Biomedical subjects

J Jeekel

Publications and source records attributed to J Jeekel.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2004

Effect of laparoscopy on the immune system.

Surgery induces alterations in local and systemic immune responses. These changes appear to be associated with an increase in postoperative morbidity. Minimally invasive techniques are considered to improve the preservation of immune function compared with open surgery and may therefore be beneficial for patient recovery. As laparoscopic techniques are increasingly used in abdominal surgery, more research has focussed on the immunologic consequences of these techniques. Nevertheless, the changes that occur in response to trauma are still not completely understood. The immunologic benefits of laparoscopic surgery are the most obvious for minor surgical procedures such as cholecystectomy and antireflux surgery. For more complex procedures such as colorectal surgery for cancer, the benefits are not immediately obvious. Although laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancies may be associated with higher survival rates and lower recurrence rates because of improved immune function, it has also been related to high incidences of port-site metastases. Reviews in the literature have now shown that incidences of port-site metastases are comparable to incidences of wound metastases after open surgery. However, it will be necessary to wait for the long-term results of randomized, clinical trials to provide further clarification of how immune function is altered after laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Acute-Phase Reaction↗

PubMed2003

Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain: a blinded randomised controlled multi-centre trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for chronic abdominal pain is controversial and is not evidence based. We aimed to test our hypothesis that laparoscopic adhesiolysis leads to substantial pain relief and improvement in quality of life in patients with adhesions and chronic abdominal pain. METHODS: Patients had diagnostic laparoscopy for chronic abdominal pain attributed to adhesions; other causes for their pain had been excluded. If adhesions were confirmed during diagnostic laparoscopy, patients were randomly assigned either to laparoscopic adhesiolysis or no treatment. Treatment allocation was concealed from patients, and assessors were unaware of patients' treatment and outcome. Pain was assessed for 1 year by visual analogue score (VAS) score (scale 0-100), pain change score, use of analgesics, and quality of life score. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Of 116 patients enrolled for diagnostic laparoscopy, 100 were randomly allocated either laparoscopic adhesiolysis (52) or no treatment (48). Both groups reported substantial pain relief and a significantly improved quality of life, but there was no difference between the groups (mean change from baseline of VAS score at 12 months: difference 3 points, p=0.53; 95% CI -7 to 13). INTERPRETATION: Although laparoscopic adhesiolysis relieves chronic abdominal pain, it is not more beneficial than diagnostic laparoscopy alone. Therefore, laparoscopic adhesiolysis cannot be recommended as a treatment for adhesions in patients with chronic abdominal pain.

Abdomen↗

PubMed2003

Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility.

Adhesions cause bowel obstruction, chronic abdominal pain, and infertility. In this review, the incidence, clinical signs, diagnostic procedures, and treatment of these sequels of abdominal surgery are discussed. Laparoscopic treatment of bowel obstruction, chronic pain, and infertility is feasible in selected patients and has been reported to cause fewer newly formed adhesions. Randomized controlled trials to compare open and laparoscopic surgery for adhesions should be executed with long-term follow-up to assess the success rates of adhesiolysis and compare the morbidity and mortality.

Abdominal Pain↗

PubMed2003

Prosthetic mesh repair should be used for any defect in the abdominal wall.

The case for mesh versus non-mesh repair of defects in the abdominal wall is argued, with the conclusion that the evidence-base is sufficiently strong to recommend that that all defects in the abdominal wall, whether inguinal, incisional or umbilical hernias, and of whatever size, should be repaired with the use of prosthetic mesh.

