[Sleep quality in ventilated patients: is the ventilatory method important or its adjustment?].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J Mancebo.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Monitoring the mechanical properties (both static and dynamic) of the respiratory tract is essential for the diagnosis and prognosis of the disease causing any condition and to take the pertinent therapeutic decisions. These measurements can maintain a lung function in optimum conditions during mechanical ventilation and choose the best time to disconnect the patient. Until recently, monitoring the respiration of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation required sophisticated and complicated apparatuses or difficult techniques. Instrumentalization of the respiratory as a monitor has evolved in such a way that many respirators can graphically reproduce in real time the changes that occur in some variables of the respiratory cycle. Using these monitoring techniques improves knowledge of lung behavior of each patient with ARDS, thus facilitating its management. It may also improve decision-making in each individual patient, improving their prognosis.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the incidence and mortality of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in intensive care units, evaluated the limitation of life support in these patients, and determined whether daily measurement of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) is useful for decision making. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, observational study in 79 intensive care units. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Of the 7,615 patients admitted during a 2-month period we found 1,340 patients to have MODS. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We recorded mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit and the hospital and the maximum and minimum total SOFA scores during MODS. Limitation of life support in MODS patients was also evaluated. Stepwise logistic regression was used to determine the factors predicting mortality. The in-hospital mortality rate in patients with MODS was 44.6%, and some type of limitation of life support was applied in 70.6% of the patients who died. The predictive model maximizing specificity included the following variables: maximum SOFA score, minimum SOFA score, trend of the SOFA for 5 consecutive days, and age over 60 years. The model diagnostic yield was: specificity 100%, sensitivity 7.2%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 57.3%; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.807. CONCLUSIONS: This model showed that in our population with MODS those older than 60 years and with SOFA score higher than 9 for at least 5 days were unlikely to survive.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Differences between assist-control pressure and volume ventilation are minimal provided that peak inspiratory flow delivered at early inspiration matches patient demand Ventilation at constant flow and controlled tidal volume allow instantaneous analysis of the patient-ventilator interactions and the mechanical properties of the respiratory system. The cycle-per-cycle variability of peak inspiratory flow, which is permitted in pressure-limited modes, may allow better patient comfort. We do not know if one mode (pressure controlled or volume controlled) is superior to the other in terms of outcomes.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury is characterised by profound hypoxaemia due to a permeability pulmonary oedema. In this setting, recruitment manoeuvres (RMs) can be a useful tool as adjuncts to lung protective ventilatory strategies to prevent cyclic alveolar stress and avoid alveolar collapse. Many experimental and physiological studies have discussed the use of RMs but only a few heterogeneous clinical experiences have demonstrated the beneficial and deleterious effects that can occur using these manoeuvres. Besides, a lot of questions remain to be answered to find the best way to perform optimal RMs. Further experimental and clinical trials are needed to understand the potential beneficial effects of recruitment manoeuvres when using a protective mechanical ventilation strategy. This paper is a general review of experimental works that support application of recruitment manoeuvres emphasising the clinical studies that have been published to date in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has emerged as a significant advance in the management of respiratory failure. There is now a wide body of prospective randomized-controlled trial data to support its use, particularly in the management of patients with acute or respiratory failure due to exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Its successful application results in a more rapid resolution of the physiological derangements, reduces the need for intubation and, in larger studies, improves survival. A reduction in the number of infectious complications is a particular advantage. In patients with acute exacerbations of COPD there is evidence of benefit when NIV is introduced earlier in the course of the illness than would be the case for invasive ventilation and it should now be considered even with mild acidosis (pH<7.35) and tachypnoea (respiratory rate >23 breaths x min(-1)) after initial medical therapy. There is less clinical-trial data in patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure, but again as with COPD those with less severe physiological disturbance are more likely to benefit. By contrast noninvasive continuous positive airways pressure, while being widely used has not been shown to reduce the need for intubation or to improve survival in patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure, with the exception of acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. Noninvasive ventilation has been a real advance in the treatment of the critically ill. Most of the studies published to date, have excluded patients needing immediate intubation and it should be viewed as a complimentary technique rather than an alternative to invasive ventilation. It is best viewed as a means of preventing the need for endotracheal intubation and as a result should be introduced earlier than would be the case for invasive ventilation.
