Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Kjekshus

Publications and source records attributed to J Kjekshus.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Risk factors for a major coronary event after myocardial infarction in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Impact of predicted risk on the benefit of cholesterol-lowering treatment.

AIMS: To analyse (1) the prognostic importance of clinical findings and lipids in patients with a previous myocardial infarction and (2) the relative and absolute benefit of simvastatin in patients at low, medium and high predicted risk. METHODS: The 4S was a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial of long-term treatment with simvastatin or matching placebo in patients with myocardial infarction or angina pectoris, serum total cholesterol 5.5-8.0 mmol x l(-1), and serum triglycerides <or=2.5 mmol x l(-1). The present study only deals with those 3525 patients who had a previous myocardial infarction. End-points comprised coronary death, definite and probable hospital verified myocardial infarction, and resuscitated cardiac arrest. Because there were few women the primary analyses were performed among men. RESULTS: A Cox model analysis in the placebo group identified the following independent predictors of coronary events: a history of hypertension (P=0.023), diabetes (P=0.0001), smoking after the myocardial infarction (P=0.010), total cholesterol (P=0.020), and HDL cholesterol (P=0.062). The relative reduction of risk by simvastatin treatment in patients at low, medium and high predicted risk was 38%, 39% and 42%, respectively, but the corresponding absolute benefit per 100 patients treated for 6 years increased from 7.9 to 16.2. CONCLUSION: In addition to serum lipids, clinical variables contributed significantly to prediction. The relative benefit from simvastatin treatment was independent of predicted risk, but the absolute benefit increased from low to high risk.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Effect of metoprolol on cytokine levels in chronic heart failure--a substudy in the Metoprolol Controlled-Release Randomised Intervention Trial in Heart Failure (MERIT-HF).

BACKGROUND: Enhanced immune activation has been suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of congestive heart failure (CHF). There is evidence for interactions between the sympathetic nervous system and the immune system. We therefore examined the effect of the selective beta(1)-receptor blocker metoprolol on various immunologic variables in CHF. METHODS: Eighty-one patients with CHF were randomized to metoprolol or placebo in a double-blind trial. Plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R), monocyte chemoattractant peptide-1, and IL-8 were measured at baseline, after 3 months, and at the end of the study (11.4 +/- 0.4 months). RESULTS: Our main findings were (1) at baseline TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant peptide-1, and sIL-2R but not IL-10 levels were markedly elevated in patients with CHF compared with controls; (2) during treatment with metoprolol, but not with placebo, there was a significant decrease in sIL-2R after 3 months, with a return to baseline at the end of the study; and (3) levels of all other immunologic variables remained unchanged throughout the study in both the metoprolol and the placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that metoprolol treatment in CHF is associated with a significant but temporary decrease in sIL-2R, possibly reflecting down-modulation of T-cell activation. However, an enhanced immune activation also persisted in the metoprolol group, suggesting a potential for more specific immunomodulatory therapy in CHF.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

Natriuretic peptides in patients with aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Whereas atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) is secreted mainly from cardiac atria, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is produced to a larger extent in ventricles. Their relative importance as markers of cardiac function and myocardial hypertrophy is not yet clarified. This study evaluated circulating BNP and ANP and the N-terminal part of their propeptides (NT-proBNP and NT-proANP) as markers of left ventricular hypertrophy and atrial pressure increase in patients with aortic stenosis. METHODS: The plasma concentrations of BNP, NT-proBNP, ANP, and NT-proANP were measured by radioimmunoassay in 67 patients with aortic stenosis. Peptide plasma concentrations were related to measurements obtained by cardiac catheterization and echocardiography. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that BNP and NT-proBNP performed best in the detection of increased left ventricular mass and NT-proANP in the detection of increased left atrial pressure. NT-proBNP was significantly increased in mild left ventricular hypertrophy (left ventricular mass index, 78 to 139 g/m(2)), whereas NT-proANP was not increased until left ventricular mass index was 141 to 180 g/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma BNP and NT-proBNP may serve as early markers of left ventricular hypertrophy, whereas ANP and NT-proANP reflect left atrial pressure increase. The repeated and combined measurements of natriuretic peptides might provide diagnostic information relevant to the evaluation of the stage of aortic stenosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Challenges of subgroup analyses in multinational clinical trials: experiences from the MERIT-HF trial.

