Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Metrot

Publications and source records attributed to J Metrot.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

[Double-blind treatment of 49 cases of chronic multiple sclerosis using hyperbaric oxygen].

Forty nine patients with a chronic form of multiple sclerosis (MS) [progressive or stable] were treated with hyperbaric oxygen (HO) in a double blind trial. Patients were divided in three groups: the first group (group I) received a course of 2.3 ATA HO with diazepam (5 mg); the second group (group II) received a course of 2 ATA HO; the third group (group III) was the control group. Each patient breathed an adapted gaseous mixture in high pressure. Each patient received 20 sessions of this procedure during 4 weeks. Patients were evaluated with clinical, neurophysiological and immunological parameters. Clinical examination consisted in the evaluation of the Kurtzke's Disability Status Scale (DSS) and Functional Status Scale (FSS). This evaluation was done in the week before the procedure, the week following the treatment, then in the third and sixth month. The neurophysiological study was a comparative analysis from the variations of visual, somesthesic and brain stem auditory potentials. The immunological study was the analysis of the lymphocyte populations (OKT4/OKT8 ratio). Each examination was carried out the week before, then the week following the procedure. We found no amelioration into three groups. Subjectively, some patients thought to be better, but this was true in the two treated groups (I, II) and in the control group (III). There was not an FSS significant variation. We also found no significant variation of evoked potentials and OKT4/OKT8 ratio. We observed some incidental effects of the treatment, particularly in group I, in which patients were treated with a higher pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Brain↗

[Helicopters and medical first aid units. Role of Medical First Aid Unit 94].

For the transport of injured and sick patients, the helicopter (even the mono-turbine type) offers greater advantages when compared to land vehicles: - more comfort (less vibrations, accelerations and decelerations); - a greater speed, that is to say a 61 p. 100 gain of time upon the distance and a gain from 29 up to 44 p. 100 upon the total amount of time taken up by each transport. This gain in time enables valuable specialised medical teams to be more available: - more precise time-tables than by land which namely makes it easier to receive the patients. The drawbacks are linked with the risks which are not nonexistent but rather less serious than by land. The drawbacks also depend upon the weather-conditions (although this factor does not matter much in our area), upon nuisances such as the noise (which is more important but far more transitory than by ambulance) and chiefly upon the cost of air-transport. In fact, the mean cost of a medical land transport amounts roughly to one thousand Francs, a quarter of which only does represent the actual cost of medical aid. For a similar transport, the helicopter comes to a 47 mns flight. There are several ways of making good use of a helicopter. Practical problems have been solved. The "SAMU 94" experience goes back to 1973 and includes over 500 transports by helicopter essentially with the help of the teams and the helicopters belonging to the Paris Base (Civil Protection and the Fire-Brigade). For flights over urban areas, it is to be desired in the future that only twin-turbine helicopters should be used.

Accidents, Traffic↗