Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J K Baum

Publications and source records attributed to J K Baum.

26 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Ultrasonic evaluation of pleural opacities.

Forty-one patients with substantial pleural opacities on chest films were examined by A-mode and B-mode ultrasound. Ultrasonic examination provides an accurate means of differentiating pleural fluid from other conditions which produce such opacities and is superior to the chest films as a means of localizing fluid. With the gain setting used in this series, fluid collections less than 1 cm thick were missed and were probably obscured by reverberation from the ribs. M-mode scanning provides a simple and accurate means of localizing the diaphragm in nearly all patients, almost completely eliminating difficulties caused by subdiaphragmatic placement of the thoracocentesis needle.

Diagnosis, Differential↗

High resolution CT mammography of surgical biopsy specimens.

PURPOSE: Our goal was to assess the performance of high resolution CT on breast biopsy specimens before considering the reevaluation of refined CT techniques in patients with breast abnormalities. METHOD: High resolution CT was done in 44 surgical biopsy specimens following conventional X-ray specimen mammography. The specimens comprised 38 palpable and nonpalpable soft tissue abnormalities with mean size of 19 mm and 6 specimens with clustered microcalcifications only. There were 21 carcinomas, 10 fibroadenomas, and 13 other benign conditions. Evaluation of CT and conventional images was done separately, and a feature-grading list was used to compare the two modalities. RESULTS: In fatty specimens, grading of morphologic features of masses and the confidence to detect a soft tissue abnormality were equal with both techniques. CT significantly improved the confidence to detect a mass in 17 specimens with dense tissue: On a scale of 0-10, the mean score for detection was 3.8 with radiography and 5.8 with CT (p<0.008). For clustered microcalcifications, X-ray was superior to CT. The mean CT attenuation of 18 malignant masses (82 HU) was significantly lower than the mean attenuation of 10 fibroadenomas (131 HU; p = 0.003). CT scans of the American College of Radiology test phantom met the requirements for X-ray accreditation. CONCLUSION: For soft tissue abnormalities, CT specimen mammography performed equally as or better than specimen radiography. These in vitro results suggest potential advantages for increased sensitivity and specificity with CT and justify further investigations.

Biopsy↗

Accuracy of touch imprint cytology of image-directed breast core needle biopsies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of touch imprint (TI) cytology of image-directed core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens of nonpalpable breast lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-two consecutive CNBs from 44 patients were performed under mammographic or ultrasound guidance. Air- dried TIs of CNBs were stained with Diff-Quik. TI cellularity was considered adequate if six or more ductal cell groups were identified. CNBs and TIs were interpreted in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: TI cellularity was adequate in 37/52 (71%) cases, including 17/20 carcinomas and 20/32 benign lesions. Among 17 carcinomas, TIs were positive in 12, suspicious in 4 and atypical in 1. One case of lactational change was suspicious on TI, and 5/8 fibroadenomas were atypical. No benign lesions were called "carcinoma" on cytology. When lesions categorized as "carcinoma" or "suspicious" were considered positive and those classified as "atypical" or "benign" were scored as negative, TI sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 95%, respectively. When the "atypical" cases were grouped with the positive cases, TI sensitivity was 100%, with 75% specificity. CONCLUSION: With satisfactory cellularity, TIs of CNBs are highly accurate. When immediate evaluation of CNB specimens is important, TIs can potentially decrease the number of biopsy passes required and provide preliminary diagnoses.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Local recurrence after conservative surgery and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: Possible importance of family history.

PURPOSE: The optimal treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ is controversial. Traditionally, women with this disease have been treated with mastectomy with excellent results, but recently the need for such extensive surgery has been questioned. Long-term data on the use of conservative surgery and radiation therapy for treatment are limited. A retrospective analysis was performed to assess treatment outcome and prognostic factors for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1976 to 1990, 76 women with ductal carcinoma in situ were treated with conservative surgery followed by radiation therapy. The median age at diagnosis was 48 years. Seventeen patients had a positive family history of breast cancer in a first-degree (n=8) or second-degree (n=9) relative. Median follow-up interval was 74 months for the 71 survivors. In 54 patients, the carcinoma was detected by mammography alone; in 13 patients, by mammography and physical examination; and in 4 patients, by physical examination with a normal mammogram; and in 5 patients, by physical examination alone without mammography. Fifty patients had re-excision after initial biopsy. Final margins were positive in 11, close in 11, negative in 34, and unknown in 20. The median volume of excised tissue was 60 cm3. The axilla was surgically staged in 30 patients (39%) and all were negative. The whole breast was irradiated to a dose of 45 to 50 Gy in all patients. Seventy-two patients also received a boost to the primary site. The median total radiation dose to the primary site was 61 Gy (range, 46 to 71). RESULTS: Seven patients had a recurrence in the treated breast at 16, 18, 41, 63, 72, 83, and 104 months after treatment. The 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of local recurrence were 4% and 15%, respectively. Six of seven recurrences occurred in the vicinity of the original lesion. Four local recurrences were invasive, and three were ductal carcinoma in situ. Two patients developed a contralateral invasive carcinoma. The 5- and 10-year cause-specific survival rates were 100% and 96%, respectively. The 10-year actuarial rate of local recurrence was 25% in the group with a total excision volume less than 60 cm3, as compared with 0% in those with 60 cm3 or more excised (P=0.04). In patients with a positive family history, the 10-year actuarial rate of local recurrence was 37%, as compared with 9% in patients with a negative family history (P=0.008). Of the 17 patients with a positive family history, four developed either an ipsilateral or contralateral invasive breast cancer, whereas 1 of the 58 patients without a family history developed a subsequent invasive breast cancer (P=0.008). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy (including a boost to the primary site) appear to benefit from wide, rather than limited, resection. These results also suggest that family history may be an important prognostic factor for progression of disease.

Adult↗