Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Kobashigawa

Publications and source records attributed to J Kobashigawa.

39 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Randomized study of high dose oral cyclosporine therapy for mild acute cardiac rejection.

Mild acute rejection progresses to moderate rejection in approximately one third of the cases. Standard rejection therapy would then be instituted with the attendant risk of infection and other side effects. We randomized 40 episodes of mild acute rejection (20 episodes in each group) to receive no additional therapy or to have the oral cyclosporine dose increased for 7 to 10 days with repeat endomyocardial biopsy performed. In the group with no additional therapy 30% progressed to moderate rejection, whereas in the group with increased doses of oral cyclosporine, 10% progressed to moderate rejection (p = 0.10). As the purpose of our study was to assess the efficacy of increased cyclosporine levels for preventing progression from mild to moderate rejection, the treated group was redefined according to whether the cyclosporine level increased by greater than or equal to 50% during the study. In this treated group average cyclosporine levels increased from 169 +/- 78 to 413 +/- 267 ng/ml. Progression to moderate rejection occurred in one of 21 cases (5%) compared with seven of 19 cases (37%) in the group without an increase in cyclosporine level (p less than 0.05). The transient increase in cyclosporine levels was well tolerated. This study demonstrates that the use of high dose oral cyclosporine to treat mild acute rejection is well tolerated and may reduce progression to moderate rejection when a significant increase in cyclosporine level is achieved.

Acute Disease↗

University of Wisconsin solution versus Stanford cardioplegic solution and the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

BACKGROUND: University of Wisconsin (intracellular) solution has been shown to offer some distinct benefits of myocardial preservation over Stanford (extracellular) solution, including a more rapid functional recovery, improved adenosine triphosphate preservation, and a tendency for less postoperative inotropic agents. However intracellular solutions with high potassium content have been reported to cause a functional if not structural endothelial injury in laboratory experiments. METHODS: Because of this information we retrospectively viewed our follow-up angiographic data for the development of the cardiac allograft vasculopathy in a consecutive series of 195 heart transplant recipients. These patients were treated in identical fashion, with the same immunosuppression regimen, except for the type of cardioplegia used--Stanford solution (group I n = 95) and University of Wisconsin solution (group II n = 100). RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 24 months after transplantation, a significant difference was seen in the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in group II (22%) versus group I (14%, p < 0.03). Although significant differences were observed with univariate analysis with respect to donor age and ischemic time favoring group I and with multivariate statistical analysis with respect to overall rejections favoring group II, the only significant variable for the difference in the development of allograft vasculopathy was University of Wisconsin cardioplegic solution (p < 0.003). A subgroup of 30 patients previously randomized for a functional study comparing the two cardioplegic agents showed a tendency for statistical significance with a freedom from allograft vasculopathy of 93% in group I, as compared with 83% in group II, after 13 months follow-up (p = 0.09). The overall probability of being free of vasculopathy at 24 months was 86% for group I and 70% for group II. CONCLUSIONS: The data support the conclusion that University of Wisconsin intracellular solution is associated with an increased incidence of vasculopathy versus Stanford solution and warrants investigation for modification of this preservation agent in heart transplantation.

Adenosine↗