Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J L Kaufman

Publications and source records attributed to J L Kaufman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Accidental intraaortic placement of a Greenfield filter.

A Greenfield vena cava filter was accidentally placed in the mid-abdominal aorta. It was manipulated to the aortic bifurcation, where it has been observed for >48 months. This case is the first example of arterial placement of a vena cava filter. This report describes the probable mechanisms for this aberrant placement, methods for prevention of this complication, and options for management of this problem.

Accidents↗
PubMed1999

Surgical renal artery reconstruction without contrast arteriography: the role of clinical profiling and magnetic resonance angiography.

PURPOSE: Contrast arteriography is the accepted gold standard for diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (RVD). In this study, the results of a selective policy of surgical renal artery reconstruction (RAR) with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) as the sole preoperative imaging modality are reviewed. METHODS: From May 1993 to May 1998, 25 patients underwent RAR after clinical evaluation, and aortic/renal MRA performed with a gadolinium-enhanced and 3-dimensional phase contrast technique. Clinical presentations suggested severe RVD in all patients and included poorly controlled hypertension (16 patients), hospitalization for hypertensive crises and/or acute pulmonary edema (13), and deterioration of renal function within one year of operation (15). Thirteen patients had associated aortic pathologic conditions (12 aneurysms, 1 aortoiliac occlusive disease), and eight of these patients also underwent noncontrast computed tomography scans. Significant renal dysfunction (serum creatinine level, >/=2.0 mg/dL) was present in all but 4 patients with 14 of 25 patients having extreme (creatinine level, >/=3.0 mg/dL) dysfunction. RESULTS: Hemodynamically significant RVD in the main renal artery was verified at operation in 37 of 38 reconstructed main renal arteries (24/25 patients). A single accessory renal artery was missed by MRA. RAR was comprehensive (bilateral or unilateral to a single-functioning kidney) in 21 of 25 patients and consisted of hepatorenal bypass graft (3 patients), combined aortic and RAR (13 patients), isolated transaortic endarterectomy (8 patients), and aortorenal bypass graft (1 patient). Early improvement in both hypertension control and/or renal function was noted in 21 of 25 patients without operative deaths or postoperative renal failure. Sustained favorable functional results at follow-up, ranging from 5 months to 4 years, were noted in 19 of 25 patients. CONCLUSION: MRA is an adequate preoperative imaging modality in selected patients before RAR. This strategy is best applied in circumstances where the clinical presentation suggests hemodynamically significant bilateral RVD and/or in patients at substantial risk of complications from contrast angiography.

Angiography↗
PubMed1998

Immediate salvage procedure for infected penile prosthesis.

PURPOSE: The most devastating complication after the insertion of a penile prosthesis is the development of infection. The standard approach involves removing the entire device, treating intensively with antibiotics and attempting to reinsert a prosthesis at a later date, often with a suboptimal result. Based on the encouraging results of others, during the last 24 months we have used in 2 separate private urological practices a salvage procedure for treatment of infected inflatable penile prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The protocol used in 7 men with an infected inflatable penile prosthesis included removal of all device components, a 7-step vigorous intraoperative irrigation with 4 different solutions, including vancomycin, immediate reimplantation of a new inflatable penile prosthesis and postoperative outpatient antibiotics with oral ciprofloxacin or intravenous vancomycin or cefazolin. RESULTS: Of the 7 men 6 have experienced excellent results with no infection, minimal morbidity and preservation of penile length. The only failure occurred in a poorly controlled diabetic who required multiple revisions and may have had latent infection for months before it became apparent. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that an immediate salvage procedure for an infected inflatable penile prosthesis is an effective treatment for this difficult complication.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

A prospective comparison of two expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for linear forearm hemodialysis access: does the manufacturer matter?

