Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Joris

Publications and source records attributed to J Joris.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

[Surgery under hypnosedation. A new therapeutic approach to hyperparathyroidism].

The elective unilateral approach, sometimes under local anaesthesia, offers many advantages in terms of less invasive and faster surgical approach compared to the conventional surgery under general anaesthesia. Nevertheless this approach is restricted to patients unsuspected of multiglandular disease, free from thyroid disease and for whom localization studies are contributive. Surgery under hypnosedation offers the same advantages and provides the possibility of not only exploring the four glands but also of performing a partial thyroidectomy if needed. In our experience 21 patients underwent a cervicotomy under hypnosedation for primary hyperparathyroidism (HPT). No conversion to general anaesthesia was needed; mean operative time was 52 +/- 16 min. In 17 cases, HPT was due to a single adenoma, in 3 cases to hyperplasia (among them a MEN-1 case), and in one last case to a double adenoma. The four glands were identified in 85%. With a follow-up running from 4 to 45 months, all patients are cured. Hypnosedation offers the same medical and economic advantages than the unilateral access under local anaesthesia. Moreover indications are not restricted to selected patients.

Adult↗

[Hypnosis and its application in surgery].

Since 1992, we have used hypnosis routinely in more than 1400 patients undergoing surgery. We found that hypnosis used in patients as an adjunct to conscious sedation and local anesthesia was associated with improved intraoperative patient comfort, and with reduced anxiety, pain, intraoperative requirements for anxiolytic and analgesic drugs, optimal surgical conditions and a faster recovery of the patient. We reported our clinical experience and our fundamental research.

Anesthesia, Local↗

Psychological approaches during conscious sedation. Hypnosis versus stress reducing strategies: a prospective randomized study.

Stress reducing strategies are useful in patients undergoing surgery. Hypnosis is also known to alleviate acute and chronic pain. We therefore compared the effectiveness of these two psychological approaches for reducing perioperative discomfort during conscious sedation for plastic surgery. Sixty patients scheduled for elective plastic surgery under local anesthesia and intravenous sedation (midazolam and alfentanil upon request) were included in the study after providing informed consent. They were randomly allocated to either stress reducing strategies (control: CONT) or hypnosis (HYP) during the entire surgical procedure. Both techniques were performed by the same anesthesiologist (MEF). Patient behavior was noted during surgery by a psychologist, the patient noted anxiety, pain, perceived control before, during and after surgery, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Patient satisfaction and surgical conditions were also recorded. Peri- and postoperative anxiety and pain were significantly lower in the HYP group. This reduction in anxiety and pain were achieved despite a significant reduction in intraoperative requirements for midazolam and alfentanil in the HYP group (alfentanil: 8.7 +/- 0.9 microg kg(-1)/h(-1) vs. 19.4 +/- 2 microg kg(-1)/h(-1), P < 0.001; midazolam: 0.04 +/- 0.003 mg kg(-1)/h(-1) vs. 0.09 +/- 0.01 mg kg(-1)/h(-1), P < 0.001). Patients in the HYP group reported an impression of more intraoperative control than those in the CONT group (P < 0.01). PONV were significantly reduced in the HYP group (6.5% vs. 30.8%, P < 0.001). Surgical conditions were better in the HYP group. Less signs of patient discomfort and pain were observed by the psychologist in the HYP group (P < 0.001). Vital signs were significantly more stable in the HYP group. Patient satisfaction score was significantly higher in the HYP group (P < 0.004). This study suggests that hypnosis provides better perioperative pain and anxiety relief, allows for significant reductions in alfentanil and midazolam requirements, and improves patient satisfaction and surgical conditions as compared with conventional stress reducing strategies support in patients receiving conscious sedation for plastic surgery.

Adult↗

Postoperative spirometry after laparoscopy for lower abdominal or upper abdominal surgical procedures.

In this prospective study, we have compared women undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic gynaecological surgery and laparoscopic minor gynaecological procedures (diagnostic, tubal, ligation) (n = 10 in each group) to determine if lower abdominal laparoscopy results in less postoperative pulmonary dysfunction than upper abdominal laparoscopy. Pulmonary testing was performed before operation, and 3 and 6 h after operation, on the first and second days after surgery. After operation, a significant reduction in forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s and peak expiratory flow rate occurred after laparoscopic cholecystectomy at each time. There were no significant changes after minor gynaecologic laparoscopy, whereas laparoscopic gynaecological surgery resulted in minor pulmonary dysfunction on the day of surgery only. We conclude that postoperative pulmonary function was less impaired after gynaecological laparoscopy than after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study suggests that the site of surgery is an important determinant of lung dysfunction after laparoscopy.

