Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Krol

Publications and source records attributed to J Krol.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1994

A comparison of low- with high-osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiography. Identification of criteria for selective use.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to whether low-osmolality radiographic contrast agents, which have less detrimental pharmacological effects but are considerably more expensive than high-osmolality agents, should be used universally or only for selected high-risk patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A randomized, double-blind study was used to compare the frequency and severity of adverse events in 2245 consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac angiography. Two thousand one hundred sixty-six patients were successfully randomized to either iohexol, a low-osmolality contrast agent, or diatrizoate (as Hypaque 76), a high-osmolality agent. The end point event included clinically important adverse events (which jeopardized the patient or required aggressive treatment), contrast agent-related procedure abbreviations, and conversion to open-label contrast agent. Clinically important end point events were associated with increased age, New York Heart Association functional class, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, arteriovenous oxygen difference, severity of coronary artery disease, and history of a previous reaction to contrast agent. End point events were less frequent in patients receiving iohexol (2.6% versus 4.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-2.60; P = .07). The difference in event frequency between iohexol and diatrizoate was confined to the highest-risk quartile of the patient population. An algorithm was developed to classify patients as being at high or low risk for an event based on patient age, New York Heart Association class, history of a prior contrast reaction, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Application of this algorithm for selective use of low-osmolality agents only for high-risk patients to a theoretical population of 1000 patients reduced contrast agent costs 66% without increasing the frequency of contrast agent-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of low-osmolality contrast agents are clinically important in patients with severe heart disease but are not in less ill patients. Universal use of low-osmolality agents for cardiac angiography in an unselected population is not necessary. Appropriately guided selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents is feasible and has the potential to reduce cost substantially without compromising safety or effectiveness.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1993

Intravascular ultrasonographic assessment of the results of coronary artery stenting.

We studied 12 patients undergoing elective coronary stent implantation for either recurrent restenosis or adverse lesion appearance. By use of a 4.8F 20 MHz intravascular ultrasound catheter, the conventional angioplasty site was examined before and after coronary stent implantation. Quantitative angiographic analysis revealed the expected excellent final result with a group mean poststent diameter reduction of 14 +/- 9% and a cross-sectional area reduction of 22 +/- 13%. Angiographic analysis also indicated an increase in minimum stenosis diameter from 1.8 +/- 0.6 mm after conventional balloon angioplasty to 2.8 +/- 0.3 mm after coronary stent implantation. Quantitative analysis of the corresponding intravascular ultrasound images, however, revealed significant residual endoluminal obstruction. Fractional plaque area remained unchanged from 30 +/- 12% after conventional balloon angioplasty to 32 +/- 11% after stent implantation. The circumferential distribution of plaque increased significantly from 0.44 +/- 0.17 to 0.55 +/- 0.15 (p = 0.03) after stent implantation. Despite the lack of significant change in the ultrasound-determined minimum stenosis diameter after stent placement, there was a borderline significant increase in the plaque-free lumen area (before stent, 6.35 +/- 1.55 mm2; after stent, 7.25 +/- 1.6 mm2; p = 0.06). Thus, in contrast to the substantial improvement in the angiographically assessed residual luminal obstruction after stent implantation compared with the prestent condition, considerably less improvement was found by intravascular ultrasound-assessed examination. Morphometric analysis indicated a tendency toward circumferential remodeling of plaque. The inherently different approaches to vascular imaging represented by contrast angiography and intravascular ultrasound techniques appear to provide complementary information.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Coronary Angiography↗
PubMed1992

Assessment of cardiovascular reflexes is of limited value in predicting maximal +Gz-tolerance.

The importance of +Gz-induced loss of consciousness as a major cause of inflight incapacitation emphasizes the need for predicting +Gz-tolerance and investigating its possible determinants. The cardiovascular changes from +Gz-stress are initially counteracted reflexly by the cardiovascular autonomic system. The integrity of neural cardiovascular reflex control can be assessed by analysing the blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) responses to different maneuvers, such as the Valsalva maneuver, standing and forced respiratory sinus arrhythmia. The aim of the present study was to investigate a possible relation between the cardiovascular responses to these tests and +Gz-tolerance. In 10 healthy subjects continuous Finapres BP and HR responses to the tests have been determined and correlated with their G-levels of peripheral light loss (PLL) during centrifuge-runs (0.1 G/s). Only mean BP recovery during Valsalva maneuver correlated marginally significantly with PLL (r = 0.63, p = 0.049). Cardiovascular findings were within normal range revealing no cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction. These results indicate that intact neural cardiovascular control seems to be a condition for tolerating +Gz-stress without determining maximal +Gz-tolerance. We conclude that assessment of cardiovascular reflexes may only confirm baroreflex integrity. However, they have limited value in predicting +Gz-tolerance.

Acceleration↗