Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J M Church

Publications and source records attributed to J M Church.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Chances of cure are not compromised with sphincter-saving procedures for cancer of the lower third of the rectum.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare patterns of recurrence and long-term outcome after sphincter-saving procedures (SSPs) and abdominoperineal resection (APR) in patients with tumors located in the lower third of the rectum. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 1001 patients operated on for primary rectal adenocarcinoma between 1980 and 1991. All patients with tumors located between 5 and 7 cm from the anal verge and treated with curative intent were included. RESULTS: Of the 261 patients who met our criteria, 162 had undergone SSP and 99 had undergone APR. The local recurrence rates for SSP and APR were 8% and 11%, respectively (p = 0.41), and the distant metastases rates were 23% and 28%, respectively (p = 0.35). Recurrence and distant metastases rates for SSP and APR, respectively, did not differ by TNM classification: state I, 10% versus 9% (p = 0.9); stage II, 25% versus 43% (p = 0.13); and stage III, 56% versus 57% (p = 0.92). Five-year disease-free survival rates for SSP and APR patients were 70.5% and 62.3%, respectively (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Tumors in the lower third of the rectum can be treated with sphincter-saving procedures without compromising the chance of cure.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvement in surgical techniques and stapling devices during the last 10 years, colorectal anastomoses are still prone to leakage. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance and safety of stapled anastomoses in rectal surgery and to identify factors that influence the occurrence of anastomotic leaks. STUDY DESIGN: A review was undertaken of 1,014 patients who underwent stapled anastomoses to the rectum or anal canal for colorectal cancer or benign disease between 1989 and 1995 in a tertiary care institution. Indications for operations, comorbidities at admission, preoperative bowel preparation, stapler size, intraoperative events, associated surgical procedures, and clinical outcomes were tested for any association with anastomotic leak. RESULTS: A double stapled technique was used in 154 patients and a conventional single stapler technique was used in 860. Postoperative mortality was 1.6%, and the overall morbidity was 18.4%. Clinically apparent anastomotic leak developed in 29 patients (2.9%). Anastomotic dehiscence occurred in 22 of 284 patients (7.7%) after low stapling (within 7 cm from the anal verge) and in 7 of 730 patients (1%) after high stapling (p < 0.001). Diabetes mellitus, use of pelvic drainage, and duration of surgery were significantly related to the occurrence of anastomotic leak by the univariate analysis. Multivariate regression analysis identified an anastomotic distance from the anal verge within 7 cm as the only variable related to the occurrence of postoperative leak (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Low anastomoses were associated with a leak rate greater than with high colorectal anastomoses. We conclude that anastomoses to the rectum using the circular stapler can be done with low mortality and morbidity.

Adolescent↗

The risk of cancer and dysplasia among ulcerative colitis patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) may have an increased risk for colonic dysplasia or cancer. They also may have higher levels of carcinogenic secondary bile acids and, thus, be more likely to develop cancer in the right side of the colon, where secondary bile acid concentrations are highest. METHODS: Since 1983, 1212 UC patients have undergone total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis at the Cleveland Clinic. All 27 patients with PSC were compared with the remaining 1185 patients in a historical cohort study. RESULTS: Dysplasia detected during cancer surveillance was the indication for surgery in 16 (59.5%) PSC patients and 136 (11.5%) controls [adjusted relative risk (RR), 6.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.0-16.0]. Dysplasia or cancer was found in the resected specimen in 18 (66.7%) PSC patients and 145 (12.2%) controls (RR 10.4, CI 4.1-26.1). Right-sided cancers (proximal to the splenic flexure) were found in all four PSC patients with cancer and in 20 of 49 controls with cancer (RR 2.5, CI 1.3-5.4). CONCLUSIONS: UC patients with PSC are at a significantly increased risk for dysplasia or cancer. The high proportion of right-sided cancers supports the contention that secondary bile acids are carcinogenic and increase the likelihood of cancer in the proximal colon.

Adolescent↗

Results after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and coexisting colorectal cancer.