Abdomen↗

[Is celioscopic approach of pheochromocytoma acceptable? Reflections apropos of a prospective study of 6 personal cases].

Today, laparoscopy is for us the technique of choice for approaching presumed benign adrenal tumors. With regards to pheochromocytoma however, two major questions must be addressed. First, is it acceptable to resect potentially multifocal tumors with such a targeted approach? Second, can peroperative hemodynamic changes be anticipated and controlled by the anesthetist, taking into account the additional effects of pneumoperitoneum and catecholamine release on the cardiovascular system? The present prospective study attempts to answer these two questions. From November 1993 to November 1995 we operated on four women and two men, with ages ranging from 33 to 71 years (mean of 47) and a mean Body Mass Index of 25 kg/m2 (range 17-35). Four patients were assigned ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status 2, one grade 1 and one grade 3. Comprehensive preoperative work-up, including a CT scan and an I131 MIBG Scan in all, a C11 Hydroxyephedrine PET Scan in 4 and a MRI in one patient, showed a solitary lesion in each case. There were four right-sided and two left-sided tumors, ranging from 30 to 60 mm in diameter. Laparoscopy was always performed transperitoneally. Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics were thoroughly assessed. Epinephrin and norepinephrin concentrations were measured at the 10 key-time of surgery. Use of continuous intravenous infusion of nicardipine allowed tight control of hemodynamics despite impressive increases in circulating catecholamines. The mean operative time was 76 minutes (range 59-130). Blood loss was minimal. We observed neither mortality nor morbidity. Mean hospital stay ranged from 3 to 13 days (median = 3). All patients are normotensive without drug after a follow-up of 9 to 33 months. In conclusion, we think that laparoscopic removal of selected cases of pheochromocytoma may be performed safely from both the hemodynamical and oncological standpoints.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms↗

Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in heart transplant recipients.

Reports of laparoscopy in heart graft recipients are scarce and, to our knowledge, laparoscopic colectomy has not yet been reported in heart transplant patients. The magnitude and the tolerance of the hemodynamic changes induced by pneumoperitoneum are unknown in heart graft recipients, who have a denervated heart and are "preload-dependent". The authors report the clinical courses of 2 heart graft recipients who developed acute diverticulitis without perforation or peritonitis and who underwent laparoscopic-assisted colectomy without complications.

Abscess↗

Efficacy of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in postoperative pain.

Historically, NSAIDs, used for more than 25 years to treat rheumatologic diseases, were then introduced to relieve pain after tooth extraction, and finally about 10 years ago for postoperative analgesia. NSAIDs have been increasingly used over the past ten years in the treatment of postoperative pain, such that they now play an important role in the management of postoperative analgesia, either alone or combined with opioids. When used alone, they are effective in relieving minor or moderate pain such as that seen after maxillofacial, minor orthopedic, or some ambulatory surgical procedures, and postpartum pain (episiotomy). In these indications, the main benefit as compared with opioids is the lack of respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting. Since these side effects delay discharge from the hospital after ambulatory surgery, the use of NSAIDs may result in faster recovery and earlier discharge. Because of the ceiling effect of NSAIDs, their efficacy as sole agents is usually insufficient to treat pain after major surgery (orthopedic, abdominal, thoracic). NSAIDs should then be combined with opioids. As part of a balanced analgesia regimen, NSAIDs will allow for opioid-sparing, and might subsequently reduce opioid-mediated side effects. A 20 to 50% reduction in opioid consumption, sometimes with improved quality of analgesia, has been reported using different NSAIDs following various types of surgery. Better respiratory function, improved sleep quality, and faster recovery of gastrointestinal function have been reported with NSAIDs. However, the use of NSAIDs has not been shown to be associated with improved outcome or more rapid recovery.

Abdomen↗

[Endocrine surgery by hypnosis. From fiction to daily clinical application...].

