Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

J Lake

Publications and source records attributed to J Lake.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Hepatitis B virus and apparent fulminant non-A, non-B hepatitis.

While there is evidence that hepatitis C virus (HCV) does not cause fulminant non-A, non-B hepatitis, the causal agent remains unknown. To evaluate the role of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in this disease, we used a two-step polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify the surface and core regions of HBV DNA in serum and liver samples taken prospectively from twenty-six patients (mean age 36 years, range 1 to 64) with acute hepatic failure undergoing liver transplantation. HBV DNA was absent from the serum of all patients before transplantation. Seventeen patients were diagnosed as having non-A, non-B hepatitis because they lacked serological evidence of hepatitis A virus or HBV infection. Liver samples were taken from twelve of these patients, and six samples were positive for HBV DNA. By contrast HBV DNA was not detected in liver from three patients with acute liver failure caused by hepatitis A or toxins. HCV RNA was not found in pretransplant samples by PCR. Four of the six patients with detectable HBV DNA in liver and presumptive non-A, non-B hepatitis had detectable HBV DNA in serum after transplantation. One additional patient who did not donate pretransplant liver had HBV DNA in a post-transplant serum sample. Thus, HBV DNA was present before or after transplantation in seven of seventeen patients with apparent non-A, non-B hepatitis. Three of five patients with detectable post-transplant serum HBV DNA were serologically positive for HBV surface antigen. These findings indicate that HBV may be a common cause of fulminant hepatic failure in patients lacking serological evidence of HBV infection.

Acute Disease

Hepatitis C viral infection in liver transplant recipients.

In this study we examined multiple serial liver biopsy specimens from liver transplant recipients to determine the pathological features of hepatitis C virus-induced hepatitis. Hepatitis C virus infections acquired after transplantation and previous infections that recurred in patients after transplantation were confirmed by the results of the polymerase chain reaction. Of 43 patients infected with the hepatitis C virus, 18 had a mild form of chronic hepatitis. Four patients had hepatitis that progressed to focal bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis. There were no significant clinical or pathological differences between infections acquired after transplantation and recurrent infections (as determined by polymerase chain reaction) except that acquired infections more often developed into hepatitis. Findings indicative of hepatitis C infection included portal and parenchymal mononuclear infiltrates of varying degrees, acidophilic necrosis and swollen hepatocytes. Other common findings included lymphoid aggregates, bile duct damage and fatty change. Atypical pathological conditions included extensive hepatocyte swelling or acidophilic necrosis with minimal inflammation mimicking ischemia and ductal or ductular damage and proliferation with mixed portal infiltrates mimicking rejection or obstruction. We conclude that in transplant recipients infection by the hepatitis C virus usually produces a mild disease state, but the diagnosis of hepatitis can be difficult to make because indicators of hepatitis may mimic those of rejection, ischemia, obstruction or other hepatic infections. Serial biopsy specimens with persistent pathology and polymerase chain reaction may be necessary to define the presence of a hepatitis C virus lesion.

Bile Ducts

Incidence and diagnostic features of macroregenerative nodules vs. small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers.

In Japan, the presence of a large regenerative nodule within a cirrhotic liver, referred to as a macroregenerative nodule or adenomatous hyperplasia, is thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. These lesions, however, have received little attention outside of Japan. We examined 110 sequentially explanted cirrhotic livers for the presence of such nodules. By gross examination, 19 livers (17.3%) had 40 nodules (10 livers had more than one nodule) between 0.8 and 3.5 cm in diameter. By histological examination, 28 of these were macroregenerative nodules and 12 were hepatocellular carcinomas. Three of these hepatocellular carcinomas, however, appeared to have arisen in association with a macroregenerative nodule. We found that the architectural features of thickened cell plates, formation of trabeculae and loss of reticulin were usually very helpful in differentiating benign macroregenerative nodules from hepatocellular carcinoma. The incidence of macroregenerative nodules in our series was similar to that seen in the Japanese studies, and although we feel that they may play a role in the pathogenesis of carcinoma, we do not believe their presence is necessary for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Adenoma

Intragraft cytokine profile during human liver allograft rejection.

Forty-three human liver allograft biopsies and normal liver were directly analyzed for inflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokine gene expression by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). IL-5 gene expression was predominantly present in biopsies from liver allografts with histopathological evidence of acute rejection. IL-2 gene expression was rarely observed in rejecting allografts or allografts without evidence of rejection. In contrast, IL-4 message was readily detectable in the majority of liver allografts regardless of clinical status. The inflammatory mediators IL-1 beta, TNF-alpha, and IL-6 were detected with similar frequency in rejecting allografts and allografts without evidence of rejection. These findings suggest that inflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokines are produced within the allograft. Moreover, IL-5 may play a role in the local mechanisms of liver allograft rejection.