BACKGROUND: The function and patency of standard 6-mm Goretex (W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) and Impra (Impra, Inc., Tempe, AZ) expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) grafts for hemodialysis as radial-antecubital linear arteriovenous fistulae for dialysis are compared. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in two community dialysis centers and in one hospital-based center serviced by one vascular surgical practice, that performed the access surgery. Selection of linear forearm access, as opposed to other hemodialysis graft configurations, was at the discretion of the surgeon. Candidates for linear grafts had palpable radial pulses with a normal Allen test and normal digital Doppler flow in the hand. Linear grafts were placed using end-to-side anastomoses to the artery and vein, and the graft type was determined by randomization. Primary patency was determined by first episode of thrombosis, first revision, or angioplasty of the graft. Secondary patency after thrombectomy, revision, or angioplasty was determined when the graft was no longer clinically usable, and a new graft needed to be placed as a parallel conduit in the forearm or in another site. Statistical analysis was by actuarial life-table methods. RESULTS: There were 131 linear forearm grafts in 117 patients. The Impra and Goretex groups were equally matched for gender and major risk factors, except for smoking, which was more common in the Goretex group. Minimum followup was 24 months. Life table primary patencies at 1 year (Impra 43%, Goretex 47%) and at 2 years (Impra 30%, Goretex 26%) were not statistically different (p = 0.78); secondary patency was also equal at 1 year (Impra 49%, Goretex 69%) and at 2 years (Impra 33%, Goretex 41%) (p = 0.15). Discontinuance of use of a patent graft, complications, episodes of thrombosis, and the need to replace the original graft occurred in the two groups without a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: In the linear forearm position from the radial artery to an antecubital vein, there is no difference in the performance of 6-mm standard e-PTFE grafts on the basis of manufacturer, whether Goretex or Impra. On the basis of performance, linear forearm dialysis grafts are an acceptable method for hemodialysis access.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Feasibility and safety of 1-day postoperative hospitalization for carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 1-day postoperative hospitalization after carotid endarterectomy is safe and the degree to which this can be achieved. DESIGN: Consecutive sample series of all carotid endarterectomies performed by a single surgical group. SETTING: A single tertiary-care hospital. PATIENTS: All who underwent carotid endarterectomy. Patients with procedures combined with coronary revascularization and patients undergoing the first part of a staged bilateral carotid endarterectomy performed in 1 hospitalization were excluded. INTERVENTION: In December 1993, a fast-track protocol was initiated, aiming for a 1-day stay after carotid endarterectomy without admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Before this date, postoperative care included obligatory monitoring for at least 1 night in an ICU. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of stay, admission to and stay in the ICU, complications, and hospital readmission rate. RESULTS: Over a 21-month period, 152 patients had 163 carotid endarterectomies. Of these, 124 were elective and 39 urgent (patients with a critical stenosis). Indications were stroke (n = 14 [8.6%]), transient ischemic attack (n = 50 [30.7%]), amaurosis fugax (n = 36 [22.1%]), and asymptomatic stenosis (n = 63 [38.7%]). General anesthesia was used for 159 procedures, cervical block for 4. Mean operation time was 2.6 hours. Postoperative stay was 1 day for 82 procedures (50%), 2 days for 49 procedures (30%), 3 days for 12 procedures (7%), and longer for 20 procedures (12%). In the last half of the study, 61% of patients (50/82) were discharged on postoperative day 1 and 87% (71/82) by postoperative day 2. One hundred three patients went to a surgical floor postoperatively. Overall, 60 patients went to the ICU, but only 18 (22%) of the last 82 procedures required ICU admission. The total stay averaged 3.8 days. Twenty-one patients (13%) experienced complications, including 3 deaths within 30 days and 5 neurological deficits. There were 14 early readmissions, but none was attributable to discharge on the first or second postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS: Early discharge home after carotid endarterectomy is safe and efficacious, and obligatory admission to an ICU is not necessary. At least 60% of patients who undergo carotid endarterectomy can have a postoperative stay of 1 day, and more than 80% can be discharged by postoperative day 2. A short postoperative stay is not associated with a significant risk of readmission for complications.

Adult↗