Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J M Geiderman

Publications and source records attributed to J M Geiderman.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1979

Prophylactic lidocaine in suspected acute myocardial infarction.

The incidence of serious ventricular arrhythmias following acute myocardial infarction is highest during the first few hours after injury, and thereafter declines. Several investigations into the prophylactic use of lidocaine to prevent the development of arrhythmias have shown that lidocaine, given in therapeutic doses, is effective in preventing ventricular fibrillation and in reducing early mortality. Lidocaine was found to be effective when given either by the intravenous or by the intramuscular routes. The recommended dosage is 100 mg given as an intravenous bolus followed by 2 to 4 mg/min as an infusion, which should be given by infusion pump. Another recommendation is to use two 100 mg boluses 20 minutes apart, along with the same infusion. We recommend that lidocaine be started as soon as possible in all patients suspected of having suffered acute myocardial infarction.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
PubMed1979

The Frenchman's fibular fracture (Maisonneuve fracture).

Two patients with injuries to the ankle sustained by rotational trauma complained only of pain in the ankle. Careful examination revealed tenderness over the proximal fibula. Subsequent radiographic studies revealed high helical fracture of the fibula, as originally described by Maisonneuve. The Maisonneuve fracture is produced by diastasis - a separation of bones resulting from rupture of ligaments around the ankle. According to classification of fibula injuries by mechanism of injury, the Maisonneuve fracture is due to external rotation of the foot relative to the tibia but it is not clear whether the foot is in pronation or supination or moves during injury.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Diversion of ALS ambulances: characteristics, causes, and effects in a large urban system.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the reasons for and effects of diversions of advanced life support (ALS) ambulances in a large urban area with a high concentration of receiving hospitals. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in a large urban region during a consecutive three-month period. Diversion was defined as the ALS transport of a patient to an emergency department (ED) other than the designated primary receiving facility. Case-matched concurrent cohorts of patients who were and were not diverted were studied to establish emergency medical services (EMS) time intervals, including total prehospital interval (TPI), on-scene interval (OSI), and patient transfer interval (PTI); age; gender; Glasgow Coma Score (GCS); ALS interventions; and insurance status. The reasons for diversion and the chief complaints of diverted patients were also studied. RESULTS: During the study period, 2,534 ALS runs occurred, of which 147 (5.8%) were diverted. Twenty-four (16.3%) diversions had incomplete run times, leaving 123 (83.7%) for analysis. The most common chief complaints of diverted patients were shortness of breath (SOB), chest pain (CP), and altered mental status (AMS). The most common reason for diversion was special consideration (SC), defined as a diversion requested by a patient, family member, law enforcement officer, or private medical doctor. Diverted ambulances had significant increases in TPI, 36.4 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 35.1-37.7] vs. 33.4 [95% CI 32.13-34.7], and PTI, 10.3 [95% CI 9.4-11.2] vs. 7.9 [95% CI 7.2-8.6], compared with nondiverted ambulances. Further analysis demonstrated that SC diversions accounted for all of the increases in TPI (p<0.001) and PTI (p<0.001) when compared with other types of diversions and nondiverted transports. CONCLUSION: "Special consideration" was the most common reason for diversion in this study. Special consideration diversions increased TPI and PTI, causing delays in arrival to the ED and decreased ALS ambulance availability.

Adult↗