To investigate the mechanisms underlying improvement of arterial oxygenation during a protective ventilatory strategy (PVS) in early acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), we studied eight patients during volume-controlled mechanical ventilation, keeping respiratory rate and fraction of inspired oxygen (FI(O(2))) (0.82 +/- 0.20) unchanged: (1) at baseline (tidal volume [VT] 10 to 12 ml x kg(-1); positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] 8 to 10 cm H(2)O); (2) during PVS (PEEP 2 cm H(2)O above the low inflexion point (P(FLEX)) and VT of 5 to 7 ml x kg(-1)); and (3) post-PVS, back to baseline conditions. Inert gas measurements were done after 30 min in each ventilatory modality. During PVS, Pa(O(2)) increased significantly from 93 +/- 27 to 166 +/- 77 mm Hg (p < 0.008) and Pa(CO(2)) rose from 39 +/- 7 to 57 +/- 11 mm Hg (p < 0.0002) because of the decrease in minute ventilation (V E) (-3.6 L x min(-1)) (p < 0.005). Both heart rate (HR, +13 min(-1)) (p < 0.002) and cardiac output (Q, +1.2 L x min(-1)) (p < 0.05) increased. Static respiratory system linear compliance increased from 36 +/- 14 to 44 +/- 16 ml. cm H(2)O(-1) (p < 0.0002). PVS provoked recruitment of previously collapsed alveoli and redistribution of pulmonary blood flow from nonventilated alveoli to normal lung. Despite the increase in Q, intrapulmonary shunt fell from 39 +/- 15% to 31 +/- 11% (p < 0.04). We conclude that the decrease in intrapulmonary shunt owing to alveolar recruitment remains the pivotal mechanism to explain improvement of arterial oxygenation during this PVS.
Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) and prone position (PP) are frequently used in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We compared the gas exchange and hemodynamic effects induced by the combination of NO inhalation and PP in patients with ARDS and analyzed whether or not pulmonary (Pu) and extrapulmonary (Epu) ARDS patients behave differently. Eight Pu and seven Epu ARDS patients were studied in four situations: supine position (SP); SP with NO inhalation at 5 ppm (SP + NO); PP; and PP with NO inhalation (PP + NO). In comparison with SP, NO inhalation and PP induced significant increases in Pa(O(2))/FI(O(2)) (from 106 +/- 58 in SP to 131 +/- 69 mm Hg in SP + NO, p = 0.01, and to 184 +/- 67 mm Hg in PP, p < 0.001). Pu and Epu ARDS showed a similar improvement in Pa(O(2))/FI(O2) with PP. Only Pu ARDS patients showed a significant increase (p < 0.001) in oxygenation induced by NO inhalation from 81 +/- 45 to 100 +/- 50 mm Hg in SP, and from 146 +/- 53 to 197 +/- 98 mm Hg in PP. In conclusion, PP is associated with a marked improvement in oxygenation, irrespective of the causes of ARDS, and additive effects of NO inhalation are mainly seen in patients with Pu ARDS.
Both reduction in tidal volume (VT) and alveolar recruitment may be important to limit ventilator-associated lung injury during mechanical ventilation of patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The aim of this study was to assess the risk of alveolar derecruitment associated with VT reduction from 10 to 6 ml/kg. Whether this VT-related derecruitment could be reversed, either by a recruitment maneuver or by an increase in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level, was also investigated. Fifteen patients with ARDS were successively ventilated using conventional VT (CVT = 10 +/- 1 ml/kg) and low VT (LVT = 6 +/- 1 ml/ kg); total PEEP (PEEPtot) was individually set at the lower inflection point (Plip) of the pressure-volume curve (PEEPtot = 11 +/- 4 cm H(2)O). Pressure-volume curves were recorded from zero PEEP (ZEEP) and from PEEP, and recruited volume (Vrec) was calculated as the volume difference between the two curves for a given pressure. Despite a similar PEEPtot, Vrec was significantly lower with LVT than with CVT, indicating low VT-induced alveolar derecruitment. Reduction in VT was associated with a reduced Sa(O(2)). In 10 patients, Vrec was also measured before and after a recruitment maneuver (two sustained inflations at 45 cm H(2)O), and after an increase in PEEP (by 4 cm H(2)O). Low VT-induced derecruitment was reversed by a recruitment maneuver and by increasing PEEP. We conclude that a reduction in VT could be responsible for alveolar derecruitment, which may be transiently reversed by a reexpansion maneuver or prevented by a PEEP increase above Plip.