Between April 1994 and March 1996, 108 thyroidectomies (97 partial or unilateral lobectomies and 11 bilateral lobectomies) and 13 cervical explorations for hyperparathyroidism were performed under hypnosedation (HS) technique combining hypnosis and light conscious sedation. Informed consent was obtained from each patient. None of these patients underwent preoperatively standard susceptibility test score or preparatory hypnotic session. Nevertheless, no patient required conversion to general anesthesia. Operative data and postoperative courses were compared to a well-matched population (n = 70) of patients operated on for thyroid diseases under general anesthesia (GA). Under HS, mortality was zero and surgical management was only complicated by unilateral definitive recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis in one case (0.8%) and the need for neck reexploration for severe hematoma after parathyroidectomy in another case. Hyperparathyroidism was cured in all cases. The surgeons all reported better operating conditions, estimated by visual analog scale (VAS), for cervicotomy using HS (8.9 +/- 0.6 cm vs 8.0 +/- 1.2 cm in the GA group, p < 0.01). This is probably related to reduced bleeding in the operative field. All the patients reported a very pleasant experience and enjoyed having their surgery performed under HS (VAS of satisfaction: 9.35 +/- 0.99 vs 2.88 cm +/- 2.8 cm in the GA group, p < 0.001). Patients having HS had less postoperative pain (VAS of pain: 2.2 +/- 1.6 cm vs 3.2 +/- 2.0 cm in the GA group, p < 0.01), whereas antalgic consumption was significantly reduced in the HS group compared with the GA group (paracetamol on first postoperative day was, 932 +/- 519 mg vs 1437 +/- 622 mg in the GA group, p < 0.001). Hospital stay was also significantly lower (46.3 h +/- 14.6 vs 74.2 +/- 9.5 h in the GA group, p < 0.001), providing a substantial reduction of the costs of medical care. The postoperative fatigue syndrome and surgical convalescence were significantly improved after HS (VAS of fatigue: 2.05 +/- 2.01 cm vs 4.7 +/- 2.4 cm in the GA group, p < 0.001, hand grip test: 95.5% of preoperative muscular maximum force vs 89.9% in the GA group, p < 0.01). Full return to social or professional activity was usually accomplished after 10.3 +/- 10.2 days in the HS group vs 36 +/- 8 days in the GA group, p < 0.001). From this study, we concluded that HS is a very effective technique for providing relief of intra- and postoperative pain in endocrine surgery. This technique results in high patient satisfaction and better surgical convalescence. This technique therefore can be used in most motivated patients and reduces the socio-economic impact of hospitalization.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Laparoscopic removal of pheochromocytoma. Why? When? and Who? (reflections on one case report).

Until now, the need for wide exposure and nonmanipulative dissection of pheochromocytoma has dictated the use of a large intraperitoneal transabdominal approach, which unfortunately results in a significant incidence of morbidity. A unilateral retroperitoneal approach guided by the refinements of new imaging techniques is less invasive but is associated with a small risk of incomplete cure. In one case report, we tested the hypothesis that laparoscopic surgery could combine the beneficial effects of both operative strategies without their respective side effects. We concluded that a laparoscopic approach combined with exclusive intraoperative infusion of nicardipine, a calcium-channel blocker, can be used to surgically remove pheochromocytoma under stable hemodynamic conditions. This provides better exposure of the anatomical structures than open surgery and allows a visual exploration of the entire abdominal cavity to exclude tumor multicentricity or ectopic sites in the case of inconclusive preoperative imaging investigations. Moreover, conversion to open surgery is always possible if needed.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms↗

Inhaled nitric oxide for hemodynamic support after postpneumonectomy ARDS.

Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) has been reported to promote selective pulmonary vasodilation and better arterial oxygenation in cases of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with pulmonary hypertension (PHT). However, the clinical relevance of these changes and their effects on outcome remain to be proven, since long-term inhalation carries a potential risk of toxicity. We used NO to treat a patient who developed postpneumonectomy ARDS with severe PHT and right ventricular failure. NO resulted in better oxygenation and markedly improved hemodynamic status. As the underlying disease progressively worsened the patient became fully dependent on NO for hemodynamic support, and he died after 24 days of effective supportive therapy with inhaled NO.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: characteristics and effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine.

