Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J M Kwakman

Publications and source records attributed to J M Kwakman.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

A case of imported paracoccidioidomycosis: an awkward infection in The Netherlands.

Paracoccidioidomycosis is an important endemic mycosis in South America. In Europe the disease is very rare and only found as infections in travelers to Latin America. We report here the first case encountered in the Netherlands for which the appropriate diagnosis was not attained for several months. A Dutch 60-year-old man presented with a painful ulceration in the buccal mandibular vestibular mucosa of three months duration. While his medical history was uneventful, he had worked, until 8 years prior to his presentation, as a carpenter for 25 years in the jungles of Peru and Ecuador. An aberrant chest radiograph, CT-scan of the lungs and increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate were suggestive of sarcoidosis or a bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia. There was no improvement in the patient's symptoms despite the use of budesonide and prednisone medication, as well as tuberculosis prophylaxis with isoniazide and rifampicin, and local use of miconazole. Quite to the contrary, as an irritated, irregular hyperemic mucosa and gingiva with ulceration were noticed during this period of time. These precipitated an incisional biopsy through which a mixed inflammatory cellular infiltrate and large yeast cells were found on histopathologic examination. Based on the patient's travel history and the multiple budding yeastlike cells revealed in the biopsy tissue, the diagnosis of paracoccidioidomycosis was finally made. This was supported by the isolation of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in culture. Antimycotic oral therapy with itraconazole was started and continued for 15 months. At two and five year follow-ups, the patient was asymptomatic. In Europe, it may be expected that diseases that are endemic in other areas will be seen more frequently in countries where the diseases are not routinely encountered. It is most likely that the use of corticosteroid medication, with its inherent immunosuppressive effect, resulted in the reactivation of an infection acquired many years before in Latin America. The etiologic agent then disseminated from the initial focal point to cause the ensuing oral mucous membrane lesions. The importance of the patient's prolonged residence in Latin America was overlooked. The very long latency of endemic mycoses emphasizes the need for a meticulous history which should include not only recent trips, but also past residence in foreign countries.

Antifungal Agents↗

Five years of aftercare of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures.

The purpose of this multicentre randomized clinical trial was to analyse surgical and prosthetic aftercare and clinical implant performance of edentulous patients with implant-retained mandibular overdentures and of patients with conventional dentures, either or not after pre-prosthetic vestibuloplasty and deepening of the floor of the mouth. The evaluation period was 5 years. The implant systems evaluated were the IMZ implant system, the Brånemark implant system and the Transmandibular Implant system. The centre in Groningen had five groups (n=149) and the centre in Nijmegen had three groups (n=86). The evaluation comprised of surgical and prosthetic aftercare, together with clinical implant performance (CIP). The highest implant loss (29%) is found in the Transmandibular Implant group. All groups had prosthetic revisions and complications according to the CIP-scale. The majority of the patients in the endosseous implant groups were subject to minor complications. The CIP-score of the Transmandibular Implant group is significantly higher than the scores of the other groups, because of the high number of lost posts. In 26;1% of the patients in this group score 4 is given, which means failure of the implant system. From this study it can be concluded that the endosseous implant systems used in this study have less surgical aftercare and a better clinical implant performance than the Transmandibular Implant system and are therefore the systems of choice for the edentulous mandible.

Aftercare↗

Implant-retained mandibular overdentures: 6-year results of a multicenter clinical trial on 3 different implant systems.

PURPOSE: The goal of this multicenter prospective clinical trial was to compare clinical outcome and post-treatment care and patient satisfaction with different implant systems used for mandibular overdenture treatment during a 6-year follow-up period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 87 edentulous patients with a severely resorbed mandible (bone height, 8 to 15 mm) received treatment involving either 2 Intra Mobiele Zylinder implants (IMZ group, n = 41) (Friedrichsfeld AG, Mannheim, Germany), 2 Brånemark implants (Brå group, n = 17) (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) or a Transmandibular Implant (TMI; Krijnen Medical, Beesd, The Netherlands) (TMI group, n = 29). The evaluation involved clinical parameters, radiographs, surgical and prosthetic post-treatment care, clinical implant performance (CIP scale), and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: After 6 years, there was a significant difference in the mean plaque index:the mean plaque index of the TMI group was significantly higher than that of the IMZ and Brå groups. Other clinical parameters showed no significant differences. The implant survival rate of 97.5% was noted in the IMZ group, 97.1% in the Brå group, and 72.0% in the TMI group. The CIP scale were significantly worse for the TMI group. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the IMZ and the Brånemark implant systems have a better survival rate and clinical implant performance than the TMI system. Based on these data, these systems should be the choice for the edentulous mandible with a height between 8 and 15 mm.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗

[Needs for implant therapy in cancer patients; a retrospective study].