Abdominal Wall↗

PubMed2002

Safe laparoscopic adhesiolysis with optical access trocar and ultrasonic dissection. A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this clinical study was to examine the feasibility, safety, and adequacy of hemostasis of combined use of an optical trocar and ultrasonic dissection in laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain. METHODS: In 105 patients, identification of anatomic layers of the abdominal wall, establishment of pneumoperitoneum, completeness of adhesiolysis, hemostasis, and complications and pain relief were studied. RESULTS: All abdominal wall layers could be determined during introduction as well as adherence of intraabdominal organs at the introduction site. Ultrasonic dissection enables an (almost) complete adhesiolysis in 103 (98%) patients and offered adequate hemostasis in 101 (96%) patients. Four perforations during laparoscopic adhesiolysis and no late (thermal) perforations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: With an optical trocar a safe introduction site of the abdominal wall can be chosen. The ultrasonic technique offers a sound adhesiolysis with adequate hemostasis and fewer thermal perforations and adds to feasibility and safety of laparoscopic adhesiolysis.

Abdominal Pain↗

PubMed2002

Complications and feasibility of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain. A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: A retrospective study was done to determine whether laparoscopic adhesiolysis benefits patients with chronic abdominal pain. Factors that influence complications and feasibility of laparoscopic adhesiolysis were evaluated. METHODS: 174 consecutive operations in 157 patients were retrospectively analyzed for factors which might influence the complication rate and the feasibility of laparoscopic adhesiolysis. RESULTS: In 128 out of 174 procedures a complete adhesiolysis was performed. We had to accept an incomplete adhesiolysis in 39 other patients and in 7 patients a primary conversion was needed. We noticed 16 major complications. Two patients died. Relief of pain was recorded in 80% of patients after short follow-up. The number of previous abdominal operations and patient age significantly affected the outcome of surgery. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain seems to be a feasible and effective operation with considerable risk.

Abdominal Pain↗

PubMed2002

Randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia.

BACKGROUND: The optimum method for inguinal hernia repair has not yet been determined. The recurrence rate for non-mesh methods varies between 0.2 and 33 per cent. The value of tension-free repair with prosthetic mesh remains to be confirmed. The aim of this study was to compare mesh and non-mesh suture repair of primary inguinal hernias with respect to clinical outcome, quality of life and cost in a multicentre randomized trial in general hospitals. METHODS: Between September 1993 and January 1996, all patients scheduled for repair of a unilateral primary inguinal hernia were randomized to non-mesh or mesh repair. The patients were followed up at 1 week and at 1, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months. Clinical outcome, quality of life and costs were registered. RESULTS: Three hundred patients were randomized of whom 11 were excluded. Three-year recurrence rates differed significantly: 7 per cent for non-mesh repair (n = 143) and 1 per cent for mesh repair (n = 146) (P = 0.009). There were no differences in clinical variables, quality of life and costs. CONCLUSION: Mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia repair is superior to non-mesh repair with regard to hernia recurrence and is cost-effective. Postoperative complications, pain and quality of life did not differ between groups.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions.

BACKGROUND: Various randomized studies have evaluated techniques of abdominal fascia closure but controversy remains, leaving surgeons uncertain about the optimal method of preventing incisional hernia. METHOD: Medline and Embase databases were searched. All trials with a follow-up of at least 1 year that randomized patients with midline laparotomies to closure of the fascia by different suture techniques and/or suture materials were subjected to meta-analysis. Primary outcome was incisional hernia; secondary outcomes were wound dehiscence, wound infection, wound pain and suture sinus formation. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were identified with a total of 6566 patients. Closure by continuous rapidly absorbable suture was followed by significantly more incisional hernias than closure by continuous slowly absorbable suture (P < 0.009) or non-absorbable suture (P = 0.001). No difference in incisional hernia incidence was found between slowly absorbable and non-absorbable sutures (P = 0.75), but more wound pain (P < 0.005) and more suture sinuses (P = 0.02) occurred after the use of non-absorbable suture. Similar outcomes were observed with continuous and interrupted sutures, but continuous sutures took less time to insert. CONCLUSION: To reduce the incidence of incisional hernia without increasing wound pain or suture sinus frequency, slowly absorbable continuous sutures appear to be the optimal method of fascial closure.

Hernia, Ventral↗

PubMed2002

Mesh repair of incisional hernia: comparison of laparoscopic and open repair.

