors and were compared with other indicators of cardiac performance. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiograms were recorded before randomization and at follow-up intervals. Baseline measurements of left ventricular internal diameters (LVIDd, LVIDs), wall thickness (THd, THs), radius to thickness ratios (Rd/THd, Rs/THs), and mitral E-point septal separation (EPSS) were evaluated as predictors of mortality individually, in multivariate regression models with each other, and with nonechocardiographic predictors. Within-subject changes were compared between treatment groups. Cumulative survival curves were compared between strata formed by cut-points of EPSS and Rs/THs data. In Cox regression analyses, EPSS, LVIDs, and Rs/THs were significant predictors of mortality. In V-HeFT I, Rd/THd was a predictor in the presence of ejection fraction and peak oxygen uptake. In patients with EPSS > or = 21, there was an 83% increase in mortality in the subgroup of patients with Rs/THs > or = 2.5 compared with Rs/THs < 2.5 (p = 0.003), whereas there was no statistical difference for EPSS < 21. EPSS showed improvement in patients treated with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate compared with placebo at 2 and 18 months and a trend toward deterioration between 36 and 66 months. In V-HeFT II, there were no differences between enalapril and hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate groups at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic variables, EPSS, LVIDs, and Rs/THs were shown to be predictors of mortality and monitors of treatment for heart failure in clinical trials.

Drug Therapy, Combination↗
PubMed1993

Evaluation by patients with heart failure of the effects of enalapril compared with hydralazine plus isosorbide dinitrate on quality of life. V-HeFT II. The V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group.

BACKGROUND: Two new questionnaires concerning the quality of life of patients with heart failure were used in a randomized, controlled trial to determine if the patients' perceptions of the effects of enalapril on their daily activities and sense of well-being were different from those of a group treated with hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate. METHODS AND RESULTS: The questionnaires were completed at baseline and at 3 months, 6 months, and subsequently every 6 months during follow-up, which averaged 2.5 years (range, 0.5-5.7 years). Data from the questionnaires were reliable as indicated by correlation coefficients between repeated baseline scores of 0.88 and 0.87. Both treatment groups showed a progressive deterioration in quality of life as measured by both questionnaires. The questionnaire scores of the two treatment groups were not significantly different at any follow-up visit. Furthermore, there were no differences between treatments among subgroups defined by baseline questionnaire scores, peak oxygen consumption, ejection fraction, previous vasodilator use, and plasma norepinephrine concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Although several factors may limit the generalization of these results, the lack of a difference with regard to patients' quality of life is an important consideration for the evaluation of the relative therapeutic efficacy of these vasodilators.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed1993

Effect of enalapril, hydralazine plus isosorbide dinitrate, and prazosin on hospitalization in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. The V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization of persons with congestive heart failure for recurrent heart failure or other complications is common. METHODS AND RESULTS: Male patients aged 18-75 with chronic heart failure were randomized in two sequential trials designed to study the efficacy of vasodilator therapy. Patients were evaluated every 3 months, and information regarding hospitalizations between visits was obtained from the patient, his family, and/or hospital records. Hospitalization data also were obtained for patients who had died between scheduled clinic visits. Hospitalizations were not recorded if a patient died during transit to the hospital or in the hospital emergency department before admission. In Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trial (V-HeFT) I, no significant difference in number of patients hospitalized or number of hospitalizations was noted among the treatment groups, although there was a trend for fewer and delayed cardiac hospitalizations in the hydralazine plus isosorbide dinitrate arm in which the survival was greater. In V-HeFT II, no difference in hospitalizations was apparent between the enalapril and hydralazine plus isosorbide dinitrate arms. Univariate predictors of hospitalization for all causes were reduced peak oxygen consumption (VO2) during exercise (p < 0.0001), reduced exercise duration (p < 0.0001), increased cardiothoracic ratio on chest radiograph (p < 0.0001), increased age (p < 0.03), and use of antiarrhythmic drugs (p < 0.013), whereas multivariate predictors were reduced peak VO2 (p < 0.0001), use of antiarrhythmic drugs (p < 0.015), and increased cardiothoracic ratio (p < 0.03). Univariate predictors of hospitalization for heart failure were peak VO2 (p < 0.0001), LVEF (p < 0.0001), reduced exercise duration (p < 0.0001), elevated cardiothoracic ratio (p < 0.0001), and elevated plasma norepinephrine (p < 0.0001). Multivariate predictors were exercise duration (p < 0.0001), LVEF (p < 0.04), elevated cardiothoracic ratio (p < 0.03), plasma norepinephrine (p < 0.0005), and coronary artery disease (p < 0.02). Time to first hospitalization, cause specific or overall, was considerably shorter for patients with baseline peak VO2 < 10 mL.kg-1 x min-1 compared with those with peak VO2 > 15 mL.kg-1 x min-1. CONCLUSIONS: Despite better survival in patients randomized to hydralazine plus isosorbide dinitrate compared with placebo and better survival in patients randomized to enalapril compared with hydralazine plus isosorbide dinitrate, no significant differences between the treatment groups were apparent in the incidence of hospitalization or time to first hospitalization for congestive heart failure, for cardiac reasons other than congestive heart failure, or for other causes. V-HeFT I and V-HeFT II data demonstrate no treatment effect on hospitalization, perhaps reflecting in part the effectiveness of the Veterans Affairs special heart failure clinics in dealing with worsening heart failure on an outpatient basis. Identification of predictors of hospitalization were similar in both studies.