After cancer treatment in the head and neck area, mastication and speech are often affected. Some of the problems encountered can be solved by adequate dental rehabilitation. However, dental rehabilitation is often compromised, for various reasons. The change in anatomy due to surgery often results in lack of denture bearing mucosa. The effects of radiotherapy of the salivary glands and the mucosa result in dry oral tissues and diminished retention of removable dentures. Osseointegrated implants can help to solve these problems. Implant treatment has, so far, not been widely used in cancer patients. An analysis was made of 95 consecutive patients with a tumor in the head and neck area. The indication for treatment with osseointegrated implants was reviewed and the need for implants as experienced bij patients was evaluated. Results show that 45% did not need specific prosthetic rehabilitation, and approximately 25% of the patients could benefit from osseointegrated implants. Due to general and local contra-indications and patients' refusal, only 3% actually have been treated. For complete oral rehabilitation of this group of patients the use of osseointegrated implants should be considered at an early stage, before the initial tumor treatment.

Adult↗

Treatment of the edentulous mandible with a vestibuloplasty combined with Intramobil Zylinder implants: a 5-year follow-up.

The long-term success of endosseous implants is related to healthy peri-implant tissues. Attached keratinized mucosa does not seem important for the prevention of soft tissue complications. Prevention of muscle attachment near the implants, however, seems more decisive for maintaining a favourable peri-implant environment. We treated 150 patients from 1990-91 with two Intramobil Zylinder implants and modified vestibuloplasty, 65 of whom were randomly selected for evaluation at 1 year; 48 of the 65 were also seen at 5 years. The vestibuloplasty was done by the technique of Pichler and Trauner, to prevent muscle pull and to create a thin layer of mucosa around the implants, and endosseous osseointegrated implants were inserted. The results show an adequately depended vestibulum with no muscle pull around the implants and significantly lower pocket depth after 5 years of follow-up compared with similar studies.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

Randomized prospective clinical trial of two implant systems for overdenture treatment: a comparison of the 2-year and 5-year results using the clinical implant performance scale.

In a prospective randomized clinical trial, edentulous patients were treated with dental implants and overdentures. The results of treatment with two IMZ implants connected by a Dolderbar, and a transmandibular implant (TMI) were compared. By using the clinical implant performance scale, the clinical and radiographic data were evaluated and compared after a two-year and five-year follow up. After the five-year follow up, significantly less problems and complications were recorded in the IMZ group than in the TMI group (Wilcoxon, P=0.03). When compared to the two-year follow up, there was, however, a gradual increase of scores on the clinical implant performance scale in the IMZ group, while in the TMI group only a slight increase was recorded.

Adult↗

[Comparison of dental implant systems for mandibular overdentures].

OBJECTIVE: To compare three implant systems in patients with severely resorbed mandibles 1 year after insertion of the mandibular denture. DESIGN: A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Centers at University of Nijmegen and Groningen. METHODS: Three different implant systems were used: the transmandibular implant, the IMZ and the Brånemark system. Treatment was assigned to 88 patients according to a balanced allocation method. Evaluation included clinical and radiographic parameters. A Clinical Implant Performance scale (CIP) was constructed based on all conceivable complications of the different implant systems. RESULTS: During the healing period 1 IMZ- and 1 BRA-implant were lost. One TMI was removed after functional loading. The results of the clinical and radiographic parameters and the CIP-scale showed no significant differences between the three implant systems. CONCLUSION: Taking the one year evaluation into account the three systems used did not differ in clinical and radiographic performance.

Dental Implantation, Endosseous↗

[Overdenture prostheses on implants versus complete dentures].