OBJECTIVE: To compare our results of open and laparoscopic mesh repair of incisional hernias. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Teaching hospitals, The Netherlands. SUBJECTS: All patients who had had a laparoscopic (n = 25) or an open (n = 76) mesh repair of incisional hernia between January 1996 and January 2000. INTERVENTIONS: Physical examination at the time of the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity and recurrence. RESULTS: The groups were comparable. 11 patients (14%) developed postoperative infections after open repair and 1 (4%) after laparoscopic repair (p = 0.29). Median hospital stay was 5 days (range 1-19) in the open group and 4 (range 1-11) in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.28). The 2-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 18% after open repair (median follow-up of 17 months (range 1-46) and 15% after laparoscopic repair (median follow-up of 15 months, range 1-44). Recurrences in the laparoscopic group were all among the first 7 cases in which the mesh was fixed with staples alone. CONCLUSION: There were fewer infections and hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group, but not significantly so. Recurrence rates were comparable.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Abdominal incisions: techniques and postoperative complications.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The choice of incision for laparotomy depends on the area that needs to be exposed, the elective or emergency nature of the operation and personal preference. Type of incision may however have its influence on the occurrence of postoperative wound complications. Techniques and features of various incisions are discussed, as well as the incidence of their postoperative complications. METHOD: A medline search was conducted identifying prospective randomised trials, as well as retrospective studies with sufficient follow-up, comparing midline, paramedian, transverse and oblique incisions. RESULTS: Significant differences in wound infection and wound dehiscence rates were not reported. Transverse, oblique and paramedian incisions caused significantly less incisional hernias than midline incisions. However, trials comparing transverse and midline incisions for larger laparotomies did not show significant differences. All four trials comparing lateral paramedian with midline incisions reported incisional hernia rates of 0% after the lateral paramedian incision. Differences with the midline incision were significant. CONCLUSION: Transverse or oblique incisions should be preferred for small unilateral operations. The paramedian incision should be used for major elective laparotomies. The use of the midline incision should be restricted to operations in which unlimited access to the abdominal cavity is useful or necessary.

Abdominal Wall↗

PubMed2001

Effect of inflammatory cytokines and growth factors on tumour cell adhesion to the peritoneum.

In this experimental study, the effect of inflammatory cytokines and growth factors on tumour cell adhesion to the peritoneum was investigated. A reproducible in vitro assay was developed to study the adhesion of CC531 colon carcinoma cells to an autologous monolayer of rat mesothelial cells. Tumour cell adhesion to mesothelium pre-incubated with interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) resulted in at least 60% more tumour cell adhesion at maximal stimulation (p</=0.001). Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) pre-incubation resulted in minor, though significant stimulation of cell adhesion (maximal 16%, p<0.05). The effect of IL-1beta was time- and dose-dependent. No mesothelial cell proliferation took place after pretreatment with IL-1beta, indicating that enhanced adhesion was not based on an increase in the number of mesothelial cells. Pretreatment with EGF stimulated mesothelial cell growth as measured by DNA analysis. This effect on cell growth and adhesion was dose-dependent. Additional blocking experiments with anti-IL-1beta resulted in statistically significant inhibition of IL-1beta-stimulated tumour cell adhesion (p</=0.01), demonstrating the specificity of this effect. Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), IL-6, and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) pre-incubation had no effect on tumour cell adhesion. These results prove that IL-1beta and EGF are significant promoting factors in tumour cell adhesion to mesothelium in vitro and may therefore account for tumour recurrence in the peritoneum in vivo.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Glove powder promotes adhesion formation and facilitates tumour cell adhesion and growth.