We identified 65 observational studies of weaning predictors that had been reported in 70 publications. After grouping predictors with similar names but different thresholds, the following predictors met our relevance criteria: heterogeneous populations, 51; COPD patients, 21; and cardiovascular ICU patients, 45. Many variables were of no use in predicting the results of weaning. Moreover, few variables had been studied in > 50 patients or had results presented to generate estimates of predictive power. For stepwise reductions in mechanical support, the most promising predictors were a rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) < 65 breaths/min/L (measured using the ventilator settings that were in effect at the time that the prediction was made) and a pressure time product < 275 cm H2O/L/s. The pooled likelihood ratios (LRs) were 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 1.28) for a respiratory rate [RR] of < 38 breaths/min and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.06 to 1.71) for an RR of > 38 breaths/min, which indicate that an RR of < 38 breaths/min leaves the probability of successful weaning virtually unchanged but that a value of > 38 breaths/min leads to a small reduction in the probability of success in weaning the level of mechanical support. For trials of unassisted breathing, the most promising weaning predictors include the following: RR; RSBI; a product of RSBI and occlusion pressure < 450 cm H2O breaths/min/L; maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) < 20 cm H2O; and a knowledge-based system for adjusting pressure support. Pooled results for the power of a positive test result for both RR and RSBI were limited (highest LR, 2.23), while the power of a negative test result was substantial (ie, LR, 0.09 to 0.23). Summary data suggest a similar predictive power for RR and RSBI. In the prediction of successful extubation, an RR of < 38 breaths/min (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 47%), an RSBI < 100 or 105 breaths/min/L (sensitivity, 65 to 96%; specificity, 0 to 73%), PImax, and APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II scores that are obtained at hospital admission appear to be the most promising. After pooling, two variables appeared to have some value. An RR of > 38 breaths/min and an RSBI of > 100 breaths/min/L appear to reduce the probability of successful extubation, and PImax < 0.3, for which the pooled LR is 2.23 (95% CI, 1.15 to 4.34), appears to marginally increase the likelihood of successful extubation. Judging by areas under the receiver operator curve for all variables, none of these variables demonstrate more than modest accuracy in predicting weaning outcome. Why do most of these tests perform so poorly? The likely explanation is that clinicians have already considered the results when they choose patients for trials of weaning.
The pathophysiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by pulmonary edema due to extravasation from capillary lesions in the endothelium. A clinical diagnosis is made when there is a predisposing cause (sepsis and pneumonia being the most common) that gives rise to acute respiratory insufficiency (PaO2/FiO2 ratio (3/4) 200 mmHg, bilateral infiltrates visible on a chest film and hemodynamic or other clinical signs of left cardiac insufficiency). Most patients require invasive support ventilation at a high FiO2 and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The only therapeutic approach available at this time associated with a highly significant decrease in mortality in patients with ARDS is ventilation at low flow volumes (6 ml/kg) and moderate levels of PEEP (approximately 10 cmH2O).
CONTEXT: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is widely used in the belief that it may reduce the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency. OBJECTIVE: To compare the physiologic effects and the clinical efficacy of CPAP vs standard oxygen therapy in patients with acute hypoxemic, nonhypercapnic respiratory insufficiency. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized, concealed, and unblinded trial of 123 consecutive adult patients who were admitted to 6 intensive care units between September 1997 and January 1999 with a PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio of 300 mm Hg or less due to bilateral pulmonary edema (n = 102 with acute lung injury and n = 21 with cardiac disease). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive oxygen therapy alone (n = 61) or oxygen therapy plus CPAP (n = 62). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement in PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio, rate of endotracheal intubation at any time during the study, adverse events, length of hospital stay, mortality, and duration of ventilatory assistance, compared between the CPAP and standard treatment groups. RESULTS: Among the CPAP vs standard therapy groups, respectively, causes of respiratory failure (pneumonia, 54% and 55%), presence of cardiac disease (33% and 35%), severity at admission, and hypoxemia (median [5th-95th percentile] PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio, 140 [59-288] mm Hg vs 148 [62-283] mm Hg; P =.43) were similarly distributed. After 1 hour of treatment, subjective responses to treatment (P<.001) and median (5th-95th percentile) PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratios were greater with CPAP (203 [45-431] mm Hg vs 151 [73-482] mm Hg; P =.02). No further difference in respiratory indices was observed between the groups. Treatment with CPAP failed to reduce the endotracheal intubation rate (21 [34%] vs 24 [39%] in the standard therapy group; P =.53), hospital mortality (19 [31%] vs 18 [30%]; P =.89), or median (5th-95th percentile) intensive care unit length of stay (6.5 [1-57] days vs 6.0 [1-36] days; P =.43). A higher number of adverse events occurred with CPAP treatment (18 vs 6; P =.01). CONCLUSION: In this study, despite early physiologic improvement, CPAP neither reduced the need for intubation nor improved outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic, nonhypercapnic respiratory insufficiency primarily due to acute lung injury. JAMA. 2000;284:2352-2360.
Most patients who are recovering from respiratory failure are successfully liberated from mechanical ventilation easily and soon after the causative disorders are corrected. Roughly one third of patients, however, are not successful on initial attempts at liberation. Clinicians should define and treat the causes of respiratory failure and use validated methods to initiate weaning and manage patients who fail initial spontaneous breathing trials.