Although the operation of choice for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), its place in the management of patients with FAP and cancer has not been defined. The authors have reviewed their experience with these patients to determine the safety of IPAA and its efficacy as a cancer operation. The records of 55 patients with FAP who had undergone IPAA were examined. Follow-up studies included an annual questionnaire and physical examination. Eight patients had FAP with coexisting colorectal cancer. Median age at diagnosis was 25 (range 13-46) years, and at operation 33 (range 22-36) years. Of the eight patients (four men), four had colonic cancer and four had rectal cancer. Synchronous colorectal carcinoma was found in two patients. Staging according to the tumor node metastasis classification showed that five patients had stage 1 tumour, two had stage 2 and one had stage 3. Tumours were well, moderately or poorly differentiated in one, five and two patients respectively. During a median follow-up of 56 (range 14-98) months, metastasis developed in the liver of one patient 66 months after surgery. Two patients suffered complications: one had small bowel obstruction and the other mucosal prolapse. Tubular adenomas were found in the pouch of two patients and in the anal transitional zone of one. Pouch function is good to excellent in all surviving patients. Restorative proctocolectomy for patients with FAP and coexisting colorectal cancer can be undertaken with a favourable prognosis and function. It is compatible with curative intent.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

Quality of life after prophylactic colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic colectomy or proctocolectomy is standard treatment for colorectal manifestation of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), a dominantly inherited disorder for which the risk of developing colorectal cancer in an untreated patient is close to 100 percent. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is also dominantly inherited but has a lower risk of colorectal cancer than FAP and does not have a clinically obvious phenotype. The role of prophylactic colectomy in patients with HNPCC is controversial. PURPOSE: This study was performed to examine the outcome of colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) so its use as a prophylactic procedure can be better evaluated. METHODS: Records of all patients undergoing IRA for FAP between 1985 and 1993 were reviewed. Demographic data and data about the operation were collected. Surgical outcome data included length of hospital stay, complications, bowel function, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: There were 51 patients with a median age of 28 years; 24 were male. All but eight patients were asymptomatic, and all had less than 1,000 polyps in the resected specimen. Mean surgery time was 3.5 hours, mean blood loss was 406 ml, and median length of hospital stay was seven days. There were no deaths, and eight patients (16 percent) had complications. Mean number of stools per day after median follow-up of 4.2 years was 3.6. Only 11 patients had nighttime stooling. Four patients reported seepage, 9 had some incontinence, and 16 had urgency. Quality of life, rated on a scale of 0 to 10, was 7 or above in 44 of 48 assessed patients. Quality of health was rated 7 or higher in all 48 patients, energy level was 7 or higher in 39 patients, and overall happiness with surgery was 7 or higher in 47 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Colectomy and IRA is a relatively safe operation that results in minimum disturbance of bowel function. Patient satisfaction is usually high. Prophylactic colectomy can be offered to HNPCC gene carriers with a greater understanding of the likely outcome of surgery.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

Effect of systemic steroids on ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term steroid therapy predisposes to postsurgical complications, especially in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine incidence of early septic complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients who are undergoing prolonged steroid therapy. METHODS: We reviewed charts of 692 patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA to treat ulcerative colitis. Incidence of early (within 30 days) septic complications and sepsis-related reoperations, in patients who were having high-dose (>20 mg of prednisone per day) and low-dose steroid therapy (<20 mg of prednisone per day) for more than one month before surgery, was compared with patients who were not receiving steroid therapy. Follow-up included an annual questionnaire and physical examination. RESULTS: Patients without steroid dose data recorded were excluded (n = 21). Of the 671 remaining patients, 310 received no steroids, 169 received low-dose steroids, and 192 received high-dose steroids. These three groups were similar in gender composition, age at surgery, types of anastomosis (stapled or handsewn), and incidence of diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and obesity. Early septic complications were found in 18 (6 percent), 14 (8 percent), and 12 (6 percent) patients without steroid therapy, those having low-dose steroid therapy, and those having high-dose steroid therapy (P = 0.57), respectively. Sepsis- related reoperation rate (P = 0.73) and number of sepsis-related pouch excisions (P = 0.79) did not differ between groups. In patients undergoing IPAA without ileostomy, early septic complications were found in one (3.8 percent), two (20 percent), and five (50 percent) patients without steroid treatment, low-dose steroid therapy, and high-dose steroid therapy (P = 0.004), respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients who are undergoing IPAA with diversion for ulcerative colitis, prolonged systemic steroid therapy before surgery is not associated with increased septic complications.

Adolescent↗

Pouch polyposis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis: report of a case.