OBJECTIVE: To establish the treatment outcome of implant retained overdentures (IRD) versus complete dentures (CD) in which the outcome assessment focuses on the patient's subjective evaluation ('denture-satisfaction and chewing ability'). DESIGN: A multicenter randomized clinical trial (prospective). SETTING: The department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry of the University of Nijmegen, the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the University Hospital Nijmegen and the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics of the University Hospital Groningen. METHODS: In this study 151 patients with severely resorbed mandibles participated, treatment had been assigned according to a balanced allocation method. Denture satisfaction and chewing ability were assessed using questionnaires before and 1 year after treatment. RESULTS: Before treatment all patients were dissatisfied with their mandibular denture and they could hardly chew tough or had food. One year after treatment the IRD-group was satisfied with their mandibular denture, whereas only one third of the CD-group was satisfied. With respect to the chewing ability the IRO-group scored significantly better than the CD-group (p < or = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: For patients with a severely resorbed mandible, overdentures retained by dental implants appear to provide a more satisfactory solution to their denture-related problems.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗

Bone level changes in patients with transmandibular implants.

PURPOSE: In this article, the mandibular bone height in edentulous patients previously treated with a transmandibular implant was evaluated after the dentures were modified according to the latest prosthetic protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The bone height of 36 patients was measured on three radiographs; the first at the time of insertion of the implant, the second just before using the latest prosthetic protocol, and the third 1 year later. RESULTS: A slight bone increase at the lateral posts and at the cortical screws mesial to these posts was measured. No significant bone increase was found above the lateral cortical screw. CONCLUSION: The bone increase that is found in this study was not of the extent indicated in earlier reports.

Adult↗

Improvement in oral function following tumour surgery by a combination of tongue plasty by the Steinhäuser technique and osseointegrated implants.

Oral functions such as speaking, chewing and swallowing are often reduced after ablative tumour surgery in the mouth and oropharynx. For restoration of at least a part of these functions, stable dentures and satisfactory mobility of the tongue are necessary. Dental implants can be used to achieve stable dentures. Pre-implant surgery, however, is often needed to reduce the amount of bulky tissue when myocutaneous flaps have been used for reconstruction, and to achieve adequate mobility of the tongue. A combination of tongueplasty by the Steinhäuser technique and osseointegrated implants will be described and discussed. Twelve patients have been treated by this technique between 1992 and 1995, with a mean follow up of 11.6 months. All patients reported an improved tongue mobility and ability to chew. Tongueplasty by the Steinhäuser technique with secondary epithelialization, in combination with osseointegrated implants, is a simple and effective means of improving oral function.

Deglutition↗

Osseointegrated oral implants in head and neck cancer patients.

After cancer treatment in the head and neck area, mastication and speech are often affected. Some of the problems encountered can be solved by adequate dental rehabilitation. However, dental rehabilitation is often compromised for various reasons. The change in anatomy due to surgery often results in lack of denture-bearing mucosa. The effects of radiotherapy on the salivary glands and the mucosa result in dry oral tissue and diminished retention of removable dentures. Osseointegrated oral implants can help to solve these problems. Although implant treatment for patients with cancer of the head and neck is covered by the Dutch national health insurance, and there is therefore no financial obstacle, implants have not, so far, been widely used with these patients. In order to establish the possible reasons for this, an analysis was performed. Retrospective data on 95 consecutive patients were collected from records. The indication for the use of oral osseointegrated implants was reviewed. Analysis of the data showed that 45% did not need specific prosthetic rehabilitation. An indication for the use of osseointegrated implants was found in 25% of the patients. For various reasons, only 3% actually received implants. In striving to completely rehabilitate a cancer patient, the possible use of osseointegrated oral implants should be evaluated before the initial oncological treatment begins. The insertion of implants during the initial surgical procedure should be considered more often, with a view to reducing the number of surgical procedures.

Adult↗

Transmandibular implant versus intramobile cylinder implants: a randomized, prospective clinical trial.

A randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted to compare two different implant treatment modalities for edentulous patients with severely resorbed mandibles. In one modality (the IMZ group), two intramobile cylinder implants were placed, connected by a Dolder bar and provided with an overdenture, and in the other (the TMI group), a transmandibular implant with a triple bar and cantilever extensions was placed, likewise provided with an overdenture. The conditions of the overdentures, the peri-implant tissues, and the implants were evaluated. Orthopantomograms were taken for radiologic evaluation. An overall complication scale which took account of all aspects was devised to compare the results. The follow-up period was 2-4 years, with a mean follow-up of 3 years. The condition of dentures and oral hygiene aspects were comparable for both groups. The complication rate in the TMI group was significantly higher than that in the IMZ group. The scores on the complication scale resulted in a significant difference between the TMI and the IMZ groups (Wilcoxon, P = 0.0044).

Alveolar Bone Loss↗