Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J L Fozard

Publications and source records attributed to J L Fozard.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1979

A questionnaire assessment of age differences in retention of recent and remote events.

Age-related differences in memory for recently and remotely dated events have been evaluated through questionnaire assessment. Results from previous studies employing the technique differ in the analysis of retrieval of recent and remote events. In attempting to reconcile extant results from the literature, the following study employed a group of healthy males ranging in age from 26 to 69. The results showed: 1. The elderly exhibited no impairment of the ability to remember recent colloquial events. 2. The elderly's surprisingly accurate recall of remote events was not a product of selective and frequent rehearsal.

Adult↗
PubMed1978

Remembering the person: relations of individual difference variables to memory.

Individual differences in personality and temperament variables were examined in relation to measures of simple mental performance in an attempt to determine the effects of personality on cognitive functioning in the elderly. Shorter latencies in binary decision and choice reaction times, and in recognition memory and object naming tasks were found to be associated with greater trait anxiety and experiential openness. The need to include clinical assessments of memory impairment and measures of more global cognitive abilities and styles in future research on personality and mental performance was discussed, and ways in which information on personality variables might be incorporated into programs of intervention for memory impairment in the elderly were suggested.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1978

Toward applying cognitive skill training to memory problems.

Four elements of a successful program of cognitive skill training for the elderly include: (a) the use of mnemonic aids for the memorization of new information; (b) the development of motivational techniques to enhance attention to materials and maintenance of cognitive skills acquired through training; (c) the design of techniques which utilize individual differences in abilities, personality, and cognitive style to enhance individual programs of cognitive skill training; and (d) the use of appropriate medical and/or psychiatric care when necessary.

Aged↗
PubMed1978

Age and familiarity in memory scanning.

Sixty-five healthy males (31 to 75 years old) memorized lists of six letters (familiar or unfamiliar organization). Letters were then presented singly, and subjects responded yes or no according to whether a given letter was in the memorized set. Subjects of all ages took longer to respond in the case of the unfamiliar list. This was disproportionately true for the oldest subjects, consistent with the idea that the age-related differences in the unfamiliar condition could not be wholly accounted for by psychomotor factors. The distributions of response latencies in the oldest groups had greater variance and skew.

Adult↗
PubMed1978

Speed of retrieval from long-term memory in relation to age, familiarity, and datedness of information.

The time required to name four groups of pictures was measured in 83 community dwelling males (18-70 years of age). One group consisted of objects used 50 to 70 years ago (unique dated exemplars), and another consisted of objects unique to contemporary times (unique contemporary exemplars). For comparison, other pictures of contemporary and dated objects commonly used in both periods were employed. There were three major findings. One, the familiarity of the pictured object is the major determinant of the time required to retrieve its name. Older subjects named the dated unique objects that were relatively more familiar to them more rapidly than did younger adults, while the reverse was true for contemporary unique objects. No age difference in the speed of naming common contemporary objects was found. Two, the overall age-related difference in naming latency was attributed to perceptual-motor aspects of the task. Three, the physical features as well as the familiarity of the object contributed to the speed of retrieval of the object's name.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1978

Retrieval time from different memory stores.

Two experiments were carried out to measure age-related differences in speed of error-free recall by normal adults. The major results were that: (a) the time taken to read a word aloud (retrieval from lexical memory) does not increase appreciably until subjects reach their 60s; (b) the time taken to recall a verbal item just attended to (retrieval from primary memory) increases steadily throughout the adult years, and most markedly between the sixth and seventh decades; and, (c) the time taken to recall recent verbal information outside the span of attention (retrieval from secondary memory) also increases as a function of chronological age, at a relatively rapid rate and most markedly between the fifth and sixth decades. The effects are independent of the number of stimulus-response alternatives.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Age-related differences in naming latency.

Older people seem to have difficulty learning new materials, perhaps because it takes them longer to retrieve relevant encoding information from memory. To assess the effects of age on speed of retrieval, 60 healthy males from 25 to 74 were shown pictures of common objects they were to name aloud as quickly as possible. The older subjects took longer to name the pictured objects. This difference was minimized with practice or when the name was cued, but did not interact with word frequency. The pattern of results for healthy older subjects was not similar to that found by Wingfield for brain-damaged subjects.

Adult↗
PubMed1976

Effects of age and frequency of stimulus repetitions on two-choice reaction time.

Binary choice-reaction times for 123 males, 25-79 years of age, were obtained in a sequence of discrete trials in which the proportion of occasions that the same stimulus was presented twice in succession varied from .25, .50, and .75 or from .75, .50, and .25 over successive thirds of the sequence. Stimulus alternations were responded to more rapidly than stimulus repetitions by subjects in all age groups, especially in trial blocks with .75 alterations. The absolute differences in mean reaction time to stimulus alterations and repetitions increased with age. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that reaction times are affected both by pre-existing expectations for stimulus alternations as well as expectations for stimulus alternations or repetitions developed during the course of the experiment. Mean response latency as well as between- and within-subject variability in performance increased with age. Analyses of frequency distributions of the reaction times indicated that the psychomotor component of reaction time increases with age while the decision-making component becomes more variable.

Adult↗
PubMed1976

Relations of age and personality dimensions to cognitive ability factors.

The relation between three cognitive ability factors - Information Processing Ability (IPA), Manual Dexterity (MD), and Pattern Analysis Capability (PAC) - and three personality dimensions - Anxiety, Extraversion, and Openness to Experience - were examined in three age groups. Subjects were 969 male volunteers ranging in age from 25 to 82. Subjects high in anixety scored lower on all three cognitive factors; subjects open to experience scored higher on IPA and PAC; and introverted subjects scored higher on PAC. Most of these effects remained when the education and socio-economic status were held constant in covariance analyses. Older subjects performed less well than younger ones on MD and PAC, but not on IPA. While personality has some influence on cognitive performance, the declines with age in performance on some cognitive tasks are not mediated by personality.

Adult↗