PURPOSE: A case of a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is reported, in whom adenomas developed in an ileal pelvic pouch six years after it was made. This case is reported to serve as a warning that restorative proctocolectomy, a relatively recent addition to surgical options for FAP, does not remove the risk of metachronous intestinal neoplasia; it merely defers it. METHODS: Case of a patient with pouch polyposis was reviewed, and patient was prospectively studied after three months of sulindac therapy. RESULTS: Polyps not removed at first examination became much less prominent. Literature review reveals only one study of adenomas in pelvic pouches, with 7 cases of 38. CONCLUSION: Proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis does not cure FAP, and multiple polyps can occur in the ileal pouch.

Adenoma↗

Stapled ileal pouch anal anastomoses are safer than handsewn anastomoses in patients with ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: One of the theoretic advantages of using a stapled versus handsewn ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) in restorative proctocolectomy is a reduction in septic complications. We performed this study to compare the incidence of early septic complications in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with stapled or handsewn IPAA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A chart review of 692 patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy for treatment of ulcerative colitis was performed. The incidence of early septic complications in patients having stapled IPAA was compared to that in patients having handsewn IPAA. Follow-up studies included an annual questionnaire and physical examination. RESULTS: Of the 692 patients, 238 had handsewn IPAA and 454 had stapled IPAA; these two groups were similar in sex, duration of disease, age at surgery, and type of surgical procedure performed. In the handsewn IPAA group, 25 patients (10.5%) had 32 septic complications, and 24 required 89 reparations. In 7 patients, the pouch was excised. In the stapled IPAA group, 21 patients (4.6%) had 23 septic complications, and 14 required 40 reparations. One patient needed pouch excision. There were more patients (P=0.0001) with early septic complications, and more (P<0.0001) pouch excisions because of these complications, in patients with handsewn IPAA than in patients with stapled IPAA. The sepsis-related reoperation rates did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The stapled technique for IPAA has fewer septic complications and results in fewer sepsis-related pouch excisions, in our hands, than the handsewn technique technique, for treating patients with ulcerative colitis.

Adolescent↗

Preliminary experience with laparoscopic intestinal surgery for Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic techniques are being applied to the surgical management of various intestinal conditions, but few reports describe their use with Crohn's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 31 selected patients with Crohn's disease underwent laparoscopic intestinal surgery: 18 women and 13 men, with a median age of 39 years (range 22 to 79). Indications for operation included: primary terminal ileitis (13); recurrent ileitis (2); Crohn's colitis (3); rectovaginal fistula (6); and severe perianal disease (7). Resections were laparoscopically assisted with division of mesentery and anastomosis performed extracorporeally. Diversion procedures were performed using a two-cannula technique. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 31 procedures were completed laparoscopically: loop ileostomy or colostomy (12); ileocecectomy (10); segmental colon resection (2); and total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (1). Six cases were converted to conventional surgery secondary to extensive adhesions from prior surgery (2) or severe inflammation (4). No case was converted because of intraoperative complication. Median operative time for diversion procedures was 53 minutes (range 20 to 90) and for resections 195 minutes (range 90 to 380). Median blood loss was 100 mL (range 10 to 500), and there were no intraoperative complications. Only 1 postoperative complication occurred: a myocardial infarction. Median times to passage of flatus and bowel movement were both 3 days (range 1 to 6). Median time to discharge was 6 days (2 to 21) for diversion patients, and 6 days (3 to 7) for resected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic intestinal surgery, both for resection and diversion, is feasible and safe for the management of selected patients with Crohn's disease. To determine if real advantages exist for laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of Crohn's disease, further study is needed.

Adult↗

How safe is strictureplasty in the management of Crohn's disease?

BACKGROUND: Strictureplasty is a well-accepted technique in the management of selected patients with Crohn's disease. To determine the safety and optimal clinical setting for performing strictureplasty, perioperative complications and long-term outcomes need to be analyzed. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 162 patients (87 men, 75 women) with Crohn's disease who underwent strictureplasty between June 1984 and July 1994. Medical and surgical history, including medications and laboratory data, intraoperative findings, perioperative complications, and long-term follow-up data were recorded. RESULTS: These patients underwent 698 strictureplasties (Heineke-Mikulicz procedures, 617; Finney procedures, 81). Median hospital stay was 8 days. Perioperative septic complications were noted in 8 patients (5%); however, reoperation for sepsis was needed only in 5 patients. Five percent of patients developed prolonged ileus after strictureplasty. Symptomatic improvement after strictureplasty was achieved in 98% of patients. Restricture or new stricture or perforative disease was seen in 5% and 17% of patients, respectively, during a 42-month median follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that strictureplasty is a good surgical option for stenosing small-bowel Crohn's disease, particularly in patients with multiple obstruction and in those vulnerable to short-bowel syndrome. Perioperative complications are few, and long-term results are gratifying.