Drug Therapy, Combination↗
PubMed1993

Functional capacity in heart failure. Comparison of methods for assessment and their relation to other indexes of heart failure. The V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction plays a primary role in the pathogenesis of congestive heart failure and correlates with prognosis, but a strong quantitative relation between exercise performance and indexes of LV function has not been demonstrated. We examined the relation between LV ejection fraction at rest, oxygen consumption at peak exercise (VO2), patient and physician assessments of clinical severity, and other clinical attributes in 804 patients with moderate heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ejection fraction correlated weakly with VO2, and mean ejection fraction was related to severity of symptoms. There was a statistical association between the patient's self-assessed quality of life questionnaire score and the physician-assigned New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class; NYHA class was statistically associated with exercise performance. To identify other factors that might influence exercise capacity, comparisons of clinical attributes were made between patients grouped by VO2 within each stratum of LV function. Exercise performance was inversely related to plasma norepinephrine levels within the ejection fraction < 25% stratum. The percentage of patients reaching their anaerobic threshold was not different between groups, yet the peak heart rate increased with VO2 within all strata. Elevated venous pressure and cardiomegaly were inversely related to exercise performance. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical scales based on physician and patient assessment of symptoms were statistically associated with exercise capacity but do not accurately predict individual exercise performance. The strong association of heart rate response to exercise performance suggests that the variability of the chronotropic response to exercise contributes to differences in exercise capacity among patients with a similar degree of LV dysfunction.

Drug Therapy, Combination↗
PubMed1993

Incidence of thromboembolic events in congestive heart failure. The V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of thromboembolism and the benefit of anticoagulation in congestive heart failure are controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: The data base provided by the Veterans Affairs Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trials (V-HeFT I and II) was examined retrospectively to address these issues. In V-HeFT I, 642 men with heart failure were followed an average of 2.28 years, providing 1,464 patient-years of follow-up. In V-HeFT II, 804 men were followed an average of 2.56 years, with 2,061 patient-years of follow-up. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 30% in V-HeFT I and 29% in V-HeFT II: Functional capacity was at the interface of classes II and III with a peak exercise oxygen consumption of 14.7 mL.kg-1 x min-1 in V-HeFT I and 13.7 mL.kg-1 x min-1 in V-HeFT II: Warfarin and antiplatelet agents were administered at the discretion of individual investigators. The incidence of all thromboembolic events during 1,068 patient-years without warfarin in V-HeFT I was 2.7/100 patient-years and during 1,188 patient-years in V-HeFT II was 2.1/100 patient-years and was not reduced in patients treated with warfarin. Patients experiencing events had a lower peak exercise oxygen consumption (p < 0.03 in V-HeFT I and p < 0.001 in V-HeFT II) and a lower mean ejection fraction (p = 0.10 in V-HeFT I and p = 0.07 in V-HeFT II). Atrial fibrillation was not associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of thromboembolism and stroke in class II or III congestive heart failure is not high and may not be significantly reduced with warfarin treatment. Routine use of anticoagulants in patients with heart failure may not be justified.

Cerebrovascular Disorders↗
PubMed1992

Pharmacologic mechanisms of nitrates in myocardial ischemia.