BACKGROUND: International placebo-controlled survival trials (Metoprolol Controlled-Release Randomised Intervention Trial in Heart Failure [MERIT-HF], Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study [CIBIS-II], and Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival trial [COPERNICUS]) evaluating the effects of b-blockade in patients with heart failure have all demonstrated highly significant positive effects on total mortality as well as total mortality plus all-cause hospitalization. Also, the analysis of the US Carvedilol Program indicated an effect on these end points. Although none of these trials are large enough to provide definitive results in any particular subgroup, it is natural for physicians to examine the consistency of results across various subgroups or risk groups. Our purpose was to examine both predefined and post hoc subgroups in the MERIT-HF trial to provide guidance as to whether any subgroup is at increased risk, despite an overall strongly positive effect, and to discuss the difficulties and limitations in conducting such subgroup analyses. METHODS: The study was conducted at 313 clinical sites in 16 randomization regions across 14 countries, with a total of 3991 patients. Total mortality (first primary end point) and total mortality plus all-cause hospitalization (second primary end point) were analyzed on a time to first event. The first secondary end point was total mortality plus hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: Overall, MERIT-HF demonstrated a hazard ratio of 0.66 for total mortality and 0.81 for mortality plus all-cause hospitalization. The hazard ratio of the first secondary end point of mortality plus hospitalization for heart failure was 0.69. The results were remarkably consistent for both primary outcomes and the first secondary outcome across all predefined subgroups as well as for nearly all post hoc subgroups. The results of the post hoc US subgroup showed a mortality hazard ratio of 1.05. However, the US results regarding both the second primary combined outcome of total mortality plus all-cause hospitalization and of the first secondary combined outcome of total mortality plus heart failure hospitalization were in concordance with the overall results of MERIT-HF. Tests of country by treatment interaction (14 countries) revealed a nonsignificant P value of.22 for total mortality. The mortality hazard ratio for US patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV was 0.80, and it was 2.24 for patients in NYHA class II, which is not consistent with causality by biologic gradient. We have not been able to identify any confounding factor in baseline characteristics, baseline treatment, or treatment during follow-up that could account for any treatment by country interaction. Thus we attribute the US subgroup mortality hazard ratio to be due to chance. CONCLUSIONS: Just as we must be extremely cautious in overinterpreting positive effects in subgroups, even those that are predefined, we must also be cautious in focusing on subgroups with an apparent neutral or negative trend. We should examine subgroups to obtain a general sense of consistency, which is clearly the case in MERIT-HF. We should expect some variation of the treatment effect around the overall estimate as we examine a large number of subgroups because of small sample size in subgroups and chance. Thus the best estimate of the treatment effect on total mortality for any subgroup is the estimate of the hazard ratio for the overall trial.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2000

Follow-up study of patients randomized in the Scandinavian simvastatin survival study (4S) of cholesterol lowering.

The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) and other randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that cholesterol-lowering treatment with statins improves prognosis in patients with coronary atherosclerosis compared with placebo. The effect of therapy with statins beyond the typical 5 to 6 years' duration of the trials, in particular regarding the risk of cancer, has not been investigated. This study examines the long-term effects of simvastatin for up to 8 years on cause-specific mortality in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). We performed an observational, government registry-based study of mortality in the groups originally randomized to simvastatin or placebo in the 4S over an additional 2-year follow-up period, so that the median total follow-up period was 7.4 years (range 6.9 to 8.3 in surviving patients). Randomization took place at outpatient clinics at 94 clinical centers in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden from 1988 to 1989. Of 4,444 patients with CHD, 2,223 and 2,221 were randomized to treatment with placebo or simvastatin therapy, respectively. Patients received treatment with simvastatin, starting at 20 mg/day, with titration to 40 mg/day at 12 or 24 weeks if total cholesterol was >5.2 mmol/L (200 mg/dl), or placebo. After the double-blind period, most patients in both treatment groups received simvastatin as open-label prescription. Of the 1,967 patients originally treated with placebo and surviving the double-blind period, 97 (4.9%) died during the following 2 years. In the group randomized to simvastatin the corresponding number was 74 of the 2, 039 survivors (3.6%). Adding these deaths to those occurring during the original trial, the total was 353 (15.9%) and 256 (11.5%) deaths in the groups originally randomized to placebo and simvastatin, respectively. The relative risk was 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0. 60 to 0.82, p = 0.00002). The total number of cancer deaths was 68 (3.1%) in the placebo group and 52 (2.3%) in the simvastatin group (relative risk 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.05, p = 0. 087), and the numbers of noncardiovascular and other deaths were similar in both groups. We therefore conclude that treatment with simvastatin for up to 8 years in patients with CHD is safe and yields continued survival benefit.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Effects of controlled-release metoprolol on total mortality, hospitalizations, and well-being in patients with heart failure: the Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in congestive heart failure (MERIT-HF). MERIT-HF Study Group.

