Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J La Puma

Publications and source records attributed to J La Puma.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Community hospital ethics consultation: evaluation and comparison with a university hospital service.

BACKGROUND: Ethics consultants may improve patient care by responding to physician requests for assistance with problems they identify as ethical issues. OBJECTIVE: To examine three aspects of ethics consultation: the clinical questions asked; the helpfulness of the consultation to requesting physicians; and the differences between consultations performed at a community teaching hospital and those performed at a university hospital. SETTINGS: A community teaching hospital and a university teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Physicians who formally requested ethics consultations in both hospitals and the patients for whom they requested them. METHODS: Over 2 years (January 1, 1988, to December 31, 1989), we prospectively evaluated a newly established clinical ethics consultation service in a community teaching hospital using confidentially completed, pretested, structured questionnaires, and compared our data with previously reported university hospital data. RESULTS: During the 2-year study, 104 consultation requests were received from 68 physicians in eight departments. Requesters most often requested consultation about deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment (74%), resolving disagreements (46%), and assessing patient competence (30%). Requesters found the consultation "very helpful" or "helpful" in one or more aspects of patient care in 86% of cases, or in one or more aspects of physician education in 86% of cases. These data are similar to university hospital data.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Medical staff privileges for ethics consultants: an institutional model.

On January 1, 1991, the Joint Commission required hospitals to be equipped for resolving moral dilemmas that arise in the care of a patient. Regulation of those professing expertise in clinical ethics is new and untested yet must be evaluated and further developed to protect patients from practitioners who lack expertise in clinical ethics but may promote themselves as qualified. The authors report the development of standard criteria for clinical ethics consultation privileges as one model to protect patients. An institutional medical staff model utilizing approved credentialing mechanisms is a generous umbrella under which patients may be protected, qualified clinical ethicists may practice, and continuous quality improvement may be sought.

Credentialing↗
PubMed1991

Access to care.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

When physicians treat members of their own families. Practices in a community hospital.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the circumstances under which physicians care for family members. We sought to examine current practice and, in particular, to learn how often family members request medical care or treatment, whether physicians accede to such requests, and what concerns, if any, physicians have about caring for their family members. METHODS: In late 1990 we distributed a pretested, structured questionnaire to all members of the active medical staff (physicians with M.D. or D.O. degrees) of a large suburban community teaching hospital. Of 691 eligible members of the medical staff, 465 physicians responded. RESULTS: Of the 465 respondents, 461 (99 percent) reported requests from family members for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. A total of 386 (83 percent of the respondents) had prescribed medication for a family member, 372 (80 percent) had diagnosed medical illnesses, 334 (72 percent) had performed physical examinations, 68 (15 percent) had acted as a family member's primary attending physician in the hospital, and 44 (9 percent) had operated on a family member. In addition, 152 (33 percent) reported that they had observed another physician "inappropriately involved" in a family member's care, and 103 (22 percent) had acceded to a specific request about which they felt uncomfortable. CONCLUSIONS: Practicing physicians often attend and treat their family members and diagnose their illnesses. They may often experience some disquiet in doing so. For physicians, complete medical data, proper training, and sound judgment are essential when family members request treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1991

Ethics consultation: skills, roles, and training.

A clinical ethics consultant gathers information firsthand at the patient's bedside. The consultant's special clinical skills include the ability to identify and analyze ethical problems; use reasonable clinical judgment; communicate effectively; negotiate and facilitate negotiations; and teach others how to construct their own ethical frameworks for medical decision making. Appropriate roles for the consultant include those of professional colleague, negotiator, patient and physician advocate, case manager, and educator. The training necessary for an ethics consultant includes substantial patient care experience, instruction in health care law and moral reasoning, and preparation in medical humanism. We favor a clinical model for ethics consultation. When urgent care is needed, other consultants promptly see the patient; the clinical ethics consultant can be expected to do the same.

Certification↗
PubMed1991

The clinical ethicist at the bedside.

In this paper we attempt to show how the goal of resolving moral problems in a patient's care can best be achieved by working at the bedside. We present and discuss three cases to illustrate the art and science of clinical ethics consultation. The sine qua non of the clinical ethics consultant is that he or she goes to the patient's bedside to obtain specific clinical and ethical information. Unlike ethics committees, which often depend on second hand information from a physician or nurse, clinical ethics consultants personally speak with and examine patients and review their laboratory data and medical records. The skills of the clinical ethics consultant include the ability to delineate and resolve ethical problems in a particular patient's case and to teach other health professionals to build their own frameworks for clinical ethical decision making. When the clinical situation requires it, clinical ethics consultants can and should assist primary physicians with case management.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

The ethics of pressure sore prevention and treatment in the elderly: a practical approach.

The management of pressure sores in elderly patients raises a number of ethical dilemmas for health care professionals. Aggressive treatment of advanced pressure sores is often inconsistent with the overall goals of therapy. Private and public funding for effective prevention and early treatment are restricted and constrained. Little information is available that proves treatment efficacy. Health care professionals and their institutions are often stigmatized by the occurrence of a pressure sore even though accountabilities may lie in the natural history of the disease. We use case analysis to identify ethical dilemmas in pressure sore prevention and management and suggest a framework for ethical decisionmaking so that health care professionals and public policy analysts can make informed judgments about patients and standards of quality care.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

A clarification.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Ethics Committees↗
PubMed1990

Quality-adjusted life-years. Ethical implications for physicians and policymakers.

Quality-adjusted life-years have been used in economic analyses as a measure of health outcomes, one that reflects both lives saved and patients' valuations of quality of life in alternative health states. The concept of "cost per quality-adjusted life year" as a guideline for resource allocation is founded on six ethical assumptions: quality of life can be accurately measured and used, utilitarianism is acceptable, equity and efficiency are compatible, projections of community preferences can substitute for individual preferences, the old have less "capacity to benefit" than the young, and physicians will not use quality-adjusted life-years as clinical maxims. Quality-adjusted life-years signal two shifts in the locus of control and the nature of the clinical encounter: first, formal expressions of community preferences and societal usefulness would counterbalance patient autonomy, and second, formal tools of resource allocation and applied decision analysis would counterbalance the use of clinical judgment. These shifts reflect and reinforce a new financial ethos in medical decision making. Presently using quality-adjusted life-years for health policy decisions is problematic and speculative; using quality-adjusted life-years at the bedside is dangerous.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