Nitrates exert both hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic effects that help explain the mechanisms by which these drugs benefit patients with myocardial ischemia. The hemodynamic effects of nitrates include relaxation of conduit arteries, increased arterial compliance, increased venous capacitance, dilation of collateral vessels in the myocardium, and, possibly, increased myocardial compliance. A growing body of evidence suggests that the nonhemodynamic effects of these agents include inhibition of vascular smooth muscle growth and of myocyte hypertrophy and ventricular remodeling. Since endothelial function appears to be abnormal in patients with myocardial ischemia and nitrates replicate many of the effects of endothelium-derived relaxing factor, these drugs may be viewed as a pharmacologic replacement for deficient endogenous activity.

Hemodynamics↗
PubMed1992

Mechanisms of action and efficacy of nitrates in heart failure.

Nitrates exert hemodynamic and possibly nonhemodynamic effects that result in reduced cardiac filling pressures, increased cardiac output, reduced pulmonary vascular pressures, and improvement in symptoms and exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure. Combined with hydralazine, chronic oral administration of isosorbide dinitrate has been demonstrated to improve survival when added to digoxin and diuretic therapy. A long-term improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction in these clinical studies has raised the possibility that the nitrates may be acting at least in part by inhibiting left ventricular remodeling. The precise role of nitrates and the optimal dosing regimen in the therapeutic armamentarium for heart failure, particularly in patients already treated with a converting enzyme inhibitor, remains to be established.

Forecasting↗
PubMed1992

Effect of enalapril on mortality and the development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions.

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether the treatment of patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction reduces mortality and morbidity. We studied the effect of an angiotensin-converting--enzyme inhibitor, enalapril, on total mortality and mortality from cardiovascular causes, the development of heart failure, and hospitalization for heart failure among patients with ejection fractions of 0.35 or less who were not receiving drug treatment for heart failure. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (n = 2117) or enalapril (n = 2111) at doses of 2.5 to 20 mg per day in a double-blind trial. Follow-up averaged 37.4 months. RESULTS: There were 334 deaths in the placebo group, as compared with 313 in the enalapril group (reduction in risk, 8 percent by the log-rank test; 95 percent confidence interval, -8 percent [an increase of 8 percent] to 21 percent; P = 0.30). The reduction in mortality from cardiovascular causes was larger but was not statistically significant (298 deaths in the placebo group vs. 265 in the enalapril group; risk reduction, 12 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -3 to 26 percent; P = 0.12). When we combined patients in whom heart failure developed and those who died, the total number of deaths and cases of heart failure was lower in the enalapril group than in the placebo group (630 vs. 818; risk reduction, 29 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 21 to 36 percent; P less than 0.001). In addition, fewer patients given enalapril died or were hospitalized for heart failure (434 in the enalapril group; vs. 518 in the placebo group; risk reduction, 20 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 9 to 30 percent; P less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The angiotensin-converting--enzyme inhibitor enalapril significantly reduced the incidence of heart failure and the rate of related hospitalizations, as compared with the rates in the group given placebo, among patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. There was also a trend toward fewer deaths due to cardiovascular causes among the patients who received enalapril.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1992

The effect of treatment on survival in congestive heart failure.

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a disorder characterized by a variety of clinical, biochemical, electrophysiological, and hemodynamic abnormalities. During the past two decades, numerous drugs have been employed in the treatment of this complex syndrome, and many agents have been shown to improve symptoms and ventricular function in patients with CHF. Because CHF is associated with a high risk of death, treatment should be directed not only toward the relief of symptoms, but also toward a reduction in mortality. Many variables have been shown to be related to survival; taken individually, however, each is limited in its utility in predicting prognosis. In recent years, large-scale studies with large sample sizes have directly assessed the effects of treatment on mortality in CHF. Results from these trials indicate that vasodilators and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may improve mortality in patients with symptoms of heart failure. Additional trials are now in progress to evaluate the effect of treatment on patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed1992

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendan, a new cardiotonic and vasodilator agent, in patients with severe congestive heart failure.

Pimobendan, a new oral cardiotonic and vasodilator agent, increases myocardial contractile force through specific inhibition of phosphodiesterase type III and increased calcium sensitivity of the myocardial contractile elements. The effects of pimobendan on left ventricular performance and maximal exercise capacity were studied in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 52 patients with severe congestive heart failure despite diuretics, digoxin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The acute hemodynamic evaluation included three single doses of 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg of oral pimobendan, which was subsequently administered at a daily dose of 5 or 10 mg for 4 weeks. Acute administration of pimobendan significantly increased the resting cardiac index and lowered pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in a dose-dependent manner, whereas heart rate and systemic arterial pressure were not substantially altered. Patients receiving pimobendan, 5 and 10 mg daily, had a significantly greater increase in maximal exercise duration than those receiving placebo, that is, 144 +/- 30 and 124 +/- 33 seconds versus 58 +/- 25 seconds (p = 0.05). Peak oxygen uptake increased by 1.7 +/- 0.8 and 2.2 +/- 1.3 ml/kg/min in patients receiving pimobendan at a daily dose of 5 and 10 mg, respectively, whereas it decreased by 0.1 +/- 0.6 ml/kg/min in patients receiving placebo (p = 0.06). Thus pimobendan acutely improves resting left ventricular performance and chronically increases exercise duration and peak oxygen uptake in patients with severe congestive heart failure concomitantly treated with digoxin, diuretics, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