CONTEXT: Results from recent studies on the effects of beta1-blockade in patients with heart failure demonstrated a 34% reduction in total mortality. However, the effect of beta1-blockade on the frequency of hospitalizations, symptoms, and quality of life in patients with heart failure has not been fully explored. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of the beta1-blocker controlled-release/extended-release metoprolol succinate (metoprolol CR/XL) on mortality, hospitalization, symptoms, and quality of life in patients with heart failure. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind controlled trial, preceded by a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period, conducted from February 14, 1997, to October 31, 1998, with a mean follow-up of 1 year. SETTING: Three hundred thirteen sites in 14 countries. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 3991) with chronic heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II to IV, and ejection fraction of 0.40 or less who were stabilized with optimum standard therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to metoprolol CR/XL, 25 mg once per day (NYHA class II), or 12.5 mg once per day (NYHA class III or IV), titrated for 6 to 8 weeks up to a target dosage of 200 mg once per day (n = 1990); or matching placebo (n = 2001). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total mortality or any hospitalization (time to first event), number of hospitalizations for worsening heart failure, and change in NYHA class, by intervention group; quality of life was assessed in a substudy of 741 patients. RESULTS: The incidence of all predefined end points was lower in the metoprolol CR/XL group than in the placebo group, including total mortality or all-cause hospitalizations (the prespecified second primary end point; 641 vs 767 events; risk reduction, 19%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-27%; P<.001); total mortality or hospitalizations due to worsening heart failure (311 vs 439 events; risk reduction, 31%; 95% CI, 20%-40%; P<.001), number of hospitalizations due to worsening heart failure (317 vs 451; P<.001); and number of days in hospital due to worsening heart failure (3401 vs 5303 days; P<.001). NYHA functional class, assessed by physicians, and McMaster Overall Treatment Evaluation score, assessed by patients, both improved in the metoprolol CR/XL group compared with the placebo group (P = .003 and P = .009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with symptomatic heartfailure, metoprolol CR/XL improved survival, reduced the need for hospitalizations due to worsening heart failure, improved NYHA functional class, and had beneficial effects on patient well-being.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2000

Clinical effects of early angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment for acute myocardial infarction are similar in the presence and absence of aspirin: systematic overview of individual data from 96,712 randomized patients. Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitor Myocardial Infarction Collaborative Group.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether the clinical effects of early angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACEi) treatment for acute myocardial infarction (MI) are influenced by the concomitant use of aspirin (ASA). BACKGROUND: Aspirin and ACEi both reduce mortality when given early after MI. Aspirin inhibits the synthesis of vasodilating prostaglandins, and, in principle, this inhibition might antagonize some of the effects of ACEi. But it is uncertain whether, in practice, this influences the effects of ACEi on mortality and major morbidity after MI. METHODS: This overview sought individual patient data from all trials involving more than 1,000 patients randomly allocated to receive ACEi or control starting in the acute phase of MI (0-36 h from onset) and continuing for four to six weeks. Data on concomitant ASA use were available for 96,712 of 98,496 patients in four eligible trials (and for none of 1,556 patients in the one other eligible trial). RESULTS: Overall 30-day mortality was 7.1% among patients allocated to ACEi and 7.6% among those allocated to control, corresponding to a 7% (standard deviation [SD], 2%) proportional reduction (95% confidence interval 2% to 11%, p = 0.004). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor was associated with similar proportional reductions in 30-day mortality among the 86,484 patients who were taking ASA (6% [SD, 3%] reduction) and among the 10,228 patients who were not (10% [SD, 5%] reduction: chi-squared test of heterogeneity between these reductions = 0.4; p = 0.5). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor produced definite increases in the incidence of persistent hypotension (17.9% ACEi vs. 9.4% control) and of renal dysfunction (1.3% ACEi vs. 0.6% control), but there was no good evidence that these effects were different in the presence or absence of ASA (chi-squared for heterogeneity = 0.4 and 0.0, respectively; both not significant). Nor was there good evidence that the effects of ACEi on other clinical outcomes were changed by concomitant ASA use. CONCLUSIONS: Both ASA and ACEi are beneficial in acute MI. The present results support the early use of ACEi in acute MI, irrespective of whether or not ASA is being given.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Differential responses of plasma atrial and brain natriuretic peptides to acute alteration in atrial pressure in pigs.