BACKGROUND: The presence of foreign material in the abdominal cavity irritates the peritoneal surface, leading to an inflammatory response. This defensive mechanism can provoke adhesion formation. The same peritoneal defence cascade is thought to play a role in the process of intra-abdominal tumour recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether glove powder produced peritoneal adhesions in a rat adhesion model and whether it promoted intra-abdominal tumour recurrence in a rat tumour cell adhesion and growth model. METHODS: A reproducible model that allowed semiquantitative scoring of adhesion formation or tumour load was used in three different groups of rats. One group was treated by intra-abdominal application of powder obtained from starch-powdered gloves, one by application of pure starch and in one group no powder was used. RESULTS: Application of glove powder or pure starch on minimally and severely traumatized peritoneum gave rise to significantly greater adhesion formation and intra-abdominal tumour load than peritoneal trauma alone (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Starch-induced peritoneal trauma leads not only to more adhesion formation but also to increased adhesion and growth of tumour cells. Since good powder-free alternatives are available there is no longer any justification for the use of powdered gloves during intra-abdominal surgery.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2001

Randomized clinical trial of patient-controlled versus fixed regimen feeding after elective abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although studies have shown that early oral feeding after abdominal surgery is feasible, many surgeons still advocate a careful, slow introduction of postoperative oral feeding. This study was conducted to investigate whether patient-controlled postoperative feeding is possible in patients undergoing colonic or aortic surgery. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial compared patient-controlled postoperative oral feeding (PC group) with a fixed regimen (FR group). Patients in the PC group (n = 56) received oral feeding when they requested it; patients in the FR group (n = 49) started a normal diet on day 5. Endpoints were time to tolerance of a diet similar to the preoperative diet, reinsertion of a nasogastric tube, complications and duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: Median time to resumption of a normal diet was 3 days in the PC group and 5 days in the FR group (P < 0.001). Reinsertion of a nasogastric tube was required in nine patients in each group (P not significant). The incidence of complications was similar in both groups: 12 of 56 in the PC group and 13 of 49 in the FR group. There was no significant difference in duration of hospital stay between the groups. CONCLUSION: Most patients tolerate a normal diet on the third day after operation. Patient-controlled postoperative feeding is safe and leads to earlier resumption of a normal diet.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Inflammatory pseudotumour (inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour) of the pancreas: a report of six cases associated with obliterative phlebitis.

AIMS: To describe in detail an uncommon pancreatic condition, which generally presents with cholestasis and a mass lesion suspicious of malignancy, and which is characterized histologically by proliferation of fibrous tissue with associated moderate or marked inflammation, as well as obliterative phlebitis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Out of a consecutive series of 23 pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens which on histological evaluation were found to contain no malignant tumour, six cases characterized by the features mentioned above were identified and investigated further. Poor circumscription, firm consistence, histology of dense sclerosis with scattered round cell infiltrates and associated obliterative phlebitis and often perineural accentuation of inflammation were the distinguishing features. On the basis of available histological evidence, the term inflammatory pseudotumour perhaps remains the term best suited to designate this entity, since it sums up its two most distinctive features. However, the possibility that this lesion is in fact a neoplastic process with reactive inflammation (inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour) cannot be ruled out on the basis of the histology, and remains a serious consideration in view of the proven neoplastic nature of lesions with very similar histology arising elsewhere in the body. Importantly, none of the pancreatic lesions reported here recurred or progressed (five informative cases, median follow-up time 70 months). CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory pseudotumour (inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour) of the pancreas may closely mimic pancreatic adenocarcinoma clinically and radiologically.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2000

A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is an important complication of abdominal surgery. Procedures for the repair of these hernias with sutures and with mesh have been reported, but there is no consensus about which type of procedure is best. METHODS: Between March 1992 and February 1998, we performed a multicenter trial in which we randomly assigned to suture repair or mesh repair 200 patients who were scheduled to undergo repair of a primary hernia or a first recurrence of hernia at the site of a vertical midline incision of the abdomen of less than 6 cm in length or width. The patients were followed up by physical examination at 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months. Recurrence rates and potential risk factors for recurrent incisional hernia were analyzed with the use of life-table methods. RESULTS: Among the 154 patients with primary hernias and the 27 patients with first-time recurrent hernias who were eligible for the study, 56 had recurrences during the follow-up period. The three-year cumulative rates of recurrence among patients who had suture repair and those who had mesh repair were 43 percent and 24 percent, respectively, with repair of a primary hernia (P=0.02; difference, 19 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, 3 to 35 percentage points). The recurrence rates were 58 percent and 20 percent with repair of a first recurrence of hernia (P=0.10; difference, 38 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, -1 to 78 percentage points). The risk factors for recurrence were suture repair, infection, prostatism (in men), and previous surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm. The size of the hernia did not affect the rate of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with midline abdominal incisional hernias, mesh repair is superior to suture repair with regard to the recurrence of hernia, regardless of the size of the hernia.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

[Surgical research in the Netherlands. The Dutch experience with clinical studies in surgery].

