Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J L Steimer

Publications and source records attributed to J L Steimer.

42 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Pharmacometrics: modelling and simulation tools to improve decision making in clinical drug development.

There is broad recognition within the pharmaceutical industry that the drug development process, especially the clinical part of it, needs considerable improvement to cope with rapid changes in research and health care environments. Modelling and simulation are mathematically founded techniques that have been used extensively and for a long time in other areas than the pharmaceutical industry (e.g. automobile, aerospace) to design and develop products more efficiently. Both modelling and simulation rely on the use of (mathematical and statistical) models which are essentially simplified descriptions of complex systems under investigation. It has been proposed to integrate pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) principles into drug development to make it more rational and efficient. There is evidence from a survey on 18 development projects that a PK/PD guided approach can contribute to streamline the drug development process. This approach extensively relies on PK/PD models describing the relationships among dose, concentration (and more generally exposure), and responses such as surrogate markers, efficacy measures, adverse events. Well documented empirical and physiologically based PK/PD models are becoming available more and more, and there are ongoing efforts to integrate models for disease progression and patient behavior (e.g. compliance) as well. Other types of models which are becoming increasingly important are population PK/PD models which, in addition to the characterization of PK and PD, involve relationships between covariates (i.e. patient characteristics such as age, body weight) and PK/PD parameters. Population models allow to assess and to quantify potential sources of variability in exposure and response in the target population, even under sparse sampling conditions. As will be shown for an anticancer agent, implications of significant covariate effects can be evaluated by computer simulations using the population PK/PD model. Stochastic simulation is widely used as a tool for evaluation of statistical methodology including for example the evaluation of performance of measures for bioequivalence assessment. Recently, it was suggested to expand the use of simulations in support of clinical drug development for predicting outcomes of planned trials. The methodological basis for this approach is provided by (population) PK/PD models together with random sampling techniques. Models for disease progression and behavioral features like compliance, drop-out rates, adverse event dependent dose reductions, etc. have to be added to population PK/PD models in order to mimic the real situation. It will be shown that computer simulation helps to evaluate consequences of design features on safety and efficacy assessment of the drug, enabling identification of statistically valid and practically realisable study designs. For both modelling and simulation a guidance on 'best practices' is currently worked out by a panel of experts comprising representatives from academia, regulatory bodies and industry, thereby providing a necessary condition that model-based analysis and simulation will further contribute to streamlining pharmaceutical drug development processes.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Sparse sampling for assessment of drug exposure in toxicological studies.

In support of animal toxicity testing of new drugs, toxicokinetics is designed to assess the systemic exposure of the animals to the drug across dose levels, genders, and periods of the study. In small rodents, repeated sampling may alter the health of the animals and jeopardize the toxicity evaluation. One conventional way to circumvent this limitation is to collect serial samples from satellite animals maintained as the main study animals but not monitored for toxicity. We evaluated, on a real example, whether the exposure could be assessed in the main animals from sparse samples. The only acceptable designs consisted of one single sample per animal repeated on two or three study days. In the rat 13-week oral toxicity study of a new chemical entity, both serial sampling in the satellite animals and sparse sampling in the main animals were applied. Similar measures of exposure and qualitative conclusions were derived from the two groups of animals. The very sparse design applied to the main group yielded adequate estimation of the animal exposure, even with a very simple non-compartmental approach. The population pharmacokinetics analysis of the sparse data with NONMEM provided additional information about drug disposition and the influence of the covariates.

Animals↗

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data and models in clinical trials.

There is current emphasis for extended integration of pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) into all phases of new drug development, including large-scale clinical trials. In this paper, we focus on study design and data analysis issues for the investigation of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and blood level/effect relationships in patients. The application of descriptive and model-based regression statistical methodology for including sparse drug systemic concentration data in the analysis of efficacy and safety is illustrated by examples chosen from diverse therapeutic areas. The population approach, based on mixed-effects modelling, is one such methodology, which also provides new tools for analysis of response vs dose and response vs time data. The existence of a variety of statistical techniques for handling complex PK/PD time-varying data should increase the impact of such data analysis on future drug development.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Feedback control methods for drug dosage optimisation. Concepts, classification and clinical application.

The concept of feedback control methods for drug dosage optimisation is described from the viewpoint of control theory. The control system consists of 5 parts: (a) patient (the controlled process); (b) response (the measured feedback); (c) model (the mathematical description of the process); (d) adaptor (to update the parameters); and (e) controller (to determine optimum dosing strategy). In addition to the conventional distinction between open-loop and closed-loop control systems, a classification is proposed for dosage optimisation techniques which distinguishes between tight-loop and loose-loop methods depending on whether physician's interaction is absent or included as part of the control step. Unlike engineering problems where the process can usually be controlled by fully automated devices, therapeutic situations often require that the physician be included in the decision-making process to determine the 'optimal' dosing strategy. Tight-loop and loose-loop methods can be further divided into adaptive and non-adaptive, depending on the presence of the adaptor. The main application areas of tight-loop feedback control methods are general anaesthesia, control of blood pressure, and insulin delivery devices. Loose-loop feedback methods have been used for oral anticoagulation and in therapeutic drug monitoring. The methodology, advantages and limitations of the different approaches are reviewed. A general feature common to all application areas could be observed: to perform well under routine clinical conditions, which are characterised by large interpatient variability and sometimes also intrapatient changes, control systems should be adaptive. Apart from application in routine drug treatment, feedback control methods represent an important research tool. They can be applied for the investigation of pathophysiological and pharmacodynamic processes. A most promising application is the evaluation of the relationship between an intermediate response (e.g. drug level), which is often used as feedback for dosage adjustment, and the final therapeutic goal.

Anesthetics↗