Although pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is less intense than after open cholecystectomy, some patients still experience considerable discomfort. Furthermore, the characteristics of postlaparoscopy pain differ considerably from those seen after laparotomy. Therefore, we investigated the time course of different pain components after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the effects of intraperitoneal bupivacaine on these different components. Forty ASA physical status grade I-II patients were randomly assigned to receive either 80 mL of bupivacaine 0.125% with epinephrine 1/200,000 (n = 20) or the same volume of saline (n = 20) instilled under the right hemidiaphragm at the end of surgery. Intensity of total pain, visceral pain, parietal pain, and shoulder pain was assessed 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 h after surgery. Analgesic consumption was also recorded. Patient data were similar in the two groups. In the saline group, visceral pain was significantly more intense than parietal pain at each time point; visceral and parietal pain were greater than shoulder pain during the first 8 h postoperatively. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine did not significantly affect any of the different components of postoperative pain. Analgesic consumption was similar in the two groups. This study demonstrates that visceral pain accounts for most of the pain experienced after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine is not effective for treating any type of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Abdominal Muscles↗

High-dose aprotinin reduces blood loss in patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery.

BACKGROUND: Aprotinin, a proteinase inhibitor, has been reported to reduce blood loss significantly during cardiac surgery. The mechanisms of this effect remain unclear. We studied the effect of aprotinin on blood loss and transfusion requirement during total hip replacement. Potential mechanisms of action and side effects also were investigated. METHODS: Forty patients scheduled for primary total hip replacement were randomized to receive, in double-blind fashion, either aprotinin given as a bolus of 2 x 10(6) kallikrein inactivator units (KIU) followed by an infusion of 5 x 10(5) KIU/h until the end of surgery or an equivalent volume of normal saline. Anesthesia and surgical techniques were standardized and systematic deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis was used. Peri- and postoperative blood loss and transfusion were measured. Fibrinolysis, coagulation pathways, and platelet function were assessed. Renal and hepatic function as well as the incidence of deep venous thrombosis also were assessed. RESULTS: Aprotinin reduced total blood loss from 1,943 +/- 700 ml to 1,446 +/- 514 ml (P < 0.05). This reduction of blood loss occurred during surgery (P < 0.05) and postoperatively (P < 0.001). Total amounts of blood transfused were 3.4 +/- 1.3 units/patient in the control group and 1.8 +/- 1.2 units/patient in the aprotinin group (P < 0.001). The activated partial thromboplastin time was significantly prolonged by aprotinin immediately after surgery, at 50.6 +/- 12.4 versus 32.3 +/- 4.6 s in control patients (P < 0.001), but results of the other coagulation tests were not different between the two groups. No side effects were observed in the aprotinin group. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis in the two groups was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The use of high-dose aprotinin during total hip replacement results in a reduction in both blood loss and the amount of blood transfused. Aprotinin's mode of action, however, remains to be elucidated.

Aged↗

Epidural anesthesia impairs both central and peripheral thermoregulatory control during general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The authors tested the hypotheses that: (1) the vasoconstriction threshold during combined epidural/general anesthesia is less than that during general anesthesia alone; and (2) after vasoconstriction, core cooling rates during combined epidural/general anesthesia are greater than those during general anesthesia alone. Vasoconstriction thresholds and heat balance were evaluated under controlled circumstances in volunteers, whereas the clinical importance of intraoperative thermoregulatory vasoconstriction was evaluated in patients. METHODS: Five volunteers were each evaluated twice. On one of the randomly ordered days, epidural anesthesia (approximately T9 dermatomal level) was induced and maintained with 2-chloroprocaine. On both study days, general anesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane (0.7% end-tidal concentration), and core hypothermia was induced by surface cooling and continued for at least 1 h after fingertip vasoconstriction was observed. Patients undergoing colorectal surgery were randomly assigned to combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia (n = 13) or enflurane alone (n = 13). In appropriate patients, epidural anesthesia was maintained by an infusion of bupivacaine. The core temperature that triggered fingertip vasoconstriction identified the threshold. RESULTS: In the volunteers, the vasoconstriction threshold was 36.0 +/- 0.2 degrees C during isoflurane anesthesia alone, but significantly less, 35.1 +/- 0.7 degrees C, during combined epidural/isoflurane anesthesia. Cutaneous heat loss and the rates of core cooling were similar 30 min before vasoconstriction with and without epidural anesthesia. In the 30 min after vasoconstriction, heat loss decreased 33 +/- 13 W when the volunteers were given isoflurane alone, but only 8 +/- 16 W during combined epidural/isoflurane anesthesia. Similarly, the core cooling rates in the 30 min after vasoconstriction were significantly greater during combined epidural/isoflurane anesthesia (0.8 +/- 0.2 degrees C/h) than during isoflurane alone (0.2 +/- 0.1 degrees C/h). In the patients, end-tidal enflurane concentrations were slightly, but significantly, less in the patients given combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia (0.6 +/- 0.2% vs. 0.8 +/- 0.2%). Nonetheless, the vasoconstriction threshold was 34.5 +/- 0.6 degrees C in the epidural/enflurane group, which was significantly less than that in the other patients, 35.6 +/- 0.8 degrees C. When the study ended after 3 h of anesthesia, patients given combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia were 1.2 degrees C more hypothermic than those given general anesthesia alone. The rate of core cooling during the last hour of the study was 0.4 +/- 0.2 degrees C/h during combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia, but only 0.1 +/- 0.3 degrees C/h during enflurane alone. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that epidural anesthesia reduces the vasoconstriction threshold during general anesthesia. Furthermore, the markedly reduced rate of core cooling during general anesthesia alone illustrates the importance of leg vasoconstriction in maintaining core temperature.