A large number of good surgical studies have been published in The Netherlands, putting the country at the top of the list in the Western world. It is remarkable that the highest productivity was found in small countries and in countries with a low population. Most of the large European countries have a low scientific output according to the method used in the present study. The Scandinavian countries, Holland, and Switzerland have the best scientific index according to these results. It could be that the larger countries, such as Germany, Italy, France, and Spain, tend more to publish in national journals. Perhaps it is not common in some some countries and regions to publish data in English--which certainly has a negative effect on the scientific index of such a country. The high productivity found among Dutch surgeons could be explained by the fact that the 700 surgeons in a small country with a relatively high population are well organized: Almost all Dutch surgeons are members of the national surgical society. All of them can speak and write English very well. Participation in the activities organized by the national society is high. Scientific meetings where surgeons and assistants get together for a day or two are held twice a year. In addition quality controls are carried out at all teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Through this the surgeons in this relatively small country know each other quite well, which promotes cooperation when studies are undertaken. The Netherlands is just large enough for relevant clinical studies to be conducted and it may be that we initiate a relatively large number of such studies. It is a democratic country in which surgeons and researchers are offered the freedom and opportunity to conduct research and publish their results as they like without being hindered by hierarchic structures. Together, these factors create a scientific climate in The Netherlands which stimulates the organization of multicenter and clinical studies.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2000

Peritoneal adhesions to prosthetic materials: choice of mesh for incisional hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: In many cases, incisional hernia repair requires the use of prosthetic materials. The aim of this experimental study in a rat model was to assess the role of polyglactin 910 mesh and fluoropassivated polyester mesh in preventing the formation of adhesions. METHODS: In the first experiment, the formation of peritoneal adhesions was assessed after insertion of polypropylene, polypropylene combined with polyglactin 910, or no mesh. In the second experiment, adhesion formations were compared after insertion of fluoropassivated polyester, polypropylene, and no mesh. RESULTS: The first experiment showed no significant difference in adhesion formations between the polypropylene mesh and the combined mesh; however, when no mesh was used, there were significantly fewer adhesions in both experiments (p < 0.01). The second experiment showed a significantly lower degree of adhesions and a lower Adhesion Index after insertion of fluoropassivated polyester mesh than when polypropylene mesh was used (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Adding polyglactin 910 mesh to polypropylene mesh to prevent the formation of adhesions is not an effective measure. Fluoropassivated polyester meshes appear to provide a better alternative to the use of polypropylene meshes for incisional hernia repair in humans in terms of the formation of adhesions.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh repair of incisional hernia is not associated with enterocutaneous fistula.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia repair with prosthetic material is followed by fewer recurrences than primary repair. Polypropylene is the most commonly used prosthetic material but may cause entero- cutaneous fistulas. The aim of this study was to determine whether enterocutaneous fistulas developed after incisional hernia repair with polypropylene mesh and to evaluate clinical outcome after incisional hernia repair. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the outcome of incisional hernia repair with polypropylene mesh between 1982 and 1998 was conducted. Follow-up data were obtained from medical records and questionnaires. RESULTS: Polypropylene incisional hernia repair was performed in 136 patients. Median follow-up was 34 months. No enterocutaneous fistulas developed. Wound infection occurred in 6 per cent. Wound sinus formation occurred in two patients. No mesh was removed because of infection and no persisting infection of the mesh occurred. CONCLUSION: Enterocutaneous fistula formation appears to be very rare after incisional hernia repair with polypropylene mesh, regardless of intraperitoneal placement, omental coverage or closing of the peritoneum.

Cutaneous Fistula↗