To describe the differential dynamic responses of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide (Nt-proANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) to acute changes in atrial pressure, 6 pigs were studied during and after a 24-h period of rapid atrial pacing (225 bpm). During pacing, left atrial pressure increased acutely. ANP plasma concentrations showed a sharp initial peak followed by a decline, but remained significantly increased throughout the 24-h period. Nt-proANP followed a smoother pattern, increasing significantly only after 24 h. BNP increased significantly after 8 h after pacing and even more after 24 h. An opposite but similarly differential pattern of peptide responses was found in the post-pacing period. The different responses in ANP, Nt-proANP and BNP plasma concentrations may reflect the different mechanisms of regulation of secretion as well as plasma clearance. If the present findings reflect the acute clinical situation in humans, they may be of diagnostic relevance. An isolated ANP elevation would indicate a recent acute pressure increase, while elevation of two or more natriuretic peptides would point to a pressure increase of longer duration.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

[Chronic heart failure--suggestion to a management program].

In 1994, a Norwegian programme for diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure was published. Recently the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association and the Task Force on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology have published similar guidelines. In this article, the Working Group on Heart Failure of the Norwegian Society of Cardiology presents an updated programme for evaluation and management of patients with chronic heart failure.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of the effects of losartan and captopril on mortality in patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL trial design. Optimal Therapy in Myocardial Infarction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan.

Patients with acute myocardial infarction and evidence of heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction during the acute phase have an excessive mortality risk. Therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors attenuates the detrimental effects of angiotensin II and has been shown to substantially reduce morbidity and mortality in this population. Selective, angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonism with losartan, which inhibits the effects of angiotensin II regardless of its source at the receptor level, may provide more complete blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. The Optimal Therapy in Myocardial Infarction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (OPTIMAAL) study is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel, captopril-controlled trial. The primary hypothesis is that, compared with captopril, losartan will decrease the risk for all-cause mortality by 20% in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction. The study population will consist of 5,000 patients, > or = 50 years of age, with heart failure during the acute phase or with a new Q-wave anterior infarction or reinfarction. Patients will be randomized to treatment with either losartan or captopril. All patients will be followed until 937 deaths occur (event-driven). The primary end point is total mortality (all-cause mortality). The secondary and tertiary end points are sudden death (and/or resuscitated cardiac death) and fatal/nonfatal reinfarction. Based on the assumed event rate, treatment effect and a 95% power to detect a 20% reduction in all-cause mortality at the 4.3% significance level (2-sided, adjusted for 2 interim analyses), the trial will enroll at least 5,004 patients and continue until a total number of 937 events has been reached (intention-to-treat analysis).

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed1999

[Current use of beta-blockers in coronary artery disease].

This article presents the results of a retrospective analysis of the use of beta-blockers and current dosing of these agents in patients with coronary artery disease. While 70 to 78% of patients admitted to Norwegian university hospitals during 1990-1997 for angiographic evaluation of chest pain used beta-blockers, only 43-60% of patients with stable coronary artery disease enrolled in the 4S study in Norway received such treatment. High risk groups such as diabetics and patients with peripheral artery disease were less likely to receive beta-blockers during the early period, but were not treated differentially compared to low risk patients during recent years. Only 15% of patients with congestive heart failure received oral beta-blockers, and only 10.5% intravenous beta-blockade during acute myocardial infarction. The dosing of the most common beta-blockers were low, approximately 50% of doses shown to improve survival after acute myocardial infarction.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1999

Long-term survival in severe heart failure in patients treated with enalapril. Ten year follow-up of CONSENSUS I.