Base Sequence

Hepatitis C in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) among patients undergoing liver transplantation and the relation between anti-HCV and post-transplant hepatitis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PATIENTS: Serum samples from 128 patients who underwent liver transplantation. Sixty-six patients who had 6 months of follow-up and for whom both pretransplant and post-transplant serum samples were available were included in a study to asses the relation between anti-HCV and post-transplant hepatitis. MEASUREMENTS: Sera were tested for anti-HCV using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and, if positive, two confirmatory tests were done. Patients had a biopsy every week until two specimens showed no abnormal findings. MAIN RESULTS: Only patients with chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis (15 of 30; 50%), alcoholic cirrhosis (7 of 19; 37%), and chronic hepatitis B infection (3 of 11; 27%) were anti-HCV positive. No patient with another form of chronic liver disease or with acute liver failure due to non-A, non-B hepatitis was anti-HCV positive. After transplantation, loss of anti-HCV was frequent and acquisition rare. Hepatitis developed in the graft in 17% of patients, but the incidence was similar among anti-HCV negative and anti-HCV-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis C virus is a common cause of chronic liver disease in patients requiring liver transplantation, but anti-HCV is rarely found in patients with acute liver failure. Previous HCV infection, based on detection of anti-HCV, is not an independent risk factor for post-transplant hepatitis.

Cohort Studies

Azathioprine hepatotoxicity after liver transplantation.

We report the first two cases of apparent azathioprine hepatotoxicity occurring after liver transplantation. The two patients exhibited jaundice, elevated serum transaminase activities and histopathological features of sinusoidal congestion and centrilobular hepatocellular degeneration 17 and 61 days after transplantation. After withdrawal of azathioprine, liver test results improved immediately in both patients. Recurrence of liver injury after another challenge with azathioprine was seen in the first case. Previously, fatal venoocclusive disease occurring after kidney transplantation had been attributed to azathioprine. Irreversible venoocclusive disease and the reversible hepatotoxicity described in this report (i.e., sinusoidal congestion with centrizonal necrosis) most likely represent different stages of hepatic endotheliitis caused by azathioprine. Thus early diagnosis of azathioprine hepatotoxicity is of great importance.

Adult

Hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients.

HCV infection is commonly found in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing liver transplantation. However, the presence of antibody to HCV does not appear to be associated with the development of hepatitis posttransplant. No other risk factors were identified that appear to predispose patients to development of hepatitis in the posttransplant period, including amount of blood product exposure. The role of immunosuppression in the acquisition and expression of liver disease caused by HCV remains to be determined.

Hepacivirus

Graft vs. host disease after liver transplantation in humans: a report of four cases.

Four cases of patients in whom graft vs. host disease developed after liver transplantation are described. The clinical course of each patient was similar with fever, pancytopenia, diarrhea and a skin rash developing 1 or 2 mo after liver transplantation. The clinical diagnosis was made from skin or colon biopsy specimens. Liver dysfunction did not occur in the patients at the time of diagnosis. Extrahepatic donor DNA was identified in the three patients it was tested for. Three patients died from the complications of the disease primarily related to sepsis. The other patient recovered from the graft vs. host disease but died from lymphoproliferative disease.

Adult

Patient and spouse responses to education early after myocardial infarction.

The impact of a post myocardial infarction education programme was assessed by comparing the increase in knowledge of patients and spouses about CHD in two hospitals, one (A) with and the other (B) without such a programme. Subjects completed the same two questionnaires twice, once within 4 days of admission and again within 16 days of leaving hospital. Q1 contained 83 questions about CHD and Q2, consisted of seven questions of immediate practical relevance to their convalescence. When the two hospitals were compared the only significant changes were observed in the responses of spouses and patients from hospital A. Spouses in A increased their scores on Q1 by a mean of 7.13% (p 0.001) in contrast to a fall of 2.01% in B. The mean increase in scores on Q2 for patients in A was 19.3% (p 0.001). It is concluded that an education programme increases the knowledge of patients and spouses but that their learning ability differs. Whilst it is suggested that spouses are included in patient education it appears likely that their educational needs may differ from those of the patient.

Adult

Who me? A writer?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Christianity