Cardiotonic Agents↗
PubMed1992

Assessment of patient outcome with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire: reliability and validity during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendan. Pimobendan Multicenter Research Group.

To determine the reliability and validity of a patient outcome questionnaire for chronic heart failure, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-month trial of pimobendan, an investigational medication with inotropic and vasodilator activities, was performed. Evaluated were 198 ambulatory patients with primarily New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III heart failure from 20 referral centers. Baseline therapy included digoxin, diuretics and, in 80%, a converting enzyme inhibitor. Oral pimobendan at 2.5 (n = 49), 5.0 (n = 51), or 10 (n = 49) mg daily or matching placebo (n = 49) was administered. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (LIhFE) questionnaire was a primary outcome measure, along with an exercise test. Interitem correlations identified subgroups of questions representing physical and emotional dimensions. Repeated baseline scores were highly correlated (r = 0.93), as were the physical (r = 0.89) and emotional (r = 0.88) dimension scores. Placebo did not have a significant effect with median (25th, 75th percentile) changes from baseline scores of 1 (-3, 5), 1 (-2, 3), and 0 (-1, 2), respectively (all p values greater than 0.10). The 5 mg dose significantly improved the total score, 7.5 (0, 18; p = 0.01) and the physical dimension, 4 (0, 8; p = 0.01), compared with placebo. Changes in the total (r = 0.33; p less than 0.01) and physical (r = 0.35; p less than 0.01) scores were weakly related to changes in exercise times, but corresponded well with changes in patients' ratings of dyspnea and fatigue.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1992

Hemodynamic, left ventricular structural and hormonal changes after discrete myocardial damage in the dog.

Transmyocardial direct-current (DC) shock produces localized left ventricular myocardial necrosis without obstruction to coronary blood flow. In 43 dogs sequential measurements of hemodynamic, neuroendocrine and myocardial structural changes were made at baseline and for 16 weeks after DC shock. Six dogs (14%) died in the peri-shock period. By 1 week after shock, left ventricular mass, as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, had increased from a mean value +/- SD of 67.9 +/- 10.1 to 82.5 +/- 12.9 g (p = 0.0001). Left ventricular end-diastolic volume was unchanged at 1 week but increased at 16 weeks from 56.1 +/- 10.3 to 70.3 +/- 10.7 ml (p = 0.0003). Left ventricular mass demonstrated a further increase at 12 months (107.8 +/- 14.8 g). Rest cardiac output was significantly decreased at 4 months (3.67 +/- 1.23 to 3.18 +/- 0.81 liters/min, p less than 0.01) as was stroke volume (43 +/- 9 to 37 +/- 7 ml, p less than or equal to 0.01). Left ventricular ejection fraction decreased progressively from 73% to 38% at 1 year. At 4 months there were increases in mean pulmonary artery pressure (18 +/- 4 to 23 +/- 4 mm Hg, p less than 0.01), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (9 +/- 3 to 15 +/- 3 mm Hg, p less than 0.01) and right atrial pressure (5 +/- 4 to 9 +/- 3 mm Hg, p less than 0.01). Plasma norepinephrine was increased at 4 months (318 +/- 190 to 523 +/- 221 pg/ml, p = 0.0003), whereas plasma renin activity was not significantly changed (4.3 +/- 2.6 vs. 5.2 +/- 3.4 ng/ml per h). Microsphere regional blood flow studies demonstrated a 50% reduction in skeletal muscle blood flow at 4 months (0.06 +/- 0.06 ml/min per g compared with 0.12 +/- 0.09 in normal dogs, p = 0.05), and a reduction in the endocardial/epicardial blood flow ratio (1.11 +/- 0.13 compared with 1.24 +/- 0.13 in normal dogs, p = 0.02). Therefore, in this model of acute left ventricular damage, left ventricular hypertrophy precedes progressive left ventricular dilation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