BACKGROUND: The CONSENSUS trial was the first study to show prognostic improvement by an ACE inhibitor. Patients in NYHA class IV heart failure were treated with enalapril or placebo. After study completion (average 183 days) all patients were offered open-label enalapril therapy. This paper reports on the survival at the 10-year follow up of the patients randomized in the CONSENSUS trial. METHODS: All 35 participating centres in CONSENSUS I were asked to complete a questionnaire on the survival status at 1 November 1996 of patients randomized in CONSENSUS. RESULTS: At 10-year follow up, one patient was lost to follow-up. Five patients, all in the enalapril group, were long-term survivors (P = 0.004). Averaged over the duration of the trial (double-blind plus open-label extension) the risk reduction was 30% (P = 0.008), with a 95% confidence interval of 11% to 46%. At the end of the double-blind study period, mortality was considerably higher among patients who did not receive open ACE inhibitor therapy compared to those who did. CONCLUSION: After a treatment period of, on average, 6 months, enalapril was shown to be effective. The effect was sustained for at least 4 years i.e. for another 3.5 years. The present follow-up is the first heart failure trial where the full life-cycle has been followed from randomization. In severe heart failure, mortality is significantly reduced by enalapril. On average, the beneficial effect is maintained for several years and overall survival time is prolonged by 50% (from 521 to 781 days).

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed1999

Effect of simvastatin treatment on cardiovascular resource utilization in impaired fasting glucose and diabetes. Findings from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study.

OBJECTIVE: The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study showed that simvastatin treatment reduced cardiovascular events in hypercholesterolemic subjects with coronary heart disease. The clinical benefits of therapy were similar in all three subgroups: normal fasting glucose (NFG, n = 3,237), impaired fasting glucose (IFG, n = 678), and diabetes (n = 483). This analysis compared the costs of simvastatin treatment with the costs of cardiovascular disease-related hospitalizations in the three subgroups. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The cost of simvastatin treatment was defined as the average retail price and the cost of drug safety monitoring and adverse experiences. The costs of cardiovascular disease-related hospitalizations were determined by actual rates of hospitalization and 1995 MEDSTAT diagnosis-related group costs. RESULTS: Within trial, simvastatin treatment cost approximately $6,000 per patient. Simvastatin treatment reduced cardiovascular disease-related hospitalizations by 23% in NFG (P = 0.001), 30% in IFG (P = 0.015), and 40% in diabetic subjects (P = 0.007) within trial (median follow-up of 5.4 years). Average length of stay was reduced by 2.4 days in diabetic subjects (P = 0.021). Total cardiovascular disease-related hospital days were reduced by 28% (P < 0.001) in NFG, 38% (P = 0.005) in IFG, and 55% (P < 0.001) in diabetic subjects. For NFG subjects, simvastatin reduced the average cost of cardiovascular disease-related hospitalizations by $3,585, which offset 60% of the cost of simvastatin therapy. For IFG subjects, average cardiovascular disease-related hospitalization costs were reduced by $4,478, which offset 74% of the drug cost. For diabetic subjects, there was a net cost savings of $1,801 per subject within trial. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin significantly reduced cardiovascular disease-related hospitalizations and total hospital days for all three groups and significantly reduced length of stay for the diabetic group in addition to providing significant clinical benefits. The benefits were greatest in the diabetic group, with estimated cost savings within trial from simvastatin treatment.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed1998

Influence of guidewire and catheter type on the frequency of cerebral microembolic signals during left heart catheterization.

