Echocardiographic recognition of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J Manning.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The mandible is an uncommon presentation site for lymphoma and misdiagnosis is common. Eleven patients with lymphoma of the mandible were seen between 1947 and 1983. In 5 of the 11 patients, the diagnosis of lymphoma could not be established from the initial biopsy and additional material for examination was required. In three patients, this resulted in a partial or total removal of the mandible. In a recent histopathologic review, the diagnosis of diffuse large cell was made in seven, diffuse undifferentiated (non-Burkitt's) in two, diffuse undifferentiated (Burkitt's) in one, and unclassified in one. Using the Ann Arbor method of staging, six patients were determined to have stage IE disease; three had stage IIE, and two had stage IV. In 10 patients definitive treatment consisted of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of both. Treatment was limited to surgery in one patient. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 62% and 50%, respectively. These results are comparable to those for lymphoma of other extranodal head and neck sites.
Omapatrilat is the most clinically advanced member of a new class of cardiovascular drugs, vasopeptidase inhibitors. Omapatrilat is a single molecule that simultaneously inhibits neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin-converting enzyme, thus preserving vasodilator peptides and inhibiting production of the vasoconstrictor angiotensin II. In healthy male volunteers, omapatrilat decreased blood pressure while being generally well tolerated, with no serious adverse events. This study was undertaken to determine the effect of age and gender on the pharmacodynamics of omapatrilat. Healthy male or female volunteers between the ages of 18 and 80 were given a single oral dose of omapatrilat 40 mg. Neither age nor gender affected the vasopeptidase inhibition by omapatrilat. There were no differences between subject groups in the effect of omapatrilat on supine systolic, diastolic, or mean arterial blood pressure. Based on this study of healthy subjects, it can be concluded that it is not necessary to adjust the initial dose of omapatrilat for the treatment of hypertension based solely on age or gender.
1. Many forms of human and experimental hypertension begin with compromised renal function. Essential hypertension may be another such case. 2. The kidneys of subjects with essential hypertension excrete normal amounts of salt and water at higher-than-normal renal perfusing pressures. Other overt signs of renal dysfunction are few; renal disease is excluded by definition. However, renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate are usually less than normal in essential hypertension. 3. Renal afferent resistance can be calculated from arterial pressure, renal blood flow, and an estimate of glomerular capillary pressure. These calculations indicate that afferent resistance is increased to two or more times normal in essential hypertension. 4. It is not clear whether afferent constriction causes hypertension or results from it. The ability of high pressure to produce vascular damage points to the latter. But, most essential hypertensives show low-to-normal plasma renin levels and a marked afferent dilation after saline loading. These observations do not suggest nephrosclerosis: they are consistent with a causal role for afferent constriction. 5. We can speculate that, in essential hypertension, there is a defect in one of the mechanisms that sets afferent resistance. Afferent constriction could result from extrinsic influences (neural or humoral) or something totally within the kidney, such as abnormal handling of information from the macula densa. 6. The effect of afferent constriction on salt-and-water excretion would theoretically be offset by elevated arterial pressure so that the actual salt-and-water excretion would be normal, but only so long as the arterial pressure remained elevated.
Injection of narcotics in the subarachnoid space is the most recent advancement in managing pain during childbirth. This article reviews the history of labor pain control and discusses the introduction of intrathecal narcotics (ITNs), including administration, side effects, and nursing care, in one birthing center. The responses of clients and nurses to ITNs are discussed.
Two hundred seventy-five computed tomographic (CT) angiograms of the thoracic aorta were obtained over a period of approximately 4 years in patients with suspected or known aortic dissection. In all cases, unenhanced images were initially obtained, followed by contrast material-enhanced images. A variety of pitfalls were encountered that mimicked aortic dissection. These pitfalls were attributable to technical factors (eg, improper timing of contrast material administration relative to image acquisition); streak artifacts generated by high-attenuation material, high-contrast interfaces, or cardiac motion; periaortic structures (eg, aortic arch branches, mediastinal veins, pericardial recess, thymus, atelectasis, pleural thickening or effusion adjacent to the aorta); aortic wall motion and normal aortic sinuses; aortic variations such as congenital ductus diverticulum and acquired aortic aneurysm with thrombus; and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. Although several of these pitfalls are easy to recognize and therefore unlikely to present a diagnostic problem, others are potentially confusing. Familiarity with these common pitfalls, coupled with a knowledge of normal intrathoracic anatomy, will facilitate recognition of true aortic dissection and help avoid misdiagnosis at thoracic aortic CT angiography.