BACKGROUND: Although the use of external positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is recommended for patients with intrinsic PEEP, no simple method exists for bedside titration. We hypothesized that the occlusion pressure, measured from airway pressure during the phase of ventilator triggering (P0.1t), could help to indicate the effects of PEEP on the work of breathing (WOB). METHODS: Twenty patients under assisted ventilation with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were studied with 0, 5, and 10 cm H2O of PEEP while ventilated with a fixed level of pressure support. RESULTS: PEEP 5 significantly reduced intrinsic PEEP (mean +/- SD, 5.2 +/- 2.4 cm H2O at PEEP 0 to 3.6 +/- 1.9 at PEEP 5; P < 0.001), WOB per min (12. 6 +/- 6.7 J/min to 9.1 +/- 5.9 J/min; P = 0.003), WOB per liter (1.2 +/- 0.4 J/l to 0.8 +/- 0.4 J/l; P < 0.001), pressure time product of the diaphragm (216 +/- 86 cm H2O. s-1. min-1 to 155 +/- 179 cm H2O. s-1. min-1; P = 0.001) and P0.1t (3.3 +/- 1.5 cm H2O to 2.3 +/- 1.4 cm H2O; P = 0.002). At PEEP 10, no further significant reduction in muscle effort nor in P0.1t (2.5 +/- 2.1 cm H2O) occurred, and transpulmonary pressure indicated an increase in end-expiratory lung volume. Significant correlations were found between WOB per min and P0.1t at the three levels of PEEP (P < 0.001), and between the changes in P0.1t versus the changes in WOB per min (P < 0.005), indicating that P0.1t and WOB changed in the same direction. A decrease in P0.1 with PEEP indicated a decrease in intrinsic PEEP with a specificity of 71% and a sensitivity of 88% and a decrease in WOB with a specificity of 86% and a sensitivity of 91%. CONCLUSION: These results show that P0.1t may help to assess the effects of PEEP in patients with intrinsic PEEP.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the evolution of plasma concentrations of leukotriene (LT) B4, LTC4, LTD4, and interleukin (IL)-8 in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and in patients at risk of ARDS and to assess the value of these mediators in predicting mortality rate from ARDS. DESIGN: A case-control study comparing ARDS patients and patients at risk of ARDS as well as survivors and nonsurvivors with ARDS. SETTING: Hospital intensive care unit, laboratory, and department of hematology. PATIENTS: Twenty-one patients with ARDS and 14 patients at risk of ARDS. INTERVENTION: Arterial blood samples were collected on days 0, 1, and 5 after admission to the intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: LTs were extracted, separated by high-pressure liquid chromatography and quantified by enzyme immunoassay. IL-8 was analyzed by ELISA. Plasma concentrations of LTB4 and LTC4 plus LTD4 were significantly higher in ARDS patients than in patients at risk of ARDS during the first 24 hrs. Concentrations of IL-8 were also higher in ARDS patients than in patients at risk throughout the study, although the differences between the two groups were only significant on day 5. Only the plasma concentration of LTB4 on day 1 was a marker of ARDS (72.2% sensitivity, 84.6% specificity). A logistic regression analysis showed that LTB4 and IL-8, on day 1, were markers of mortality rate in patients with ARDS (70.0% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: LTs are elevated during the early phases of ARDS, whereas IL-8 increases throughout the study. The evaluation of LTB4 and IL-8 may be useful prognostic indices in patients with early phase ARDS after admission to the intensive care unit.
Measuring elastic pressure-volume (Pel-V) curves of the respiratory system and the volume recruited by a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) allows one to study the pressure range over which recruitment occurs in acute lung injury (ALI), and to explain how recruitment affects the compliance. Pel-V curves were measured with the low flow inflation technique in 11 patients mechanically ventilated for ALI. Curve I was recorded during inflation from the volume attained after a prolonged expiration (6 s) at PEEP (9.0 +/- 2.2 cm H2O), and Curve II after expiration to the elastic equilibrium volume at zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP). By using the end-expiratory volume of the breaths, the curves were aligned on a common volume axis to determine the effect of a single complete expiration. In each patient, Curve II (from ZEEP) was shifted toward lower volumes than Curve I. The volume shift, probably due to derecruitment, was 205 +/- 100 ml at 15 cm H2O (p < 0.01) and 78 +/- 93 ml at 30 cm H2O (p < 0.01); thus, during inflation from ZEEP, the volume deficit was successively regained over a pressure range up to at least 30 cm H2O. At any pressure, compliance was higher on the curve from ZEEP than from PEEP, by 10.0 +/- 8.7 ml/cm H2O at 15 cm H2O (p < 0.01), and by 5.4 +/- 5.5 at 30 cm H2O (p < 0.01). It is concluded that in ALI, a single expiration to ZEEP leads to lung collapse. High compliance during insufflation from ZEEP indicates that lung recruitment happens far above the lower inflection point of the Pel-V curve.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.