Cerebral embolization is a serious complication during diagnostic heart catheterization. To date there have been no studies to determine whether the technique and the catheter type influence the frequency of cerebral microembolic signals (MES's) during left ventricular catheterization. Twenty-two patients had a leading straight tip guidewire protruding 5 to 10 cm outside the coronary catheters when the latter was advanced over the aortic arch (group A), whereas in 21 patients the guidewire was withdrawn in the descending part of the aorta (group B). Transcranial Doppler of the left middle cerebral artery was performed to monitor the number of cerebral MES's. When a protruding guidewire was used to advance the coronary catheters over the aortic arch, MES's were detected in 86% of the patients compared with 29% when the catheters were advanced without a guidewire (relative risk = 4.6, p = 0.00001). The number of MES's per patient also was significantly higher when a guidewire was used (median 9 vs 0) (p = 0.000004). In group A, a higher number of MES's was detected when a right Judkins catheter was advanced over the aortic arch than when a left Judkins catheter was advanced (median 6.5 vs 1) (p = 0.0005) and in patients who previously had a myocardial infarction than in those who had not (median 1 1 vs 4) (p = 0.007). This study strongly suggests that the risk of embolization is greater when straight tip guidewires are used to advance catheters over the aortic arch during left ventricular heart catheterization, especially in patients with a history of myocardial infarction.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Neuropeptide Y receptor 1 (NPY-Y1) expression in human heart failure and heart transplantation.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a neurotransmitter released from cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals along with catecholamines. It influences vascular tone and cardiac function, probably through the receptor subtype Y1. The present study examined the expression of Y1 in patients with end-stage heart failure and in heart transplant recipients. Y1 mRNA was analyzed in right ventricular endomyocardial biopsies taken from 12 donor hearts prior to implantation (controls), 15 patients with end stage heart failure at time of transplantation, and 16 patients more than 1 year after transplantation. RT-PCR (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) was used to detect mRNA for the Y1 receptor, the beta1-adrenergic-receptor, and beta-actin. Y1 mRNA was present in biopsies of all donor hearts, but was observed significantly less frequently in the two patient groups; only 5 out of 15 (P < 0.01) heart failure and 9 out of 16 (P < 0.05) transplant recipients demonstrated visible PCR product. In contrast, mRNA for the beta1-adrenergic receptor and beta-actin were detected by RT-PCR in all samples. Our results provide the first evidence for altered regulation of the neuropeptide Y1 receptor in heart failure and transplant patients, and suggests that loss of signal transduction by this receptor may be adaptive in both groups.

Actins↗
PubMed1998

Lipoprotein changes and reduction in the incidence of major coronary heart disease events in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)

BACKGROUND: The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) randomized 4444 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and serum cholesterol 5.5 to 8.0 mmol/L (213 to 310 mg/dL) with triglycerides < or =2.5 mmol/L (220 mg/dL) to simvastatin 20 to 40 mg or placebo once daily. Over the median follow-up period of 5.4 years, one or more major coronary events (MCEs) occurred in 622 (28%) of the 2223 patients in the placebo group and 431 (19%) of the 2221 patients in the simvastatin group (34% risk reduction, P<.00001). Simvastatin produced substantial changes in several lipoprotein components, which we have attempted to relate to the beneficial effects observed. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the relationship between lipid values (baseline, year 1, and percent change from baseline at year 1) and MCEs. The reduction in MCEs within the simvastatin group was highly correlated with on-treatment levels and changes from baseline in total and LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and less so with HDL cholesterol, but there was no clear relationship with triglycerides. We estimate that each additional 1% reduction in LDL cholesterol reduces MCE risk by 1.7% (95% CI, 1.0% to 2.4%; P<.00001). CONCLUSIONS: These analyses suggest that the beneficial effect of simvastatin in individual patients in 4S was determined mainly by the magnitude of the change in LDL cholesterol, and they are consistent with current guidelines that emphasize aggressive reduction of this lipid in CHD patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Elevated circulating levels of C-C chemokines in patients with congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Immunologic and inflammatory responses appear to play a pathogenic role in the development of congestive heart failure (CHF). Activation and migration of leukocytes to areas of inflammation are important factors in these immunologic responses. Because the C-C chemokines are potent chemoattractants of monocytes and lymphocytes and can modulate other functions of these cells (eg, generation of reactive oxygen species), we measured circulating levels of three C-C chemokines in CHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Levels of macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), macrophage inflammatory protein- 1alpha (MIP-1alpha), and RANTES (regulated on activation normally T-cell expressed and secreted) were measured by enzyme immunoassays in 44 patients with CHF and 21 healthy control subjects. CHF patients had significantly elevated levels of all chemokines with the highest levels in New York Heart Association class IV, and MCP-1 and MIP-1alpha levels were significantly inversely correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction. Elevated C-C chemokine levels were found independent of the cause of the heart failure, but MCP-1 levels were particularly raised in patients with coronary artery disease. Studies on cells isolated from peripheral blood suggested that platelets, CD3+ lymphocytes, and in particular, monocytes, might contribute to the elevated C-C chemokine levels in CHF. The increased MCP-1 levels in CHF were correlated with increased monocyte activity reflected in an enhancing effect of serum from CHF patients on O2-generation in monocytes, which was inhibited by neutralizing antibodies against MCP-1. CONCLUSIONS: This first demonstration of increased circulating levels of C-C chemokines in CHF with particularly high levels in patients with severe disease may represent previously unrecognized pathogenic factors in CHF.

Adult↗