Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Mintz

Publications and source records attributed to J Mintz.

172 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

Universal, developmental, and variable aspects of young children's play: a cross-cultural comparison of pretending at home.

Using longitudinal data from five Irish American families in the United States and nine Chinese families in Taiwan, in conjunction with an emerging body of evidence in the cultural psychology literature, we propose universal, culturally variable, and developmental dimensions of young children's pretend play. Possible universal dimensions include the use of objects, and the predominantly social nature of pretend play. Developmental dimensions include increases in the proportion of social pretend play initiated by the child, the proportion of partner initiations elaborated upon by the child, and caregivers' use of pretend play initiations to serve other, nonplay social functions. Culturally variable dimensions include the centrality of objects, the participation of specific play partners, the extent of child initiations of social pretend play with caregivers, the various functions of social pretend play in interaction, and specific themes. These findings raise the theoretical issue of how universal and variable dimensions of pretend play interact in specific communities to create distinctive development pathways.

Child Development↗

Pharmacological and psychological treatments for depressed older patients: a meta-analysis and overview of recent findings.

A meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate data published between January 1974 and February 1998 comparing rates of treatment response and tolerability of pharmacological and psychological treatments for depression in persons over age 55. Drugs (tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors, and a mixed group of other drugs) were significantly better than placebo, with an average reduction in symptom severity of 48.0% versus 31.3% (analysis weighted by sample size; 50.6% vs. 21.4% unweighted). No single drug or group of drugs was superior in terms of efficacy, and no statistically significant differences in tolerability emerged between tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors, whether measured by total dropouts or by dropouts due to side effects. Compared to the data on pharmacological treatments, those for outcomes of psychological treatments are very limited. Existing data indicate that cognitive-behavioral, behavioral, and psychodynamic therapies are significantly better than placebo. In the current meta-analysis, response rates to these nondrug therapies did not differ significantly from those observed with tricyclic antidepressants or selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors, but direct comparison data are insufficient for firm conclusions to be drawn about comparative efficacy. It is possible, even likely, that not only different subtypes of depression but also different patients vary in their treatment responses. However, lack of adequate data prevented the current meta-analysis from addressing these issues. Rigorously designed prospective studies on treatment outcome, taking into account the above differences, are urgently needed to provide robust data on which to base clinical recommendations for the treatment of depression in older patients.

Aged↗