Crohn Disease↗

Prophylactic colectomy in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Prophylactic colectomy is indicated in patients whose colons are at very high risk of developing cancer. Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is the best example of a situation where prophylactic surgery is clearly necessary to prevent cancer, and has been shown to be effective in doing so. Recent advances in the molecular genetics of colorectal cancer have allowed presymptomatic diagnosis of patients with another dominantly inherited syndrome, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Prior to this, prophylactic colectomy had not been a consideration for patients in HNPCC families. A review of the outcome of colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in FAP patients shows that although it is a major abdominal surgery there is a relatively low complication rate and the functional outcome is acceptable for a prophylactic procedure. The decision to apply colectomy to HNPCC patients depends on careful consideration of factors such as comorbidity, age, sphincter function, likely compliance with future surveillance and likely efficiency of colonoscopy as a cancer prevention strategy. In general, prophylactic colectomy is indicated in HNPCC gene carriers, because their lifetime risk for colorectal cancer is 80%.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

Surgery for the teenager with familial adenomatous polyposis: ileo-rectal anastomosis or restorative proctocolectomy?

Increasing numbers of polyposis registries have led to more young patients being diagnosed with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). To provide guidelines for selecting the appropriate surgical procedure in teenagers (10-19 years), we compared the results of colectomy and ileo-rectal anastomosis (IRA, n = 17 patients) to the results of restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA, n = 7 patients). Charts were reviewed to obtain data on the operative technique, blood loss and transfusions, hospital stay (including the time for ileostomy closure), and early (within 30 days of surgery) and late complications. Functional results (bowel movements per 24 h, use of antidiarrheal drugs, seepage, and fecal incontinence) and quality of life were evaluated prospectively with a questionnaire and physical examination. The median follow-up time was 49 months (range, 6 to 95 months) after IRA, and 36 months after IPAA (range, 4 to 87 months). Although restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA, is a longer (5.75 vs 3.1 hours), more bloody (500 vs 300 mL blood loss), and more complex operation with a longer hospital stay (12 vs 7 days) than IRA (P = 0.008, P = 0.006, P = 0.02, respectively), no significant difference (P > 0.05) was found between groups concerning the complication rate or quality of life. For teenagers with FAP and rectal carpeting, large rectal adenomas, curable cancer in the upper two-thirds of the rectum, or who are unavailable for follow-up, we recommend a restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA. For the other patients, the decision whether to perform IRA or restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA depends on the patient's desire and the surgeon's skill.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

Safety of urgent restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for fulminant colitis.

PURPOSE: Subtotal colectomy with ileostomy is the operation of choice for patients with fulminant colitis. Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is preferred for patients who undergo elective surgery for ulcerative colitis. We retrospectively evaluated the safety of RPC with IPAA in patients with a moderate form of fulminant colitis. METHODS: A chart review of 737 patients who underwent RPC with IPAA for ulcerative and indeterminate colitis from 1983 through 1992 was performed. Moderate fulminant colitis was defined as acute disease requiring hospitalization and parenteral steroid therapy, but without hypotension (systolic blood pressure, < 100 mmHg), tachycardia (> 120 beats/min), or megacolon. RESULTS: Twelve patients with moderate fulminant colitis underwent urgent surgery (1.6 percent). They had been treated preoperatively for 5.1 +/- 2.3 days with intravenous high-dose steroids, total parenteral nutrition, and antibiotics. These patients had a shorter length of disease (P = 0.01), lower hemoglobin, hematocrit, and albumin (P = 0.001), and higher temperature (P = 0.002) and leukocyte count (P = 0.007) than patients undergoing elective surgery. No early septic complications occurred, although perianal abscess occurred in one patient and pouch-anal fistula in another patient, 13 and 14 months after surgery, respectively. CONCLUSION: In carefully selected, hemodynamically stable patients with fulminant colitis and without megacolon, RPC with IPAA can be safely performed.