Adolescent↗

Clonidine and ketanserin both are effective treatment for postanesthetic shivering.

BACKGROUND: Although meperidine is an effective treatment of postanesthetic shivering, its mechanism of action remains unknown. Investigation of other drugs might help clarify the mechanisms by which shivering can be controlled. Accordingly, we investigated the efficacy of clonidine, an alpha 2-adrenergic agonist, and ketanserin, a 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist, in treating postanesthetic shivering. METHODS: First, 54 patients shivering after general anesthesia were allocated randomly to receive an intravenous bolus of saline, 150 micrograms clonidine, or 10 mg ketanserin. A second study explored the dose-dependence of clonidine. Forty shivering patients were given saline or clonidine, 37.5, 75, or 150 micrograms. RESULTS: The duration of shivering was significantly shorter in those given clonidine (2.1 +/- 0.9 min) than in the other two groups and shorter in the ketanserin group (4.3 +/- 0.9 min) than in the saline group (12.0 +/- 1.6 min). Clonidine and ketanserin significantly decreased systolic arterial blood pressure when compared to saline. Core rewarming was significantly slower in the clonidine group. In the second study, 37.5 micrograms clonidine was no more effective than saline. Two minutes after treatment, 150 micrograms obliterated shivering in all patients. Five minutes after treatment, all patients given 75 micrograms had stopped shivering. Systolic arterial pressure and heart rate decreased significantly in patients given 75 and 150 micrograms clonidine. CONCLUSIONS: Clonidine (150 micrograms) and ketanserin (10 mg) both are effective treatment for postanesthetic shivering. The effect of clonidine on shivering is dose-dependent: whereas 37.5 micrograms had no effect, 75 micrograms clonidine stopped shivering within 5 min.

Adult↗

Total intravenous anesthesia in South-African genetic porphyria (variegate porphyria).

The authors report the case of a female patient with South-African genetic porphyria who had to undergo hepatic tumorectomy under general anesthesia. The choice for propofol as the induction and maintenance agent using a balanced anesthetic technique led to a significant rise in urinary excretion of porphyrins without associated clinical manifestations. A short review of the literature on physiopathology of porphyrias and medicinal agents, susceptible to induce acute porphyric crisis follows. The authors conclude that the innocuity of propofol as induction and maintaining agent in the porphyric patient cannot be yet established without further studies.

Adult↗

Metabolic and respiratory changes after cholecystectomy performed via laparotomy or laparoscopy.

We have compared metabolic and respiratory changes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 15) with those after open cholecystectomy (n = 15). The durations of postoperative i.v. therapy, fasting and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group. During the first and second days after operation, analgesic consumption but not pain scores (visual analogue scale) were significantly smaller after laparoscopy, while vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and PaO2 were significantly greater. The metabolic and acute phase responses (glucose, leucocytosis, C-reactive protein) were less after laparoscopy compared with laparotomy. Although plasma cortisol and catecholamine concentrations were not significantly different between the two groups, after surgery interleukin-6 concentrations were less in the laparoscopy group.

Acute-Phase Reaction↗