Acute Disease↗

Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy: indications, surgical technique, and results.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy, originally performed for malignancy of the pancreas and duodenum, is also commonly used for potentially malignant lesions. Because a normal pancreas should be spared, we investigated the concept of duodenectomy alone with the pancreas intact for diseases such as familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome. METHODS: Five patients underwent pancreas-sparing duodenectomy for nonmalignant lesions performed by means of meticulous detachment of the duodenum from the pancreas, transecting the bile and pancreatic ducts outside the duodenum. Reconstruction was accomplished by advancing the jejunum to anastomose end-to-end with the juxtapyloric duodenal cuff, implanting the bile and pancreatic ducts in a location corresponding to the native papilla. The hospital course, complications, and long-term follow-up status of all patients are reviewed in detail. RESULTS: No deaths occurred in this series. Delayed gastric emptying was seen in one patient and transient pancreatic fistula in another. Long-term endoscopic follow-up showed no stenosis of the ductal anastomoses. Endoscopic surveillance, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, was not hampered by this technique of reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy is a practical operation for nonmalignant duodenal lesions where the pancreas is not involved by the disease process.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients.

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become an established surgery for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. PURPOSE: The authors report the results of an 11-year experience of restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA at a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Chart review was performed for 1005 patients undergoing IPAA from 1983 through 1993. Preoperative histopathologic diagnoses were ulcerative colitis (n = 858), familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 62), indeterminate colitis (n = 75), and miscellaneous (n = 10). Information was obtained regarding patient demographics, type and duration of diseases, previous operations, and indications for surgery. Data were collected on surgical procedure and postoperative pathologic diagnosis. Early (within 30 days after surgery) and late complications were noted. Follow-up included an annual function and quality-of-life questionnaire, physical examination, and biopsies of the pouch and anal transitional zone. RESULTS: Of the 1005 patients (455 women), postoperative histopathologic diagnoses were as follows: ulcerative colitis (n = 812), familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 62), indeterminate colitis (n = 54), Crohn's disease (n = 67), and miscellaneous (n = 10). During a mean follow-up time of 35 months (range 1-125 months), histopathologic diagnoses were changed for 25 patients. The overall mortality rate was 1% (n = 10 patients, early = 4, late = 6); one death (0.1%) was related to pouch necrosis and sepsis. The overall morbidity rate was 62.7% (1218 complications in 630 patients; early, n = 27.5%; late, n = 50.5%). Septic complication and reoperation rates were 6.8% and 24%, respectively. The ileal pouch was removed in 34 patients (3.4%), and it is nonfunctional in 11 (1%). Functional results and quality of life were good to excellent in 93% of the patients with complete data (n = 645) and are similar for patients with ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, indeterminate colitis, and Crohn's disease. Patients who underwent operations from 1983 through 1988 have similar functional results and quality of life compared with patients who underwent operations after 1988. CONCLUSION: Restorative proctocolectomy with an IPAA is a safe procedure, with low mortality and major morbidity rates. Although total morbidity rate is appreciable, functional results generally are good and patient satisfaction is high.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

The ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in challenging patients: stretching the limits.

Total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the best option in the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis, and for some patients with familial polyposis. Contraindications to the procedure include old age, obesity, weak sphincters, perianal sepsis and previous enterectomy. In this study the results of IPAA in five patients with one or more of these contraindications are presented and ways of dealing with them are discussed. All patients had a favourable outcome showing that such contraindications are relative, and IPAA may be attempted as long as patients are fully informed and understand the risks to which they are subject.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

Elevated levels of 2',5'-linked oligoadenylate-dependent ribonuclease L occur as an early event in colorectal tumorigenesis.

RNA decay in IFN-treated cells is controlled by 2'5'-linked oligoadenylate (2-5A)-dependent RNase (RNase L), a uniquely regulated endoribonuclease that requires short 5'-phosphorylated, 2-5A for its activity. Because RNase L is also implicated in the regulation of cell proliferation, we monitored its expression in colorectal adenocarcinomas and noncancerous polyps from familial adenomatous polyposis patients. Elevated levels of RNase L mRNA and activity were found in 17 of 20 tumors compared with corresponding normal mucosa. An mAb against RNase L revealed elevated amounts of this RNase in sections of the tumors, largely in the base of the villi. The occurrence of elevated levels of RNase L seems to be an early event in colorectal tumorigenesis, suggesting that control of RNA turnover is an important step in tumor progression. These data also indicate that regulating RNase L activity may be a useful strategy in treating colorectal carcinomas.

Adenocarcinoma↗